Emerging role of liquid biopsy in rat sarcoma virus mutated metastatic colorectal cancer:A case report

BACKGROUND In patients with metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC),the treatment options are limited and have been proved to be affected by rat sarcoma virus(RAS)mutational status.In RAS wild-type(wt)patients,the combination of antiepidermal growth factor receptor(EGFR)monoclonal antibodies with chemotherapy(CT)is more effective than CT alone.On the other hand,RAS-mutated patients are not eligible for treatment with anti-EGFR antibodies.CASE SUMMARY Eleven patients with initially RAS-mutated mCRC were followed from diagnosis to May 2022.At the time of cell-free DNA determination,five patients had undergone one CT line,five patients had undergone two CT lines,and one patient had undergone three CT lines(all in combination with bevacizumab).At the second and third treatment lines[second line(2L),third line(3L)],patients with neo-RAS wt received a combination of CT and cetuximab.In neo-RAS wt patients treated with anti-EGFR,our findings indicated an increase in progression-free survival for both 2L and 3L(14.5 mo,P=0.119 and 3.9 mo,P=0.882,respectively).Regarding 2L overall survival,we registered a slight increase in neo-RAS wt patients treated with anti-EGFR(33.6 mo vs 32.4 mo,P=0.385).At data cut-off,two patients were still alive:A RAS-mutated patient undergoing 3L treatment and a neo-RAS wt patient who received 2L treatment with anti-EGFR(ongoing).CONCLUSION Our case series demonstrated that monitoring RAS mutations in mCRC by liquid biopsy may provide an additional treatment line for neo-RAS wt patients.

Therapeutic strategies targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor signaling pathway in metastatic colorectal cancer

More than 1.9 million new colorectal cancer(CRC)cases and 935000 deaths were estimated to occur worldwide in 2020,representing about one in ten cancer cases and deaths.Overall,colorectal ranks third in incidence,but second in mortality.More than half of the patients are in advanced stages at diagnosis.Treatment options are complex because of the heterogeneity of the patient population,including different molecular subtypes.Treatments have included conventional fluorouracil-based chemotherapy,targeted therapy,immunotherapy,etc.In recent years,with the development of genetic testing technology,more and more targeted drugs have been applied to the treatment of CRC,which has further prolonged the survival of metastatic CRC patients.

Comparative effectiveness of immunotherapy and chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer stratified by microsatellite instability status

BACKGROUND Immunotherapy have demonstrated promising outcomes in patients with high microsatellite instability(MSI)(MSI-H)metastatic colorectal cancer.However,the comparative effectiveness of Immunotherapy and chemotherapy for patients with low MSI(MSI-L),and microsatellite stable(MSS)metastatic colorectal cancer remains unclear.AIM To investigate immunotherapy vs chemotherapy for treatment of MSI-L/MSS metastatic colorectal cancer,and to evaluate the success of immunotherapy against chemotherapy in managing MSI-H metastatic colorectal cancer during a follow-up of 50 months.METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the National Cancer Database(NCDB)to evaluate the overall survival(OS)of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with immunotherapy or chemotherapy.The study population was stratified by MSI status(MSI-H,MSI-L,and MSS).Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the association between treatment modality and OS,adjusting for potential confounders.RESULTS A total of 21951 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were included in the analysis,of which 2358 were MSI-H,and 19593 were MSI-L/MSS.In the MSI-H cohort,immunotherapy treatment(n=142)was associated with a significantly improved median OS compared to chemotherapy(n=860).After adjusting for potential confounders,immunotherapy treatment remained significantly associated with better OS in the MSI-H cohort[adjusted hazard ratio(aHR):0.57,95%confidence interval(95%CI):0.43-0.77,P<0.001].In the MSS cohort,no significant difference in median OS was observed between immunotherapy treatment and chemotherapy(aHR:0.94,95%CI:0.69-1.29,P=0.715).CONCLUSION In this population-based study using the NCDB,immunotherapy treatment was associated with significantly improved OS compared to chemotherapy in patients with MSI-H metastatic colorectal cancer,but not in those with MSI-L/MSS metastatic colorectal cancer.Further studies are warranted to determine the optimal therapeutic approach for patients with MSI-L/MSS metastatic colorectal cancer.

