The energy minimization multi-scale(EMMS)is a heterogeneous drag model widely used to simulate gas-solid fluidized beds.In this work,we conducted computational fluid dynamics simulations of a gas-solid fluidized bed f...The energy minimization multi-scale(EMMS)is a heterogeneous drag model widely used to simulate gas-solid fluidized beds.In this work,we conducted computational fluid dynamics simulations of a gas-solid fluidized bed for Geldart B particles to compare the EMMS with the homogeneous Gidaspow drag model.The results from both the homogeneous and heterogeneous drag models were compared with literature experimental data on pressure drop and bed expansion.There was no noticeable difference in predicted bed characteristics in the slugging regime.However,in the turbulent regime,the EMMS model predicted slightly lower bed expansion than did the Gidaspow model.We evaluated the effects of solid-solid and solid-wall interaction parameters by varying the restitution and specularity coefficients.Bed expansion increases by a factor of 1.05-1.08 when the restitution coefficient increases from 0.9 to 0.99.The models predict a higher solid volume fraction and higher solid downflow velocity near the wall for a low specularity coefficient of 0.01 or 0.When we considered solid phases of different sizes to model polydisperity,the simulation predicted vertical segregation of 300,350,and 400μm in the fluidized region due to gravity.Furthermore,the drag models made similar predictions in bad characteristics from cold model simulation ofa polysilicon fluidized-bed reactor,although there was very little vertical segregation of solid particles for this case.展开更多
基金This research was supported by Korea Electric Power Corpora-tion(Grant number:R18XA06-14)supported by the Human Resources Development(No.20184030202070)of the Korea Insti-tute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning(KETEP)grant funded by the Korea government Ministry of Trade,Industry and Energy.
文摘The energy minimization multi-scale(EMMS)is a heterogeneous drag model widely used to simulate gas-solid fluidized beds.In this work,we conducted computational fluid dynamics simulations of a gas-solid fluidized bed for Geldart B particles to compare the EMMS with the homogeneous Gidaspow drag model.The results from both the homogeneous and heterogeneous drag models were compared with literature experimental data on pressure drop and bed expansion.There was no noticeable difference in predicted bed characteristics in the slugging regime.However,in the turbulent regime,the EMMS model predicted slightly lower bed expansion than did the Gidaspow model.We evaluated the effects of solid-solid and solid-wall interaction parameters by varying the restitution and specularity coefficients.Bed expansion increases by a factor of 1.05-1.08 when the restitution coefficient increases from 0.9 to 0.99.The models predict a higher solid volume fraction and higher solid downflow velocity near the wall for a low specularity coefficient of 0.01 or 0.When we considered solid phases of different sizes to model polydisperity,the simulation predicted vertical segregation of 300,350,and 400μm in the fluidized region due to gravity.Furthermore,the drag models made similar predictions in bad characteristics from cold model simulation ofa polysilicon fluidized-bed reactor,although there was very little vertical segregation of solid particles for this case.
