Cytokine release syndrome induced by anti-programmed death-1 treatment in a psoriasis patient:A dark side of immune checkpoint inhibitors

In recent years,cancer immunotherapy has introduced novel treatments,such as monoclonal antibodies,which have facilitated targeted therapies against tumor cells.Programmed death-1(PD-1)is an immune checkpoint expressed in T cells that regulates the immune system’s activity to prevent over-activation and tissue damage caused by inflammation.However,PD-1 is also expressed in tumor cells and functions as an immune evasion mechanism,making it a therapeutic target to enhance the immune response and eliminate tumor cells.Consequently,immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs)have emerged as an option for certain tumor types.Nevertheless,blocking immune checkpoints can lead to immune-related adverse events(irAEs),such as psoriasis and cytokine release syndrome(CRS),as exemp-lified in the clinical case presented by Zhou et al involving a patient with adva-nced gastric cancer who received sintilimab,a monoclonal antibody targeting PD-1.Subsequently,the patient experienced exacerbation of psoriasis and CRS.The objective of this editorial article is to elucidate potential immunologic mechanisms that may contribute to the development of CRS and psoriasis in patients receiving ICIs.It is crucial to acknowledge that while ICIs offer superior safety and efficacy compared to conventional therapies,they can also manifest irAEs affecting the skin,gastrointestinal tract,or respiratory system.In severe cases,these irAEs can lead to life-threatening complications such as circulatory shock or multiorgan failure.Consequently,it is recommended that patients receiving ICIs undergo regular monitoring to identify and manage these adverse events effectively.

Efficacy comparison of fruquintinib,regorafenib monotherapy or plus programmed death-1 inhibitors for microsatellite stable metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND Regorafenib(R)and fruquintinib(F)are the standard third-line regimens for colorectal cancer(CRC)according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines,but both have limited efficacy.Several phase 2 trials have indicated that R or F combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors can reverse immunosuppression and achieve promising efficacy for microsatellite stable or proficient mismatch repair(MSS/pMMR)CRC.Due to the lack of studies comparing the efficacy between F,R,F plus programmed death-1(PD-1)inhibitor,and R plus PD-1 inhibitors(RP),it is still unclear whether the combination therapy is more effective than monotherapy.AIM To provide critical evidence for selecting the appropriate drugs for MSS/pMMR metastatic CRC(mCRC)patients in clinical practice.METHODS A total of 2639 CRC patients were enrolled from January 2018 to September 2022 in our hospital,and 313 MSS/pMMR mCRC patients were finally included.RESULTS A total of 313 eligible patients were divided into F(n=70),R(n=67),F plus PD-1 inhibitor(FP)(n=95)and RP(n=81)groups.The key clinical characteristics were well balanced among the groups.The median progression-free survival(PFS)of the F,R,FP,and RP groups was 3.5 months,3.6 months,4.9 months,and 3.0 months,respectively.The median overall survival(OS)was 14.6 months,15.7 months,16.7 months,and 14.1 months.The FP regimen had an improved disease control rate(DCR)(P=0.044)and 6-month PFS(P=0.014)and exhibited a better trend in PFS(P=0.057)compared with F,and it was also significantly better in PFS than RP(P=0.030).RP did not confer a significant survival benefit;instead,the R group had a trend toward greater benefit with OS(P=0.080)compared with RP.No significant differences were observed between the R and F groups in PFS or OS(P>0.05).CONCLUSION FP is superior to F in achieving 6-month PFS and DCR,while RP is not better than R.FP has an improved PFS and 6-month PFS compared with RP,but F and R had similar clinical efficacy.Therefore,FP may be a highly promising strategy in the treatment of MSS/pMMR mCRC.

Research progress regarding programmed cell death 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 inhibitors combined with targeted therapy for treating hepatocellular carcinoma

In recent years,a number of targeted therapeutic agents have achieved success in phase III trials in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC),including sorafenib,lenvatinib,and regorafenib.Immunotherapy is considered to be an effective treatment for advanced HCC.Immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting programmed cell death 1(PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1(PDL1)are important antitumor immunotherapy agents that represent breakthroughs in the treatment of advanced HCC.However,treating advanced HCC is still a great challenge,and the need for new treatments remains urgent.This review briefly summarizes the research progress in the use of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with targeted therapy for treating HCC.

