非小细胞肺癌(non-small cell lung cancer NSCLC)的化疗效果及预后较差源于其肿瘤的耐药作用。如能研究逆转耐药的途径及方法,对于临床选择用药及防止耐药具有非常重要的意义,有望改变NSCLC患者的生存率。本文对与NSCLC耐药紧密相关的...非小细胞肺癌(non-small cell lung cancer NSCLC)的化疗效果及预后较差源于其肿瘤的耐药作用。如能研究逆转耐药的途径及方法,对于临床选择用药及防止耐药具有非常重要的意义,有望改变NSCLC患者的生存率。本文对与NSCLC耐药紧密相关的因子的研究进展进行综述。展开更多
The clinical efficacy obtained from 211 cases of middle and late stage lung cancer treated byelectrochemical therapy (ECT) were summarized. The responses are divided into CR, PR, NR, PD accord-ing to the international...The clinical efficacy obtained from 211 cases of middle and late stage lung cancer treated byelectrochemical therapy (ECT) were summarized. The responses are divided into CR, PR, NR, PD accord-ing to the international standard of four grades. The short term effectiveness within one year was : CR(29. 4% ) and PR (40. 39% ) were assessed as the total effective rate being 69. 7% , NR (13. 39% ) and PD(17. 1% ) were assessed as ineffective. The efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) group was54. 3% ; that of ECT group was 70. 4% ; while that of TCM combined with Western medicine group ( ECT +TCM) was 84. 3% . The efficacy of ECT + TCM group was superior to the formerr two groups f P < 0. 05 ) .The 5 years long term effectiveness of ECT group was 31. 0% , TCM groiJp 15. 7% , ECT + TOM group40. 0% . Clinical analysis showed that the effect ot ECT + TCM group was the best.展开更多
文摘The clinical efficacy obtained from 211 cases of middle and late stage lung cancer treated byelectrochemical therapy (ECT) were summarized. The responses are divided into CR, PR, NR, PD accord-ing to the international standard of four grades. The short term effectiveness within one year was : CR(29. 4% ) and PR (40. 39% ) were assessed as the total effective rate being 69. 7% , NR (13. 39% ) and PD(17. 1% ) were assessed as ineffective. The efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) group was54. 3% ; that of ECT group was 70. 4% ; while that of TCM combined with Western medicine group ( ECT +TCM) was 84. 3% . The efficacy of ECT + TCM group was superior to the formerr two groups f P < 0. 05 ) .The 5 years long term effectiveness of ECT group was 31. 0% , TCM groiJp 15. 7% , ECT + TOM group40. 0% . Clinical analysis showed that the effect ot ECT + TCM group was the best.