AIM: To compare laparoscopic vs mini-incision open appendectomy in light of recent data at our centre.METHODS: The data of patients who underwen appendectomy between January 2011 and June 2013 were collected. The data...AIM: To compare laparoscopic vs mini-incision open appendectomy in light of recent data at our centre.METHODS: The data of patients who underwen appendectomy between January 2011 and June 2013 were collected. The data included patients' demographic data, procedure time, length of hospital stay, the need for pain medicine, postoperative visual analog scale o pain, and morbidities. Pregnant women and patients with previous lower abdominal surgery were excluded Patients with surgery converted from laparoscopic appendectomy(LA) to mini-incision open appendectomy(MOA) were excluded. Patients were divided into two groups: LA and MOA done by the same surgeon. The patients were randomized into MOA and LA groups a computer-generated number. The diagnosis of acute appendicitis was made by the surgeon with physica examination, laboratory values, and radiological tests(abdominal ultrasound or computed tomography). Al operations were performed with general anaesthesia The postoperative vision analog scale score was recorded at postoperative hours 1, 6, 12, and 24. Patients were discharged when they tolerated normal food and passed gas and were followed up every week for three weeks as outpatients.RESULTS: Of the 243 patients, 121(49.9%) underwen MOA, while 122(50.1%) had laparoscopic appendectomy There were no significant differences in operation time between the two groups(P = 0.844), whereas the visua analog scale of pain was significantly higher in the open appendectomy group at the 1st hour(P = 0.001), 6th hour(P = 0.001), and 12 th hour(P = 0.027). The need for analgesic medication was significantly higher in the MOA group(P = 0.001). There were no differences between the two groups in terms of morbidity rate(P = 0.599)The rate of total complications was similar between the two groups(6.5% in LA vs 7.4% in OA, P = 0.599). Al wound infections were treated non-surgically. Six ou of seven patients with pelvic abscess were successfully treated with percutaneous drainage; one patient requiredsurgical drainage after a failed percutaneous drainage. There were no differences in the period of hospital stay, operation time, and postoperative complication rate between the two groups. Laparoscopic appendectomy decreases the need for analgesic medications and the visual analog scale of pain.CONCLUSION: The laparoscopic appendectomy should be considered as a standard treatment for acute appendicitis. Mini-incision appendectomy is an alternative for a select group of patients.展开更多
Objective To investigate the clinical effects of surgical treatment of lower lumbar fracture with mini-incision via retroperitoneal anterior approach. Methods The data of 21 cases with serious lower lumbar burst fract...Objective To investigate the clinical effects of surgical treatment of lower lumbar fracture with mini-incision via retroperitoneal anterior approach. Methods The data of 21 cases with serious lower lumbar burst fracture were analyzed retrospectively.展开更多
Stepwise mini-incision microdissection testicular sperm extraction(mTESE)is a procedure that attempts to minimize testicular damage.However,the mini-incision approach may vary in patients with different etiologies.Her...Stepwise mini-incision microdissection testicular sperm extraction(mTESE)is a procedure that attempts to minimize testicular damage.However,the mini-incision approach may vary in patients with different etiologies.Here,we performed a retrospective analysis of 665 men with nonobstructive azoospermia(NOA)who underwent stepwise mini-incision mTESE(Group 1)and 365 men who underwent standard mTESE(Group 2).The results showed that the operation time(mean±standard deviation)for patients with successful sperm retrieval in Group1(64.0±26.6min)was significantly shorter than that in Group2(80.2±31.3min),with P<0.001.The total sperm retrieval rate(SRR)was 23.1%in our study,and there was no significant difference between Group 1 and Group 2(P>0.05),even when the etiologies of NOA were taken into consideration.The results of consecutive multivariate logistic regression analysis(odds ratio[0R]:0.57;95%confidence interval[Cl]:0.38-0.87;P=0.009)and receiver operating characteristic(ROC)analysis(area under the ROC curve[AUC]=O.628)showed that preoperative anti-Mullerian hormone(AMH)level in idiopathic NOA patients was a potential predictor for surgical outcomes after initial three small incisions made in the equatorial region without sperm examined under an operating microscope(Steps 2-4).In conclusion,stepwise mini-incision mTESE is a useful technique for NOA patients,with comparable SRR,less surgical invasiveness,and shorter operation time compared with the standard approach.Low AMH levels may predict successful sperm retrieval in idiopathic patients even after a failed initial mini-incision procedure.展开更多
