Short-term effect and long-term prognosis of neuroendoscopic minimally invasive surgery for hypertensive int-racerebral hemorrhage

BACKGROUND Hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage is a common critical disease of the nervous system,comprising one fifth of all acute cerebrovascular diseases and has a high disability and mortality rate.It severely affects the patients’quality of life.AIM To analyze the short-term effect and long-term prognosis of neuroendoscopic minimally invasive surgery for hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage.METHODS From March 2018 to May 2020,118 patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage were enrolled in our study and divided into a control group and observation group according to the surgical plan.The control group used a hard-channel minimally invasive puncture and drainage procedure.The observation group underwent minimally invasive neuroendoscopic surgery.The changes in the levels of serum P substances(SP),inflammatory factors[tumor necrosis factor-α,interleukin-6(IL-6),IL-10],and the National Hospital Stroke Scale(NIHSS)and Barthel index scores were recorded.Surgery related indicators and prognosis were compared between the two groups.RESULTS The operation time(105.26±28.35)of the observation group was min longer than that of the control group,and the volume of intraoperative bleeding was 45.36±10.17 mL more than that of the control group.The hematoma clearance rates were 88.58%±4.69%and 94.47%±4.02%higher than those of the control group at 48 h and 72 h,respectively.Good prognosis rate(86.44%)was higher in the observation group than in the control group,and complication rate(5.08%)was not significantly different from that of the control group(P>0.05).The SP level and Barthel index score of the two groups increased(P<0.05)and the inflam-matory factors and NIHSS score decreased(P<0.05).The cytokine levels,NIHSS score,and Barthel index score were better in the observation group than in the control group(P<0.05).CONCLUSION Neuroendoscopic minimally invasive surgery is more complicated than hard channel minimally invasive puncture drainage in the treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage;however,hematoma clearance is more thorough,and the short-term effect and long-term prognosis are better than hard channel minimally invasive puncture drainage.

Quality of life after surgical and endoscopic management of severe acute pancreatitis: A systematic review

BACKGROUND Treatment for severe acute severe pancreatitis(SAP)can significantly affect Health-related quality of life(HR-QoL).The effects of different treatment strategies such as endoscopic and surgical necrosectomy on HR-QoL in patients with SAP remain poorly investigated.AIM To critically appraise the available evidence on HR-QoL following surgical or endoscopic necrosectomy in patient with SAP.METHODS A literature search was performed on PubMed,Google^(TM) Scholar,the Cochrane Library,MEDLINE and Reference Citation Analysis databases for studies that investigated HR-QoL following surgical or endoscopic necrosectomy in patients with SAP.Data collected included patient characteristics,outcomes of interventions and HR-QoL-related details.RESULTS Eleven studies were found to have evaluated HR-QoL following treatment for severe acute pancreatitis including 756 patients.Three studies were randomized trials,four were prospective cohort studies and four were retrospective cohort studies with prospective follow-up.Four studies compared HR-QoL following surgical and endoscopic necrosectomy.Several metrics of HR-QoL were used including Short Form(SF)-36 and EuroQol.One randomized trial and one cohort study demonstrated significantly improved physical scores at three months in patients who underwent endoscopic necrosectomy compared to surgical necrosectomy.One prospective study that examined HR-QoL following surgical necrosectomy reported some deterioration in the functional status of the patients.On the other hand,a cohort study that assessed the long-term HR-QoL following sequential surgical necrosectomy stated that all patients had SF-36>60%.In the only study that examined patients following endoscopic necrosectomy,the HR-QoL was also very good.Three studies investigated the quality adjusted life years suggesting that endoscopic and surgical approaches to management of pancreatic necrosis were comparable in cost effectiveness.Finally,regarding HR-QoL between open necrosectomy and minimally invasive approaches,patients who underwent the later had a significantly better overall quality of life,vitality and mental health.CONCLUSION This review would suggest that the endoscopic approach might offer better HR-QoL compared to surgical necrosectomy.However,the available comparative literature was very limited.More randomized trials powered to detect differences in HR-QoL are required.