Risk for hepatocellular carcinoma in the course of chronic hepatitis B virus infection and the protective effect of therapy with nucleos(t)ide analogues

Hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) is a major health problem worldwide, representing one of the leading causes of death. Chronic hepatitis B virus(HBV) infection(CHB) is the most important etiologic factor of this tumor, accounting for the development of more than50% of the cases in the world. Primary prevention ofHCC is possible by hepatitis B vaccination conferring protection from HBV infection. However, according to the World Health Organization Hepatitis B Fact sheet N° 204(update of July 2014) globally there exists a large pool of > 240 million people chronically infected with HBV who are at risk for development of HCC. These individuals represent a target population for secondary prevention both of cirrhosis and of HCC. Since ongoing HBV replication in CHB is linked with the progression of the underlying liver disease to cirrhosis as well as with the development of HCC, effective antiviral treatment in CHB has also been evaluated in terms of secondary prevention of HCC. Currently, most patients with active CHB are subjected to long term treatment with the first line nucleos(t)ide analogues entecavir and tenofovir. These compounds are of high antiviral potency and have a high barrier to HBV resistance compared to lamivudine, adefovir dipivoxil and even telbivudine. Many studies have shown that patients under antiviral treatment, especially those in virological remission, develop less frequently HCC compared to the untreated ones. However, the risk for development of HCC cannot be eliminated. Therefore, surveillance for the development of HCC of patients with chronic hepatitis B must be lifelong or until a time in the future when new treatments will be able to completely eradicate HBV from the liver particularly in the early stages of CHB infection. In this context, the aim of this review is to outline the magnitude of the risk for development of HCC among patients with CHB, in the various phases of the infection and in relation to virus, host and environmental factors as evaluated in the world literature. Moreover, the benefits of antiviral treatment of CHB with nucleos/tide analogs, which have changed the natural history of the disease and have reduced but not eliminated the risk of HCC are also reviewed.

HBsAg clearance by Peg-interferon addition to a long-term nucleos(t)ide analogues therapy

The ideal endpoint of hepatitis B virus(HBV)antiviral therapy is HBsAg loss,a difficult goal to obtain,especially in HBeAg negative patients.Herein,we report the results obtained by the addition of peg-interferonα-2a to a long-lasting nucleos(t)ide analogues therapy in a HBeAg negative,genotype D patient with steadily HBV-DNA negative/HBsAg positive values.In 2002,our Caucasian 44-year-old male patient received lamivudine and,4 years later,added adefovir because of a virological breakthrough.In 2011,considering his young age,liver stiffness(4.3 kPa)and HBsAg levels(3533IU/mL),we added Peg-interferonα-2a for six months(3in combination with nucleos(t)ide analogues followed by 3 mo of Peg-interferonα-2a monotherapy).A decrease of HBsAg levels was observed after 1 mo(1.21log)of Peg-interferon and 3 mo(1.88 log)after the discontinuation of all drugs.Later,a complete clearance of HBsAg was obtained with steadily undetectable HBVDNA serum levels(<9 IU/mL).HBsAg clearance by the addition of a short course of Peg-interferonα-2a represents an important result with clinical and pharmacoeconomic implications,considering that nucleos(t)ide analogues therapy in HBeAg negative chronic hepatitis B patients is considered a long-lasting/life-long treatment.

When to stop nucleos(t)ide analogues treatment for chronic hepatitis B? Durability of antiviral response

Introduction of nucleos(t)ide analogues(NAs)for oral antiviral therapy has dramatically improved the clinical outcome in patients with chronic hepatitis B(CHB).Although current international guidelines for the management of CHB provide information regarding when to begin the antiviral therapy with NAs,there is no clear consensus on when to stop the treatment,especially for those who respond to the therapy.Hepatitis B surface antigen loss has been regarded as an ideal endpoint of oral antiviral therapy with NAs,however since this is rarely achieved,practical endpoints have been suggested by the international guidelines.Despite the stopping rules recommended by the international guidelines,whether oral antiviral therapy with NAs can be safely discontinued is of major concern.While attention has been drawn to whether antiviral treatment with NAs can be a finite therapy,there is lack of sufficient data on off-treatment durability of highly potent NAs.Based on the available evidences,current guidelines for stopping NA therapy seems to be inadequate in terms of off-treatment durability,with relapse rates of more than 40%for both hepatitis Be antigen(HBeAg)-positive and HBeAg-negative patients.Therefore,further studies are required to accumulate data on off-treatment durability of highly potent NAs,and future studies are warranted to identify adequate predictive markers that could provide supplementary information to guide the timing of stopping NA therapy.