Systemic treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer

Significant progress has been achieved in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC)patients during the last 20 years.There are currently numerous treatments available for the first-line treatment of mCRC.Sophisticated molecular technologies have been developed to reveal novel prognostic and predictive biomarkers for CRC.The development of next-generation sequencing and wholeexome sequencing,which are strong new tools for the discovery of predictive molecular biomarkers to facilitate the delivery of customized treatment,has resulted in tremendous breakthroughs in DNA sequencing technology in recent years.The appropriate adjuvant treatments for mCRC patients are determined by the tumor stage,presence of high-risk pathologic characteristics,microsatellite instability status,patient age,and performance status.Chemotherapy,targeted therapy,and immunotherapy are the main systemic treatments for patients with mCRC.Despite the fact that these novel treatment choices have increased overall survival for mCRC,survival remains optimal for individuals with non-metastatic disease.The molecular technologies currently being used to support our ability to practice personalized medicine;the practical aspects of applying molecular biomarkers to regular clinical practice;and the evolution of chemotherapy,targeted therapy,and immunotherapy strategies for the treatment of mCRC in the front-line setting are all reviewed here.

Classification of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer into consensus molecular subtypes into real-world: A pilot study

BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer is a complex disease with high mortality rates.Over time,the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC)has gradually improved due to the development of modern chemotherapy and targeted therapy regimens.However,due to the inherent heterogeneity of this condition,identifying reliable predictive biomarkers for targeted therapies remains challenging.A recent promising classification system—the consensus molecular subtype(CMS)system—offers the potential to categorize mCRC patients based on their unique biological and molecular characteristics.Four distinct CMS categories have been defined:immune(CMS1),canonical(CMS2),metabolic(CMS3),and mesenchymal(CMS4).Nevertheless,there is currently no standardized protocol for accurately classifying patients into CMS categories.To address this challenge,reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction(RT-qPCR)and next-generation genomic sequencing(NGS)techniques may hold promise for precisely classifying mCRC patients into their CMSs.AIM To investigate if mCRC patients can be classified into CMS categories using a standardized molecular biology workflow.METHODS This observational study was conducted at the University of Chile Clinical Hospital and included patients with unresectable mCRC who were undergoing systemic treatment with chemotherapy and/or targeted therapy.Molecular biology techniques were employed to analyse primary tumour samples from these patients.RT-qPCR was utilized to assess the expression of genes associated with fibrosis(TGF-βandβ-catenin)and cell growth pathways(c-MYC).NGS using a 25-gene panel(TumorSec)was performed to identify specific genomic mutations.The patients were then classified into one of the four CMS categories according to the clinical consensus of a Tumour Board.Informed consent was obtained from all the patients prior to their participation in this study.All techniques were conducted at University of Chile.RESULTS Twenty-six patients were studied with the techniques and then evaluated by the Tumour Board to determine the specific CMS.Among them,23%(n=6),19%(n=5),31%(n=8),and 19%(n=5)were classified as CMS1,CMS2,CMS3,and CMS4,respectively.Additionally,8%of patients(n=2)could not be classified into any of the four CMS categories.The median overall survival of the total sample was 28 mo,and for CMS1,CMS2,CMS3 and CMS4 it was 11,20,30 and 45 mo respectively,with no statistically significant differences between groups.CONCLUSION A molecular biology workflow and clinical consensus analysis can be used to accurately classify mCRC patients.This classification process,which divides patients into the four CMS categories,holds significant potential for improving research strategies and targeted therapies tailored to the specific characteristics of mCRC.

