The main challenge in AI governance today is striking a balance between controlling AI dangers and fostering AI innovation.Regulators in a number of nations have progressively extended the regulatory sandbox,which was...The main challenge in AI governance today is striking a balance between controlling AI dangers and fostering AI innovation.Regulators in a number of nations have progressively extended the regulatory sandbox,which was first implemented in the banking sector,to AI governance in an effort to reduce the conflict between regulation and innovation.The AI regulatory sandbox is a new and feasible route for AI governance in China that not only helps to manage the risks of technology application but also prevents inhibiting AI innovation.It keeps inventors'trial-and-error tolerance space inside the regulatory purview while offering a controlled setting for the development and testing of novel AI that hasn't yet been put on the market.By providing full-cycle governance of AI with the principles of agility and inclusive prudence,the regulatory sandbox offers an alternative to the conventional top-down hard regulation,expost regulation,and tight regulation.However,the current system also has inherent limitations and practical obstacles that need to be overcome by a more rational and effective approach.To achieve its positive impact on AI governance,the AI regulatory sandbox system should build and improve the access and exit mechanism,the coordination mechanism between the sandbox and personal information protection,and the mechanisms of exemption,disclosure,and communication.展开更多
The paper is devoted to the corporate governance intelligence system investigation as the part of the complex stakeholder-related approach to the corporate strategic intelligence system （CSIS）. The special attention...The paper is devoted to the corporate governance intelligence system investigation as the part of the complex stakeholder-related approach to the corporate strategic intelligence system （CSIS）. The special attention is given to the minority shareholders activism in the system of corporate governance. Some existing methods of abusing minority shareholders rights, made by joint-stock companies executives, are generalized. The recommendations for minority shareholder＇s rights protection are given. The necessity for the implementation of the stakeholders-oriented approach for the CSIS creation on the base of companies＇ security principles is substantiated.展开更多
Legal order originated in a land-centered agricultural society,having now gone through a market-centered industrial society and a network-centered information society.With the rise of the intelligent society,it is tra...Legal order originated in a land-centered agricultural society,having now gone through a market-centered industrial society and a network-centered information society.With the rise of the intelligent society,it is transforming into an algorithmcentered legal order of an intelligent society.The"digital""networking""intelligent"revolution brought by the intelligent technologies including big data,cloud computing,the Internet,blockchain,and artificial intelligence(AI),has been causing critical challenges to the current legal order,and has generated powerful momentum for construction of fresh legal order featuring scientificness,people centeredness,justice,inclusiveness and co-governance.Construction of such a new jurisprudential legal order to solve this intelligent society's"governance deficit"is an urgent task.There is a need to set up a new foundation on which an intelligent society can build steady and lasting progress.展开更多
文摘The main challenge in AI governance today is striking a balance between controlling AI dangers and fostering AI innovation.Regulators in a number of nations have progressively extended the regulatory sandbox,which was first implemented in the banking sector,to AI governance in an effort to reduce the conflict between regulation and innovation.The AI regulatory sandbox is a new and feasible route for AI governance in China that not only helps to manage the risks of technology application but also prevents inhibiting AI innovation.It keeps inventors'trial-and-error tolerance space inside the regulatory purview while offering a controlled setting for the development and testing of novel AI that hasn't yet been put on the market.By providing full-cycle governance of AI with the principles of agility and inclusive prudence,the regulatory sandbox offers an alternative to the conventional top-down hard regulation,expost regulation,and tight regulation.However,the current system also has inherent limitations and practical obstacles that need to be overcome by a more rational and effective approach.To achieve its positive impact on AI governance,the AI regulatory sandbox system should build and improve the access and exit mechanism,the coordination mechanism between the sandbox and personal information protection,and the mechanisms of exemption,disclosure,and communication.
文摘The paper is devoted to the corporate governance intelligence system investigation as the part of the complex stakeholder-related approach to the corporate strategic intelligence system （CSIS）. The special attention is given to the minority shareholders activism in the system of corporate governance. Some existing methods of abusing minority shareholders rights, made by joint-stock companies executives, are generalized. The recommendations for minority shareholder＇s rights protection are given. The necessity for the implementation of the stakeholders-oriented approach for the CSIS creation on the base of companies＇ security principles is substantiated.
基金the National Social Science Fund's major research project titled“Basic Theory Research on Law with Chinese Characteristics in the New Era”(新时代中国特色法学基本理论研究)(18VXK004).
文摘Legal order originated in a land-centered agricultural society,having now gone through a market-centered industrial society and a network-centered information society.With the rise of the intelligent society,it is transforming into an algorithmcentered legal order of an intelligent society.The"digital""networking""intelligent"revolution brought by the intelligent technologies including big data,cloud computing,the Internet,blockchain,and artificial intelligence(AI),has been causing critical challenges to the current legal order,and has generated powerful momentum for construction of fresh legal order featuring scientificness,people centeredness,justice,inclusiveness and co-governance.Construction of such a new jurisprudential legal order to solve this intelligent society's"governance deficit"is an urgent task.There is a need to set up a new foundation on which an intelligent society can build steady and lasting progress.
