Narrative ethics shows multiple representing methods in Oates' s novels,including not only a variety of characters' narrative construction processes of self-narrative,other-narrative and social narrative but a...Narrative ethics shows multiple representing methods in Oates' s novels,including not only a variety of characters' narrative construction processes of self-narrative,other-narrative and social narrative but also the meaninggenerating process of the characters' interpretation and reorganization of the external and internal world.In so doing,the characters are able to obtain personal identity,the ethical communication and existence transcendence by the way of narrative.展开更多
目的研究不同程度耳聋婴幼儿选配助听器后言语产出能力的规律,探讨耳聋程度对患儿言语产出能力的影响,为这类婴幼儿听觉言语康复提供参考。方法 32名选配助听器的中重度和极重度语前聋婴幼儿为研究对象,选配助听器年龄为3～34个月,平均1...目的研究不同程度耳聋婴幼儿选配助听器后言语产出能力的规律,探讨耳聋程度对患儿言语产出能力的影响,为这类婴幼儿听觉言语康复提供参考。方法 32名选配助听器的中重度和极重度语前聋婴幼儿为研究对象,选配助听器年龄为3～34个月,平均16±9个月。根据耳聋程度(0.5～4kHz平均气导听阈)将患儿分为三组,A组为中度耳聋听阈为(41～60dB HL,5例),B组为重度耳聋听阈为(61～80dB HL,9例),C组为极重度耳聋听阈(≥81dB HL,18例)。分别在助听器选配前及选配后1、3、6、9、12个月时采用有意义使用言语量表(meaningful use of speech scale,MUSS)对各组患儿的言语产出能力进行评估。结果经多个独立样本比较的秩和检验,随助听器使用时间的延长,B组和C组患儿言语产出能力得分显著提高(P<0.05),而A组患儿无显著提高(P>0.05);经两样本比较的秩和检验,A、B两组患儿间在助听器选配前和选配后1、3、6、9、12个月各评估阶段的言语产出能力得分的差异均无显著统计学意义(P>0.05);A与C及B与C各两组患儿之间在上述各评估阶段言语产出能力得分的差异也无显著统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论重度和极重度聋婴幼儿在选配助听器1年内其言语产出能力随助听器使用时间的延长而逐渐提高;耳聋程度对选配助听器婴幼儿言语产出能力存在一定影响。展开更多
文摘Narrative ethics shows multiple representing methods in Oates' s novels,including not only a variety of characters' narrative construction processes of self-narrative,other-narrative and social narrative but also the meaninggenerating process of the characters' interpretation and reorganization of the external and internal world.In so doing,the characters are able to obtain personal identity,the ethical communication and existence transcendence by the way of narrative.
文摘目的研究不同程度耳聋婴幼儿选配助听器后言语产出能力的规律,探讨耳聋程度对患儿言语产出能力的影响,为这类婴幼儿听觉言语康复提供参考。方法 32名选配助听器的中重度和极重度语前聋婴幼儿为研究对象,选配助听器年龄为3～34个月,平均16±9个月。根据耳聋程度(0.5～4kHz平均气导听阈)将患儿分为三组,A组为中度耳聋听阈为(41～60dB HL,5例),B组为重度耳聋听阈为(61～80dB HL,9例),C组为极重度耳聋听阈(≥81dB HL,18例)。分别在助听器选配前及选配后1、3、6、9、12个月时采用有意义使用言语量表(meaningful use of speech scale,MUSS)对各组患儿的言语产出能力进行评估。结果经多个独立样本比较的秩和检验,随助听器使用时间的延长,B组和C组患儿言语产出能力得分显著提高(P<0.05),而A组患儿无显著提高(P>0.05);经两样本比较的秩和检验,A、B两组患儿间在助听器选配前和选配后1、3、6、9、12个月各评估阶段的言语产出能力得分的差异均无显著统计学意义(P>0.05);A与C及B与C各两组患儿之间在上述各评估阶段言语产出能力得分的差异也无显著统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论重度和极重度聋婴幼儿在选配助听器1年内其言语产出能力随助听器使用时间的延长而逐渐提高;耳聋程度对选配助听器婴幼儿言语产出能力存在一定影响。
