BACKGROUND Acute cholecystitis(AC)is a common disease in general surgery.Laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC)is widely recognized as the"gold standard"surgical procedure for treating AC.For low-risk patients wit...BACKGROUND Acute cholecystitis(AC)is a common disease in general surgery.Laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC)is widely recognized as the"gold standard"surgical procedure for treating AC.For low-risk patients without complications,LC is the recommended treatment plan,but there is still controversy regarding the treatment strategy for moderate AC patients,which relies more on the surgeon's experience and the medical platform of the visiting unit.Percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder puncture drainage(PTGBD)can effectively alleviate gallbladder inflammation,reduce gallbladder wall edema and adhesion around the gallbladder,and create a"time window"for elective surgery.AIM To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of LC or PTGBD combined with LC for treating AC patients,providing a theoretical basis for choosing reasonable surgical methods for AC patients.METHODS In this study,we conducted a clinical investigation regarding the combined use of PTGBD tubes for the treatment of gastric cancer patients with AC.We performed searches in the following databases:PubMed,Web of Science,EMBASE,Cochrane Library,China National Knowledge Infrastructure,and Wanfang Database.The search encompassed literature published from the inception of these databases to the present.Subsequently,relevant data were extracted,and a meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 software.RESULTS A comprehensive analysis was conducted,encompassing 24 studies involving a total of 2564 patients.These patients were categorized into two groups:1371 in the LC group and 1193 in the PTGBD+LC group.The outcomes of the meta-analysis revealed noteworthy disparities between the PTGBD+LC group and the LC group in multiple dimensions:(1)Operative time:Mean difference(MD)=17.51,95%CI:9.53-25.49,P<0.01;(2)Conversion to open surgery rate:Odds ratio(OR)=2.95,95%CI:1.90-4.58,P<0.01;(3)Intraoperative bleeding loss:MD=32.27,95%CI:23.03-41.50,P<0.01;(4)Postoperative hospital stay:MD=1.44,95%CI:0.14-2.73,P=0.03;(5)Overall postoperative compli-cation rate:OR=1.88,95%CI:1.45-2.43,P<0.01;(6)Bile duct injury:OR=2.17,95%CI:1.30-3.64,P=0.003;(7)Intra-abdominal hemorrhage:OR=2.45,95%CI:1.06-5.64,P=0.004;and(8)Wound infection:OR=0.These find-ings consistently favored the PTGBD+LC group over the LC group.There were no significant differences in the total duration of hospitalization[MD=-1.85,95%CI:-4.86-1.16,P=0.23]or bile leakage[OR=1.33,95%CI:0.81-2.18,P=0.26]between the two groups.CONCLUSION The combination of PTGBD tubes with LC for AC treatment demonstrated superior clinical efficacy and enhanced safety,suggesting its broader application value in clinical practice.展开更多
BACKGROUND To date,the optimal timing for percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage(PTGBD),particularly for patients who have missed the optimal window for emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC)(within 72 hou...BACKGROUND To date,the optimal timing for percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage(PTGBD),particularly for patients who have missed the optimal window for emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC)(within 72 hours of symptom onset)has not been determined.AIM To study the effects of LC timing on outcomes of grade II/III acute cholecystitis(AC)in patients with delayed PTGBD.METHODS Data of patients diagnosed with Tokyo Guidelines 2018 grade II or III AC who underwent delayed PTGBD followed by LC at a single hospital between 2018 and 2022 were retrospectively studied.According to the interval between gallbladder drainage and cholecystectomy,the patients were divided into early and delayed LC groups.Outcomes including surgery time,postoperative complications and hospital stay,and patient satisfaction were analyzed and compared between the two groups using t-andχ^(2) tests.RESULTS There were no significant differences between the two groups in intraoperative blood loss,postoperative abdominal drainage tube placement time,pain index,or total disease duration(all P>0.05).Compared with those of the early LC group,the delayed group showed significant decreases in the length of procedure(surgery time),conversion rate to open surgery,degree of adhesions,surgical complications,postoperative hospital stay,and total treatment costs,and increased patient satisfaction despite a longer interval before PTGBD(all P<0.05).CONCLUSION For patients with grade II/III AC with delayed PTGBD,LC should be performed 2 weeks after PTGBD to decrease postoperative complications and hospital stays and improve patient satisfaction.展开更多