Use of programmed cell death protein ligand 1 assay to predict the outcomes of non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

The recent discovery of immune checkpoints inhibitors, especially anti-programmed cell death protein 1(PD-1)and anti-programmed cell death protein ligand 1(PD-L1) monoclonal antibodies, has opened new scenarios in the management of non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC) and this new class of drugs has achieved a rapid development in the treatment of this disease. However, considering the costs of these drugs and the fact that only a subset of patients experience long-term disease control, the identification of predictive biomarkers for the selection of candidates suitable for treatment has become a priority. The research focused mainly on the expression of the PD-L1 receptor on both tumor cells and/or immune infiltrates determined by immunohistochemistry(IHC). However, different checkpoint inhibitors were tested, different IHC assays were used, different targets were considered(tumor cells, immune infiltrates or both) and different expression thresholds were employed in clinical trials. In some trials the assay was used prospectively to select the patients, while in other trials it was evaluated retrospectively. Some confusion emerges, which makes it difficult to easily compare the literature data and to translate them in practice management. This mini-review shows the possibilities and pitfalls of the PD-L1 expression to predict the activity and efficacy of anti PD1/PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of NSCLC.

Advances on biological evaluation methods of programmed cell death protein-1/ligand-1 inhibitors

Immuno-oncology represents a groundbreaking and well-established field within cancer treatment.Among the various immuno-oncology targets,the exploration of programmed cell death-1/ligand-1 for drug discovery has proven to be one of the most successful endeavors.Remarkably,it took nearly 30 years from the initial target identification to the clinical approval of monoclonal antibodies.Providing suitable and reliable bioassays for drug candidate evaluation is of paramount importance throughout the early stages of drug discovery,from lead compound identification to in vivo efficacy testing.This assay review aims to shed light on diverse assays reported in the literature for testing antagonism activity and efficacy of programmed cell death-1/ligand-1 inhibitors.Each of these assays possesses inherent advantages and can be applied in different research scenarios.The insights presented in this summary can serve as a valuable resource for scientists in this field,aiding in the selection of appropriate assays for their specific investigations.

Immunotherapy against programmed death-1/programmed death ligand 1 in hepatocellular carcinoma: Importance of molecular variations, cellular heterogeneity, and cancer stem cells

Hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)is a heterogeneous malignancy related to diverse etiological factors.Different oncogenic mechanisms and genetic variations lead to multiple HCC molecular classifications.Recently,an immune-based strategy using immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs)was presented in HCC therapy,especially with ICIs against the programmed death-1(PD-1)and its ligand PD-L1.However,despite the success of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 in other cancers,a substantial proportion of HCC patients fail to respond.In this review,we gather current information on biomarkers of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment and the contribution of HCC heterogeneity and hepatic cancer stem cells(CSCs).Genetic variations of PD-1 and PD-L1 are associated with chronic liver disease and progression to cancer.PD-L1 expression in tumoral tissues is differentially expressed in CSCs,particularly in those with a close association with the tumor microenvironment.This information will be beneficial for the selection of patients and the management of the ICIs against PD-1/PD-L1.

Comprehensive insights into the effects and regulatory mechanisms of immune cells expressing programmed death-1/programmed death ligand 1 in solid tumors

The programmed cell death-1(PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1(PD-L1)signaling pathway is an important mechanism in tumor immune escape,and expression of PD-L1 on tumor cells has been reported more frequently.However,accumulating evidence suggests that PD-1/PD-L1 is also widely expressed on immune cells,and that regulation is also critical for tumor immune responses.In this review,we emphasized that under solid tumor conditions,the immunoregulatory effects of immune cells expressing PD-1 or PD-L1,affected the prognoses of cancer patients.Therefore,a better understanding of the mechanisms that regulate PD-1 or PD-L1 expression on immune cells would provide clear insights into the increased efficacy of anti-PD antibodies and the development of novel tumor immunotherapy strategies.

