目的:分析宫颈高危型人乳头瘤病毒(high risk human papilloma virus,HR-HPV)感染患者中医体质类型分布特点,为中医药调理体质防治宫颈HR-HPV感染提供依据。方法:选择2019年1月至2020年12月就诊于河南中医药大学第一附属医院妇科门诊及...目的:分析宫颈高危型人乳头瘤病毒(high risk human papilloma virus,HR-HPV)感染患者中医体质类型分布特点,为中医药调理体质防治宫颈HR-HPV感染提供依据。方法:选择2019年1月至2020年12月就诊于河南中医药大学第一附属医院妇科门诊及体检中心的420例宫颈HR-HPV感染者作为观察组,选择420例同时段宫颈HR-HPV检测阴性者为对照组。分析两组中医体质类型分布情况、观察组不同年龄段中医体质类型分布情况、观察组不同HR-HPV基因型别中医体质类型。结果:观察组中医体质分布依次为:痰湿质(30.50%)>湿热质(19.00%)>平和质(15.50%)>阳虚质(14.80%)>气虚质(10.00%)>阴虚质(5.90%)>瘀血质(2.70%)>气郁质(1.70%);对照组中医体质分布依次为:平和质(73.30%)>湿热质(8.40%)>阴虚质(5.70%)>痰湿质(4.50%)>气虚质(4.30%)>阳虚质/瘀血质(1.80%)>气郁质(0.20%)。两组中医体质类型比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),其中,痰湿质、湿热质、阳虚质、气虚质,两组间比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.001)。观察组体质类型居前三位的是痰湿质、湿热质、阳虚质,占全部体质类型的64.30%。对照组平和质324例,占比73.50%,观察组平和质81例,占比15.50%,两组间比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.001)。观察组中,痰湿质、阳虚质、阴虚质主要见于46~55岁,湿热质、气虚质、气郁质主要见于36~45岁,组间比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组宫颈HR-HPV16、18型和非16、18型中医体质比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:痰湿质、湿热质、阳虚质为宫颈HR-HPV感染人群的易感体质;痰湿质、湿热质、阳虚质与年龄具有相关性,痰湿质多见于36~45岁,湿热质、阳虚质多见于46~55岁,HR-HPV基因型别与中医体质类型之间无明显相关性。展开更多
Objective： To explore the polymorphism of low density lipoprotein receptor （LDL-R） genes Pvu Ⅱ end Ave Ⅱ in e population with phlegm-dampness constitution （PDC）. Methods： Polymorphism of LDL-R genes at Pvu Ⅱ ...Objective： To explore the polymorphism of low density lipoprotein receptor （LDL-R） genes Pvu Ⅱ end Ave Ⅱ in e population with phlegm-dampness constitution （PDC）. Methods： Polymorphism of LDL-R genes at Pvu Ⅱ end Ave Ⅱ of 48 persons with gentle constitution （GC） end 61 with PDC were analyzed with PCR-RELP technique, end their serum contents of lipids end glucose were determined end compared as well. Results： The A＋ ellelic end P- ellelic frequency were higher end the P＋ ellelic frequency was lower in subjects with PDC then those in subjects with GC, which were 0.3083 vs 0.1771, 0.9098 vs 0.7708 end 0.0902 vs 0.2292, respectively, ell showing significant difference between the two groups （P〈0.05）. Comparison of the two groups in serum levels of triglyceride （TG）, fasting blood glucose, 2 h postprandial blood glucose, end 2 h postprandial insulin showed that ell the parameters were higher in subjects with PDC then in subjects with GC respectively, showing significant difference （P〈0.05）. Conclusion： PDC is related with the P- end A＋ ellelic frequency of higher LDL-R genes at Pvu Ⅱ end Ave Ⅱ, therefore, the polymorphism of LDL-R genes could be taken as one of the genetic markers for PDC, end humans with PDC ere more liable to suffer from blood lipids end glucose disorder then those with GC.展开更多
文摘目的:分析宫颈高危型人乳头瘤病毒(high risk human papilloma virus,HR-HPV)感染患者中医体质类型分布特点,为中医药调理体质防治宫颈HR-HPV感染提供依据。方法:选择2019年1月至2020年12月就诊于河南中医药大学第一附属医院妇科门诊及体检中心的420例宫颈HR-HPV感染者作为观察组,选择420例同时段宫颈HR-HPV检测阴性者为对照组。分析两组中医体质类型分布情况、观察组不同年龄段中医体质类型分布情况、观察组不同HR-HPV基因型别中医体质类型。结果:观察组中医体质分布依次为:痰湿质(30.50%)>湿热质(19.00%)>平和质(15.50%)>阳虚质(14.80%)>气虚质(10.00%)>阴虚质(5.90%)>瘀血质(2.70%)>气郁质(1.70%);对照组中医体质分布依次为:平和质(73.30%)>湿热质(8.40%)>阴虚质(5.70%)>痰湿质(4.50%)>气虚质(4.30%)>阳虚质/瘀血质(1.80%)>气郁质(0.20%)。两组中医体质类型比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),其中,痰湿质、湿热质、阳虚质、气虚质,两组间比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.001)。观察组体质类型居前三位的是痰湿质、湿热质、阳虚质,占全部体质类型的64.30%。对照组平和质324例,占比73.50%,观察组平和质81例,占比15.50%,两组间比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.001)。观察组中,痰湿质、阳虚质、阴虚质主要见于46~55岁,湿热质、气虚质、气郁质主要见于36~45岁,组间比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组宫颈HR-HPV16、18型和非16、18型中医体质比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:痰湿质、湿热质、阳虚质为宫颈HR-HPV感染人群的易感体质;痰湿质、湿热质、阳虚质与年龄具有相关性,痰湿质多见于36~45岁,湿热质、阳虚质多见于46~55岁,HR-HPV基因型别与中医体质类型之间无明显相关性。
基金Supported by the State Administration of TCM (No.2003LHR18)
文摘Objective： To explore the polymorphism of low density lipoprotein receptor （LDL-R） genes Pvu Ⅱ end Ave Ⅱ in e population with phlegm-dampness constitution （PDC）. Methods： Polymorphism of LDL-R genes at Pvu Ⅱ end Ave Ⅱ of 48 persons with gentle constitution （GC） end 61 with PDC were analyzed with PCR-RELP technique, end their serum contents of lipids end glucose were determined end compared as well. Results： The A＋ ellelic end P- ellelic frequency were higher end the P＋ ellelic frequency was lower in subjects with PDC then those in subjects with GC, which were 0.3083 vs 0.1771, 0.9098 vs 0.7708 end 0.0902 vs 0.2292, respectively, ell showing significant difference between the two groups （P〈0.05）. Comparison of the two groups in serum levels of triglyceride （TG）, fasting blood glucose, 2 h postprandial blood glucose, end 2 h postprandial insulin showed that ell the parameters were higher in subjects with PDC then in subjects with GC respectively, showing significant difference （P〈0.05）. Conclusion： PDC is related with the P- end A＋ ellelic frequency of higher LDL-R genes at Pvu Ⅱ end Ave Ⅱ, therefore, the polymorphism of LDL-R genes could be taken as one of the genetic markers for PDC, end humans with PDC ere more liable to suffer from blood lipids end glucose disorder then those with GC.
