Land suitability assessment is a prerequisite phase in land use planning; it guides toward optimal land use by providing information on the opportunities and constraints involved in the use of a given land area. A geo...Land suitability assessment is a prerequisite phase in land use planning; it guides toward optimal land use by providing information on the opportunities and constraints involved in the use of a given land area. A geographic information system-based procedure, known as rural settlement suitability evaluation(RSSE) using an improved technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution(TOPSIS), was adopted to determine the most suitable area for constructing rural settlements in different geographical locations. Given the distribution and independence of rural settlements, a distinctive evaluation criteria system that differed from that of urban suitability was established by considering the level of rural infrastructure services as well as living and working conditions. The unpredictable mutual interference among evaluation factors has been found in practical works. An improved TOPSIS using Mahalanobis distance was applied to solve the unpredictable correlation among the criteria in a suitability evaluation. Uncertainty and sensitivity analyses obtained via Monte Carlo simulation were performed to examine the robustness of the model. Daye, a resource-based city with rapid economic development, unsatisfied rural development, and geological environmental problems caused by mining, was used as a case study. Results indicate the following findings: 1) The RSSE model using the improved TOPSIS can assess the suitability of rural settlements, and the suitability maps generated using the improved TOPSIS have higher information density than those generated using traditional TOPSIS. The robustness of the model is improved, and the uncertainty is reduced in the suitability results. 2) Highly suitable land is mainly distributed in the northeast of the study area, and the majority of which is cultivated land, thereby leading to tremendous pressure on the loss of cultivated land. 3) Lastly, 12.54% of the constructive expansion permitted zone and 8.36% of the constructive expansion conditionally permitted zone are situated in an unsuitable area, which indicates that the general planning of Daye lacks the necessary verification of suitability evaluation. Guidance is provided on the development strategy of rural settlement patches to support decision making in general land use planning.展开更多
信息安全风险评估是一项非常重要的信息安全保障活动.依据信息安全相关标准,可从资产、威胁和脆弱性3方面识别出重要的风险因素,并确定相应的信息安全风险评估指标.参考等保2.0确定风险评估指标是一种可行的方法.在进行信息安全风险评估...信息安全风险评估是一项非常重要的信息安全保障活动.依据信息安全相关标准,可从资产、威胁和脆弱性3方面识别出重要的风险因素,并确定相应的信息安全风险评估指标.参考等保2.0确定风险评估指标是一种可行的方法.在进行信息安全风险评估时,采用熵权法进行客观的指标赋权,并结合优劣解距离法(technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution,TOPSIS)和灰色关联分析(grey relational analysis,GRA)进行综合评估.实例分析表明,依据信息熵进行客观赋权相对减少了主观因素的影响;基于TOPSIS和GRA进行信息安全风险评估,综合被评价对象整体因素和内部因素,较有效地将多项信息安全风险评估指标综合成单一评分,便于对多个被评对象进行信息安全风险的择优与排序.展开更多
目前储能技术路线多样,不同类型的储能各具应用前景,但储能选型需要综合考虑经济性、安全性等因素,是一个复杂的多目标决策问题,因此储能选型是工程应用中的关键问题之一。提出一种将层次分析法(analytic hierarchy process,AHP)和优劣...目前储能技术路线多样,不同类型的储能各具应用前景,但储能选型需要综合考虑经济性、安全性等因素,是一个复杂的多目标决策问题,因此储能选型是工程应用中的关键问题之一。提出一种将层次分析法(analytic hierarchy process,AHP)和优劣解距离法(technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution,TOPSIS)-模糊综合分析法相结合的储能选型评价体系。首先,通过建立评价体系的判断矩阵,利用AHP获取指标权重;其次,将判断矩阵里量纲不同的指标类型用TOPSIS做规范化处理,以此获得更客观的权重向量,改善AHP法的主观性;而后,将指标权重对角化处理并与标准化后的矩阵相乘获得加权判断矩阵,并求取贴近度向量。最后,加权判断矩阵与模糊综合分析法关系矩阵相乘获取储能类型的隶属度评价结果,并以隶属度最大值所在的等级为最终评价,处于等级Ⅰ中最佳,等级Ⅱ次之并以此类推;由此通过TOPSIS获得更客观的权重向量,改善AHP法的主观性,得到的权重向量也更客观。最后以锂离子电池、钠硫电池和铅酸电池等七种储能类型在应用于削峰填谷、电网保供电和改善电压质量场景为例,并与现有的储能选型方法进行比较,体现该评价体系的创新,检验所提评价体系和选型方法的有效性。展开更多
