BACKGROUND pT2+prostate cancer(PCa),a term first used in 2004,refers to organ-confined PCa characterized by a positive surgical margin(PSM)without extracapsular extension.Patients with a PSM are vulnerable to biochemi...BACKGROUND pT2+prostate cancer(PCa),a term first used in 2004,refers to organ-confined PCa characterized by a positive surgical margin(PSM)without extracapsular extension.Patients with a PSM are vulnerable to biochemical recurrence(BCR)following radical prostatectomy(RP);however,whether adjuvant radiotherapy(aRT)is imperative to PSM after RP remains controversial.This study had the longest follow-up on pT2+PCa after robotic-assisted RP since 2004.Moreover,we discussed our viewpoints on pT2+PCa based on real-world experiences.AIM To conclude a 10-year surveillance on pT2+PCa and compare our results with those of the published literature.METHODS Forty-eight patients who underwent robotic-assisted RP between 2008 and 2011 were enrolled.Two serial tests of prostate specific antigen(PSA)≥0.2 ng/mL were defined as BCR.Various designed factors were analyzed using statistical tools for BCR risk.SAS 9.4 was applied and significance was defined as P<0.05.Univariate,multivariate,linear regression,and receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve analyses were performed for statistical analyses.RESULTS With a median follow-up period of 9 years,25(52%)patients had BCR(BCR group),and the remaining 23(48%)patients did not(non-BCR group).The median time for BCR test was 4 years from the first postoperative PSA nadir.Preoperative PSA was significantly different between the BCR and non-BCR groups(P<0.001),and ROC curve analysis of preoperative PSA suggested a cutoff value of 19.09 ng/mL(sensitivity,0.600;specificity:0.739).The linear regression analysis showed no correlation between time to BCR and preoperative PSA(Pearson’s correlation,0.13;adjusted R2=0.026).CONCLUSION Robotic-assisted RP in pT2+PCa of worse conditions can provide better BCR-free survival.A surgical technique limiting the PSM in favorable situations is warranted to lower the pT2+PCa BCR rate.Preoperative PSA cut-off value of 19.09 ng/mL is a predictive factor for BCR.Based on our experiences and review of the literature,we do not recommend routine aRT for pT2+PCa.展开更多
BACKGROUND:Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration(EUS-FNA) has become a crucial diagnostic technique for pancreatic malignancies.The specimen obtained by EUS-FNA can be prepared for either cytological or ...BACKGROUND:Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration(EUS-FNA) has become a crucial diagnostic technique for pancreatic malignancies.The specimen obtained by EUS-FNA can be prepared for either cytological or histological examinations.This study was to compare diagnostic performance of cytological and histological preparations using EUSFNA in the same lesions when pancreatic malignancies were suspected.METHODS:One hundred and eighteen patients who underwent EUS-FNA for suspected pancreatic malignancies were consecutively enrolled.All procedures were conducted by a single echoendoscopist under the same conditions.Four adequate preparations were obtained by 22-gauge needles with 20 to-and-fro movements for each pass.The 4 preparations included 2 cytological and 2 histological specimens.The pathologic reviews of all specimens were conducted independently by a single experienced cytopathologist.Sensitivity,specificity,and