BACKGROUND Contemporary innovations in the area of local anesthesia have attempted to provide an absolutely pain free experience for patients.Since the introduction of Computer-Controlled Local Anesthetic Delivery Sys...BACKGROUND Contemporary innovations in the area of local anesthesia have attempted to provide an absolutely pain free experience for patients.Since the introduction of Computer-Controlled Local Anesthetic Delivery Systems to dentistry,many studies have compared its efficacy and safety to conventional anesthesia.However,very few studies have compared single tooth anesthesia(STA)and traditional local anesthesia.AIM To compare pain rating,changes in blood pressure,and heart rate during the local anesthetic injection.The secondary objectives were to measure the patients’level of satisfaction and the differences in anesthetic efficiency between the STA system and traditional local infiltration.METHODS A randomized controlled trial was conducted and a total of 80 patients with dental restorative needs were enrolled for the study.The patients were evaluated for their general physical status and oral clinical findings before enrollment.Information regarding perceived pain,changes in heart rate and blood pressure,and patients’satisfaction was collected using an electronic data form and was analyzed using paired and unpaired t-tests.RESULTS No significant difference was noted in perceived pain(P=0.59)and systolic blood pressure(P=0.09)during anesthetic injection using both traditional and STA techniques.STA patients had a significantly higher heart rate during anesthesia,although a statistically significant difference was noted among the traditional anesthesia and the STA groups even before anesthesia.During the restorative procedure,less pain was perceived by STA patients on the Wong-Baker FACES pain scale,which was statistically significant(P<0.001).Analyses of post-procedure patient responses showed that STA patients had a significantly better treatment experience and preferred to have the same method of injection in the future(P=0.04).CONCLUSION STA system can provide less painful and more comfortable restorative treatment procedures in comparison to the traditional infiltration technique.展开更多
目的探讨麻醉管理优化方案结合单孔腹腔镜手术对患者快速康复的影响。方法将68例妇科良性肿瘤患者随机分成对照组和ERAS组,对照组患者采用三孔腹腔镜手术结合常规麻醉管理方案,ERAS组患者采用单孔腹腔镜手术结合优化后的麻醉管理方案。...目的探讨麻醉管理优化方案结合单孔腹腔镜手术对患者快速康复的影响。方法将68例妇科良性肿瘤患者随机分成对照组和ERAS组,对照组患者采用三孔腹腔镜手术结合常规麻醉管理方案,ERAS组患者采用单孔腹腔镜手术结合优化后的麻醉管理方案。比较2组手术时间、拔管时间、复苏室停留时间、达出院标准时间、术后肛门排气时间、术后住院时间及术后30 min、2 h、12 h、24 h VAS评分。比较2组术后恶心呕吐及切口出血、感染等情况。结果ERAS组手术时间、拔管时间、达出院标准时间、术后肛门排气时间、术后住院时间短于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2组复苏室停留时间、恶心呕吐发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。2组患者术后均无切口出血、感染等情况发生。与对照组比较,ERAS组术后30 min VAS评分更高,其余时间点VAS评分更低(P<0.05)。结论优化后的麻醉管理策略结合单孔腔镜手术能减轻患者痛苦,缩短住院时间,促进患者快速康复。展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND Contemporary innovations in the area of local anesthesia have attempted to provide an absolutely pain free experience for patients.Since the introduction of Computer-Controlled Local Anesthetic Delivery Systems to dentistry,many studies have compared its efficacy and safety to conventional anesthesia.However,very few studies have compared single tooth anesthesia(STA)and traditional local anesthesia.AIM To compare pain rating,changes in blood pressure,and heart rate during the local anesthetic injection.The secondary objectives were to measure the patients’level of satisfaction and the differences in anesthetic efficiency between the STA system and traditional local infiltration.METHODS A randomized controlled trial was conducted and a total of 80 patients with dental restorative needs were enrolled for the study.The patients were evaluated for their general physical status and oral clinical findings before enrollment.Information regarding perceived pain,changes in heart rate and blood pressure,and patients’satisfaction was collected using an electronic data form and was analyzed using paired and unpaired t-tests.RESULTS No significant difference was noted in perceived pain(P=0.59)and systolic blood pressure(P=0.09)during anesthetic injection using both traditional and STA techniques.STA patients had a significantly higher heart rate during anesthesia,although a statistically significant difference was noted among the traditional anesthesia and the STA groups even before anesthesia.During the restorative procedure,less pain was perceived by STA patients on the Wong-Baker FACES pain scale,which was statistically significant(P<0.001).Analyses of post-procedure patient responses showed that STA patients had a significantly better treatment experience and preferred to have the same method of injection in the future(P=0.04).CONCLUSION STA system can provide less painful and more comfortable restorative treatment procedures in comparison to the traditional infiltration technique.
文摘目的探讨麻醉管理优化方案结合单孔腹腔镜手术对患者快速康复的影响。方法将68例妇科良性肿瘤患者随机分成对照组和ERAS组,对照组患者采用三孔腹腔镜手术结合常规麻醉管理方案,ERAS组患者采用单孔腹腔镜手术结合优化后的麻醉管理方案。比较2组手术时间、拔管时间、复苏室停留时间、达出院标准时间、术后肛门排气时间、术后住院时间及术后30 min、2 h、12 h、24 h VAS评分。比较2组术后恶心呕吐及切口出血、感染等情况。结果ERAS组手术时间、拔管时间、达出院标准时间、术后肛门排气时间、术后住院时间短于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2组复苏室停留时间、恶心呕吐发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。2组患者术后均无切口出血、感染等情况发生。与对照组比较,ERAS组术后30 min VAS评分更高,其余时间点VAS评分更低(P<0.05)。结论优化后的麻醉管理策略结合单孔腔镜手术能减轻患者痛苦,缩短住院时间,促进患者快速康复。