C-reactive protein to albumin ratio predict responses to programmed cell death-1 inhibitors in hepatocellular carcinoma patients

BACKGROUND Over the years,programmed cell death-1(PD-1)inhibitors have been routinely used for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)treatment and yielded improved survival outcomes.Nonetheless,significant heterogeneity surrounds the outcomes of most studies.Therefore,it is critical to search for biomarkers that predict the efficacy of PD-1 inhibitors in patients with HCC.AIM To investigate the role of the C-reactive protein to albumin ratio(CAR)in evaluating the efficacy of PD-1 inhibitors for HCC.METHODS The clinical data of 160 patients with HCC treated with PD-1 inhibitors from January 2018 to November 2022 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University were retrospectively analyzed.RESULTS The optimal cut-off value for CAR based on progression-free survival(PFS)was determined to be 1.20 using x-tile software.Cox proportional risk model was used to determine the factors affecting prognosis.Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status[hazard ratio(HR)=1.754,95%confidence interval(95%CI)=1.045-2.944,P=0.033],CAR(HR=2.118,95%CI=1.057-4.243,P=0.034)and tumor number(HR=2.932,95%CI=1.246-6.897,P=0.014)were independent prognostic factors for overall survival.CAR(HR=2.730,95%CI=1.502-4.961,P=0.001),tumor number(HR=1.584,95%CI=1.003-2.500,P=0.048)and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio(HR=1.120,95%CI=1.022-1.228,P=0.015)were independent prognostic factors for PFS.Two nomograms were constructed based on independent prognostic factors.The C-index index and calibration plots confirmed that the nomogram is a reliable risk prediction tool.The ROC curve and decision curve analysis confirmed that the nomogram has a good predictive effect as well as a net clinical benefit.CONCLUSION Overall,we reveal that the CAR is a potential predictor of short-and long-term prognosis in patients with HCC treated with PD-1 inhibitors.If further verified,CAR-based nomogram may increase the number of markers that predict individualized prognosis.

Costimulatory molecule programmed death-1 in the cytotoxic response during chronic hepatitis C

Hepatitis C virus（HCV）-specific CD8^＋ T cells play an important role in the resolution of HCV infection. Nevertheless, during chronic hepatitis C these cells lack their effector functions and fail to control the virus. HCV has developed several mechanisms to escape immune control. One of these strategies is the upregulation of negative co-stimulatory molecules such us programmed death-1 （PD-1）. This molecule is upregulated on intrahepatic and peripheral HCV-specific cytotoxic T cells during acute and chronic phases of the disease, whereas PD-1 expression is low in resolved infection. PD-1 expressing HCV-specific CD8^＋ T cells are exhausted with impairment of several effector mechanisms, such as： type-1 cytokine production, expansion ability after antigen encounter and cytotoxic ability. However, PD-1 associated exhaustion can be restored by blocking the interaction between PD-1 and its ligand （PD-L1）. After this blockade, HCV-specific CD8^＋ T cells reacquire their functionality. Nevertheless, functional restoration depends on PD-1 expression level. High PD-l-expressing intrahepatic HCV-specific CD8^＋ T cells do not restore their effector abilities after PD-1/ PD-L1 blockade. The mechanisms by which HCV is able to induce PD-1 up-regulation to escape immune control are unknown. Persistent TCR stimulation by a high level of HCV antigens could favour early PD-1 induction, but the interaction between HCV core protein and gClq receptor could also participate in this process. The PD-1/PD-L1 pathway modulation could be a therapeutic strategy, in conjunction with the regulation of others co-stimulatory pathways, in order to restore immune response aclainst HCV to succeed in clearing the infection.