修理分队指挥员科学、合理、快速地选择机动路线,对于高效发挥巡回保障力量抢修效益、有效保存战场抢修有生力量具有十分重要的意义。以单目标点抢救抢修任务为研究对象,根据摩步机动路线选择的主要影响因素,构建修理分队路线选择的评...修理分队指挥员科学、合理、快速地选择机动路线,对于高效发挥巡回保障力量抢修效益、有效保存战场抢修有生力量具有十分重要的意义。以单目标点抢救抢修任务为研究对象,根据摩步机动路线选择的主要影响因素,构建修理分队路线选择的评估指标体系。采用组合赋权-逼近理想值法(technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution,TOPSIS)评估模型,对分队抢修仿真行动过程中指挥员所选择的机动路线进行评估。在仿真条件下,对3位指挥员提出的机动路线进行评估排序,选择最优路线,以验证该方法的可行性和有效性。展开更多
高校是国家创新体系的重要组成部分,为深入分析新形势下高校科技创新效率,完善高校科技创新效率评价方法,综合运用数据包络分析(data envelopment analysis,DEA)模型和基于信息熵法的理想点模型(technique for order preference by simi...高校是国家创新体系的重要组成部分,为深入分析新形势下高校科技创新效率,完善高校科技创新效率评价方法,综合运用数据包络分析(data envelopment analysis,DEA)模型和基于信息熵法的理想点模型(technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution model,TOPSIS),以天津市区域14所高校为例,对比分析了新形势下高校科技创新效率。基于DEA模型的分析结果表明,14所高校科技创新效率总体呈不规律波动趋势,即使继续加大投入力度,也仅能获得科技成果产出规模有限的增加;基于TOPSIS模型的分析结果表明,14所高校科技创新效率总体呈上升发展趋势,可继续加大投入力度,以促进科技成果更大规模地产出。通过两个模型的综合运用,实现了评价结果的交叉验证,为新形势下高校科技创新效率评价提供了新思路。展开更多
The cross-efficiency evaluation method is reviewed which is developed as a data envelopment analysis (DEA) extensive tool.The cross-efficiency evaluation method is utilized to identify the decision making unit (DMU) w...The cross-efficiency evaluation method is reviewed which is developed as a data envelopment analysis (DEA) extensive tool.The cross-efficiency evaluation method is utilized to identify the decision making unit (DMU) with the best practice and to rank the DMUs by their respective cross-efficiency scores.The main drawbacks of the cross-efficiency evaluation method when the ultimate average cross-efficiency scores are used to evaluate and rank the DMUs are also pointed out.With the research gap,an improved technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) is introduced to rank the cross-efficiency by eliminating the average assumption.Finally,an empirical example is illustrated to examine the validity of the proposed method.展开更多
Network maintenance strategy selection is a multi-objective decision making topic. It mostly depends on the uncertainty and fuzziness of decision makers and conditions. In this paper, based on analytic hierarchy proce...Network maintenance strategy selection is a multi-objective decision making topic. It mostly depends on the uncertainty and fuzziness of decision makers and conditions. In this paper, based on analytic hierarchy process(AHP) and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution(TOPSIS), TOPSIS partial order method is proposed to choose the optimal maintenance strategy. This method uses AHP to determine the weights of evaluation indexes. The optimal maintenance strategy choice is given as an example to demonstrate the effectiveness of the method.展开更多
城市暴雨洪涝灾害是目前我国城市最突出的自然灾害。在韧性城市理念的基础上,从抵抗力、适应力和恢复力3大属性及经济、社会、生态环境和基础设施4个维度建立洪涝灾害下城市韧性评估指标体系。为定量评估城市应对洪涝灾害的能力,基于层...城市暴雨洪涝灾害是目前我国城市最突出的自然灾害。在韧性城市理念的基础上,从抵抗力、适应力和恢复力3大属性及经济、社会、生态环境和基础设施4个维度建立洪涝灾害下城市韧性评估指标体系。为定量评估城市应对洪涝灾害的能力,基于层次分析法(Analytic Hierarchy Process,AHP)和CRITIC(Criteria Importance Though Intercrieria Correlation)的组合赋权法,运用逼近理想解排序法(Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to the Ideal Solution,TOPSIS)构建城市韧性评估模型。以西安市为例,对新城区、碑林区、莲湖区、灞桥区、未央区和雁塔区6个区域韧性进行评估。结果表明:抵抗力属性和生态环境维度是影响城市韧性水平的最主要因素;灞桥区韧性水平等级为Ⅲ级,新城区和未央区韧性水平等级为Ⅱ级,碑林区、莲湖区和雁塔区为Ⅰ级。评估结果可为提升城市韧性、降低洪涝灾害风险提供参考。展开更多
