Towards a New Model of Teacher Training in Europe

The current situation of European educational systems leads to the lack of historical precedents,considering that it implies the end of educational systems based on exclusion,configuring a new conception of educational systems that we are still not able to appreciate at their true value,because we were educated by and in the previous educational system.Lacking other references,we inevitably tend to compare current problems with previous situations,without understanding that the generalization of education to 100%of the population implies a qualitative change that modifies the objectives,forms of work,and the very essence of the educational system.This stage change,marked by the acceleration of social changes,including the pandemic situation,explains why,despite the best educational system so far,teachers with the best levels of training and a financial and material endowment unimaginable until recently,try a sense of crisis and a general feeling of confusion is manifested among the teachers and parents of the children,seeing that education is no longer what it used to be(Esteve,1998).The key to defuse this apparent paradox is in the tendency to judge the new education system by the mentality and standards of the former selective education,in which most of the adults present were educated.Thus,although we continue to apply to the new general education situation the parameters of the previous situation,in which the selective system excluded every year the students who had behavior problems in the class or had difficulties regarding the mastery of certain educational subjects(Esteve,1998).In this way,we are currently criticizing the school failure of a percentage of our students,without realizing that their schooling itself is a success,because,although their level is low,they had no level before.One speaks of a low educational level,when,in reality,the educational level is increasing—the general level of the people and the individual level of the best students(Baudelot&Establet,1990).Indeed,it is true that in our education systems there are students with a very low educational level,although even so,it is a success that they have some education because they used to be on the streets;and,in any case,the current education system produces a higher percentage of students with higher levels than the best students of the 90s.The main element of change,the most substantial transformation,is the elimination of exclusion,today having access to secondary education,alongside students with an excellent level.Thousands of children who were previously expelled from it,thus comply with the European measures of access to education for all children and young people.The previous educational system can be compared to a hospital from which the sickest were kicked out,and those who created behavioral problems were eliminated through the selective mechanisms of the system.However,teaching today is qualitatively different from what it was 20-30 years ago.First of all,because working with a homogeneous group of children as a result of the selection or dealing with all the children in a country,with social and personal problems,is not the same thing.That is why many general education teachers are social workers rather than teachers;and the new configuration of our educational systems requires secondary teachers to assume diverse educational roles rather than the traditional one of intellectual training.History cannot go backwards;to have better quality educational systems,the solution is not to return to the exclusionary system.Society asks teachers to make an effort to integrate;but,during this time,our society must support and revalue the activity of teachers in order not to put them in front of impossible tasks.The transition from a selective to a general education was based on the increase/amplification of compulsory schooling.For the first time in history,European educational systems have assumed the role of declaring secondary education compulsory.This decision implies a new stage,a definitive break from the previous reality in which secondary education was reserved for those who later attend a university.

An Analysis of Teacher's Professional Development of Higher Vocational Education

Teachers are the backbones of any educational institutions. They not only play vital roles in students' development;they also directly affect the stature of their respective scholastic organizations. Highly qualified instructors produce competent and well-rounded students— learners who are more than ready to face the quirks and challenges of the labor force. This paper primarily discusses the following questions: What is teacher's professional development? What is higher vocational teacher's professional development? And how can scholastic institutions promote it? The conclusion states that the characteristics of higher vocational education directly influence the higher vocational teacher's professional development; therefore, it must be nurtured and promoted for the development of all the stakeholders of learning institutions – students, teachers, management staff,the learning institution itself, and the nation as a whole.

Three Models of English Education in China＇s Universities ——-A Historical Perspective

In the present paper, a comparison is made of the three formats in the history of EECU （English education in China＇s universities）. In the first period （1904-1949）, English education was conducted separately in government-managed educational institutions and in institutions sponsored by church-related organizations; English education was well-knit with both general education and specialty education; and self-motivating learning was encouraged. In the second period （1950-1966）, almost everything was tinted with a shady color of politics： A halt was addressed drastically to EEC （English education in China） in 1952. In the gradual recovery that started four years later, the second format was sawed and hammered, showing the following features： All non-government-mamaged institutions vanished from the stage; English was taught solely as a language or a system of verbal parts, almost deprived of all cultural loading. The third period （1978 onwards） has witnessed a barrier-free and rapid development of over three decades, resulting in the unprecedented pervasion of EECU. Yet in the third tbrmat, learners＇ efforts have turned wholly test-oriented, degenerating into the saddening disintegrity of learning as a process into isolated charges to the target of a test at a time; the ignorant reduction of the learning methods to ＂Vocabulary Booklets Plus Collections of Test Papers＂. Such a comparison not only provides a multi-dimensional perspective of EECU and a better understanding of it, but also offers some important experiences and lessons for the search of an effective solution to the pervasive problem of＂Time-Consumingness and Low-Efficiency＂.