accuracy of the 2 preparations were compared.RESULTS:The enrolled patients consisted of 62 males(52.5%),with the mean age of 64.6±10.5 years.Surgery was performed in 23(19.5%) patients.One hundred and sixteen(98.3%) lesions were classified as malignant,while 2(1.7%) were benign.Sensitivity of cytology and histology were 87.9% and 81.9%,respectively,with no significant difference(P=0.190).Accuracy was also not significantly different.Cytological preparation was more sensitive when the size of lesion was <3 cm(86.7% vs 68.9%,P=0.033).CONCLUSIONS:Our results suggested that the diagnostic performances of cytological and histological preparations are not significantly different for the diagnosis of pancreatic malignancies.However,cytological preparation might be more sensitive for pancreatic lesions <3 cm.展开更多
目的旨在探讨多参数MRI(multi-parametric MRI,Mp-MRI)前列腺影像报告和数据系统(prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2,PI-RADS V2)评分与经直肠超声引导下穿刺病理的相关性。材料与方法回顾性分析经病理证实的128例...目的旨在探讨多参数MRI(multi-parametric MRI,Mp-MRI)前列腺影像报告和数据系统(prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2,PI-RADS V2)评分与经直肠超声引导下穿刺病理的相关性。材料与方法回顾性分析经病理证实的128例前列腺病变患者的MRI资料,其中前列腺癌75例,良性前列腺增生48例、前列腺炎5例,所有患者均行3.0 T MRI扫描,获取完整的T2WI、DWI及DCE图像;由2名前列腺诊断医师在不知患者临床资料及病理的情况下采用PIRADS V2评分标准进行评分,评分结果分别记录;所有患者均行经直肠超声引导下病理穿刺,并由泌尿专业病理诊断医师进行诊断,对前列腺癌则进行Gleason评分。采用Spearman相关分析PI-RADS V2评分与穿刺病理的相关系数,并采用ROC曲线分析PI-RADS V2评分诊断前列腺癌的敏感性、特异性和准确性。结果 PI-RADS V2评分与穿刺病理呈正相关,r=0.887。PI-RADS V2评分诊断前列腺癌的ROC曲线下面积0.975,其敏感性为93.33%,特异性为96.23%,准确性为94.51%,阳性预测值97.22%,阴性预测值91.07%。Gleason评分≥8分的前列腺癌的PI-RADS V2评分为5分。结论 PI-RADS V2评分与经直肠超声引导下穿刺病理的相关性高,PI-RADS V2评分对前列腺疾病的诊断准确性高。展开更多
目的:分析穿刺活检单针阳性的前列腺癌患者行前列腺癌根治性切除术后的临床病理特征,以协助选择手术策略。方法:回顾性分析2010年1月至2018年12月北京大学第三医院泌尿外科收治的经直肠前列腺系统穿刺活检单针阳性并且接受前列腺癌根治...目的:分析穿刺活检单针阳性的前列腺癌患者行前列腺癌根治性切除术后的临床病理特征,以协助选择手术策略。方法:回顾性分析2010年1月至2018年12月北京大学第三医院泌尿外科收治的经直肠前列腺系统穿刺活检单针阳性并且接受前列腺癌根治术的患者共计53例,患者年龄(69.7±6.9)岁(54~81岁)。穿刺前前列腺特异抗原(prostate specific antigen,PSA)为(9.70±5.24)μg/L(1.69~25.69μg/L),前列腺体积为(50.70±28.39)mL(12.41~171.92 mL),穿刺Gleason评分6分、7分和≥8分者分别为39例(73.6%)、11例(20.8%)和3例(5.7%),临床分期T1期、T2期和T3期者分别为6例(11.3%)、44例(83.0%)和3例(5.7%)。按年龄、术前PSA水平、穿刺Gleason评分、单针肿瘤占穿刺组织百分比和临床分期等因素进行分组,比较各组患者的临床病理特征差异。结果:术后Gleason评分6分、7分和≥8分者分别为20例(37.7%)、21例(39.6%)和10例(18.9%),另有2例(3.8%)为pT0;病理分期T0期、T2a期、T2b期、T2c期和T3期者分别为2例(3.8%)、9例(17.0%)、2例(3.8%)、29例(54.7%)和11例(20.8%);11例(20.8%)手术切缘阳性,10例前列腺包膜外侵犯(18.9%),1例(1.9%)精囊侵犯。术后肿瘤呈多灶状分布42例(79.2%),双侧分布37例(69.8%)。与术前穿刺Gleason评分比较,术后Gleason评分下降3例(5.7%),不变28例(52.8%),升级20例(37.7%),其中有2例(3.8%)为pT0;与临床分期比较,术后病理分期下降2例(3.8%),不变10例(18.9%),升级41例(77.4%)。根据术后病理分为微灶癌组(n=8)和非微灶癌组(n=45),经比较,两组单针肿瘤占穿刺组织百分比(≤5%)差异有统计学意义(P=0.014),而年龄、前列腺体积、术前前列腺特异抗原密度(prostate special antigen density,PSAD)和术前穿刺Gleason评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);通过穿刺活检判断癌灶位于尖部的方法,假阴性率41.4%(12/29),假阳性率50.0%(12/24)。实际清扫淋巴结和保留性神经的病例,与根据术后病理再次判断方案选择时存在统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论:单针肿瘤占穿刺组织百分比≤5%是前列腺微灶癌的预测因素。37.7%病例发生病理分级升级和77.4%病例发生病理分期升级,选择手术方案(如性神经保护、淋巴结清扫、尖部的处理等)时,需要综合分析肿瘤危险度分层、列线图预测因素、多参数磁共振成像以及术中情况等多因素。