文摘AIM: To compare laparoscopic vs mini-incision open appendectomy in light of recent data at our centre.METHODS: The data of patients who underwen appendectomy between January 2011 and June 2013 were collected. The data included patients' demographic data, procedure time, length of hospital stay, the need for pain medicine, postoperative visual analog scale o pain, and morbidities. Pregnant women and patients with previous lower abdominal surgery were excluded Patients with surgery converted from laparoscopic appendectomy(LA) to mini-incision open appendectomy(MOA) were excluded. Patients were divided into two groups: LA and MOA done by the same surgeon. The patients were randomized into MOA and LA groups a computer-generated number. The diagnosis of acute appendicitis was made by the surgeon with physica examination, laboratory values, and radiological tests(abdominal ultrasound or computed tomography). Al operations were performed with general anaesthesia The postoperative vision analog scale score was recorded at postoperative hours 1, 6, 12, and 24. Patients were discharged when they tolerated normal food and passed gas and were followed up every week for three weeks as outpatients.RESULTS: Of the 243 patients, 121(49.9%) underwen MOA, while 122(50.1%) had laparoscopic appendectomy There were no significant differences in operation time between the two groups(P = 0.844), whereas the visua analog scale of pain was significantly higher in the open appendectomy group at the 1st hour(P = 0.001), 6th hour(P = 0.001), and 12 th hour(P = 0.027). The need for analgesic medication was significantly higher in the MOA group(P = 0.001). There were no differences between the two groups in terms of morbidity rate(P = 0.599)The rate of total complications was similar between the two groups(6.5% in LA vs 7.4% in OA, P = 0.599). Al wound infections were treated non-surgically. Six ou of seven patients with pelvic abscess were successfully treated with percutaneous drainage; one patient requiredsurgical drainage after a failed percutaneous drainage. There were no differences in the period of hospital stay, operation time, and postoperative complication rate between the two groups. Laparoscopic appendectomy decreases the need for analgesic medications and the visual analog scale of pain.CONCLUSION: The laparoscopic appendectomy should be considered as a standard treatment for acute appendicitis. Mini-incision appendectomy is an alternative for a select group of patients.
文摘Objective To investigate the clinical effects of surgical treatment of lower lumbar fracture with mini-incision via retroperitoneal anterior approach. Methods The data of 21 cases with serious lower lumbar burst fracture were analyzed retrospectively.
基金supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.82171590,82171597,and 82001530)Clinical Research Innovation Plan of Shanghai General Hospital(KD007-ly01,and CTCCR-C04)。
文摘Stepwise mini-incision microdissection testicular sperm extraction(mTESE)is a procedure that attempts to minimize testicular damage.However,the mini-incision approach may vary in patients with different etiologies.Here,we performed a retrospective analysis of 665 men with nonobstructive azoospermia(NOA)who underwent stepwise mini-incision mTESE(Group 1)and 365 men who underwent standard mTESE(Group 2).The results showed that the operation time(mean±standard deviation)for patients with successful sperm retrieval in Group1(64.0±26.6min)was significantly shorter than that in Group2(80.2±31.3min),with P<0.001.The total sperm retrieval rate(SRR)was 23.1%in our study,and there was no significant difference between Group 1 and Group 2(P>0.05),even when the etiologies of NOA were taken into consideration.The results of consecutive multivariate logistic regression analysis(odds ratio[0R]:0.57;95%confidence interval[Cl]:0.38-0.87;P=0.009)and receiver operating characteristic(ROC)analysis(area under the ROC curve[AUC]=O.628)showed that preoperative anti-Mullerian hormone(AMH)level in idiopathic NOA patients was a potential predictor for surgical outcomes after initial three small incisions made in the equatorial region without sperm examined under an operating microscope(Steps 2-4).In conclusion,stepwise mini-incision mTESE is a useful technique for NOA patients,with comparable SRR,less surgical invasiveness,and shorter operation time compared with the standard approach.Low AMH levels may predict successful sperm retrieval in idiopathic patients even after a failed initial mini-incision procedure.