Although liver transplantation is theoretically the best treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC),it is limited by the realities of perioperative complications,and the shortage of donor organs.Furthermore,in many c...Although liver transplantation is theoretically the best treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC),it is limited by the realities of perioperative complications,and the shortage of donor organs.Furthermore,in many cases there are available alternative treatments such as resection or locoregional therapy.Deciding upon the best option for a patient with HCC is complicated,involving numerous ethical principles including:urgency,utility,intention-to-treat survival,transplant benefit,harm to candidates on waiting list,and harm to living donors.The potential contrast between different principles is particularly relevant for patients with HCC for several reasons:(1)HCC candidates to liver transplantation are increasing;(2)the great prognostic heterogeneity within the HCC population;(3)in HCC patients tumor progression before liver transplantation may significantly impair post transplant outcome;and(4)effective alternative therapies are often available for HCC candidates to liver transplantation.In this paper we suggest that allocating organs by transplant benefit could help balance these competing principles,and also introduce equity between patients with HCC and nonmalignant liver disease.We also propose a triangular equipoise model to help decide between deceased donor liver transplantation,living donor liver transplantation,or alternative therapies.展开更多
文摘Although liver transplantation is theoretically the best treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC),it is limited by the realities of perioperative complications,and the shortage of donor organs.Furthermore,in many cases there are available alternative treatments such as resection or locoregional therapy.Deciding upon the best option for a patient with HCC is complicated,involving numerous ethical principles including:urgency,utility,intention-to-treat survival,transplant benefit,harm to candidates on waiting list,and harm to living donors.The potential contrast between different principles is particularly relevant for patients with HCC for several reasons:(1)HCC candidates to liver transplantation are increasing;(2)the great prognostic heterogeneity within the HCC population;(3)in HCC patients tumor progression before liver transplantation may significantly impair post transplant outcome;and(4)effective alternative therapies are often available for HCC candidates to liver transplantation.In this paper we suggest that allocating organs by transplant benefit could help balance these competing principles,and also introduce equity between patients with HCC and nonmalignant liver disease.We also propose a triangular equipoise model to help decide between deceased donor liver transplantation,living donor liver transplantation,or alternative therapies.