Cetuximab plus FOLFOX6 or FOLFIRI in metastatic colorectal cancer: CECOG trial

AIM: To investigate efficacy and safety of cetuximab combined with two chemotherapy regimens in patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS: Randomized patients received cetuximab with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), folinic acid (FA) and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) 6 (arm A, n = 74) or 5-FU, FA and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) (arm B, n = 77). KRAS mutation status was determined retrospectively in a subset of tumors (n = 117). RESULTS: No significant difference was found between treatment arms A and B in the progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 9 mo, 45% vs 34%; median PFS, 8.6 mo vs 8.3 mo [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.06]; overall response rate (ORR) 43% vs 45% [odds ratio (OR) = 0.93] and median overall survival (OS), 17.4 mo vs 18.9 mo (HR = 0.98). Patients with KRAS wild-type tumors demonstrated improved PFS (HR = 0.55, P = 0.0051), OS, (HR = 0.62, P = 0.0296) and ORR (53% vs 36%) and in arm A, improved PFS (HR = 0.49, P = 0.0196), OS (HR = 0.48, P = 0.0201) and ORR (56%vs 30%), compared with patients with KRAS mutated tumors. In arm B no significant differences were found in efficacy by KRAS mutation status. Treatment in arms A and B was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSION: This study confirms that combinations of cetuximab with FOLFOX6 or FOLFIRI are effective and significantly improve clinical outcome in KRAS wild-type compared with KRAS mutated mCRC.

Significance of postoperative follow-up of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer using circulating tumor DNA

BACKGROUND One of the most notable applications for circulating tumor DNA(ctDNA)detection in peripheral blood of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC)is a long-term postoperative follow-up.Sometimes referred to as a“liquid(re)biopsy”it is a minimally invasive procedure and can be performed repeatedly at relatively short intervals(months or even weeks).The presence of the disease and the actual extent of the tumor burden(tumor mass)within the patient’s body can be monitored.This is of particular importance,especially when evaluating radicality of surgical treatment as well as for early detection of disease progression or recurrence.AIM To confirm the radicality of surgery using ctDNA and compare available methods for detection of recurrence in metastatic colorectal cancer.METHODSA total of 47 patients with detected ctDNA and indications for resection of mCRC were enrolled in the multicenter study involving three surgical centers.Standard postoperative follow-ups using imaging techniques and the determination of tumor markers were supplemented by ctDNA sampling.In addition to the baseline ctDNA testing prior to surgery,a postoperative observation was conducted by evaluating ctDNA presence up to a week after surgery and subsequently at approximately three-month intervals.The presence of ctDNA was correlated with radicality of surgical treatment and the actual clinical status of the patient.RESULTS Among the monitored patients,the R0(curative)resection correlated with postoperative ctDNA negativity in 26 out of 28 cases of surgical procedures(26/28,93%).In the remaining cases of R0 surgeries that displayed ctDNA,both patients were diagnosed with a recurrence of the disease after 6 months.In 7 patients who underwent an R1 resection,4 ctDNA positivities(4/7,57%)were detected after surgery and associated with the confirmation of early disease recurrence(after 3 to 7 months).All 15 patients(15/15,100%)undergoing R2 resection remained constantly ctDNA positive during the entire follow-up period.In 22 cases of recurrence,ctDNA positivity was detected 22 times(22/22,100%)compared to 16 positives(16/22,73%)by imaging methods and 15 cases(15/22,68%)of elevated tumor markers.CONCLUSION ctDNA detection in patients with mCRC is a viable tool for early detection of disease recurrence as well as for confirmation of the radicality of surgical treatment.

Capecitabine Maintenance Therapy after First-Line Chemotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of capecitabine maintenance therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC) patients.Methods:From June 2001 to November 2006,after they had achieved clinical response from first-line chemotherapy,patients with mCRC in our hospital received two different treatment strategies.Thirty-three patients in maintenance group were treated with capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 po bid d1-14,q21d.Fifty-two patients in non-maintenance group did not receive any further chemotherapy.Results:Patients in maintenance group and non-maintenance group both received FOLFOX,FOLFIRI and XELOX as first-line therapy.The median chemotherapy cycles the two groups received were the same(6 vs 6).The response rates of first-line chemotherapy were 33.3% in maintenance group and 32.7% in non-maintenance group.Patients in maintenance group received 3-9 cycles of capecitabine therapy(median cycle 4).29/33(87.9%) patients in maintenance group and 47/52(90.4%) in non-maintenance group received following second-line chemotherapy,and no patients underwent targeted therapy.The median survival time and TTP were 40.4 months(95%CI:24.2-56.6) and 9.0 months(95%CI:6.7-11.3) in maintenance group,as compared with 21.5 months(95%CI:14.9-28.0,P=0.015) and 6.5 months(95%CI:4.4-8.5,P=0.007) in non-maintenance group.No severe adverse event was observed in the capecitabine maintenance group.Conclusion:mCRC patients could benefit from capecitabine maintenance therapy by prolonging survival time and TTP.