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with anti-angiogenesis agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAIC)has been proven to be an ideal choice for treating unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma(uHCC).HAIC-based treatment showed great potential for treating uHCC.However,large-scale studies on HAIC-based treatments and meta-analyses of first-line treatments for uHCC are lacking.AIM To investigate better first-line treatment options for uHCC and to assess the safety and efficacy of HAIC combined with angiogenesis inhibitors,programmed cell death of protein 1(PD-1)and its ligand(PD-L1)blockers(triple therapy)under real-world conditions.METHODS Several electronic databases were searched to identify eligible randomized controlled trials for this meta-analysis.Study-level pooled analyses of hazard ratios(HRs)and odds ratios(ORs)were performed.This was a retrospective single-center study involving 442 patients with uHCC who received triple therapy or angiogenesis inhibitors plus PD-1/PD-L1 blockades(AIPB)at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from January 2018 to April 2023.Propensity score matching(PSM)was performed to balance the bias between the groups.The Kaplan-Meier method and cox regression were used to analyse the survival data,and the log-rank test was used to compare the suvival time between the groups.RESULTS A total of 13 randomized controlled trials were included.HAIC alone and in combination with sorafenib were found to be effective treatments(P values for ORs:HAIC,0.95;for HRs:HAIC+sorafenib,0.04).After PSM,176 HCC patients were included in the analysis.The triple therapy group(n=88)had a longer median overall survival than the AIPB group(n=88)(31.6 months vs 14.6 months,P<0.001)and a greater incidence of adverse events(94.3%vs 75.4%,P<0.001).CONCLUSION This meta-analysis suggests that HAIC-based treatments are likely to be the best choice for uHCC.Our findings confirm that triple therapy is more effective for uHCC patients than AIPB.

Risk of interstitial lung disease with the use of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor compared with programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor in patients with breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background:Programmed cell death 1(PD-1)and programmed cell death ligand 1(PD-L1)inhibitors have become integral elements within the current landscape of breast cancer treatment modalities;however,they are associ-ated with interstitial lung disease(ILD),which is rare but potentially fatal.Notably,only a few studies have compared the difference in ILD incidence between PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors.Therefore,this study aimed to assess the discrepancies regarding ILD risk between the two immune checkpoint inhibitors.We also reported three cases of ILD after PD-1 inhibitor treatment.Methods:We comprehensively searched PubMed,EMBASE,and the Cochrane Library to identify clinical trials that investigated PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor treatment for patients with breast cancer.Pooled overall estimates of incidence and risk ratio(RR)were calculated with a 95%confidence interval(CI),and a mirror group analysis was per-formed using eligible studies.Results:This meta-analysis included 29 studies with 4639 patients who received PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor treatment.A higher ILD incidence was observed among 2508 patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors than among 2131 patients treated with PD-L1 inhibitors(0.05 vs.0.02).The mirror group analysis further revealed a higher ILD event risk in patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors than in those treated with PD-L1 inhibitors(RR=2.34,95%CI,1.13-4.82,P=0.02).Conclusion:Our findings suggest a greater risk of ILD with PD-1 inhibitors than with PD-L1 inhibitors.These findings are instrumental for clinicians in treatment deliberations,and the adoption of more structured diagnostic approaches and management protocols is necessary to mitigate the risk of ILD.

Faecal microbiota transplantation enhances efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy against cancer

Even though immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs)are effective on multiple cancer types,there are still many non-responding patients.A possible factor put forward that may influence the efficacy of ICIs is the gut microbiota.Additionally,faecal microbiota transplantation may enhance efficacy of ICIs.Nevertheless,the data available in this field are insufficient,and relevant scientific work has just commenced.As a result,the current work reviewed the latest research on the association of gut microbiota with ICI treatments based on anti-programmed cell death protein 1 antibody and anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 antibody and explored the therapeutic potential of faecal microbiota transplantation in combination with ICI therapy in the future.

Immune blockade inhibitors and the radiation abscopal effect in gastrointestinal cancers

The field of tumor immunology has produced in the recent years a revolution in cancer therapeutics putting an end in the long lasting frustration of investigators in the area stemming from largely unsuccessful strides to develop cancer vaccines. This progress has come from the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies blocking ligand/receptor pairs with inhibitory effects for immune cells. Through this blockade immune checkpoint blockers are able to ac-tivate the immune system and create an anti-tumoral effect. A significant sub-set of patients with various types of cancers such as melanoma, lung carcinomas and urothelial cancers benefit from treatment with these drugs and survivals have improved in some ca-ses. However other cancers are primarily resistant to immune blockers and secondary resistance is also the norm. Radiation therapy is often used in the palliative treatment of patients with advanced cancers and, in addition to the local effect in the irradiated field, it may in rare cases produce a systemic antitumor effect, termed "abscopal". This effect has been suggested to be produced by immune mechanisms. Thus an opportunity presents for a synergistic effect of immune stimulation between radiation and immune blockade inhibitors. The therapeutic opportunities presented with the combination of radiation and these drugs for gastrointestinal cancers will be discussed in this editorial overview.