Nucleos(t)ide analogues to treat hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma after radical resection

Significant advances have been made in nucleos(t)ideanalogue(NA) therapy to treat chronic hepatitis B,and this therapy reduces the risk of hepatitis B virus(HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) in somepatients.However,whether NAs can also prevent recurrence after radical resection of HBV-related HCC remains controversial and is an important question,giventhat most patients will experience recurrence within afew years of curative surgery.Here we systematicallyreviewed the literature since 2004 on outcomes afteradministering NAs to patients with HBV-related HCCfollowing radical resection.We focused on treatmentindications,duration,effects on recurrence-free survivaland overall survival,and the management of NA resistance.We find that patients with HCC should stronglyconsider NA therapy if they are positive for HBV-DNA,and that the available evidence suggests that postoperative NA therapy can increase both recurrence-free andoverall survival.To minimize drug resistance,cliniciansshould opt for potent analogues with higher resistancebarriers,and they should monitor the patient carefully for emergence of NA-resistant HBV.

Diagnostic and therapeutic progress of multi-drug resistance with anti-HBV nucleos(t)ide analogues

Nucleos(t)ide analogues(NA) are a breakthrough in the treatment and management of chronic hepatitis B.NA could suppress the replication of hepatitis B virus(HBV) and control the progression of the disease.However,drug resistance caused by their long-term use becomes a practical problem,which influences the long-term outcomes in patients.Liver transplantation is the only choice for patients with HBV-related end-stage liver disease.But,the recurrence of HBV after transplantation often caused by the development of drug resistance leads to unfavorable outcomes for the recipients.Recently,the multi-drug resistance(MDR) has become a common issue raised due to the development and clinical application of a variety of NA.This may complicate the antiviral therapy and bring poorly prognostic outcomes.Although clinical evidence has suggested that combination therapy with different NA could effectively reduce the viral load in patients with MDR,the advent of new antiviral agents with high potency and high genetic barrier to resistance brings hope to antiviral therapy.The future of HBV researches relies on how toprevent the MDR occurrence and develop reasonable and effective treatment strategies.This review focuses on the diagnostic and therapeutic progress in MDR caused by the anti-HBV NA and describes some new research progress in this field.

On-treatment quantitative hepatitis B e antigen predicted response to nucleos(t)ide analogues in chronic hepatitis B

AIMTo investigate potential predictors for treatment response to nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. METHODSSeventy-six HBeAg-positive CHB patients received 96-wk NAs optimized therapy (lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil) were studied retrospectively. Serum hepatitis B surface antigen, HBeAg, hepatitis B core antibody, hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA and alanine aminotransferase levels were quantitatively measured before and during the treatment at 12 and 24 wk. Stepwise logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors for treatment response, and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC) of the independent predictors were calculated. RESULTSForty-three CHB patients (56.6%) achieved virological response (VR: HBV DNA &le; 300 copies/mL) and 15 patients (19.7%) developed HBeAg seroconversion (SC) after the 96-wk NAs treatment. The HBeAg level (OR = 0.45, P = 0.003) as well as its declined value (OR = 2.03, P = 0.024) at 24-wk independently predicted VR, with the AUROC of 0.788 and 0.736, respectively. The combination of HBeAg titer 1.6 lg PEIU/mL at 24-wk predicted VR with a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) of 85%, 100%, 100% and 83%, respectively, and the AUROC increased to 0.923. The HBeAg level (OR = 0.37, P = 0.013) as well as its declined value (OR = 2.02, P = 0.012) at 24-wk also independently predicted HBeAg SC, with the AUROC of 0.828 and 0.814, respectively. The HBeAg titer 2.2 lg PEIU/mL at 24-wk predicted HBeAg SC with a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV of 88%, 98%, 88% and 98%, respectively, and the AUROC reached 0.928. CONCLUSIONThe combination of HBeAg level and its declined value at 24-wk may be used as a reference parameter to optimize NAs therapy.

