What is structruralism?Is it a school or a movement?Many critics agreethat structruralism is,in a broad sense,a revolution in the human thinkingprocess.Structuralism is,as Barthe,properly defined in,the activity of re...What is structruralism?Is it a school or a movement?Many critics agreethat structruralism is,in a broad sense,a revolution in the human thinkingprocess.Structuralism is,as Barthe,properly defined in,the activity of re-defining all the cultural phenomena,an activity grounded in the belief th-at like language,a myth,wrestling match,system of tribal kinship orrestaurant menu is a system of signs,In this connection,structuralism ismuch concerned with and influenced by the modern schools of linguisticsespecially by the structural linguistics originated by Sausure.展开更多
According to Arthur Granz,a literary critic,“Oscar Wilde’s societycomedies have foolish plots and brilliant dialogue.”We do not agree withhis unfair comment against the merits of Wilde’s original use of convention...According to Arthur Granz,a literary critic,“Oscar Wilde’s societycomedies have foolish plots and brilliant dialogue.”We do not agree withhis unfair comment against the merits of Wilde’s original use of conventionalplots as discussed in my previous thesis.However,we do agree with his impar-tial judgement about Wilde’s brilliant dialogue,When Wilde’s comedies展开更多
文摘What is structruralism?Is it a school or a movement?Many critics agreethat structruralism is,in a broad sense,a revolution in the human thinkingprocess.Structuralism is,as Barthe,properly defined in,the activity of re-defining all the cultural phenomena,an activity grounded in the belief th-at like language,a myth,wrestling match,system of tribal kinship orrestaurant menu is a system of signs,In this connection,structuralism ismuch concerned with and influenced by the modern schools of linguisticsespecially by the structural linguistics originated by Sausure.
文摘According to Arthur Granz,a literary critic,“Oscar Wilde’s societycomedies have foolish plots and brilliant dialogue.”We do not agree withhis unfair comment against the merits of Wilde’s original use of conventionalplots as discussed in my previous thesis.However,we do agree with his impar-tial judgement about Wilde’s brilliant dialogue,When Wilde’s comedies
