Aim: This study was performed to evaluate the movement of the proximal segment following different methods of ramus osteotomy that is one of the side effects of orthognathic surgery. Theoretically, with intraoral vert...Aim: This study was performed to evaluate the movement of the proximal segment following different methods of ramus osteotomy that is one of the side effects of orthognathic surgery. Theoretically, with intraoral verticosagittal ramus osteotomy, it can minimize the movement of the proximal segment. The changes in the intergonal distance of mandible and the angle of the ramus flaring in two methods of osteotomy have been compared in this study. Materials and Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, included 60 patients (32 males) with mandibular prognathism and without any asymmetry were selected and divided into two groups (n = 30). One group underwent bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy technique to achieve mandibular setback and the other by the intraoral verticosagittal ramus osteotomy technique. Intergonial width and inner-ramal angle in the transverse plane were measured on radiographs preoperatively and 1 and 12 weeks postoperatively. Data were analyzed using covariance test with the significance level set at P 0.1). Conclusion: Considering our findings, there was no significant difference between two ramus osteotomy techniques regarding changes in mandibular width and inter-ramal flaring angle.展开更多
目的 应用石膏模型牙槽嵴中心点(center of the alveolar crest,CAC)测量法、头颅正位片Ricketts测量法和宾夕法尼亚大学锥形束CT(University of Pennsylvania cone beam CT,Penn CBCT)测量法对上下颌宽度关系进行分析诊断及一致性评价...目的 应用石膏模型牙槽嵴中心点(center of the alveolar crest,CAC)测量法、头颅正位片Ricketts测量法和宾夕法尼亚大学锥形束CT(University of Pennsylvania cone beam CT,Penn CBCT)测量法对上下颌宽度关系进行分析诊断及一致性评价。方法 选择2017—2021年于中国医科大学附属口腔医院拟行正畸治疗的恒牙期初诊患者93例,应用石膏模型CAC测量法、头颅正位片Ricketts测量法和Penn CBCT测量法分别测量患者上下颌宽度并得出宽度差值,再与理论上的理想参考值比较得出宽度不调量。宽度不调量> 0诊断为上颌宽度不足,≤0诊断为无上颌宽度不足,并对3种方法的测量结果进行一致性评价。结果 在上下颌宽度关系分析诊断方面,3种方法的一致性中等(Kappa值为0.445),石膏模型CAC测量法和Penn CBCT测量法的一致性较高(Kappa值为0.710),头颅正位片Ricketts测量法和Penn CBCT测量法的一致性一般(Kappa值为0.353),石膏模型CAC测量法和头颅正位片Ricketts测量法的一致性一般(Kappa值为0.289)。结论 对于无CBCT资料的患者,应用石膏模型CAC测量法进行上下颌宽度关系的分析诊断具有较高的准确性,且临床中不建议单独使用头颅正位片进行上下颌宽度关系的分析。展开更多
文摘Aim: This study was performed to evaluate the movement of the proximal segment following different methods of ramus osteotomy that is one of the side effects of orthognathic surgery. Theoretically, with intraoral verticosagittal ramus osteotomy, it can minimize the movement of the proximal segment. The changes in the intergonal distance of mandible and the angle of the ramus flaring in two methods of osteotomy have been compared in this study. Materials and Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, included 60 patients (32 males) with mandibular prognathism and without any asymmetry were selected and divided into two groups (n = 30). One group underwent bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy technique to achieve mandibular setback and the other by the intraoral verticosagittal ramus osteotomy technique. Intergonial width and inner-ramal angle in the transverse plane were measured on radiographs preoperatively and 1 and 12 weeks postoperatively. Data were analyzed using covariance test with the significance level set at P 0.1). Conclusion: Considering our findings, there was no significant difference between two ramus osteotomy techniques regarding changes in mandibular width and inter-ramal flaring angle.