Treatment of HBeAg-Negative Chronic Hepatitis B Patients with Nucleos(t)ide Analogues in Burkina Faso

The treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) has increased significantly in recent years. In patients affected by HBeAg-negative CHB, it is necessary to distinguish the inactive carriers (low viral DNA 2000 IU/mL, normal ALT, histological lesions absent or minimal) who does not need treatment, and patients suffering from active CHB (DNA > 2000 IU/ml, high transaminases or fluctuating, significant fibrosis and/or necro-inflammatory activity > 1) who must be treated. The main purpose of treatment is to obtain a long-lasting viral suppression to improve the histological lesions and reduce the risk of evolution towards cirrhosis, liver failure and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). It about an indefinite treatment (unless HBsAg seroclearance) expensive and often inaccessible for the majority of our patients. Our study aimed to report the results of four years follow-up of HBeAg-negative patients treated by Nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) in Ouagadougou (Burkina Faso). It was a clinical observational study with 133 patients including 95 men;the average age was 41.2 years, completing the criteria of treatment. One hundred and twelve patients were treated by tenofovir (TDF), fourteen by lamivudine and seven co-infected HIV/HBV patients by Atripla® (combination TDF, Emtricitabine and Efavirenz). Virological and biochemical responses were respectively 100% and 94% after 4 years. The rate of HBsAg seroclearance was 1.5%. Twelve of fourteen patients (85.7%) had lamivudine resistance and no cases of resistance in the TDF and Atripla® groups. One co-infected patient developed HCC during treatment. Among patients treated by TDF, two cases of hypophosphatemia were noticed and no case of kidney failure. The treatment of CHB is certainly progressing;updated guidelines (EASL, AASLD) exist but should be adapted to the African context.

Antiviral therapy with nucleos(t)ide analogues for severe chronic hepatitis B

To the Editor:I read the paper by Chen et al[1]with great interest.The authors performed a retrospective study to evaluate the short-term efficacy of antiviral therapy with

Chinese Consensus on Antiviral Treatment of Chronic Hepatits B Patients with Nucleos(t)ide Analogues

Antiviral treatment is the main method for chronic hepatitis B(CHB).After antiviral treatment,some patients may obtain satisfactory therapeutic effect,but some patients still show primary non-response,suboptimal response,even resistance to nucleos(t)ide analogues or relapse,which are becoming the key problems and confusing the clinical staffs.Thus,in January 2013,editorial department of Chinese Journal of Experimental and Clinical Infectious Diseases(Electronic Edition),Chinese Journal of Liver Diseases(Electronic Edition)

Is it possible to stop nucleos(t)ide analogue treatment in chronic hepatitis B patients?

Chronic hepatitis B(CHB) remains a challenging global health problem, with nearly one million related deaths per year. Nucleos(t)ide analogue(NA) treatment suppresses viral replication but does not provide complete cure of the hepatitis B virus(HBV) infection. The accepted endpoint for therapy is the loss of hepatitis B surface antigen(HBs Ag), but this is hardly ever achieved. Therefore, indefinite treatment is usually required. Many different studies have evaluated NA therapy discontinuation after several years of NA treatment and before HBs Ag loss. The results have indicated that the majority of patients can remain off therapy, with some even reaching HBs Ag seroconversion. Fortunately, this strategy has proved to be safe, but it is essential to consider the risk of liver damage and other comorbidities and to ensure aclose follow-up of the candidates before considering this strategy. Unanswered questions remain, namely in which patients could this strategy be effective and what is the optimal time point at which to perform it. To solve this enigma, we should keep in mind that the outcome will ultimately depend on the equilibrium between HBV and the host's immune system. Viral parameters that have been described as good predictors of response in HBe Ag(+) cases, have proven useless in HBe Ag(-) ones. Since antiviral immunity plays an essential role in the control of HBV infection, we sought to review and explain potential immunological biomarkers to predict safe NA discontinuation in both groups.