Study protocol of the Asian XELIRI ProjecT(AXEPT):a multinational,randomized,non-inferiority,phase Ⅲ trial of second-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer, comparing the eicacy and safety of XELIRI with or without bevacizumab versus FOLFIRI w

Background: Capecitabine and irinotecan combination therapy(XELIRI) has been examined at various dose levels to treat metastatic colorectal cancer(m CRC). Recently, in the Association of Medical Oncology of the German Cancer Society(AIO) 0604 trial, tri?weekly XELIRI plus bevacizumab, with reduced doses of irinotecan(200 mg/m^2 on day 1) and capecitabine(1600 mg/m^2 on days 1–14), repeated every 3 weeks, has shown favorable tolerability and eicacy which were comparable to those of capecitabine and oxaliplatin(XELOX) plus bevacizumab. The doses of capecit?abine and irinotecan in the AIO trial are considered optimal. In a phase I/II study, XELIRI plus bevacizumab(BIX) as second?line chemotherapy was well tolerated and had promising eicacy in Japanese patients.Methods: The Asian XELIRI Projec T(AXEPT) is an East Asian collaborative, open?labelled, randomized, phase Ⅲ clinical trial which was designed to demonstrate the non?inferiority of XELIRI with or without bevacizumab versus standard FOLFIRI(5?fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan combination) with or without bevacizumab as second?line chemo?therapy for patients with m CRC. Patients with 20 years of age or older, histologically conirmed m CRC, Eastern Coop?erative Oncology Group performance status 0–2, adequate organ function, and disease progression or intolerance of the irst?line regimen will be eligible. Patients will be randomized(1:1) to receive standard FOLFIRI with or with?out bevacizumab(5 mg/kg on day 1), repeated every 2 weeks(FOLIRI arm) or XELIRI with or without bevacizumab(7.5 mg/kg on day 1), repeated every 3 weeks(XELIRI arm). A total of 464 events were estimated as necessary to show non?inferiority with a power of 80% at a one?sided α of 0.025, requiring a target sample size of 600 patients. The 95% conidence interval(CI) upper limit of the hazard ratio was pre?speciied as less than 1.3.Conclusion: The Asian XELIRI Projec T is a multinational phase III trial being conducted to provide evidence for XELIRI with or without bevacizumab as a second?line treatment option of mCRC.

Efficacy and safety of chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab in Chinese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer:A prospective,multicenter,observational,non-interventional phaseⅣtrial

Objective:Bevacizumab has an important and evolving role in improving outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC)worldwide and was approved in China in 2010.However,there are limited real-world data on the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy regimens combined with bevacizumab in Chinese patients with mCRC.This observational,phase IV trial study aimed to obtain more experience on the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy in Chinese mCRC patients.Methods:Between September 2013 and November 2016,patients with histologically confirmed mCRC were enrolled in a prospective,multicenter,observational,non-interventional phase IV trial at 26 centers across China.Eligible patients received different chemotherapeutic regimens combined with bevacizumab.The efficacy and safety data in the intention-to-treat study population were analyzed.Results:A total of 611 patients were included in the efficacy analysis.The median overall survival and median progression-free survival was 18.00 and 10.05 months,respectively.The objective response rate was 21.00%and disease control rate was 89.40%.In subgroup analyses,the survival differences were observed according to metastatic status,duration of treatment and elevation in blood pressure.A total of 613 patients were evaluable for safety assessments.And 569(92.82%)patients reported at least one adverse event(AE),and 151(24.63%)experienced grade 3 or higher AEs.The incidence of bevacizumab-associated AEs of special interest was reported in 31(5.06%)patients with hypertension(n=12),abscesses and fistulae(n=7),bleeding(n=6),proteinuria(n=3),gastrointestinal perforation(n=2)and venous thrombotic events(n=1).Conclusions:This observational phase IV trial broadens our experience and knowledge of bevacizumab in the Chinese population and provides a good indication of its overall efficacy and safety.Bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy offers clinical benefits to Chinese patients with mCRC and has an acceptable and manageable safety profile.

