Objective The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor(PEG-rhG-CSF)and recombinant human granulocyte colonystimulating factor(rhG-CS...Objective The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor(PEG-rhG-CSF)and recombinant human granulocyte colonystimulating factor(rhG-CSF)for the prevention of neutropenia in elderly breast cancer patients during adjuvant chemotherapy.Methods A total of 45 oncology inpatients with breast cancer,who received adjuvant chemotherapy and were older than 65 years from May 2017 to October 2018 in the General Hospital of the Northern Theater of the Chinese people’s Liberation Army,were included.Epirubivin Cyclophoshamide-Docetaxel(EC-T)sequential adjuvant chemotherapy was chosen.Forty-five patients were randomly divided into two groups;25 patients in the treatment group were treated with PEG-rhG-CSF and 20 patients in the control group were not treated with PEG-rhG-CSF,but only rhG-CSF.The experimental group was treated with the PEG-rhG-CSF at the end of chemotherapy for 24–48 h,with a 6 mg subcutaneous injection once per chemotherapy cycle.In the control group,rhG-CSF was administered after 48 h of chemotherapy,with a 100μg subcutaneous injection,1/d,d 1–7.The dosage could be increased step by step with the exacerbation of neutropenia.The primary aims of this study was to discover the incidence of leukopenia,neutropenia,neutrophilic fever,and adverse reactions in the two groups.Results The incidence of neutropenia,neutrophilic fever and adverse reactions decreased in the treatment group compared to the control group,but no significant difference existed between two groups(P>0.05).Patients in treatment group had a lower,but not statistically significant,incidence of adverse reactions(P>0.05).Conclusion Applying PEG-rhG-CSF could be effective in preventing neutropenia in elderly patients with postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy to treat breast cancer.It may effectively control the occurrence of neutropenia after chemotherapy and reduce the chance of infection.The incidence of side effects,such as fever and bone pain,was low.The adverse drug reactions were well tolerated by patients,which could ensure the smooth progress of chemotherapy.展开更多
Objective:To compare the efficacy and safety of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor(PEG-rhG-CSF)for preventive or delayed treatment in neutropenia,completion rate of concurrent chemoradio...Objective:To compare the efficacy and safety of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor(PEG-rhG-CSF)for preventive or delayed treatment in neutropenia,completion rate of concurrent chemoradiotherapy and hospitalization rate in patients with esophageal squamous carcinoma during definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy.Methods:A total of 70 patients with esophageal squamous carcinoma in Peking University Cancer Hospital from January 2019 to December 2020,who received PEG-rhG-CSF during concurrent chemoradiotherapy,were enrolled in this retrospective analysis.There were 32 patients in the preventive group,and 38 patients in the delayed group.The incidence of neutropenia,completion rate of concurrent chemoradiotherapy and neutropeniarelated hospitalization rate were compared between PEG-rhG-CSF preventive group and delayed group.Results:The incidence of severe neutropenia(Grades 3–4)in all patients was 31.4%.Comparison between preventive group and delayed group showed that the incidence of severe neutropenia was 6.3%and 39.4%(χ^(2)=10.428,P=0.001),respectively.In preventive group,the incidence of severe neutropenia was 3.7%and 20.0%,respectively,for