<span style="font-family:Verdana;"><strong>Objective</strong><strong>:</strong> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">To explore the effect of perioper...<span style="font-family:Verdana;"><strong>Objective</strong><strong>:</strong> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">To explore the effect of perioperative pain intervention on postoperative rehabilitation of patients who underwent thoracoscopic partial resection of lung cancer.</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Methods:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> From January 2021 to May 2021, 100 patients with primary lung cancer who underwent thoracoscopic partial lung resection in Cardiopulmonary Department II of</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Cancer Center in our hospital were selected. They were divided into observation group and control group by random number table</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">. Routine nursing after surgery was used in both groups, the observation group was given perioperative pain intervention nursing on the basis of routine nursing, and the postoperative pain (6</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">h, 12</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">h, 24</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">h, 48</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">h after operation), the rate of out-of-bed activity within 24</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">h after operation,</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">lien chest tube time, the incidence of postoperative complications, the influence of pain on daily life, the satisfaction of patients with pain control methods and pain education and the satisfaction of discharged patients were observed and recorded. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Results: </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">There was no significant difference in general data (age, sex, educational level, course of disease, TNM stage of lung cancer, maximum diameter of tumor (CM), surgical site) between the two groups (P > 0.05);the NRS scores of the observation group at 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours after operation were all lower than those in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05);after operation, the rate of 24</span></span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">h out-of-bed activity in the observation group was higher than that in the control group, the lien chest tube time was shorter than the control group,</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">and the incidence of postoperative complications was lower than that in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05);after operation, the effect level of pain in the observation group was lower than that in the control group, and the satisfaction of pain health education, pain control methods and discharged patients w</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">as</span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> higher than that in the control group, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Conclusion: </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Perioperative pain intervention can effectively relieve postoperative pain state of patients, promote patients’ early out of bed and conducive to lung expansion, shorten the time of lien chest tube, reduce postoperative complications and the impact of pain on daily life, help patients recover as soon as possible, and improve the satisfaction of patients for medical treatment.</span></span>展开更多
文摘<span style="font-family:Verdana;"><strong>Objective</strong><strong>:</strong> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">To explore the effect of perioperative pain intervention on postoperative rehabilitation of patients who underwent thoracoscopic partial resection of lung cancer.</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Methods:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> From January 2021 to May 2021, 100 patients with primary lung cancer who underwent thoracoscopic partial lung resection in Cardiopulmonary Department II of</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Cancer Center in our hospital were selected. They were divided into observation group and control group by random number table</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">. Routine nursing after surgery was used in both groups, the observation group was given perioperative pain intervention nursing on the basis of routine nursing, and the postoperative pain (6</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">h, 12</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">h, 24</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">h, 48</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">h after operation), the rate of out-of-bed activity within 24</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">h after operation,</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">lien chest tube time, the incidence of postoperative complications, the influence of pain on daily life, the satisfaction of patients with pain control methods and pain education and the satisfaction of discharged patients were observed and recorded. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Results: </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">There was no significant difference in general data (age, sex, educational level, course of disease, TNM stage of lung cancer, maximum diameter of tumor (CM), surgical site) between the two groups (P > 0.05);the NRS scores of the observation group at 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours after operation were all lower than those in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05);after operation, the rate of 24</span></span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">h out-of-bed activity in the observation group was higher than that in the control group, the lien chest tube time was shorter than the control group,</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">and the incidence of postoperative complications was lower than that in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05);after operation, the effect level of pain in the observation group was lower than that in the control group, and the satisfaction of pain health education, pain control methods and discharged patients w</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">as</span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> higher than that in the control group, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Conclusion: </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Perioperative pain intervention can effectively relieve postoperative pain state of patients, promote patients’ early out of bed and conducive to lung expansion, shorten the time of lien chest tube, reduce postoperative complications and the impact of pain on daily life, help patients recover as soon as possible, and improve the satisfaction of patients for medical treatment.</span></span>