EGFR gene copy number as a predictive biomarker for resistance to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies in metastatic colorectal cancer treatment:a meta-analysis

Objective：The epidermal growth factor receptor （EGFR） inhibitors monoclonal antibodies （MoAbs） have already shown the therapeutic effectiveness in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer （mCRC）.But many patients resist to the treatment.The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess EGFR gene copy number （GCN） as a candidate predictive biomarker for resistance to anti-EGFR MoAbs in mCRC treatment.Methods：Systematic computerized searches of the PubMed,EMBase and Cochrane Library were performed.The primary endpoint was objective response rate （ORR）.The second endpoints included progression-free survival （PFS）,and overall survival （OS）.The pooled odd ratio （OR） and pooled sensitivity,specificity,and summary receiver operator characteristic （SROC） for ORR were estimated.The pooled hazard ratios （HR） for PFS and OS were also calculated.Results：Fourteen studies with 1,021 patients were included.Increased EGFR GCN was associated with increased ORR （OR=6.905; 95％ CI：4.489-10.620）.It was also found in wild-type KRAS mCRC patients,with the pooled OR of 8.133 （95 ％ CI：4.316-15.326）.GCN has medium value for predicting ORR,with the pooled sensitivity of 0.79 （95％ CI：0.73-0.84）,the pooled specificity of 0.59 （95％ CI：0.55-0.62）.In wildtype KRAS mCRC patients,the sensitivity and the specificity were 0.80 （95％ CI：0.70-0.87） and 0.60 （95％CI：0.53-0.66）,respectively.Increased EGFR GCN was associated with increased PFS （HR=0.557; 95％ CI：0.382-0.732） and OS （HR=0.579; 95％ CI：0.422-0.737）.Conclusions：This meta-analysis suggests that EGFR GCN represents a predictive biomarker for tumor response in mCRC patients treated with MoAbs regardless of KRAS mutation.mCRC patients with increased EGFR GCN are more likely to have a better response,PFS,and OS when treated with cetuximab or panitumumab.

New drugs for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer(CRC)represents one of the most frequent malignancies in terms of incidence and mortality,thus representing the third leading cause of cancer death worldwide.In the last decade,few drugs have enriched the treatment landscape of metastatic CRC and have significantly affected prognosis.Unlike other neoplasms,metastatic CRC patients who have exhausted treatment options often still maintain a good performance status.There are many challenges to increasing potential treatment options,notably a better understanding of disease biology and the mechanisms of resistance underlying cancer treatment failure.The development of new drugs for metastatic CRC certainly represents one of the most important challenges in medical oncology.This article discusses the main limitations in the development of new drugs and potential future scenarios.In particular,we addressed three questions:(1)The main limitations of targeted therapy in the treatment of metastatic CRC(mCRC);(2)New target armamentarium that could escape primary and secondary resistance and lead to more personalized mCRC therapy;and(3)Future directions.

Clinical laboratory and imaging evidence for effectiveness of agarose-agarose macrobeads containing stem-like cells derived from a mouse renal adenocarcinoma cell population (RMBs) in treatment-resistant, advanced metastatic colorectal cancer:Evaluation of