primary prevention and secondary prevention of PEG-rhG-CSF(χ^(2)=12.321,P=0.001).The completion rate of concurrent chemoradiotherapy was 93.8%in the preventive group and 63.2%in the delayed group(χ^(2)=9.220,P=0.002).The incidence of treatment interruption was 25.7%in the whole group,12.5%in the preventive group and 36.8%in the delayed group(χ^(2)=5.389,P=0.020).Seven patients(7/70,10.0%)were hospitalized and treated with intravenous antibiotics for neutropenia,including 1 in the preventive group and 6 in the delayed group(P=0.078).Conclusions:Prophylactic use of PEG-rhG-CSF during concurrent chemoradiotherapy for patients with esophageal squamous carcinoma can effectively reduce the incidence of neutropenia,ensure the safety of treatment,and improve the completion rate of concurrent chemoradiotherapy.展开更多
目的:探讨无外周血CD34监测下聚乙二醇重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子(PEG-rhG-CSF)在血液肿瘤自体外周血干细胞动员中的采集时机及采集效果。方法:回顾性分析2017年8月至2022年1月福建医科大学附属第一医院收治的46例行自体外周血干细胞动...目的:探讨无外周血CD34监测下聚乙二醇重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子(PEG-rhG-CSF)在血液肿瘤自体外周血干细胞动员中的采集时机及采集效果。方法:回顾性分析2017年8月至2022年1月福建医科大学附属第一医院收治的46例行自体外周血干细胞动员的血液恶性肿瘤患者。采用大剂量化疗联合PEG-rhG-CSF或重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)动员方案,其中应用PEG-rhG-CSF动员的27例(PEG-rhG-CSF组),应用G-CSF动员的19例(G-CSF组),比较两组患者动员采集效果。结果:46例患者共采集86例次,PEG-rhG-CSF组与G-CSF组获得采集物的单个核细胞中位数分别为6.54(3.85-12.61)×10^(8)/kg和6.15(1.13-11.58)×10^(8)/kg(P>0.05),采集物CD34^(+)细胞数分别为11.44(1.33-65.02)×10^(6)/kg和4.95(0.30-24.02)×10^(6)/kg(P<0.05),采集时机分别为14(10-20)和14(4-22)d(P>0.05)。PEG-rhG-CSF组在外周血白细胞(WBC)≥10×10^(9)/L时单次所采集的产物CD34^(+)细胞数明显高于外周血WBC<10×10^(9)/L时采集的数量[19.04(2.85-65.02)×10^(6)/kg vs 6.22(0.81-34.86)×10^(6)/kg,(P<0.05)]。结论:采用PEG-rhG-CSF动员外周血干细胞单次采集足量CD34^(+)细胞成功率高,中位动员时间为14 d;在无外周血CD34监测情况下,外周血WBC≥10×10^(9)/L可以考虑作为单次采集足量干细胞的采集阈值。展开更多
目的探讨初级与次级预防性使用聚乙二醇化重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子(pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor,PEG-rhG-CSF)在卵巢癌初始肿瘤细胞减灭术后化疗的价值。方法2019年1月~2020年6月我院76例卵巢...目的探讨初级与次级预防性使用聚乙二醇化重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子(pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor,PEG-rhG-CSF)在卵巢癌初始肿瘤细胞减灭术后化疗的价值。方法2019年1月~2020年6月我院76例卵巢癌初始肿瘤细胞减灭术后行紫杉醇和卡铂联合化疗,根据初次预防性使用PEG-rhG-CSF分为初级预防组(n=49)和次级预防组(n=27),比较2组中性粒细胞减少发生率、需要补充重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子(recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor,rhG-CSF)率、中性粒细胞减少相关重复住院率、中性粒细胞减少相关化疗周期延迟发生率等。结果第一、二疗程中,初级预防组3、4度中性粒细胞减少发生率分别为8.2%(4/49)、6.1%(3/49),明显低于次级预防组发生率66.7%(18/27)、37.0%(10/27)(Z=-6.569,P=0.000;Z=-4.338,P=0.000)。在第三~六疗程中,2组中性粒细胞减少发生率无明显统计学差异(Z=-0.938,P=0.348;Z=-0.145,P=0.884;Z=-1.069,P=0.285;Z=-0.027,P=0.978)。化疗结束后初级预防组9例因中性粒细胞减少需补充rhG-CSF,发生率18.4%(9/49),次级预防组22例,发生率81.5%(22/27),2组比较差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=28.711,P=0.000)。初级预防组2例因中性粒细胞减少需重复住院,发生率4.1%(2/49),次级预防组7例,发生率25.9%(7/27),2组比较差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=6.002,P=0.014)。初级预防组1例因中性粒细胞减少导致化疗延迟,发生率2.0%(1/49),次级预防组5例,发生率18.5%(5/27),2组比较差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=4.431,P=0.035)。结论卵巢癌初始肿瘤细胞减灭术后化疗过程中初级预防性应用PEG-rhG-CSF可显著降低第一、二疗程中性粒细胞减少发生率,从而降低中性粒细胞减少相关重复住院率,保证化疗周期如期顺利进行。展开更多