The Discontinuity of Kindergarten Teachers＇ Growth——Analysis Based on Bollnow＇ s Thoughts of ＂Discontinuous Education＂

The discontinuous educational thoughts of Bollnow have provided a new perspective for our exploring the growth of Kindergarten teachers and We can rethink the drawbacks of linear development and static thinking with it. Kindergarten teachers＇ growth is the unity of continuity and discontinuity. ＂Crisis＂, ＂encounter＂, ＂awaking＂ and ＂exhortation＂ all can break off the continuity of professional growth of kindergarten teachers, put kindergarten teachers＇ growth into the stage of discontinuity, promote the kindergarten teachers to make a positive self adjustment in shocks, and open up a new stage for kindergarten teachers＇ growth. In order to promote kindergarten teachers＇ active self adjustment in shock, and impel kindergarten teachers to step out oftheir＂comfort zone＂, preschool teachers should try their best to overcome the tendency of＂comfort zone＂ and strengthen the spirit of reflection. The kindergarten should create a rich and colorful cultural environment, and establish a cooperative research community for kindergarten teachers.

From Mutual Creation to Mutual Benefit:China’s National Teacher Training Program between Higher Teacher Education and K-12 Teachers

Sustainable Development Goal(SDG 4)lays solid theoretical foundation for the development of higher teacher education in improving the quality of teaching faculty nationwide.Sustainable teacher training paves a way for teacher professional development in the long run.China’s“National Teacher Training Program”serves a connection between higher teacher education and K-12 teachers in multiple perspectives when exploring K-12 teachers’improvement of the essence by upgrading the initiative of the program with the assistance of educational technology and modern educational philosophy from mutual creation to mutual benefit.Direction orientation strategic design based on demand for teaching faculty,curriculum setting in modules,and characteristics creation have been carried out to upgrade the training of teacher colleges and National Teacher Training Program in the future for achieving a win-win situation between higher teacher education and K-12 education.

Let Each Child Have a Role to Play——A teacher's experiences in human rights education

The future of a country and society belongs to children and youngsters. As a primary school teacher, I keenly feel the need to educate our children in human rights, so that they will develop in an all-round way, morally, intellectually and physically. Over the past few yeas, I have tried to incorporate education in human rights into activities in

STEAM教育:来自韩国的经验与借鉴

STEM教育于2007年引入韩国,2011年确立了其法律地位并在中小学中开展。通过分析韩国STEAM教育的实施背景、STEAM教育模型及课程类型、课程实施流程及师资培训等内容导出了对中国的启示。中国在推进STEAM教育过程中要借鉴韩国成功经验,整合政府、研究人员及教师、社会团体等力量,促进教育的可持续发展。教师要在政策研究、课程教学模式探索、评价体系的构建等方面发挥科研引领和实践示范作用。

基于U-G-S合作的地方师范类院校教师教育模式研究

高校—政府—中小学(university-government-school,U-G-S)合作是各国高度重视的教师教育模式,该模式由高校、政府和中小学结成战略合作伙伴关系,协同促进未来教师的培养。基于U-S合作的内涵分析,梳理了美国教师“专业发展学校”模式、英国“以中小学为基地的教师培训学校”模式、法国教师教育“职前职后一体化”模式、芬兰“研究本位”的教师培养模式等国外有代表性的未来教师教育模式,阐述了基于U-G-S合作的未来教师教育模式在中国的发展状况。结合应用型大学关于教师教育的探索实践,对基于U-G-S合作的地方师范类院校教师教育模式优化提出建议。

