The second half of the previous century witnessed a tremendous rise in the number of clinical kidney transplants worldwide.This activity was,however,accompanied by many issues and challenges.An accurate diagnosis and ...The second half of the previous century witnessed a tremendous rise in the number of clinical kidney transplants worldwide.This activity was,however,accompanied by many issues and challenges.An accurate diagnosis and appropriate management of causes of graft dysfunction were and still are,a big challenge.Kidney allograft biopsy played a vital role in addressing the above challenge.However,its interpretation was not standardized for many years until,in 1991,the Banff process was started to fill this void.Thereafter,regular Banff meetings took place every 2 years for the past 30 years.Marked changes have taken place in the interpretation of kidney allograft biopsies,diagnosis,and classification of rejection and other non-rejection pathologies from the original Banff 93 classification.This review attempts to summarize those changes for increasing the awareness and understanding of kidney allograft pathology through the eyes of the Banff process.It will interest the transplant surgeons,physicians,pathologists,and allied professionals associated with the care of kidney transplant patients.展开更多
Objective To evaluate the correlation between the pathologic findings of donor renal grafts and the post-transplantative diseases throuth the biopsies of donor grafts in 482 cases. Methods The renal structures of biop...Objective To evaluate the correlation between the pathologic findings of donor renal grafts and the post-transplantative diseases throuth the biopsies of donor grafts in 482 cases. Methods The renal structures of biopsies of the donor grafts in 482 cases were observed under microscope, and the pathologic findings combined with the post-transplantative conditions were analysed. Results After transplantation, acute rejection occurred in 71 cases,of when 16(22.5%) had adverse changes in donor grafts; chronic allograft nephropahty developed in 17 cases, of whom 7 (41.2% ) had adverse changes in donor grafts; elevated sera creatinine levels with unknown causes occurred in 39 cases, of whon 7(18.0% ) had adverse changes in donor grafts. The lesion of donor renal grafts had nothing to do with the acute rejection or other abnormalities after operation ( r≤ 0.3) but some kind of lesion had certain correlation with chronic allograft nephropathy(CAN, r 】0.3). Conclusion Routine biopsy of donor renal graft is展开更多
文摘The second half of the previous century witnessed a tremendous rise in the number of clinical kidney transplants worldwide.This activity was,however,accompanied by many issues and challenges.An accurate diagnosis and appropriate management of causes of graft dysfunction were and still are,a big challenge.Kidney allograft biopsy played a vital role in addressing the above challenge.However,its interpretation was not standardized for many years until,in 1991,the Banff process was started to fill this void.Thereafter,regular Banff meetings took place every 2 years for the past 30 years.Marked changes have taken place in the interpretation of kidney allograft biopsies,diagnosis,and classification of rejection and other non-rejection pathologies from the original Banff 93 classification.This review attempts to summarize those changes for increasing the awareness and understanding of kidney allograft pathology through the eyes of the Banff process.It will interest the transplant surgeons,physicians,pathologists,and allied professionals associated with the care of kidney transplant patients.
文摘Objective To evaluate the correlation between the pathologic findings of donor renal grafts and the post-transplantative diseases throuth the biopsies of donor grafts in 482 cases. Methods The renal structures of biopsies of the donor grafts in 482 cases were observed under microscope, and the pathologic findings combined with the post-transplantative conditions were analysed. Results After transplantation, acute rejection occurred in 71 cases,of when 16(22.5%) had adverse changes in donor grafts; chronic allograft nephropahty developed in 17 cases, of whom 7 (41.2% ) had adverse changes in donor grafts; elevated sera creatinine levels with unknown causes occurred in 39 cases, of whon 7(18.0% ) had adverse changes in donor grafts. The lesion of donor renal grafts had nothing to do with the acute rejection or other abnormalities after operation ( r≤ 0.3) but some kind of lesion had certain correlation with chronic allograft nephropathy(CAN, r 】0.3). Conclusion Routine biopsy of donor renal graft is