Nationwide cohort study suggests that nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy decreases dialysis risk in Taiwan Residents chronic kidney disease patients acquiring hepatitis B virus infection

AIM To investigate the risk of end-stage renal disease(ESRD) in hepatitis B virus(HBV)-infected patients with chronic kidney disease(CKD) with and without nucleos(t)ide analogue(NA) therapy.METHODS This nationwide cohort study included 103444 Taiwan Residents CKD adults without hepatitis C virus infection from the Taiwan Longitudinal Health Insurance Database 2005 between 1997 and 2012. We identified 2916 CKD patients who acquired HBV infection and did not receive NAs(untreated cohort), and they were propensitymatched 1:4 with 11664 uninfected counterparts. We also identified 442 CKD patients who acquired HBV infection and received NAs(treated cohort), and they were propensity-matched 1:3 with 1326 untreated counterparts. The association between HBV infection, NA use, and ESRD was analyzed using competing risk analysis.RESULTS Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed a 1.67-fold higher risk(P < 0.0001) of ESRD in the untreated cohort(16-year cumulative incidence, 10.1%) than in the matched uninfected cohort(16-year cumulative incidence, 6.6%), which was independent of cirrhosis or diabetes. The treated cohort(16-year cumulative incidence, 2.2%) had an 87% lower ESRD risk(P < 0.0001) compared with the matched untreated cohort(16-year cumulative incidence, 11.9%). The number needed to treat for one fewer ESRD after NA use at 12 years was 12. Multivariable stratified analyses verified these associations in all subgroups.CONCLUSION This study suggests that untreated HBV infection and NA therapy are associated with increased and decreased risk of ESRD, respectively, in CKD patients. Identification of HBV status and targeted monitoring for ESRD development are important in CKD patients living in HBV-endemic areas.

Expanding indications for chronic hepatitis B treatment: Is it really desirable to treat everyone?

Chronic viral hepatitis causes an increased risk of progressive liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma.On the wave of the World Health Organization’s goal to reduce new cases and deaths from hepatitis B and C by 2030,there is an increasing call to expand the indications for treatment of chronic hepatitis B.Currently,the main goal of treatment is to achieve a functional cure due to the inability of current drugs to completely eradicate the virus.There are still many discrepancies between available guidelines in terms of eligibility for treatment as well as an uncertainty about the appropriate treatment duration.This editorial addresses key questions about the topic and whether indications for treatment should be expanded.

Management of chronic hepatitis B infection: Current treatment guidelines, challenges, and new developments

Chronic hepatitis B(CHB)virus infection is a global public health problem,affecting more than 400 million people worldwide.The clinical spectrum is wide,ranging from a subclinical inactive carrier state,to progressive chronic hepatitis,cirrhosis,decompensation,and hepatocellular carcinoma.However,complications of hepatitis B virus(HBV)-related chronic liver disease may be reduced by viral suppression.Current international guidelines recommend first-line treatment of CHB infection with pegylated interferon,entecavir,or tenofovir,but the optimal treatment for an individualpatient is controversial.The indications for treatment are contentious,and increasing evidence suggests that HBV genotyping,as well as serial on-treatment measurements of hepatitis B surface antigen and HBV DNA kinetics should be used to predict antiviral treatment response.The likelihood of achieving a sustained virological response is also increased by extending treatment duration,and using combination therapy.Hence the paradigm for treatment of CHB is constantly evolving.This article summarizes the different indications for treatment,and systematically reviews the evidence for the efficacy of various antiviral agents.It further discusses the shortcomings of current guidelines,use of rescue therapy in drug-resistant strains of HBV,and highlights the promising clinical trials for emerging therapies in the pipeline.This concise overview presents an updated practical approach to guide the clinical management of CHB.

Benefits of nucleos(t)ide analog treatments for hepatitis B virus-related cirrhosis

Chronic hepatitis B infection induces progressive liver disease. Before nucleos(t)ide analogs(NUCs) became established as a safe and effective treatment for hepatitis B,it was difficult to suppress the activity of the hepatitis B virus(HBV). Currently,many patients withhepatitis or cirrhosis associated with HBV are treated with NUCs for an extended period of time,and the effects,benefits,and limitations of these treatments have been apparent. This article reviews HBV-related cirrhosis,its natural course and survival,histological improvement after NUC treatments,treatment effects for decompensated cirrhosis,the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) after NUC treatments,and the efficacy of NUC treatments before and after the treatment of patients for HBV-related HCC. Of particular interest are the histological improvements,including regression of fibrosis,that have been achieved with NUC treatments. Liver function of patients with decompensated cirrhosis has significantly improved regardless of the type of NUC applied,and treatment with NUCs has reduced the incidence of HCC in cirrhotic patients. However,cirrhosis remains the strongest risk factor for HCC occurrence following NUC treatments,and the long-term cumulative incidence of HCC after NUC treatments remains high. When recurrence does occur,it is important to reconsider the treatment modality according to the degree of improved liver function that was achieved.