为提高机场运行效率评价结果的科学性和全面性,提出了一种基于组合赋权-TOPSIS(technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution)模型的机场运行效率评价方法。从机位运行效率、旅客登机效率、飞机滑行效率和协同效率...为提高机场运行效率评价结果的科学性和全面性,提出了一种基于组合赋权-TOPSIS(technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution)模型的机场运行效率评价方法。从机位运行效率、旅客登机效率、飞机滑行效率和协同效率4个维度出发,构建了由航班靠桥率、廊桥周转率、机位变更比例等11个指标组成的机场运行效率评价体系;利用G1法、熵权法分别计算评价指标主观和客观权重,以最小化主客观加权属性偏离程度为目标计算组合权重;使用TOPSIS计算待评价机场综合评价指数。利用该模型分析国内3类共8家机场的运行效率,可以得到各评价对象的运行效率等级和综合排名。结果表明:该模型能够有效探明影响机场运行效率的主要因素,具有一定的参考价值。展开更多
基金Under the auspices of National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.41371429,41401196)
文摘Land suitability assessment is a prerequisite phase in land use planning; it guides toward optimal land use by providing information on the opportunities and constraints involved in the use of a given land area. A geographic information system-based procedure, known as rural settlement suitability evaluation(RSSE) using an improved technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution(TOPSIS), was adopted to determine the most suitable area for constructing rural settlements in different geographical locations. Given the distribution and independence of rural settlements, a distinctive evaluation criteria system that differed from that of urban suitability was established by considering the level of rural infrastructure services as well as living and working conditions. The unpredictable mutual interference among evaluation factors has been found in practical works. An improved TOPSIS using Mahalanobis distance was applied to solve the unpredictable correlation among the criteria in a suitability evaluation. Uncertainty and sensitivity analyses obtained via Monte Carlo simulation were performed to examine the robustness of the model. Daye, a resource-based city with rapid economic development, unsatisfied rural development, and geological environmental problems caused by mining, was used as a case study. Results indicate the following findings: 1) The RSSE model using the improved TOPSIS can assess the suitability of rural settlements, and the suitability maps generated using the improved TOPSIS have higher information density than those generated using traditional TOPSIS. The robustness of the model is improved, and the uncertainty is reduced in the suitability results. 2) Highly suitable land is mainly distributed in the northeast of the study area, and the majority of which is cultivated land, thereby leading to tremendous pressure on the loss of cultivated land. 3) Lastly, 12.54% of the constructive expansion permitted zone and 8.36% of the constructive expansion conditionally permitted zone are situated in an unsuitable area, which indicates that the general planning of Daye lacks the necessary verification of suitability evaluation. Guidance is provided on the development strategy of rural settlement patches to support decision making in general land use planning.
文摘信息安全风险评估是一项非常重要的信息安全保障活动.依据信息安全相关标准,可从资产、威胁和脆弱性3方面识别出重要的风险因素,并确定相应的信息安全风险评估指标.参考等保2.0确定风险评估指标是一种可行的方法.在进行信息安全风险评估时,采用熵权法进行客观的指标赋权,并结合优劣解距离法(technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution,TOPSIS)和灰色关联分析(grey relational analysis,GRA)进行综合评估.实例分析表明,依据信息熵进行客观赋权相对减少了主观因素的影响;基于TOPSIS和GRA进行信息安全风险评估,综合被评价对象整体因素和内部因素,较有效地将多项信息安全风险评估指标综合成单一评分,便于对多个被评对象进行信息安全风险的择优与排序.
文摘目前储能技术路线多样,不同类型的储能各具应用前景,但储能选型需要综合考虑经济性、安全性等因素,是一个复杂的多目标决策问题,因此储能选型是工程应用中的关键问题之一。提出一种将层次分析法(analytic hierarchy process,AHP)和优劣解距离法(technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution,TOPSIS)-模糊综合分析法相结合的储能选型评价体系。首先,通过建立评价体系的判断矩阵,利用AHP获取指标权重;其次,将判断矩阵里量纲不同的指标类型用TOPSIS做规范化处理,以此获得更客观的权重向量,改善AHP法的主观性;而后,将指标权重对角化处理并与标准化后的矩阵相乘获得加权判断矩阵,并求取贴近度向量。最后,加权判断矩阵与模糊综合分析法关系矩阵相乘获取储能类型的隶属度评价结果,并以隶属度最大值所在的等级为最终评价,处于等级Ⅰ中最佳,等级Ⅱ次之并以此类推;由此通过TOPSIS获得更客观的权重向量,改善AHP法的主观性,得到的权重向量也更客观。最后以锂离子电池、钠硫电池和铅酸电池等七种储能类型在应用于削峰填谷、电网保供电和改善电压质量场景为例,并与现有的储能选型方法进行比较,体现该评价体系的创新,检验所提评价体系和选型方法的有效性。
