Intertidal zone is a significant wetland between land and ocean. It plays an important rolein maintaining local ecological balance. Both Mai Po and Futian intertidal mudflats are located in Shenzhen Bay and are import...Intertidal zone is a significant wetland between land and ocean. It plays an important rolein maintaining local ecological balance. Both Mai Po and Futian intertidal mudflats are located in Shenzhen Bay and are important 'refueling' point along the East Asian/Australian flyway of migratory birds. The environmental quality of Mai Po and Futian mudflats have aroused great concern due to rapid economic developments in Hong Kong and Shenzhen in recent decades. Macroinfauna of Mai Po and Futian mudflats was investigated in December 2000 and the faunal data were used to assess their environmental quality. Two other mudflats, namely Ma Wan Typhoon Shelter (a more disturbed area) and Luk Keng intertidal mudflat (a place with relatively less human disturbance), were also sampled for macroinfauna and used as reference mudflats. Shannon - Weaver species diversity index (Isd), biotic coefficient (Cb) and macrofaunal pollution index (Imp) of the macrofauna community on four intertidal mudflats were used to determine their environmental quality. The results showed that Luk Keng intertidal mudflat was unpolluted, Mai Po and Futian mudflats were slightly polluted, and Ma Wan was moderately polluted. The pollution in Ma Wan Typhoon Shelter mainly came from various types of rubbish and fishing boats that disturbed the sediment, while pollution sources in Mai Po and Futian mudflats were discharges of industrial water, municipal sewage and from nearby rivers.展开更多
The contribution of benthic foraminifera to sediment bioturbation has widely been overlooked despite their huge abundance in intertidal soft sediments. In this preliminary study, we specifically chose to focus on two ...The contribution of benthic foraminifera to sediment bioturbation has widely been overlooked despite their huge abundance in intertidal soft sediments. In this preliminary study, we specifically chose to focus on two key species of benthic foraminifera in temperate intertidal mudflats, <i><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;">Quinqueloculina seminula</span></i><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;"> and </span><i><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;">Ammonia</span></i> <i><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;">tepida</span></i><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;">, and first experimentally investigated their individual movements at the sediment surface. We subsequently derived from these observations the individual-level surface sediment reworking rates, and used the actual abundance of these species to extrapolate these rates at the population level. Individual surface sediment reworking rates </span><i><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;">SSRR</span><sub><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;">i</span></sub></i><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;"> ranged between 0.13 and 0.32 cm<sup>2</sup><span style="white-space:nowrap;">·</span></span><span style="font-size:12px;"><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;"></span></sup></span><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;">ind</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;font-size:8.33333px;"><sup>-1</sup><span style="white-space:nowrap;">·</span></span><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;">day<sup>-1</sup></span> <span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;">for</span><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:;" "=""> <i><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;">Q. seminula</span></i><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;">, and between 0.12 and 0.28 cm<sup>2</sup><span style="white-space:nowrap;">·</span></span><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;">ind<sup>-1</sup><span style="white-space:nowrap;">·</span></span><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;">day<sup>-1</sup></span><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;"> for </span><i><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;">A. tepida</span></i><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;">. Population-level surface sediment reworking rates were subsequently estimated as ranging between 11,484 and 28,710 cm<sup>2</sup><span style="white-space:nowrap;">·</span></span><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;">m<sup>-2</sup><span style="white-space:nowrap;">·</span></span><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;">day<sup>-1</sup></span><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;"> for </span><i><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;">Q. seminula</span></i><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;"> and 27,876 and 65,044 cm<sup>2</sup><span style="white-space:nowrap;">·</span></span><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;">m<sup>-2</sup><span style="white-space:nowrap;">·</span></span><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;">day<sup>-1</sup></span><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;"> for </span><i><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;">A. tepida</span></i><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;">. Noticeably, these reworking rates are comparable to, and eventually even higher than, the rates reported in the literature for populations of intertidal macro-invertebrates, such as the annelid polychaete </span><i><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;">Melinna palmata</span></i><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;"> and the bivalve </span><i><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;">Abra</span></i> <i><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;">ovata</span></i><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;">. Taken together these results suggest that despite their minute size intertidal benthic foraminifera are, thanks to their abundance, non-negligible contributors to the reworking of surface sediment, and may then play an unanticipated role in the benthic ecosystem functioning, through e.g. the enhancement of fluxes at the sediment-water interface.</span></span>展开更多