A 77-year-old man underwent percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage(PTGBD) for acute cholecystitis as a preoperative procedure;however,he suddenly suffered cardiopulmonary arrest 4 h after the PTGBD and died.Th...A 77-year-old man underwent percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage(PTGBD) for acute cholecystitis as a preoperative procedure;however,he suddenly suffered cardiopulmonary arrest 4 h after the PTGBD and died.There were three centesis scars for the PTGBD,and only one pathway from the most dorsal centesis scar reached the gallbladder.Microscopically,the PTGBD pathway crossed and injured the intrahepatic arterial wall,and hepatic parenchymal bleeding extended along the PTGBD pathway to the inferior surface of the liver.Blood flowed to the peritoneal cavity through a small gap between the liver and gallbladder.Consequently,the PTGBD caused lethal bleeding.When the percutaneous transhepatic cholangio drainage/PTGBD pathway runs close to vessels near the liver surface,it might be necessary to deal with the possibility of rapid and lethal peritoneal bleeding.展开更多
A 79-year-old previously healthy man presented with acute acalculous cholecystitis with obstruction of the biliary tract. He was successfully treated with antibiotics and percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage...A 79-year-old previously healthy man presented with acute acalculous cholecystitis with obstruction of the biliary tract. He was successfully treated with antibiotics and percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage, but returned to the hospital two days after discharge with a rare complication of this technique, biliopleural fistula. A thoracostomy tube was inserted to drain the pleural effusion, and the patient’s previous antibiotics reinstated. After two weeks of drainage and antibiotics, the fistula healed spontaneously without the need for further intervention.展开更多
BACKGROUND Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography drainage(PTCD)effectively treats biliary obstruction.However,patients must maintain the drainage tube after hospital discharge,which may interfere with daily life a...BACKGROUND Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography drainage(PTCD)effectively treats biliary obstruction.However,patients must maintain the drainage tube after hospital discharge,which may interfere with daily life and work,potentially causing psychological distress.Postoperative rehabilitation is crucial,and strengthened nursing interventions can shorten recovery time.AIM The aim was to evaluate an inpatient model to shorten rehabilitation duration and improve quality of life after PTCD.METHODS A total of 118 patients with malignant obstructive jaundice who were admitted to our hospital between May 2018 and January 2021 were included and divided into observational(with therapy)and control(no therapy)groups of 59 each.RESULTS The observational group had fewer hospitalization days than the control group.The complication,the PTCD fixed-tube prolapse,and tube-related admission rates within 3 mo after PTCD were significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group(P<0.05).The fatigue,pain,nausea,vomiting,pruritus,emaciation,and fever scores after PTCD decreased in both groups compared with the scores before PTCD(P<0.05).The quality of life scores after the intervention were higher in the observation than in the control group(P<0.05).CONCLUSION The model promoted rehabilitation after PTCD,reduced post-PTCD complications,and the tube-related admissions in the 3 mo after the procedure,and improved the quality of life.展开更多
BACKGROUND Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography is a diagnostic and therapeutic procedure that involves inserting a needle into the biliary tree,followed by the immediate insertion of a catheter.Endoscopic ultras...BACKGROUND Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography is a diagnostic and therapeutic procedure that involves inserting a needle into the biliary tree,followed by the immediate insertion of a catheter.Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage(EUS-BD)is a novel technique that allows BD by echoendoscopy and fluoroscopy using a stent from the biliary tree to the gastrointestinal tract.AIM To compare the technical aspects and outcomes of percutaneous transhepatic BD(PTBD)and EUS-BD.METHODS Different databases,including PubMed,Embase,clinicaltrials.gov,the Cochrane library,Scopus,and Google Scholar,were searched according to the guidelines for Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses to obtain studies comparing PTBD and EUS-BD.RESULTS Among the six studies that fulfilled the inclusion criteria,PTBD patients underwent significantly more reinterventions(4.9 vs 1.3),experienced more postprocedural pain(4.1 vs 1.9),and experienced more late adverse events(53.8%vs 6.6%)than EUS-BD patients.There was a significant reduction in the total bilirubin levels in both the groups(16.4-3.3μmol/L and 17.2-3.8μmol/L for EUSBD and PTBD,respectively;P=0.002)at the 7-d follow-up.There were no significant differences observed in the complication rates between PTBD and EUSBD(3.3 vs 3.8).PTBD was associated with a higher adverse event rate than EUSBD in all the procedures,including reinterventions(80.4%vs 15.7%,respectively)and a higher index procedure(39.2%vs 18.2%,respectively).CONCLUSION The findings of this systematic review revealed that EUS-BD is linked with a higher rate of effective BD and a more manageable procedure-related adverse event profile than PTBD.These findings highlight the evidence for successful EUS-BD implementation.展开更多
Patients with acute calculous cholecystitis are usually undertaken surgery laparoscopic cholecystectomy.However, there are controversies about the decision of operation for patients with high risk factors. Percutaneou...Patients with acute calculous cholecystitis are usually undertaken surgery laparoscopic cholecystectomy.However, there are controversies about the decision of operation for patients with high risk factors. Percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage （PTGD） is palliative therapy to alleviate symptoms and physical signs. Since improved clinical outcome has been observed for PTGD,展开更多
BACKGROUND B-mode-ultrasound-guided percutaneous cholecystostomy(PC)may be performed by a transhepatic or transperitoneal approach,called percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage(PHGD)and percutaneous transperit...BACKGROUND B-mode-ultrasound-guided percutaneous cholecystostomy(PC)may be performed by a transhepatic or transperitoneal approach,called percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage(PHGD)and percutaneous transperitoneal gallbladder drainage(PPGD),respectively.We compared the impact of PC related to the route of catheter placement on subsequent laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC).AIM To compare the impact of PC related to the route of catheter placement on subsequent LC.METHODS We retrospectively studied 103 patients with acute calculous cholecystitis who underwent scheduled LC after PC between January 2010 and January 2019.Group I included 58 patients who underwent scheduled LC after PHGD.Group II included 45 patients who underwent scheduled LC after PPGD.Clinical outcomes were analyzed according to each group.RESULTS Baseline demographic characteristics did not differ significantly between both groups(P>0.05).Both PHGD and PPGD were able to quickly resolve cholecystitis sepsis.Group I showed significantly higher efficacy than group II in terms of lower pain score during puncture(3.1 vs 4.5;P=0.001)and at 12 h follow-up(1.5 vs 2.2;P=0.001),lower rate of fever within 24 h after PC(13.8%vs 42.2%;P=0.001),shorted operation duration(118.3 vs 139.6 min;P=0.001),lower amount of intraoperative bleeding(72.1 vs 109.4 mL;P=0.001)and shorter length of hospital stay(14.3 d vs 18.0 d;P=0.001).However,group II had significantly lower rate of local bleeding at the PC site(2.2%vs 20.7%;P=0.005)and lower rate of severe adhesion(33.5%vs 55.2%;P=0.048).No significant differences were noted between both groups regarding the conversion rate to laparotomy,rate of subtotal cholecystectomy,complications and pathology.CONCLUSION B-mode-ultrasound-guided PHGD is superior to PPGD followed by LC for treatment of acute calculous cholecystitis,with shorter operating time,minimal amount of intraoperative bleeding and short length of hospital stay.展开更多