Nucleos(t)ide analogs in the prevention of hepatitis B virus related hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) is among the most common cancer types and causes of cancer related mortality worldwide.Almost 50% of all HCC cases globally are attributable to chronic hepatitis B virus(HBV) infection.The incidence rates of HCC in untreated Asian subjects with HBV infection was estimated to be 0.2% in inactive carriers,0.6% for those with chronic hepatitis without cirrhosis,and 3.7% for those with compensated cirrhosis.In Western populations,HCC incidences are reported to be 0.02% in inactive carriers,0.3% in subjects with chronic hepatitis without cirrhosis,and 2.2% in subjects with compensated cirrhosis.Despite effective antiviral treatment options which are able to transform chronic hepatitis into an inactive carrier state,the risk of HCC cannot be fully ruled out to exclude those patients from surveillance.Newer nucleos(t)ide analogues(NAs) as entecavir and tenofovir are very potent in terms of sustained virological suppression which leads to improved liver histology.However,they do not have any influence on the ccc DNA or integrated DNA of HBV in the liver.Nonetheless,viral replication is the only modifiable component among the established risk factors for HBV-related HCC with the current treatment options.In this review,it was aimed to summarize cumulative evidence behind the concept of prevention of HBV related HCC by NAs,and to discuss remaining obstacles to eliminate the risk of HCC.

Predictive value of Th17 and Treg cells at baseline for HBsAg loss in chronic hepatitis B patients with low HBsAg quantification treated with pegylated interferon and nucleos(t)ide analogue

Background and aims:The primary goal of chronic hepatitis B(CHB)treatment is to reduce hepatitis B surface antigen(HBsAg).T helper 17(Th17)and regulatory T(Treg)cells are essential for the development of CHB.However,how Th17 and Treg cells contribute to HBsAg loss is still unknown.Therefore,this study aimed to search for the predictive value of Th17 and Treg cells for HBsAg loss in CHB patients with low HBsAg quantification.Methods:The study included 99 hepatitis B e antigen(HBeAg)-negative CHB patients who had completed a year of nucleos(t)ide analogue(NA)monotherapy and had received both NA and pegylated interferon(PEG-IFN)treatment for less than 96 weeks(96 wk).In the cured group,48 patients lost HBsAg within 48 wk,while 51 patients did not(uncured group).Blood samples and clinical data were collected for research.Results:During PEG-IFN and NA combination therapy,the proportion of Th17 cells in the cured group increased significantly,while the proportion of Treg cells in the uncured group increased.From 0 to 24 wk,the proportion of Th17 cells in the cured group was significantly higher than in the uncured group,while the opposite was true for Treg cells.Patients with alanine aminotransferase(ALT)2.5 upper limit of normal(ULN)at 12 wk had a higher proportion of Th17 cells and a lower proportion of Treg cells than those with ALT<2.5 ULN at 12 wk.Additionally,the proportion of Th17 cells is inversely associated with the level of HBsAg,whereas the level of Treg cells is positively related to HBsAg quantification.The clinical cure index,including age,HBsAg quantification,and the proportions of Th17 and Treg cells,had a higher area under the curve(0.957)for predicting HBsAg loss when compared to the proportions of Th17 and Treg cells and HBsAg quantification alone.Conclusions:Combined with quantification of HBsAg,the proportions of Th17 cells and Treg cells at baseline can be used as good predictors of HBsAg loss in patients with low HBsAg quantification treated with NA and PEG-IFN.