Blood and Histopathological Biomarkers of Immune-related Adverse Effects of Treatment with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been a recent major breakthrough in the management of tumors.They have broadened the scope of management in medical oncology,which has been heavily dependent on chemotherapy.Immune checkpoint inhibitors have renewed the hope of many patients for a more effective treatment.However,Immune checkpoint inhibitors are also associated with a variety of adverse effects,most commonly immunerelated adverse events,and these are often different from the known chemotherapy-induced toxicities.Hence,there is a need to identify specific biomarkers which are able to predict or diagnose these immune-related adverse events.

Programmed cell death-1 inhibitor-related sclerosing cholangitis:A systematic review

BACKGROUND Programmed cell death-1(PD-1)inhibitor has been indicated for many types of malignancies.However,these inhibitors also cause immune-related adverse events.Hepatobiliary disorder is a phenotype of immune-related adverse event affecting 0%–4.5%of patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors.Recent studies have reported PD-1 inhibitor-related sclerosing cholangitis(SC);however,the associated clinical and pathological features are unclear.AIM To evaluate the clinical and pathological features of PD-1 inhibitor-related SC through a systematic review of the literature.METHODS The review,conducted using electronic databases in PubMed,was restricted to the period from January 2014 to September 2019 and focused on case reports/series on PD-1 inhibitor-related SC published in English.We scanned the references of the selected literature to identify any further relevant studies.Six cases previously studied by us,including three that have not yet been published,were included in this review.RESULTS Thirty-one PD-1 inhibitor-related SC cases were evaluated.Median age of patients was 67 years(range,43–89),with a male to female ratio of 21:10.The main disease requiring PD-1 inhibitor treatment was non-small cell lung cancer.Agents that caused PD-1 inhibitor-related SC were nivolumab(19 cases),pembrolizumab(10 cases),avelumab(1 case),and durvalumab(1 case).The median number of cycles until PD-1 inhibitor-related SC onset was 5.5(range,1–27).Abdominal pain or discomfort(35.5%,11/31)was the most frequent symptom.Blood serum tests identified liver dysfunction with a notable increase in biliary tract enzymes relative to hepatic enzymes,and a normal level of serum immunoglobulin G4.Biliary dilation without obstruction(76.9%,20/26),diffuse hypertrophy of the extrahepatic biliary tract(90.5%,19/21),and multiple strictures of the intrahepatic biliary tract(30.4%,7/23)were noted.In 11/23(47.8%)cases,pathological examination indicated that CD8+T cells were the dominant inflammatory cells in the bile duct or peribiliary tract.Although corticosteroids were mainly used for PD inhibitor-related SC treatment,the response rate was 11.5%(3/26).CONCLUSION Some clinical and pathological features of PD-1 inhibitor-related SC were revealed.To establish diagnostic criteria for PD-1 inhibitor-related SC,more cases need to be evaluated.

Regorafenib combined with programmed cell death-1 inhibitor against refractory colorectal cancer and the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio’s prediction on effectiveness

BACKGROUND The effectiveness of regorafenib plus programmed cell death-1(PD-1)inhibitor in treating microsatellite stable(MSS)metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC)remains controversial.AIM To investigate the benefits of regorafenib combined with PD-1 inhibitor in treating MSS mCRC and explore indicators predicting response.METHODS This retrospective study included a total of 30 patients with microsatellite stable metastatic colorectal cancer treated with regorafenib combined with programmed cell death-1 inhibitor at Henan Provincial People’s Hospital between December 2018 and December 2020.During a 4-wk treatment cycle,regorafenib was performed for 3 continuous weeks.PD-1 inhibitor was intravenously injected starting on the first day of the oral intake of regorafenib.We reviewed tumor response,progression-free survival(PFS),overall survival,and treatment-related adverse events(TRAEs)and evaluated association between platelet-tolymphocyte ratio(PLR)and outcomes in this retrospective study.RESULTS Stable disease and progressive disease were found in 18(60.0%)and 12(40.0%)patients,respectively.The disease control rate was 60.0%.The median follow-up time was 12.0 mo,and median PFS was 3.4 mo[95%confidence interval(CI):2.2-4.6 mo].Of the 12 patients with progressive disease,10(83.3%)had liver metastasis before starting the combined treatment.Among the 18 patients with SD,10(55.6%)did not have liver metastases.One patient without liver metastases at baseline was found with a substantially prolonged PFS of 11.2 mo.The liver metastasis,the choice of programmed cell death-1 inhibitor other than nivolumab or pembrolizumab and previous exposure to regorafenib was’t associated with treatment outcome.The median PFS in the low-PLR group was 4.2 mo(95%CI:3.5-4.9 mo),compared with 2.8 mo(95%CI:1.4-4.2 mo)in the high-PLR group(P=0.005).The major TRAEs included hand-foot syndrome(33.3%),hypertension(23.3%),malaise(20.0%),and gastrointestinal reaction(16.7%).The incidence of grade 3 TRAEs was 13.3%(4/30),which comprised abnormal capillary proliferation(n=1),transaminase elevation(n=1),and hand-foot syndrome(n=2).No grade 4 or higher toxicity was observed.CONCLUSION Regorafenib combined with PD-1 inhibitor could lead to a longer PFS in some patients with MSS mCRC.The PLR might be a prediction of the patient response to this therapy.