目的 评估内镜鼻胆囊引流(ENGD)治疗胆总管结石合并急性化脓性胆囊炎的安全性和有效性。方法 回顾性纳入2023年1—12月大连医科大学附属第一医院及同济大学附属东方医院收治的46例胆总管结石合并急性化脓性胆囊炎患者,其中21例行内镜逆...目的 评估内镜鼻胆囊引流(ENGD)治疗胆总管结石合并急性化脓性胆囊炎的安全性和有效性。方法 回顾性纳入2023年1—12月大连医科大学附属第一医院及同济大学附属东方医院收治的46例胆总管结石合并急性化脓性胆囊炎患者,其中21例行内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)取石+ENGD治疗(ENGD组),另外25例行ERCP取石+经皮肝穿刺胆管引流(PTGD)(PTGD组),比较两组操作成功率、手术时间、并发症发生率、不良事件发生率、住院时间、治疗费用、患者满意度,以及二期腹腔镜胆囊切除(LC)手术时间、并发症发生率、腹腔引流管留置率及住院时间。结果 两组患者操作成功率均为100%。ENGD组和PTGD组在手术时间[(46.4±4.8)min vs (55.0±6.0)min]、治疗费用[(3.2±0.3)万元vs (3.5±0.3)万元]、患者满意度[5(5,5)分vs 4(4,5)分]方面的比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);ENGD组二期LC手术时间[(45.4±7.0)min vs (58.4±9.2)min]、并发症发生率[1(4.8%) vs 7(28.0%)]、腹腔引流管留置率[10(47.6%) vs 23(92.0%)]及住院时间[(3.6±0.7)d vs (4.7±0.6)d]均低于PTGD组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 ENGD治疗胆总管结石合并急性化脓性胆囊炎安全、有效,患者满意度高,并能降低LC风险。展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND Acute cholecystitis(AC)is a common disease in general surgery.Laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC)is widely recognized as the"gold standard"surgical procedure for treating AC.For low-risk patients without complications,LC is the recommended treatment plan,but there is still controversy regarding the treatment strategy for moderate AC patients,which relies more on the surgeon's experience and the medical platform of the visiting unit.Percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder puncture drainage(PTGBD)can effectively alleviate gallbladder inflammation,reduce gallbladder wall edema and adhesion around the gallbladder,and create a"time window"for elective surgery.AIM To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of LC or PTGBD combined with LC for treating AC patients,providing a theoretical basis for choosing reasonable surgical methods for AC patients.METHODS In this study,we conducted a clinical investigation regarding the combined use of PTGBD tubes for the treatment of gastric cancer patients with AC.We performed searches in the following databases:PubMed,Web of Science,EMBASE,Cochrane Library,China National Knowledge Infrastructure,and Wanfang Database.The search encompassed literature published from the inception of these databases to the present.Subsequently,relevant data were extracted,and a meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 software.RESULTS A comprehensive analysis was conducted,encompassing 24 studies involving a total of 2564 patients.These patients were categorized into two groups:1371 in the LC group and 1193 in the PTGBD+LC group.The outcomes of the meta-analysis revealed noteworthy disparities between the PTGBD+LC group and the LC group in multiple dimensions:(1)Operative time:Mean difference(MD)=17.51,95%CI:9.53-25.49,P<0.01;(2)Conversion to open surgery rate:Odds ratio(OR)=2.95,95%CI:1.90-4.58,P<0.01;(3)Intraoperative bleeding loss:MD=32.27,95%CI:23.03-41.50,P<0.01;(4)Postoperative hospital stay:MD=1.44,95%CI:0.14-2.73,P=0.03;(5)Overall postoperative compli-cation rate:OR=1.88,95%CI:1.45-2.43,P<0.01;(6)Bile duct injury:OR=2.17,95%CI:1.30-3.64,P=0.003;(7)Intra-abdominal hemorrhage:OR=2.45,95%CI:1.06-5.64,P=0.004;and(8)Wound infection:OR=0.These find-ings consistently favored the PTGBD+LC group over the LC group.There were no significant differences in the total duration of hospitalization[MD=-1.85,95%CI:-4.86-1.16,P=0.23]or bile leakage[OR=1.33,95%CI:0.81-2.18,P=0.26]between the two groups.CONCLUSION The combination of PTGBD tubes with LC for AC treatment demonstrated superior clinical efficacy and enhanced safety,suggesting its broader application value in clinical practice.
文摘BACKGROUND To date,the optimal timing for percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage(PTGBD),particularly for patients who have missed the optimal window for emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC)(within 72 hours of symptom onset)has not been determined.AIM To study the effects of LC timing on outcomes of grade II/III acute cholecystitis(AC)in patients with delayed PTGBD.METHODS Data of patients diagnosed with Tokyo Guidelines 2018 grade II or III AC who underwent delayed PTGBD followed by LC at a single hospital between 2018 and 2022 were retrospectively studied.According to the interval between gallbladder drainage and cholecystectomy,the patients were divided into early and delayed LC groups.Outcomes including surgery time,postoperative complications and hospital stay,and patient satisfaction were analyzed and compared between the two groups using t-andχ^(2) tests.RESULTS There were no significant differences between the two groups in intraoperative blood loss,postoperative abdominal drainage tube placement time,pain index,or total disease duration(all P>0.05).Compared with those of the early LC group,the delayed group showed significant decreases in the length of procedure(surgery time),conversion rate to open surgery,degree of adhesions,surgical complications,postoperative hospital stay,and total treatment costs,and increased patient satisfaction despite a longer interval before PTGBD(all P<0.05).CONCLUSION For patients with grade II/III AC with delayed PTGBD,LC should be performed 2 weeks after PTGBD to decrease postoperative complications and hospital stays and improve patient satisfaction.