Antiviral drug resistance increases hepatocellular carcinoma:A prospective decompensated cirrhosis cohort study

AIM:To study the clinical outcome of antiviral therapy in hepatitis B-related decompensated cirrhotic patients.METHODS:Three hundred and twelve patients with decompensated hepatitis B cirrhosis were evaluated in a prospective cohort.With two years of follow-up,198patients in the group receiving antiviral therapy with nucleos(t)ide analogues and 39 patients in the control group without antiviral treatment were analysed.RESULTS:Among the antiviral treatment patients,162had a complete virological response(CVR),and 36 were drug-resistant(DR).The two-year cumulative incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)in the DR patients(30.6%)was significantly higher than that in both the CVR patients(4.3%)and the control group(10.3%)(P<0.001).Among the DR patients in particular,the incidence of HCC was 55.6%(5/9)in those who failed rescue therapy,which was extremely high.The rtA181T mutation was closely associated with rescue therapy failure(P=0.006).The Child-Pugh scores of the CVR group were significantly decreased compared with the baseline(8.9±2.3 vs 6.0±1.3,P=0.043).CONCLUSION:This study showed that antiviral drug resistance increased the risk of HCC in decompensated hepatitis B-related cirrhotic patients,especially in those who failed rescue therapy.

Effects of antiviral therapy on preventing liver tumorigenesis and hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence

Chronic hepatitis B virus(HBV)infection is the key driving force of liver disease progression,resulting in the development of hepatic dysfunction,cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).The primary aim of therapy is to suppress or eliminate HBV replication to reduce the activity of hepatitis,thus reducing the risk of,or slowing the progression of,liver disease.Nucleos(t)ide analogues(Nucs)may result in rapid suppression of HBV replication with normalization of serum transaminases and restore liver function,thus increasing survival in patients with hepatic decompensation.Long-term Nuc therapy may result in histological improvement or reversal of advanced fibrosis and reduction in disease progression,including the development of HCC.The long-term benefits of a finite course of interferon(IFN)-αtherapy also include a sustained and cumulative response,as well as hepatitis B surface antigen seroclearance and reduction in the development of cirrhosis and/or HCC.Pegylated IFN and newer Nucs may achieve better long-term outcomes because of improved efficacy and a low risk of drug resistance.However,treatment outcomes are still far from satisfactory.Understanding the effects of anti-HBV treatment against HCC incidence and recurrence after hepatectomy or liver transplantation is required for further improvement of outcome.

Current and future antiviral drug therapies of hepatitis B chronic infection

Despite significant improvement in the management of chronic hepatitis B virus(HBV) it remains a public health problem, affecting more than 350 million people worldwide. The natural course of the infection is dynamic and involves a complex interplay between the virus and the host's immune system. Currently the approved therapeutic regimens include pegylated-interferon(IFN)-α and monotherapy with five nucleos(t)ide analogues(NAs). Both antiviral treatments are not capable to eliminate the virus and do not establish long-term control of infection after treatment withdrawal. IFN therapy is of finite duration and associates with low response rates, liver decompensating and numerous side effects. NAs are well-tolerated therapies but have a high risk of drug resistance development that limits their prolonged use. The imperative for the development of new approaches for the treatment of chronic HBV infection is a challenging issue that cannot be over-sided. Research efforts are focusing on the identification and evaluation of various viral replication inhibitors that target viral replication and a number of immunomodulators that aim to restore the HBV specific immune hyporesponsiveness without inducing liver damage. This review brings together our current knowledge on the available treatment and discusses potential therapeutic approaches in the battle against chronic HBV infection.

Chronic hepatitis B: Advances in treatment

Treatment of chronic hepatitis B(CHB) has markedly improved in the last 15 years due to the availability of direct antivirals which greatly increase therapeutic options. Currently, there are two classes of agents licensed for CHB treatment: standard or pegylated interferon alpha(IFN or Peg-IFN) and five nucleoside/nucleotide analogues(NAs). Long-term treatment with NAs is the treatment option most often used in the majority of CHB patients. Entecavir and tenofovir, the most potent NAs with high barrier to resistance, are recommended as first-line monotherapy by all major treatment guidelines and can lead to long-lasting viro-logical suppression, resulting in histological improve-ment or reversal of advanced fibrosis and reduction in disease progression and liver-related complications. In this review, we focus on current treatment strategies of chronic hepatitis B and discuss the most recent efficacy and safety data from clinical trials and real life clinical practice. Recent findings of response-guided approach-es are also discussed.