Objective： The complexity, heterogeneity and capacity of malignant neoplastic cells and tumors for rapid change and evolution suggest that living-cell-based biological-systems approaches to cancer treatment are merited. Testing this hypothesis, the tumor marker, metabolic activity, and overall survival（OS） responses, to the use of one such system, implantable macrobeads [RENCA macrobeads（RMBs）], in phase I and IIa clinical trials in advanced,treatment-resistant metastatic colorectal cancer（m CRC） are described here.Methods： Forty-eight m CRC patients（30 females; 18 males）, who had failed all available, approved treatments,underwent RMB implantation（8 RMB/kg body weight） up to 4 times in phase I and phase IIa open-label trials.Physicals, labs [tumor and inflammation markers, lactate dehydrogenase（LDH）] and positron emission tomography-computed tomography（PET-CT） imaging to measure number/volume and metabolic activity of the tumors were performed pre-and 3-month-post-implantation to evaluate safety and initial efficacy（as defined by biological responses）. PET-CT maximum standard uptake value（SUVmax）（baseline and d 90; SUVmax ≥2.5）, LDH,and carcinoembryonic antigen（CEA） and/or cancer antigen 19-9（CA 19-9） response（baseline, d 30 and/or d 60）were assessed and compared to OS.Results： Responses after implantation were characterized by an at least 20% decrease in CEA and/or CA 19-9 in75% of patients. Fluorodeoxyglucose（FDG）-positive lesions（phase I, 39; 2 a, 82） were detected in 37/48 evaluable patients, with 35% stable volume and stable or decreased SUV（10） plus four with necrosis; 10, increased tumor volume, SUV. LDH levels remained stable and low in Responders（R）（d 0–60, 290.4–333.9）, but increased steadily in Non-responders（NR）（d 0–60, 382.8–1,278.5）（d 60, P=0.050）. Responders to RMBs, indicated by the changes in the above markers, correlated with OS（R mean OS=10.76 months; NR mean OS=4.9 months; P=0.0006）.Conclusions： The correlations of the tumor marker, tumor volume and SUV changes on PET-CT, and LDH levels themselves, and with OS, support the concept of a biological response to RMB implantation and the validity of the biological-systems approach to m CRC. A phase III clinical trial is planned.

Temporal Change in Treatment Patterns of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer and Its Association with Patient Survival:A Retrospective Cohort Study Based on an Intelligent Big-Data Platform

There is a lack of high-quality,large-scale,real-world evidence from patients with metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC),especially in China.It remains unclear whether efforts to improve the quality of care for mCRC would improve patient survival outcomes in real-world practice.On the basis of an intelligent bigdata platform,we established a large-scale retrospective cohort of mCRC patients.We investigated the temporal changes in the systemic and local treatment(resection,ablation,or radiation to liver,lung,or extrahepatic and/or extrapulmonary metastases)patterns of mCRC,and whether these changes were associated with improved overall survival(OS)over time.Between July 2012 and December 2018,3403 eligible patients were included in this research.The median OS was 42.8 months(95%confidence interval(CI),40.7–46.6)for the entire cohort,25.6 months(95%CI,24.7–26.9)for those treated with systemic therapy only,and not reached(95%CI,78.6 months–not reached)for those receiving local therapy.The utility rate of local therapy increased continuously from 37.9%in 2012–2014 to 46.9%in 2017–2018.A dramatic increase in the utility rate of either cetuximab or bevacizumab was observed since 2017(39.9%,43.2%,and 60.3%in 2012–2014,2015–2016,and 2017–2018,respectively).Compared with 2012–2014,the OS of the entire population significantly improved in 2015–2016(hazard ratio(HR)=0.87(95%CI,0.78–0.99);P=0.034),but not for patients receiving systemic therapy only(HR=0.99(95%CI,0.86–1.14);P=0.889),whereas an improved OS was found in 2015–2018 for both the entire population(HR=0.75(95%CI,0.70–0.81);P<0.001)and for patients receiving systemic therapy only(HR=0.83(95%CI,0.77–0.91);P<0.001).In summary,the quality of care for mCRC,as indicated by the utility rate of targeted and local therapies,has been continuously improving over time in this study cohort,which is associated with continuously improving survival outcomes for these patients.