文摘修理分队指挥员科学、合理、快速地选择机动路线,对于高效发挥巡回保障力量抢修效益、有效保存战场抢修有生力量具有十分重要的意义。以单目标点抢救抢修任务为研究对象,根据摩步机动路线选择的主要影响因素,构建修理分队路线选择的评估指标体系。采用组合赋权-逼近理想值法(technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution,TOPSIS)评估模型,对分队抢修仿真行动过程中指挥员所选择的机动路线进行评估。在仿真条件下,对3位指挥员提出的机动路线进行评估排序,选择最优路线,以验证该方法的可行性和有效性。
文摘高校是国家创新体系的重要组成部分,为深入分析新形势下高校科技创新效率,完善高校科技创新效率评价方法,综合运用数据包络分析(data envelopment analysis,DEA)模型和基于信息熵法的理想点模型(technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution model,TOPSIS),以天津市区域14所高校为例,对比分析了新形势下高校科技创新效率。基于DEA模型的分析结果表明,14所高校科技创新效率总体呈不规律波动趋势,即使继续加大投入力度,也仅能获得科技成果产出规模有限的增加;基于TOPSIS模型的分析结果表明,14所高校科技创新效率总体呈上升发展趋势,可继续加大投入力度,以促进科技成果更大规模地产出。通过两个模型的综合运用,实现了评价结果的交叉验证,为新形势下高校科技创新效率评价提供了新思路。
基金supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China for Innovative Research Groups(70821001),the National Natural Science Foundation of China(70901069)the Special Fund for the Gainers of Excellent Ph.D.'s Dissertations and Dean's Scholarships of Chinese Academy of Sciences,the Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China for New Teachers(20093402120013)+1 种基金the Research Fund for the Excellent Youth Scholars of Higher School of Anhui Province of China(2010SQRW001ZD)the Social Science Research Fund for Higher School of Anhui Province of China
文摘The cross-efficiency evaluation method is reviewed which is developed as a data envelopment analysis (DEA) extensive tool.The cross-efficiency evaluation method is utilized to identify the decision making unit (DMU) with the best practice and to rank the DMUs by their respective cross-efficiency scores.The main drawbacks of the cross-efficiency evaluation method when the ultimate average cross-efficiency scores are used to evaluate and rank the DMUs are also pointed out.With the research gap,an improved technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) is introduced to rank the cross-efficiency by eliminating the average assumption.Finally,an empirical example is illustrated to examine the validity of the proposed method.
基金the Weapons and Equipment Preresearch Fund(No.9140A27040414JB34079)the Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of the Military Education(No.2015JY354)
文摘Network maintenance strategy selection is a multi-objective decision making topic. It mostly depends on the uncertainty and fuzziness of decision makers and conditions. In this paper, based on analytic hierarchy process(AHP) and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution(TOPSIS), TOPSIS partial order method is proposed to choose the optimal maintenance strategy. This method uses AHP to determine the weights of evaluation indexes. The optimal maintenance strategy choice is given as an example to demonstrate the effectiveness of the method.
文摘城市暴雨洪涝灾害是目前我国城市最突出的自然灾害。在韧性城市理念的基础上,从抵抗力、适应力和恢复力3大属性及经济、社会、生态环境和基础设施4个维度建立洪涝灾害下城市韧性评估指标体系。为定量评估城市应对洪涝灾害的能力,基于层次分析法(Analytic Hierarchy Process,AHP)和CRITIC(Criteria Importance Though Intercrieria Correlation)的组合赋权法,运用逼近理想解排序法(Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to the Ideal Solution,TOPSIS)构建城市韧性评估模型。以西安市为例,对新城区、碑林区、莲湖区、灞桥区、未央区和雁塔区6个区域韧性进行评估。结果表明:抵抗力属性和生态环境维度是影响城市韧性水平的最主要因素;灞桥区韧性水平等级为Ⅲ级,新城区和未央区韧性水平等级为Ⅱ级,碑林区、莲湖区和雁塔区为Ⅰ级。评估结果可为提升城市韧性、降低洪涝灾害风险提供参考。
文摘为提高机场运行效率评价结果的科学性和全面性,提出了一种基于组合赋权-TOPSIS(technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution)模型的机场运行效率评价方法。从机位运行效率、旅客登机效率、飞机滑行效率和协同效率4个维度出发,构建了由航班靠桥率、廊桥周转率、机位变更比例等11个指标组成的机场运行效率评价体系;利用G1法、熵权法分别计算评价指标主观和客观权重,以最小化主客观加权属性偏离程度为目标计算组合权重;使用TOPSIS计算待评价机场综合评价指数。利用该模型分析国内3类共8家机场的运行效率,可以得到各评价对象的运行效率等级和综合排名。结果表明:该模型能够有效探明影响机场运行效率的主要因素,具有一定的参考价值。