文摘A 77-year-old man underwent percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage(PTGBD) for acute cholecystitis as a preoperative procedure;however,he suddenly suffered cardiopulmonary arrest 4 h after the PTGBD and died.There were three centesis scars for the PTGBD,and only one pathway from the most dorsal centesis scar reached the gallbladder.Microscopically,the PTGBD pathway crossed and injured the intrahepatic arterial wall,and hepatic parenchymal bleeding extended along the PTGBD pathway to the inferior surface of the liver.Blood flowed to the peritoneal cavity through a small gap between the liver and gallbladder.Consequently,the PTGBD caused lethal bleeding.When the percutaneous transhepatic cholangio drainage/PTGBD pathway runs close to vessels near the liver surface,it might be necessary to deal with the possibility of rapid and lethal peritoneal bleeding.
文摘A 79-year-old previously healthy man presented with acute acalculous cholecystitis with obstruction of the biliary tract. He was successfully treated with antibiotics and percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage, but returned to the hospital two days after discharge with a rare complication of this technique, biliopleural fistula. A thoracostomy tube was inserted to drain the pleural effusion, and the patient’s previous antibiotics reinstated. After two weeks of drainage and antibiotics, the fistula healed spontaneously without the need for further intervention.
文摘BACKGROUND Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography drainage(PTCD)effectively treats biliary obstruction.However,patients must maintain the drainage tube after hospital discharge,which may interfere with daily life and work,potentially causing psychological distress.Postoperative rehabilitation is crucial,and strengthened nursing interventions can shorten recovery time.AIM The aim was to evaluate an inpatient model to shorten rehabilitation duration and improve quality of life after PTCD.METHODS A total of 118 patients with malignant obstructive jaundice who were admitted to our hospital between May 2018 and January 2021 were included and divided into observational(with therapy)and control(no therapy)groups of 59 each.RESULTS The observational group had fewer hospitalization days than the control group.The complication,the PTCD fixed-tube prolapse,and tube-related admission rates within 3 mo after PTCD were significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group(P<0.05).The fatigue,pain,nausea,vomiting,pruritus,emaciation,and fever scores after PTCD decreased in both groups compared with the scores before PTCD(P<0.05).The quality of life scores after the intervention were higher in the observation than in the control group(P<0.05).CONCLUSION The model promoted rehabilitation after PTCD,reduced post-PTCD complications,and the tube-related admissions in the 3 mo after the procedure,and improved the quality of life.
文摘BACKGROUND Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography is a diagnostic and therapeutic procedure that involves inserting a needle into the biliary tree,followed by the immediate insertion of a catheter.Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage(EUS-BD)is a novel technique that allows BD by echoendoscopy and fluoroscopy using a stent from the biliary tree to the gastrointestinal tract.AIM To compare the technical aspects and outcomes of percutaneous transhepatic BD(PTBD)and EUS-BD.METHODS Different databases,including PubMed,Embase,clinicaltrials.gov,the Cochrane library,Scopus,and Google Scholar,were searched according to the guidelines for Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses to obtain studies comparing PTBD and EUS-BD.RESULTS Among the six studies that fulfilled the inclusion criteria,PTBD patients underwent significantly more reinterventions(4.9 vs 1.3),experienced more postprocedural pain(4.1 vs 1.9),and experienced more late adverse events(53.8%vs 6.6%)than EUS-BD patients.There was a significant reduction in the total bilirubin levels in both the groups(16.4-3.3μmol/L and 17.2-3.8μmol/L for EUSBD and PTBD,respectively;P=0.002)at the 7-d follow-up.There were no significant differences observed in the complication rates between PTBD and EUSBD(3.3 vs 3.8).PTBD was associated with a higher adverse event rate than EUSBD in all the procedures,including reinterventions(80.4%vs 15.7%,respectively)and a higher index procedure(39.2%vs 18.2%,respectively).CONCLUSION The findings of this systematic review revealed that EUS-BD is linked with a higher rate of effective BD and a more manageable procedure-related adverse event profile than PTBD.These findings highlight the evidence for successful EUS-BD implementation.
