Objective:To investigate the current status of kinesiophobia in patients with temporomandibular disorders(TMD)and analyze its risk factors.Methods:The Tampa Scale for kinesiophobia for patients with Temporomandibular ...Objective:To investigate the current status of kinesiophobia in patients with temporomandibular disorders(TMD)and analyze its risk factors.Methods:The Tampa Scale for kinesiophobia for patients with Temporomandibular Disorders(TSK-TMD),Numerical Rating Scale(NRS),Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale(HADS),General Self-Efficacy Scale(GSES),Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire(SCSQ),and Social Support Rating Scale(SSRS)were adopted to measure patient's kinesiophobia,pain intensity,anxiety,depression,self-efficacy,coping styles and social support.Multiple linear regression was used to analyze the risk factors of kinesiophobia in patients with TMD.Results:A total of 307 participants were included in the present study.The average score of patients with kinesiophobia was(34.37±6.96)points.Multiple linear regression analysis showed that pain duration,worst pain intensity,mouth opening limitation,joint noise,joint trauma,self-efficacy,depression,negative coping style,support utilization and education level are independent risk factors for kinesiophobia.Conclusion:Patients with TMD have higher levels of kinesiophobia and poor recognition of the disease.Longer pain duration,pain intensity,mouth opening limitation,joint noise,joint trauma,lower self-efficacy,depression,negative coping style,lower support utilization and lower educational level can be used to predict the degree of kinesiophobia.展开更多
目的分析颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合(anterior cervical discectomy and fusion,ACDF)术后患者运动恐惧分型及影响因素,为制订针对性干预方案提供参考。方法采用横断面调查,选取2022年1月至2023年6月收治的ACDF术后患者作为调查对象,采用...目的分析颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合(anterior cervical discectomy and fusion,ACDF)术后患者运动恐惧分型及影响因素,为制订针对性干预方案提供参考。方法采用横断面调查,选取2022年1月至2023年6月收治的ACDF术后患者作为调查对象,采用一般资料调查表、恐动症Tampa评分量表、多维度运动自我效能量表进行调查。使用潜在剖面分析识别患者运动恐惧分型,二元Logistic回归分析不同运动恐惧类别的影响因素。结果最终纳入137例ACDF术后患者,其运动恐惧分为2个潜在剖面类别:“高恐惧—运动恐惧型”54例占39.4%,“低恐惧—运动回避型”83例占60.6%。相比较于“低恐惧—运动回避型”,女性、体重指数>24.0 kg/m^(2)、运动自我效能得分低的患者发展为“高恐惧—运动恐惧型”的概率大(OR=0.476、0.700、-1.305,P<0.05)。结论ACDF术后患者运动恐惧有2种潜在剖面类别,医护人员应根据其运动恐惧分型,实施针对性干预,以提高其康复运动的积极性。展开更多
目的系统评价中国慢性疼痛患者恐动症评估工具的方法学和测量属性质量,为临床工作人员工具选择提供参考依据。方法检索中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、中国知网、万方、维普、PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、The Cochrane Library,搜...目的系统评价中国慢性疼痛患者恐动症评估工具的方法学和测量属性质量,为临床工作人员工具选择提供参考依据。方法检索中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、中国知网、万方、维普、PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、The Cochrane Library,搜集关于慢性疼痛患者恐动症评估工具的研究,检索时限为建库至2024年3月。基于健康测量工具选择的共识标准(Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments,COSMIN)指南对纳入研究中的评估工具进行质量评价。结果共纳入10项研究并构建13种恐动症评估工具。2种评估工具的内容效度为“充分”,3种为“不充分”,其余均为“不确定”;所有评估工具均使用因子分析法评价结构效度,其中5种无法提供具体数值,因此测量属性为“不充分”,其余均为“不确定”;12种评估工具评价了内部一致性,方法学质量评价为“良”,测量属性为“充分”。最终1种评估工具为A级推荐、10种为B级推荐、2种为C级推荐。结论FABQ-HK测量属性最好且推荐等级最高,但鉴于海峡两岸语言习惯等方面的差异,为更全面地评估其有效性,需收集更多关于该评估工具在内地人群中的研究证据。展开更多
文摘Objective:To investigate the current status of kinesiophobia in patients with temporomandibular disorders(TMD)and analyze its risk factors.Methods:The Tampa Scale for kinesiophobia for patients with Temporomandibular Disorders(TSK-TMD),Numerical Rating Scale(NRS),Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale(HADS),General Self-Efficacy Scale(GSES),Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire(SCSQ),and Social Support Rating Scale(SSRS)were adopted to measure patient's kinesiophobia,pain intensity,anxiety,depression,self-efficacy,coping styles and social support.Multiple linear regression was used to analyze the risk factors of kinesiophobia in patients with TMD.Results:A total of 307 participants were included in the present study.The average score of patients with kinesiophobia was(34.37±6.96)points.Multiple linear regression analysis showed that pain duration,worst pain intensity,mouth opening limitation,joint noise,joint trauma,self-efficacy,depression,negative coping style,support utilization and education level are independent risk factors for kinesiophobia.Conclusion:Patients with TMD have higher levels of kinesiophobia and poor recognition of the disease.Longer pain duration,pain intensity,mouth opening limitation,joint noise,joint trauma,lower self-efficacy,depression,negative coping style,lower support utilization and lower educational level can be used to predict the degree of kinesiophobia.
文摘目的系统评价中国慢性疼痛患者恐动症评估工具的方法学和测量属性质量,为临床工作人员工具选择提供参考依据。方法检索中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、中国知网、万方、维普、PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、The Cochrane Library,搜集关于慢性疼痛患者恐动症评估工具的研究,检索时限为建库至2024年3月。基于健康测量工具选择的共识标准(Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments,COSMIN)指南对纳入研究中的评估工具进行质量评价。结果共纳入10项研究并构建13种恐动症评估工具。2种评估工具的内容效度为“充分”,3种为“不充分”,其余均为“不确定”;所有评估工具均使用因子分析法评价结构效度,其中5种无法提供具体数值,因此测量属性为“不充分”,其余均为“不确定”;12种评估工具评价了内部一致性,方法学质量评价为“良”,测量属性为“充分”。最终1种评估工具为A级推荐、10种为B级推荐、2种为C级推荐。结论FABQ-HK测量属性最好且推荐等级最高,但鉴于海峡两岸语言习惯等方面的差异,为更全面地评估其有效性,需收集更多关于该评估工具在内地人群中的研究证据。