展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND pT2+prostate cancer(PCa),a term first used in 2004,refers to organ-confined PCa characterized by a positive surgical margin(PSM)without extracapsular extension.Patients with a PSM are vulnerable to biochemical recurrence(BCR)following radical prostatectomy(RP);however,whether adjuvant radiotherapy(aRT)is imperative to PSM after RP remains controversial.This study had the longest follow-up on pT2+PCa after robotic-assisted RP since 2004.Moreover,we discussed our viewpoints on pT2+PCa based on real-world experiences.AIM To conclude a 10-year surveillance on pT2+PCa and compare our results with those of the published literature.METHODS Forty-eight patients who underwent robotic-assisted RP between 2008 and 2011 were enrolled.Two serial tests of prostate specific antigen(PSA)≥0.2 ng/mL were defined as BCR.Various designed factors were analyzed using statistical tools for BCR risk.SAS 9.4 was applied and significance was defined as P<0.05.Univariate,multivariate,linear regression,and receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve analyses were performed for statistical analyses.RESULTS With a median follow-up period of 9 years,25(52%)patients had BCR(BCR group),and the remaining 23(48%)patients did not(non-BCR group).The median time for BCR test was 4 years from the first postoperative PSA nadir.Preoperative PSA was significantly different between the BCR and non-BCR groups(P<0.001),and ROC curve analysis of preoperative PSA suggested a cutoff value of 19.09 ng/mL(sensitivity,0.600;specificity:0.739).The linear regression analysis showed no correlation between time to BCR and preoperative PSA(Pearson’s correlation,0.13;adjusted R2=0.026).CONCLUSION Robotic-assisted RP in pT2+PCa of worse conditions can provide better BCR-free survival.A surgical technique limiting the PSM in favorable situations is warranted to lower the pT2+PCa BCR rate.Preoperative PSA cut-off value of 19.09 ng/mL is a predictive factor for BCR.Based on our experiences and review of the literature,we do not recommend routine aRT for pT2+PCa.
文摘BACKGROUND:Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration(EUS-FNA) has become a crucial diagnostic technique for pancreatic malignancies.The specimen obtained by EUS-FNA can be prepared for either cytological or histological examinations.This study was to compare diagnostic performance of cytological and histological preparations using EUSFNA in the same lesions when pancreatic malignancies were suspected.METHODS:One hundred and eighteen patients who underwent EUS-FNA for suspected pancreatic malignancies were consecutively enrolled.All procedures were conducted by a single echoendoscopist under the same conditions.Four adequate preparations were obtained by 22-gauge needles with 20 to-and-fro movements for each pass.The 4 preparations included 2 cytological and 2 histological specimens.The pathologic reviews of all specimens were conducted independently by a single experienced cytopathologist.Sensitivity,specificity,and accuracy of the 2 preparations were compared.RESULTS:The enrolled patients consisted of 62 males(52.5%),with the mean age of 64.6±10.5 years.Surgery was performed in 23(19.5%) patients.One hundred and sixteen(98.3%) lesions were classified as malignant,while 2(1.7%) were benign.Sensitivity of cytology and histology were 87.9% and 81.9%,respectively,with no significant difference(P=0.190).Accuracy was also not significantly different.Cytological preparation was more sensitive when the size of lesion was <3 cm(86.7% vs 68.9%,P=0.033).CONCLUSIONS:Our results suggested that the diagnostic performances of cytological and histological preparations are not significantly different for the diagnosis of pancreatic malignancies.However,cytological preparation might be more sensitive for pancreatic lesions <3 cm.