高质量的“U-G-I-S-C”教师教育模式构建研究

“U-G-I-S-C”教师教育模式能满足教师教育一体化发展、大学和中小学共同利益实现与优势发挥最大化、实现中国式现代化和教育强国建设培养卓越中小学教师的需要。为进一步提高我国教师教育质量,可从以下几方面优化“U-G-I-S-C”教师教育模式运行策略:明晰合作理念和共同利益目标,合作关系从松散走向共生;建立平等协商和高效工作机制,合作效果从单兵作战走向互惠共赢;共同发展教育作为爱的事业,从利益联合走向文化融合;增进技术赋能,促进教师培养从断裂式走向全程浸入式并基于循证的教师教育过程;完善保障机制,汇聚各方组织的巨大合力。

The Role of the Finnish Basic Education Model in Enhancing Students’Happiness and Learning Motivation

This paper examines the Finnish basic education model,renowned for its student-centric approach and high performance in international assessments.The study explores the model’s core principles,including equity,teacher autonomy,and minimal standardized testing,and their impact on student happiness and motivation.Through case studies,interviews,and surveys with students,teachers,and parents,the paper provides an in-depth analysis of the Finnish model’s effectiveness.Challenges such as adaptability to diverse cultural contexts,integration of immigrant students,and sustainability in the face of global educational trends are also discussed.The paper concludes with recommendations for the continued evolution of the Finnish model,emphasizing the need for adaptability,inclusivity,and a focus on sustainability and technology integration.

成效·局限·改革:“G-U-S”三位一体协同育师机制审思

“G-U-S”三位一体协同育师机制是指,政府、高校、中小学(含幼儿园)三方各司其职,责任共担、协同培育教师的一种制度形式与工作方式。现有的三位一体协同育师机制尽管促进了教师培育成效提高、教师教育资源整合、区域教育均衡发展及教师专业水平持续提升,但仍然存在相关决策主体单一、三元主体权责不明、培育方案不够成熟、协同培育管理不够协调等局限。为进一步提升“三位一体”协同育师机制的成效,理应构建具有一定行政职能的协同育师主体联盟,明晰“三位”主体各自的权责,完善协同育师培育方案,促进协同培育管理更加协调。

民族地区县域学前教育教师资源配置水平研究——基于PLS结构方程模型的分析

学前教师资源的合理配置是民族地区学前教育实现高质量发展的核心。本研究基于新疆M县71所幼儿园教师资源调研数据,运用Smart 3.0软件构建县域内学前教师资源配置水平PLS结构方程模型。结果发现,县域内学前教师资源配置整体水平呈现“县级园所>村级园所>乡级园所”的不平衡样貌。其中,县级园所教师数量配置水平偏低,乡级园所教师资源配置水平整体偏弱,村级园所教师资源配置水平园际差异大;县域内教师资源配置水平均衡性呈现县、乡、村三级行政区域组间均衡性高于组内均衡性,村级园所园际差异大是造成组内均衡性低的主要原因。为进一步提升学前教师资源配置水平,亟待达成供需生态平衡,解决教师资源供给问题;明确发展定位,促成乡园教师资源整体提升;探寻适宜生态位,解惑村级园所个性化发展。

U-S教师共同体合作机制审思———基于知识管理的视角

20世纪末大量兴起的区域教师共同体为教师专业发展创造了切实可行的路径,但在共同体实际合作中也存在着知识流动不平等、实践与理论割裂、合作机制固化等亟待解决的问题。20世纪90年代提出的知识管理的SECI模型建构了两种知识交互的四种模式,并以此来解释显性知识和隐性知识的相互作用,从而分析知识的流动与转化过程。将知识管理的手段运用在U-S教师共同体合作中,能够为解决合作中的困境与难题提供新的思路,为教师共同体实现真正意义上的知识共享与交流谋求可行性路径。

论教师教育课程中的小组合作探究教学——以S大学国家一流本科课程“教学论”为例

小组合作探究教学是一种教学模式,这种模式坚持“以学生发展为中心”的理念,以学生自主学习为突破口,以问题组织教学内容,以小组合作学习、讨论探究为方式方法,以过程性评价为激励机制,从根本上改变了以教师讲授知识为主的课堂教学方式。这种教学模式有其哲学和学习理论的依据,主动迎接了基础教育的挑战,适应了国家对教师教育的新要求。其实施的条件包括:教师要具有现代教育思想和教育情怀,具备扎实系统的专业知识和研究能力;小组建设要提供组织保障,发挥出过程性评价的激励作用;教学时间和物质环境要获得充足保障,以促进小组合作学习的顺利开展。

Strategies on Promoting Transformative Learning of College English Teachers

Based on the previous case study in promoting transformative learning of college English teachers,who participated in a three-month online training courses,the article made a further research and concluded four strategies on promoting transformative learning of college English Teachers.

