The China Society for Human Rights Studies and the National Human Rights Center of Uzbekistan signed a mem- orandum of understanding （MOU） over cooperation on human rights on September 13, 2013.
I. Symposium on National Human Rights Institutions and Research Topics Academic research in the Chinese mainland on national human rights institutions started in February 2003. From October 16-17, 2004, the China Uni...I. Symposium on National Human Rights Institutions and Research Topics Academic research in the Chinese mainland on national human rights institutions started in February 2003. From October 16-17, 2004, the China University of Political Science and Law organized an international sympo- sium in Qingdao, Shandong Province, on research about national human rights protection institutions, inviting experts from Australia, South Africa and Canada to brief the symposium on related information concerning the Asia-Pacific region and South Africa as well as to provide information about Canada＇s National Human Rights Commission. Chinese participants also discussed the possibility of establishing a national human rights organization in China.展开更多
From Nov. 5 to 6, 2013, the China Society for Human Rights Studies （CSHRS）held the Fifth National Meeting for the Exchange of Work Experience Among Human Rights Research Institutions at Wuhan University. More than 1...From Nov. 5 to 6, 2013, the China Society for Human Rights Studies （CSHRS）held the Fifth National Meeting for the Exchange of Work Experience Among Human Rights Research Institutions at Wuhan University. More than 100 experts and scholars, focusing on empirical human rights studies and their contribution to building a society based on the rule of law, shared their work experience and discussed effective strategies. CSHRS President Luo Haocai, who served as vice chairman of the 10th National Committee of the Chinese People＇s Political Consultative Conference,展开更多
Doubtlessly, the term ＂human rights＂ has become a world language in the 21st century. China has written ＂The state respects and protects human rights＂ into its constitution, thus opening up a new period of constit...Doubtlessly, the term ＂human rights＂ has become a world language in the 21st century. China has written ＂The state respects and protects human rights＂ into its constitution, thus opening up a new period of constitutional construction and human rights cause. This great term ＂human rights＂ does not only contain specific rights that can be put into practice but also carry dignity, equality, freedom and other value systems and moral requirements.展开更多
EDITOR'S NOTE: In recent years, Chinese human rights institutes and experts are increasingly having academic exchanges and co-operation with those of other countries, among of which Danish Institute for Human Righ...EDITOR'S NOTE: In recent years, Chinese human rights institutes and experts are increasingly having academic exchanges and co-operation with those of other countries, among of which Danish Institute for Human Rights (DIHR) and its staff are an outstanding example. In early June,Mr. Morten Kjserum, the Executive Director of DIHR, Co-director ofthe Danish Centre for International Studies and Human Rights, Memberof the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD),President of the International Coordination Committee for NationalHuman Rights Institutions (ICC) came to Beijing to participate in aseminar, during which he was interviewed by our staff reporter Wang Yanbing. Following is his viewpoints of human rights issues.展开更多
In China,the main discourse on human rights can be classified into four categories:political discourse,policy discourse,institutional discourse,and academic discourse.These four categories show significant differences...In China,the main discourse on human rights can be classified into four categories:political discourse,policy discourse,institutional discourse,and academic discourse.These four categories show significant differences in terms of the context,content,mode of expression,characteristics,and functions of the discourse.They cannot be simply equated or interchangeable with one another.However,they also rely on,restrict,and promote each other,and under certain conditions,they can be transformed into one another.It is needed to prevent imbalances,mismatches in context,isolation,and inadequate translation among human rights discourses.Meanwhile,it is essential to promote balanced development among different discourses,where each discourse maintains its own boundaries,refers to one another,and undergoes accurate translation,in order to construct their healthy interrelationships.Exploring appropriate methods of translation between discourses is an important and worthwhile topic for research in Chinese human rights discourse.It holds significant practical significance and academic value in constructing the Chinese human rights discourse system.展开更多
文摘The China Society for Human Rights Studies and the National Human Rights Center of Uzbekistan signed a mem- orandum of understanding （MOU） over cooperation on human rights on September 13, 2013.
文摘I. Symposium on National Human Rights Institutions and Research Topics Academic research in the Chinese mainland on national human rights institutions started in February 2003. From October 16-17, 2004, the China University of Political Science and Law organized an international sympo- sium in Qingdao, Shandong Province, on research about national human rights protection institutions, inviting experts from Australia, South Africa and Canada to brief the symposium on related information concerning the Asia-Pacific region and South Africa as well as to provide information about Canada＇s National Human Rights Commission. Chinese participants also discussed the possibility of establishing a national human rights organization in China.
文摘From Nov. 5 to 6, 2013, the China Society for Human Rights Studies （CSHRS）held the Fifth National Meeting for the Exchange of Work Experience Among Human Rights Research Institutions at Wuhan University. More than 100 experts and scholars, focusing on empirical human rights studies and their contribution to building a society based on the rule of law, shared their work experience and discussed effective strategies. CSHRS President Luo Haocai, who served as vice chairman of the 10th National Committee of the Chinese People＇s Political Consultative Conference,
文摘Doubtlessly, the term ＂human rights＂ has become a world language in the 21st century. China has written ＂The state respects and protects human rights＂ into its constitution, thus opening up a new period of constitutional construction and human rights cause. This great term ＂human rights＂ does not only contain specific rights that can be put into practice but also carry dignity, equality, freedom and other value systems and moral requirements.
文摘EDITOR'S NOTE: In recent years, Chinese human rights institutes and experts are increasingly having academic exchanges and co-operation with those of other countries, among of which Danish Institute for Human Rights (DIHR) and its staff are an outstanding example. In early June,Mr. Morten Kjserum, the Executive Director of DIHR, Co-director ofthe Danish Centre for International Studies and Human Rights, Memberof the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD),President of the International Coordination Committee for NationalHuman Rights Institutions (ICC) came to Beijing to participate in aseminar, during which he was interviewed by our staff reporter Wang Yanbing. Following is his viewpoints of human rights issues.
基金a phased outcome of the research project“Research on the Practice of Human Rights in China Promoting and Enriching Shared Values for All Humanity”funded by the National Social Science Fund of China under project approval No.22ZDA127。
文摘In China,the main discourse on human rights can be classified into four categories:political discourse,policy discourse,institutional discourse,and academic discourse.These four categories show significant differences in terms of the context,content,mode of expression,characteristics,and functions of the discourse.They cannot be simply equated or interchangeable with one another.However,they also rely on,restrict,and promote each other,and under certain conditions,they can be transformed into one another.It is needed to prevent imbalances,mismatches in context,isolation,and inadequate translation among human rights discourses.Meanwhile,it is essential to promote balanced development among different discourses,where each discourse maintains its own boundaries,refers to one another,and undergoes accurate translation,in order to construct their healthy interrelationships.Exploring appropriate methods of translation between discourses is an important and worthwhile topic for research in Chinese human rights discourse.It holds significant practical significance and academic value in constructing the Chinese human rights discourse system.