文摘Objective The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor(PEG-rhG-CSF)and recombinant human granulocyte colonystimulating factor(rhG-CSF)for the prevention of neutropenia in elderly breast cancer patients during adjuvant chemotherapy.Methods A total of 45 oncology inpatients with breast cancer,who received adjuvant chemotherapy and were older than 65 years from May 2017 to October 2018 in the General Hospital of the Northern Theater of the Chinese people’s Liberation Army,were included.Epirubivin Cyclophoshamide-Docetaxel(EC-T)sequential adjuvant chemotherapy was chosen.Forty-five patients were randomly divided into two groups;25 patients in the treatment group were treated with PEG-rhG-CSF and 20 patients in the control group were not treated with PEG-rhG-CSF,but only rhG-CSF.The experimental group was treated with the PEG-rhG-CSF at the end of chemotherapy for 24–48 h,with a 6 mg subcutaneous injection once per chemotherapy cycle.In the control group,rhG-CSF was administered after 48 h of chemotherapy,with a 100μg subcutaneous injection,1/d,d 1–7.The dosage could be increased step by step with the exacerbation of neutropenia.The primary aims of this study was to discover the incidence of leukopenia,neutropenia,neutrophilic fever,and adverse reactions in the two groups.Results The incidence of neutropenia,neutrophilic fever and adverse reactions decreased in the treatment group compared to the control group,but no significant difference existed between two groups(P>0.05).Patients in treatment group had a lower,but not statistically significant,incidence of adverse reactions(P>0.05).Conclusion Applying PEG-rhG-CSF could be effective in preventing neutropenia in elderly patients with postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy to treat breast cancer.It may effectively control the occurrence of neutropenia after chemotherapy and reduce the chance of infection.The incidence of side effects,such as fever and bone pain,was low.The adverse drug reactions were well tolerated by patients,which could ensure the smooth progress of chemotherapy.
文摘Objective:To compare the efficacy and safety of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor(PEG-rhG-CSF)for preventive or delayed treatment in neutropenia,completion rate of concurrent chemoradiotherapy and hospitalization rate in patients with esophageal squamous carcinoma during definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy.Methods:A total of 70 patients with esophageal squamous carcinoma in Peking University Cancer Hospital from January 2019 to December 2020,who received PEG-rhG-CSF during concurrent chemoradiotherapy,were enrolled in this retrospective analysis.There were 32 patients in the preventive group,and 38 patients in the delayed group.The incidence of neutropenia,completion rate of concurrent chemoradiotherapy and neutropeniarelated hospitalization rate were compared between PEG-rhG-CSF preventive group and delayed group.Results:The incidence of severe neutropenia(Grades 3–4)in all patients was 31.4%.Comparison between preventive group and delayed group showed that the incidence of severe neutropenia was 6.3%and 39.4%(χ^(2)=10.428,P=0.001),respectively.In preventive group,the incidence of severe neutropenia was 3.7%and 20.0%,respectively,for primary prevention and secondary prevention of PEG-rhG-CSF(χ^(2)=12.321,P=0.001).The completion rate of concurrent chemoradiotherapy was 93.8%in the preventive group and 63.2%in the delayed group(χ^(2)=9.220,P=0.002).The incidence of treatment interruption was 25.7%in the whole group,12.5%in the preventive group and 36.8%in the delayed group(χ^(2)=5.389,P=0.020).Seven patients(7/70,10.0%)were hospitalized and treated with intravenous antibiotics for neutropenia,including 1 in the preventive group and 6 in the delayed group(P=0.078).Conclusions:Prophylactic use of PEG-rhG-CSF during concurrent chemoradiotherapy for patients with esophageal squamous carcinoma can effectively reduce the incidence of neutropenia,ensure the safety of treatment,and improve the completion rate of concurrent chemoradiotherapy.