教育数字化背景下高校教师在线教学持续使用意愿的实证研究——以S省为例

在线教学实施的各个环节都将促进教育数字化的推进,为使在线教学能够在后疫情时代持续发展。该研究以技术接受模型为理论基础,在新冠感染疫情期间对开展在线教学的高校教师问卷调查,收集有效问卷651份,系统研究高校教师在线教学持续使用意愿的影响因素。研究结果显示,教师对在线教学的接受度总体较好,相比较而言对在线教学的持续使用意愿偏低,学校对在线教学的政策和条件支持、教师的感知有用性是影响持续使用意愿的最关键因素。

升级版“GP-S模式”在我国南北实证研究中的可行性分析

全科住院医师规范化培训(以下简称“住培”)是培养全科医师的重要途径。浙江大学医学院附属第一医院(以下简称“浙大一院”)全科医学科创新建立了升级版导航式多路径全科医师培养模式(升级版“GP-S模式”),为求同质化培养全科医生,现拟开展升级版“GP-S模式”在中国的南北实证研究。研究拟选取浙江省和内蒙古自治区的全科住培基地为试验基地,并采用SWOT分析法探讨升级版“GP-S模式”应用于中国南北地区的可行性。文章从试验基地的人才与资源优势、外部的技术与政策支持以及浙江省与内蒙古自治区的差异等方面分析,并提出了应对劣势与挑战的策略,以提升升级版“GP-S模式”在我国南北地区开展实证研究的可行性。

由规模化到精准化:国家中小学智慧教育平台教师研修的差异化需求及优化策略研究

立足常态化的新发展阶段,国家智慧教育平台教师寒暑假研修如何从规模化走向差异化、精准化,“按需施训”尤为关键。研究以基础教育阶段参训教师的9.06万条、149万余字反馈文本为研究对象,综合运用结构主题模型(STM)及重要性-绩效分析法(IPA),构建了国家中小学智慧教育平台教师研修需求框架,并深入分析其差异、明确基于需求要素的优化方向。研究发现:参训教师需求包含个体发展和系统环境两个层面的五类需求,且均存在显著的区域及城乡差异,针对时间安排及学时认定等研修机制需求仍须优化改进。研究为教师寒暑假研修精准化、差异化发展提供实证依据与决策支持,为优化研修服务提供策略建议。

培养创新创业能力的职业教育模式研究

如何更加高效地培养学生创新创业能力,探索出既不烦琐又可操作且广泛适用的职业教育模式,是现阶段各大高职院校亟须解决的重要课题。为进一步促进高职院校培养创新创业能力的职业教育模式改革与发展,对现有高职创新创业教育模式存在的弊端进行分析,提出“厚植学生创新创业观、完善高职院校创新创业教育体系、优化高职院校创新创业实践体系、建立健全创新创业能力培养评价机制”等策略,助力职业教育高质量发展,培养出理念先进、技术扎实、素养过硬的新时代复合型人才。

模范教师师德特征及其启示——基于全国教书育人楷模中24名职业院校教师先进事迹的质性分析

全国教书育人楷模作为优秀教师的突出代表,其师德特征对教师队伍建设具有重要的引领作用。通过对全国教书育人楷模中24名职业院校教师先进事迹的质性分析发现,其师德特征主要表现为钟情职教,科研育人;关爱学生,技术赋能;修己立德,提升自我;勇担大任,服务社会。在立德树人背景下,职业院校的师德建设可以通过培养教师职教情感,推动教师队伍建设;激发教师爱生之心,鼓励教师多渠道技能传授;提升教师个人修养,建立教师专业提升长效机制;强化教师社会责任感,锻炼教师社会服务能力等方面来推进。