Common endocrine system adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs),a novel anti-tumor therapeutic modality,are monoclonal antibodies targeting certain immune checkpoints(ICs)that reactivate T cells to achieve anti-tumor immunity by targeting,binding,and blocking ICs.Targeted inhibitory antibodies against the ICs cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen and programmed death receptor-1 have demonstrated efficacy and durable anti-tumor activity in patients with cancer.ICs may prevent autoimmune reactions.However,ICIs may disrupt ICs properties and trigger autoimmune-related adverse reactions involving various organ systems including the cardiovascular,pulmonary,gastrointestinal,renal,musculoskeletal,dermal,and endocrine systems.Approximately 10%of patients with damage to target organs such as the thyroid,pituitary,pancreas,and adrenal glands develop endocrine system immune-related adverse events(irAEs)such as thyroid dysfunction,pituitary gland inflammation,diabetes mellitus,and primary adrenal insufficiency.However,the symptoms of immunotherapy-associated endocrine system irAEs may be nonspecific and similar to those of other treatment-related adverse reactions,and failure to recognize them early may lead to death.Timely detection and treatment of immunotherapy-associated endocrine irAEs is essential to improve the efficacy of immunotherapy,prognosis,and the quality of life of patients.This study aimed to review the mechanisms by which ICIs cause endocrine irAEs providing guidance for the development of appropriate management protocols.Here,we discuss(1)the biological mechanisms of ICs in tumorigenesis and progression,focusing on cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen and programmed cell death-1/programmed cell death-ligand 1;and(2)the epidemiology,clinical symptoms,diagnosis,and treatment of four immunotherapy-related endocrine complications.

Type 1 diabetes induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors

With the increasing use of immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICI)including anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte associated antigen-4(CTLA-4)and anti-programmed cell death-1(PD-1)in cancers,ICI-induced type 1 diabetes has been reported throughout the world.In this review,we aim to summarize the characteristics of this disease and discuss the mechanism of it.As an immune-related adverse event,type 1 diabetes developed after the administration of anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-ligand 1(PD-L1)in the combination with or without anti-CTLA-4.It usually presented with acute onset,and 62.1%of the reported cases had diabetic ketoacidosis.Only a third of them had positive autoantibodies associated with type 1 diabetes.Susceptible HLA genotypes might be associated.T-cell-stimulation by blocking of the interaction of PD-1 and PD-L1 in pancreatic β cells was the main mechanism involved in the pathology.Insulin was the only effective treatment of ICI-induced type 1 diabetes.In conclusions,ICI-induced type 1 diabetes is a potentially life-threating adverse event after the immunotherapy of cancers.Screening and early recognition is important.Further investigation of the mechanism may help to better understand the pathology of type 1 diabetes.

Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with or without PD-L1 selection:A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Background:Immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs)are standard treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC);however,evidence regarding their relative efficacy and safety is lacking.This study compared the efficacy and safety of all currently available ICI treatments in patients with advanced NSCLC to identify optimal treatment regimens.Methods:PubMed,Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials(CENTRAL),MEDLINE,and Embase databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials(RCTs)published up to August 8,2022.The primary outcomes were overall survival(OS)and progression-free survival(PFS).Secondary outcomes included objective response rate(ORR)and adverse events(AEs).Results:Forty RCTs involving 22,526 patients were selected,and a total of 26 treatment regimens were identified.Treatment with anti-programmed cell death protein-1(anti-PD-1)provided superior OS compared with anti-programmed death ligand 1(anti-PD-L1)treatment.ICIs plus platinum-based chemotherapy(PBC)were superior to ICIs treatment alone,although the addition of PBC increased treatment toxicity.Cemiplimab ranked first for OS and lowest for any-grade AEs in advanced NSCLC patients without PD-L1 selection.Regarding grade≥3 AEs,the toxicity of ICI monotherapy or ICI-ICI combination was consistently lower than that of the other treatments.For patients without PD-L1 selection,cemiplimab showed the best OS,pembrolizumab plus docetaxel(Pem-DXT)showed the best PFS,and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and PBC(Atezo-Beva-PBC)showed the best ORR.Pembrolizumab plus PBC and Atezo-Beva-PBC were the most likely optimal treatments for OS and PFS in patients with PD-L1 expression<1%,respectively.In patients with PD-L1 expression≥1%,treatment regimens containing anti-PD-1 provided superior OS benefits compared with those of anti-PD-L1 treatment,and sintilimab plus PBC(Sint-PBC)provided the best OS benefit;as for PFS,ICI plus PBC consistently showed greater PFS benefits than ICI or PBC alone.For patients with anti-PD-L1 expression of 1-49%,camrelizumab plus PBC provided the best benefit for OS and PFS among included treatment.Durvalumab-tremelimumab-PBC and Atezo-Beva-PBC respectively presented the highest OS and PFS for patients with PD-L1 expression≥50%.Moreover,cemiplimab and Atezo-Beva-PBC yielded the best OS and PFS benefits as first-line treatments for patients with advanced NSCLC,respectively.Conclusions:Although ICI plus PBC likely resulted in superior survival outcomes compared to ICI treatment alone,it did increase toxicity.Cemiplimab presented a well-balanced efficacy and safety profile in advanced NSCLC treatment.Our findings with the current ICIs comparisons will aid future trials for cancer immunotherapy.Registration:PROSPERO,https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/,CRD42022323879.

PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂诱发免疫相关甲状腺功能障碍的影响因素及肿瘤总生存期分析

目的探究程序性死亡受体-1(PD-1)/程序性死亡配体-1(PD-L1)抑制剂诱发免疫相关甲状腺功能障碍(irTD)的影响因素及对肿瘤总生存期(OS)的影响。方法纳入211例PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂治疗的肿瘤患者,比较是否发生irTD组间的差异,并进行亚组分析。采用多因素Logistic回归分析探究irTD的影响因素,生存分析法探究是否发生irTD与OS的关系,组间比较采用log-rank检验,多模型COX回归分析评估irTD对OS的影响。结果irTD的发生率为26.1%,1级发生率13.3%,2级发生率10.0%,3~4级发生率2.8%,发生的中位时间为第9周(IQR:5~25周)。性别、吸烟史、靶向史、基线甲状腺抗体在是否发生irTD组间具有统计学差异(P<0.05)。irTD患者甲状腺球蛋白抗体(TGAb)在第3周开始升高,第6~30周高于基线水平,30周后开始下降并逐渐恢复至基线水平,甲状腺微粒体抗体(TMAb)的变化幅度小于TGAb。亚组分析显示,甲亢组首次接受免疫治疗的年龄较甲减组小(P<0.05),基线促甲状腺激素(TSH)水平低于甲减组(P<0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,基线甲状腺抗体阳性的患者发生irTD的风险是阴性患者的4.595倍(95%CI:2.286~9.239,P<0.001)。生存分析显示,irTD患者的OS更长。多模型COX回归分析显示:在调整年龄、性别、化疗、肿瘤类型、是否转移等因素后irTD患者的OS更长(HR=0.228,95%CI:0.079~0.656,P=0.006)。结论irTD严重程度以1~2级为主,3~4级少见。基线甲状腺抗体阳性是irTD发生的独立危险因素。发生irTD的患者具有更长的OS,可能是由于irTD患者具有更好的免疫应答。