基金This study was supported by grants from Science and Technology Development Plan of Shandong Province （No. 2011GSF 11836）, Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province （No. ZR2012HM029） and Shandong Taishan Scholarship （Liu J）.
文摘Patients with acute calculous cholecystitis are usually undertaken surgery laparoscopic cholecystectomy.However, there are controversies about the decision of operation for patients with high risk factors. Percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage （PTGD） is palliative therapy to alleviate symptoms and physical signs. Since improved clinical outcome has been observed for PTGD,
文摘BACKGROUND B-mode-ultrasound-guided percutaneous cholecystostomy(PC)may be performed by a transhepatic or transperitoneal approach,called percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage(PHGD)and percutaneous transperitoneal gallbladder drainage(PPGD),respectively.We compared the impact of PC related to the route of catheter placement on subsequent laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC).AIM To compare the impact of PC related to the route of catheter placement on subsequent LC.METHODS We retrospectively studied 103 patients with acute calculous cholecystitis who underwent scheduled LC after PC between January 2010 and January 2019.Group I included 58 patients who underwent scheduled LC after PHGD.Group II included 45 patients who underwent scheduled LC after PPGD.Clinical outcomes were analyzed according to each group.RESULTS Baseline demographic characteristics did not differ significantly between both groups(P>0.05).Both PHGD and PPGD were able to quickly resolve cholecystitis sepsis.Group I showed significantly higher efficacy than group II in terms of lower pain score during puncture(3.1 vs 4.5;P=0.001)and at 12 h follow-up(1.5 vs 2.2;P=0.001),lower rate of fever within 24 h after PC(13.8%vs 42.2%;P=0.001),shorted operation duration(118.3 vs 139.6 min;P=0.001),lower amount of intraoperative bleeding(72.1 vs 109.4 mL;P=0.001)and shorter length of hospital stay(14.3 d vs 18.0 d;P=0.001).However,group II had significantly lower rate of local bleeding at the PC site(2.2%vs 20.7%;P=0.005)and lower rate of severe adhesion(33.5%vs 55.2%;P=0.048).No significant differences were noted between both groups regarding the conversion rate to laparotomy,rate of subtotal cholecystectomy,complications and pathology.CONCLUSION B-mode-ultrasound-guided PHGD is superior to PPGD followed by LC for treatment of acute calculous cholecystitis,with shorter operating time,minimal amount of intraoperative bleeding and short length of hospital stay.
文摘目的 评估内镜鼻胆囊引流(ENGD)治疗胆总管结石合并急性化脓性胆囊炎的安全性和有效性。方法 回顾性纳入2023年1—12月大连医科大学附属第一医院及同济大学附属东方医院收治的46例胆总管结石合并急性化脓性胆囊炎患者,其中21例行内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)取石+ENGD治疗(ENGD组),另外25例行ERCP取石+经皮肝穿刺胆管引流(PTGD)(PTGD组),比较两组操作成功率、手术时间、并发症发生率、不良事件发生率、住院时间、治疗费用、患者满意度,以及二期腹腔镜胆囊切除(LC)手术时间、并发症发生率、腹腔引流管留置率及住院时间。结果 两组患者操作成功率均为100%。ENGD组和PTGD组在手术时间[(46.4±4.8)min vs (55.0±6.0)min]、治疗费用[(3.2±0.3)万元vs (3.5±0.3)万元]、患者满意度[5(5,5)分vs 4(4,5)分]方面的比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);ENGD组二期LC手术时间[(45.4±7.0)min vs (58.4±9.2)min]、并发症发生率[1(4.8%) vs 7(28.0%)]、腹腔引流管留置率[10(47.6%) vs 23(92.0%)]及住院时间[(3.6±0.7)d vs (4.7±0.6)d]均低于PTGD组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 ENGD治疗胆总管结石合并急性化脓性胆囊炎安全、有效,患者满意度高,并能降低LC风险。