Management of skin toxicities during panitumumab treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy is associated with skin adverse events not previously reported with conventional chemotherapy. Prophylactic actions are recommended, but routine clinical management of these toxicities and their impact on quality of life remain unknown. AIM To assess the dermatological toxicities reported after panitumumab initiation, their impact on the quality of life and the clinical practices for their management. METHODS Patients included in this prospective multicenter observational study were over 18 years of age and began treatment with panitumumab for wild-type KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer. The incidence of dermatological toxicities, clinical practices for their management and impact on quality of life were recorded during a 6-mo follow-up. RESULTS Overall, 229 patients (males, 57.6%;mean age, 66.2 years) were included. At day 15, 59.3% of patients had dermatological toxicity;the rate peaked at month 2 (74.7%) and decreased at month 6 (46.5%). The most frequent dermatological toxicities were rash/acneiform rash, xerosis and skin cracks. At least one preventive treatment was administered to 65.9% of patients (oral antibiotics, 84.1%;emollients, 75.5%;both, 62.9%). The rates of patients who received at least one curative treatment peaked at month 2 (63.4%) and decreased at month 6 (44.8%). The impact of the dermatological toxicities on quality of life was limited as assessed with Dermatology Life Quality Index scores and inconvenience visual analogic scale score. The rates of topical corticosteroids administration and visits to specialists were low. CONCLUSION The rates of the different skin toxicities peaked at various times and were improved at the end of follow-up. Nevertheless, their clinical management could be optimized with a better adherence to current recommendations. The impact of skin toxicities on patient’s quality of life appeared to be limited.

Contemporary treatment approaches for metastatic colorectal cancer driven by BRAF V600 mutations

The treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC)harboring BRAF V600 mutations is challenging.These tumors are often refractory to standard treatment.Therefore,the patients may exhibit rapid clinical deterioration,depriving them of the chance to receive salvage therapy.In newly diagnosed patients with good performance status,the administration of an intensive chemotherapy regimen like FOLFOXIRI(5-fluorouracil,leucovorin,oxaliplatin,and irinotecan)along with the antiangiogenic agent bevacizumab can modify this aggressive behavior of the disease and improve patient clinical outcomes.The recently published results of the BEACON(Binimetinib,Encorafenib,and Cetuximab Combined to Treat BRAF-Mutant Colorectal Cancer)study demonstrated that a combination therapy consisting of BRAF,epidermal growth factor receptor,and mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase inhibitors could be a useful second-or third-line alternative.This review summarizes the current treatment strategies for BRAF-mutant mCRC.

Effects of the number of neoadjuvant therapy cycles on clinical outcomes, safety, and survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer undergoing metastasectomy

The controversial outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC)highlight the need for developing effective systemic neoadjuvant treatment strategies to improve clinical results.The optimal treatment cycles in patients with mCRC for metastasectomy remain undefined.This retrospective study compared the efficacy,safety,and survival of cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy/targeted therapy for such patients.Sixty-four patients with mCRC who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy/targeted therapy following metastasectomy were enrolled between January 2018 and April 2022.Twenty-eight patients received 6 cycles of chemotherapy/targeted therapy,whereas 36 patients received≥7 cycles(median,13;range,7–20).Clinical outcomes,including response,progression-free survival(PFS),overall survival(OS),and adverse events,were compared between these two groups.Of the 64 patients,47(73.4%)were included in the response group,and 17(26.6%)were included in the nonresponse group.The analysis revealed chemotherapy/targeted therapy cycle and pretreatment serum carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA)level as independent predictors of the response as well as overall survival and chemotherapy/targeted therapy cycle as an independent predictor of progression(all p<0.05).Furthermore,our results revealed shorter operation time,lower estimated operative blood loss,higher response rate,lower progression rate,and higher survival rate in≥7 cycles of chemotherapy/targeted therapy group(all p<0.05),but no statistical differences in adverse events were observed between the two groups(all p>0.05).The median OS and PFS were 48 months(95%CI,40.855–55.145)and 28 months(95%CI,18.952–37.48)in the≥7-cycle group and 24 months(95%CI,22.038–25.962)and 13 months(95%CI,11.674–14.326)in the 6-cycle group,respectively(both p<0.001).The oncological outcomes in the≥7-cycle group were significantly better than those in the 6-cycle group,without significant increases in adverse events.However,prospective randomized trials are mandatory to confirm the potential advantages of cycle numbers of neoadjuvant chemotherapy/targeted therapy.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer to the liver: from chemotherapy to targeting therapy

Despite the advances in surgical techniques, adjuvant chemotherapy and targeted therapy, approximately 40%-70% of patients with progressive colorectal cancer will develop liver metastases, of whom one-third are found at the time of diagnosis.[1] Surgical resection is now the standard treatment and also the only potentially curative treatment for resectable lesions.