文摘目的:探讨无外周血CD34监测下聚乙二醇重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子(PEG-rhG-CSF)在血液肿瘤自体外周血干细胞动员中的采集时机及采集效果。方法:回顾性分析2017年8月至2022年1月福建医科大学附属第一医院收治的46例行自体外周血干细胞动员的血液恶性肿瘤患者。采用大剂量化疗联合PEG-rhG-CSF或重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)动员方案,其中应用PEG-rhG-CSF动员的27例(PEG-rhG-CSF组),应用G-CSF动员的19例(G-CSF组),比较两组患者动员采集效果。结果:46例患者共采集86例次,PEG-rhG-CSF组与G-CSF组获得采集物的单个核细胞中位数分别为6.54(3.85-12.61)×10^(8)/kg和6.15(1.13-11.58)×10^(8)/kg(P>0.05),采集物CD34^(+)细胞数分别为11.44(1.33-65.02)×10^(6)/kg和4.95(0.30-24.02)×10^(6)/kg(P<0.05),采集时机分别为14(10-20)和14(4-22)d(P>0.05)。PEG-rhG-CSF组在外周血白细胞(WBC)≥10×10^(9)/L时单次所采集的产物CD34^(+)细胞数明显高于外周血WBC<10×10^(9)/L时采集的数量[19.04(2.85-65.02)×10^(6)/kg vs 6.22(0.81-34.86)×10^(6)/kg,(P<0.05)]。结论:采用PEG-rhG-CSF动员外周血干细胞单次采集足量CD34^(+)细胞成功率高,中位动员时间为14 d;在无外周血CD34监测情况下,外周血WBC≥10×10^(9)/L可以考虑作为单次采集足量干细胞的采集阈值。
文摘目的探讨初级与次级预防性使用聚乙二醇化重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子(pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor,PEG-rhG-CSF)在卵巢癌初始肿瘤细胞减灭术后化疗的价值。方法2019年1月~2020年6月我院76例卵巢癌初始肿瘤细胞减灭术后行紫杉醇和卡铂联合化疗,根据初次预防性使用PEG-rhG-CSF分为初级预防组(n=49)和次级预防组(n=27),比较2组中性粒细胞减少发生率、需要补充重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子(recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor,rhG-CSF)率、中性粒细胞减少相关重复住院率、中性粒细胞减少相关化疗周期延迟发生率等。结果第一、二疗程中,初级预防组3、4度中性粒细胞减少发生率分别为8.2%(4/49)、6.1%(3/49),明显低于次级预防组发生率66.7%(18/27)、37.0%(10/27)(Z=-6.569,P=0.000;Z=-4.338,P=0.000)。在第三~六疗程中,2组中性粒细胞减少发生率无明显统计学差异(Z=-0.938,P=0.348;Z=-0.145,P=0.884;Z=-1.069,P=0.285;Z=-0.027,P=0.978)。化疗结束后初级预防组9例因中性粒细胞减少需补充rhG-CSF,发生率18.4%(9/49),次级预防组22例,发生率81.5%(22/27),2组比较差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=28.711,P=0.000)。初级预防组2例因中性粒细胞减少需重复住院,发生率4.1%(2/49),次级预防组7例,发生率25.9%(7/27),2组比较差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=6.002,P=0.014)。初级预防组1例因中性粒细胞减少导致化疗延迟,发生率2.0%(1/49),次级预防组5例,发生率18.5%(5/27),2组比较差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=4.431,P=0.035)。结论卵巢癌初始肿瘤细胞减灭术后化疗过程中初级预防性应用PEG-rhG-CSF可显著降低第一、二疗程中性粒细胞减少发生率,从而降低中性粒细胞减少相关重复住院率,保证化疗周期如期顺利进行。