文摘Intertidal zone is a significant wetland between land and ocean. It plays an important rolein maintaining local ecological balance. Both Mai Po and Futian intertidal mudflats are located in Shenzhen Bay and are important 'refueling' point along the East Asian/Australian flyway of migratory birds. The environmental quality of Mai Po and Futian mudflats have aroused great concern due to rapid economic developments in Hong Kong and Shenzhen in recent decades. Macroinfauna of Mai Po and Futian mudflats was investigated in December 2000 and the faunal data were used to assess their environmental quality. Two other mudflats, namely Ma Wan Typhoon Shelter (a more disturbed area) and Luk Keng intertidal mudflat (a place with relatively less human disturbance), were also sampled for macroinfauna and used as reference mudflats. Shannon - Weaver species diversity index (Isd), biotic coefficient (Cb) and macrofaunal pollution index (Imp) of the macrofauna community on four intertidal mudflats were used to determine their environmental quality. The results showed that Luk Keng intertidal mudflat was unpolluted, Mai Po and Futian mudflats were slightly polluted, and Ma Wan was moderately polluted. The pollution in Ma Wan Typhoon Shelter mainly came from various types of rubbish and fishing boats that disturbed the sediment, while pollution sources in Mai Po and Futian mudflats were discharges of industrial water, municipal sewage and from nearby rivers.
文摘The contribution of benthic foraminifera to sediment bioturbation has widely been overlooked despite their huge abundance in intertidal soft sediments. In this preliminary study, we specifically chose to focus on two key species of benthic foraminifera in temperate intertidal mudflats, <i><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;">Quinqueloculina seminula</span></i><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;"> and </span><i><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;">Ammonia</span></i> <i><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;">tepida</span></i><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;">, and first experimentally investigated their individual movements at the sediment surface. We subsequently derived from these observations the individual-level surface sediment reworking rates, and used the actual abundance of these species to extrapolate these rates at the population level. Individual surface sediment reworking rates </span><i><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;">SSRR</span><sub><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;">i</span></sub></i><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;"> ranged between 0.13 and 0.32 cm<sup>2</sup><span style="white-space:nowrap;">·</span></span><span style="font-size:12px;"><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;"></span></sup></span><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;">ind</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;font-size:8.33333px;"><sup>-1</sup><span style="white-space:nowrap;">·</span></span><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;">day<sup>-1</sup></span> <span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;">for</span><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:;" "=""> <i><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;">Q. seminula</span></i><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;">, and between 0.12 and 0.28 cm<sup>2</sup><span style="white-space:nowrap;">·</span></span><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;">ind<sup>-1</sup><span style="white-space:nowrap;">·</span></span><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;">day<sup>-1</sup></span><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;"> for </span><i><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;">A. tepida</span></i><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;">. Population-level surface sediment reworking rates were subsequently estimated as ranging between 11,484 and 28,710 cm<sup>2</sup><span style="white-space:nowrap;">·</span></span><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;">m<sup>-2</sup><span style="white-space:nowrap;">·</span></span><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;">day<sup>-1</sup></span><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;"> for </span><i><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;">Q. seminula</span></i><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;"> and 27,876 and 65,044 cm<sup>2</sup><span style="white-space:nowrap;">·</span></span><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;">m<sup>-2</sup><span style="white-space:nowrap;">·</span></span><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;">day<sup>-1</sup></span><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;"> for </span><i><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;">A. tepida</span></i><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;">. Noticeably, these reworking rates are comparable to, and eventually even higher than, the rates reported in the literature for populations of intertidal macro-invertebrates, such as the annelid polychaete </span><i><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;">Melinna palmata</span></i><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;"> and the bivalve </span><i><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;">Abra</span></i> <i><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;">ovata</span></i><span style="font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana;">. Taken together these results suggest that despite their minute size intertidal benthic foraminifera are, thanks to their abundance, non-negligible contributors to the reworking of surface sediment, and may then play an unanticipated role in the benthic ecosystem functioning, through e.g. the enhancement of fluxes at the sediment-water interface.</span></span>