Prognostic role of sarcopenia in metastatic colorectal cancer patients during first-line chemotherapy:A retrospective study

BACKGROUND Sarcopenia is a condition characterized by decreased skeletal muscle mass due to physiological ageing or to a concomitant disease such as neoplasia.In cancer patients,a low lean body mass is suggested to be a negative prognostic factor for survival and for the development of dose-limiting chemotherapy toxicities irrespective of disease stage.AIM To evaluate the prognostic role of sarcopenia in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC)undergoing first-line chemotherapy.METHODS Our retrospective analysis included 56 mCRC patients who received first-line chemotherapy from 2014 to 2017 at the Medical Oncology Unit of our hospital.Computerized scans were performed before starting chemotherapy and at the first disease reassessment.Sarcopenia was assessed using the skeletal mass index=muscle area in cm^(2)/(height in m^(2))calculated at the L3 vertebra.Overall survival and objective response rate were evaluated.Toxicities were analyzed during the first four cycles of therapy and graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0.A loss of skeletal muscle mass≥5%was considered indicative of deterioration in muscle condition.RESULTS Median age was 67 years and 35.7%of patients were≥70 years old.Fourteen patients(25%)were sarcopenic at baseline computed tomography(CT)scan(7/33 men;7/23 women);5/14 sarcopenic patients were≥70 years old.Median followup was 26.8 mo(3.8-66.8 mo)and median overall survival was 27.2 mo(95%CI:23.3-37.3).Sarcopenia was not correlated to overall survival(P=0.362),to higher toxicities reported during the first 4 cycles of chemotherapy(P=1.0)or to response to treatment(P=0.221).At the first disease reassessment,a skeletal muscle loss(SML)≥5%was found in 17 patients(30.3%)3 of whom were already sarcopenic at baseline CT scan,while 7 patients became sarcopenic.SML was not correlated to overall survival(P=0.961).No statistically significant correlation was found between baseline sarcopenia and age(P=1.0),body mass index(P=0.728),stage at diagnosis(P=0.355)or neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio(P=0.751).CONCLUSION Neither baseline sarcopenia nor SML affected survival.In addition,baseline sarcopenia was not related to worse treatment toxicity.However,these results must be interpreted with caution due to the limited sample size.

Clinical observation of rh-endostatin combined with chemotherapy as first line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer

Objective To analyze the efficacy and safety of Rh-endostatin combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.Methods All 60 metastatic colorectal cancer patients were divided into the test group(n = 30) and the control group(n = 30). The control group was treated with chemotherapy regime FOLFOX4(Oxaliplatin + Fluorouracil + Calcium Levofolinate), the test group was treated by Endostar combined with FOLFOX4 scheme.Results The response rates were 53.3% in test group and 36.7% in control group respectively(P < 0.05), the disease control rate were 83.3% and 73.3%(P < 0.05). The median progression-free survival in test group and control group were 7.3 months versus 5.3 months(P < 0.05) and median overall survival were 11.6 months versus 9.3 months(P < 0.05). Among 27 cases of liver metastases were sub group analysis, difference on the test group and the control group response rate(RR) and disease control rate(DCR) had statistical significance(P < 0.05), but difference on progression free survival(PFS) and overall survival(OS) had no statistical significance(P > 0.05). The major toxicities were myelosuppression, gastrointestinal symptoms, neurotoxicity, most in grade I-II. After chemotherapy, quality of life(QOL) of patients were more improved than before treatment. After treatment the carcino embryonie antigen(CEA) and caner antigent 199(CA199) levels decreased obviously, furthermore, the test group decreased more obviously than the control group. Conclusion Rh-endostatin combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer is safer and effective, and also improves PFS.