文摘目的旨在探讨多参数MRI(multi-parametric MRI,Mp-MRI)前列腺影像报告和数据系统(prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2,PI-RADS V2)评分与经直肠超声引导下穿刺病理的相关性。材料与方法回顾性分析经病理证实的128例前列腺病变患者的MRI资料,其中前列腺癌75例,良性前列腺增生48例、前列腺炎5例,所有患者均行3.0 T MRI扫描,获取完整的T2WI、DWI及DCE图像;由2名前列腺诊断医师在不知患者临床资料及病理的情况下采用PIRADS V2评分标准进行评分,评分结果分别记录;所有患者均行经直肠超声引导下病理穿刺,并由泌尿专业病理诊断医师进行诊断,对前列腺癌则进行Gleason评分。采用Spearman相关分析PI-RADS V2评分与穿刺病理的相关系数,并采用ROC曲线分析PI-RADS V2评分诊断前列腺癌的敏感性、特异性和准确性。结果 PI-RADS V2评分与穿刺病理呈正相关,r=0.887。PI-RADS V2评分诊断前列腺癌的ROC曲线下面积0.975,其敏感性为93.33%,特异性为96.23%,准确性为94.51%,阳性预测值97.22%,阴性预测值91.07%。Gleason评分≥8分的前列腺癌的PI-RADS V2评分为5分。结论 PI-RADS V2评分与经直肠超声引导下穿刺病理的相关性高,PI-RADS V2评分对前列腺疾病的诊断准确性高。
文摘目的:分析穿刺活检单针阳性的前列腺癌患者行前列腺癌根治性切除术后的临床病理特征,以协助选择手术策略。方法:回顾性分析2010年1月至2018年12月北京大学第三医院泌尿外科收治的经直肠前列腺系统穿刺活检单针阳性并且接受前列腺癌根治术的患者共计53例,患者年龄(69.7±6.9)岁(54~81岁)。穿刺前前列腺特异抗原(prostate specific antigen,PSA)为(9.70±5.24)μg/L(1.69~25.69μg/L),前列腺体积为(50.70±28.39)mL(12.41~171.92 mL),穿刺Gleason评分6分、7分和≥8分者分别为39例(73.6%)、11例(20.8%)和3例(5.7%),临床分期T1期、T2期和T3期者分别为6例(11.3%)、44例(83.0%)和3例(5.7%)。按年龄、术前PSA水平、穿刺Gleason评分、单针肿瘤占穿刺组织百分比和临床分期等因素进行分组,比较各组患者的临床病理特征差异。结果:术后Gleason评分6分、7分和≥8分者分别为20例(37.7%)、21例(39.6%)和10例(18.9%),另有2例(3.8%)为pT0;病理分期T0期、T2a期、T2b期、T2c期和T3期者分别为2例(3.8%)、9例(17.0%)、2例(3.8%)、29例(54.7%)和11例(20.8%);11例(20.8%)手术切缘阳性,10例前列腺包膜外侵犯(18.9%),1例(1.9%)精囊侵犯。术后肿瘤呈多灶状分布42例(79.2%),双侧分布37例(69.8%)。与术前穿刺Gleason评分比较,术后Gleason评分下降3例(5.7%),不变28例(52.8%),升级20例(37.7%),其中有2例(3.8%)为pT0;与临床分期比较,术后病理分期下降2例(3.8%),不变10例(18.9%),升级41例(77.4%)。根据术后病理分为微灶癌组(n=8)和非微灶癌组(n=45),经比较,两组单针肿瘤占穿刺组织百分比(≤5%)差异有统计学意义(P=0.014),而年龄、前列腺体积、术前前列腺特异抗原密度(prostate special antigen density,PSAD)和术前穿刺Gleason评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);通过穿刺活检判断癌灶位于尖部的方法,假阴性率41.4%(12/29),假阳性率50.0%(12/24)。实际清扫淋巴结和保留性神经的病例,与根据术后病理再次判断方案选择时存在统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论:单针肿瘤占穿刺组织百分比≤5%是前列腺微灶癌的预测因素。37.7%病例发生病理分级升级和77.4%病例发生病理分期升级,选择手术方案(如性神经保护、淋巴结清扫、尖部的处理等)时,需要综合分析肿瘤危险度分层、列线图预测因素、多参数磁共振成像以及术中情况等多因素。
