Anterior shoulder instability with bone loss can be a difficult problem to treat. It usually involves a component of either glenoid deficiency or a Hill-Sachs lesion. Recent data shows that soft tissue procedures alon...Anterior shoulder instability with bone loss can be a difficult problem to treat. It usually involves a component of either glenoid deficiency or a Hill-Sachs lesion. Recent data shows that soft tissue procedures alone are typically not adequate to provide stability to the shoulder. As such, numerous surgical procedures have been described to directly address these bony deficits. For glenoid defects, coracoid transfer and iliac crest bone block procedures are popular and effective. For humeral head defects, both remplissage and osteochondral allografts have decreased the rates ofrecurrent instability. Our review provides an overview of current literature addressing these treatment options and others for addressing bone loss complicating anterior glenohumeral instability.展开更多
BACKGROUND RAS,BRAF,and mismatch repair(MMR)/microsatellite instability(MSI)are crucial biomarkers recommended by clinical practice guidelines for colorectal cancer(CRC).However,their characteristics and influencing f...BACKGROUND RAS,BRAF,and mismatch repair(MMR)/microsatellite instability(MSI)are crucial biomarkers recommended by clinical practice guidelines for colorectal cancer(CRC).However,their characteristics and influencing factors in Chinese patients have not been thoroughly described.AIM To analyze the clinicopathological features of KRAS,NRAS,BRAF,and PIK3CA mutations and the DNA MMR status in CRC.METHODS We enrolled 2271 Chinese CRC patients at the China-Japan Friendship Hospital.MMR proteins were tested using immunohistochemical analysis,and the KRAS/NRAS/BRAF/PIK3CA mutations were determined using quantitative polymerase chain reaction.Microsatellite status was determined using an MSI detection kit.Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS software and logistic regression.RESULTS The KRAS,NRAS,BRAF,and PIK3CA mutations were detected in 44.6%,3.4%,3.7%,and 3.9% of CRC patients,respectively.KRAS mutations were more likely to occur in patients with moderate-to-high differentiation.BRAF mutations were more likely to occur in patients with right-sided CRC,poorly differentiated,or no perineural invasion.Deficient MMR(dMMR)was detected in 7.9% of all patients and 16.8% of those with mucinous adenocarcinomas.KRAS,NRAS,BRAF,and PIK3CA mutations were detected in 29.6%,1.1%,8.1%,and 22.3% of patients with dMMR,respectively.The dMMR was more likely to occur in patients with a family history of CRC,aged<50 years,right-sided CRC,poorly differentiated histology,no perineural invasion,and with carcinoma in situ,stage I,or stage II tumors.CONCLUSION This study analyzed the molecular profiles of KRAS,NRAS,BRAF,PIK3CA,and MMR/MSI in CRC,identifying key influencing factors,with implications for clinical management of CRC.展开更多
Deficiencies in DNA repair due to inherited germ-line mutations in DNA repair genes cause increased risk of gastrointestinal(GI) cancer. In sporadic GI cancers, mutations in DNA repair genes are relatively rare. Howev...Deficiencies in DNA repair due to inherited germ-line mutations in DNA repair genes cause increased risk of gastrointestinal(GI) cancer. In sporadic GI cancers, mutations in DNA repair genes are relatively rare. However, epigenetic alterations that reduce expression of DNA repair genes are frequent in sporadic GI cancers. These epigenetic reductions are also found in field defects that give rise to cancers. Reduced DNA repair likely allows excessive DNA damages to accumulate in somatic cells. Then either inaccurate translesion synthesis past the un-repaired DNA damages or error-prone DNA repair can cause mutations. Erroneous DNA repair can also cause epigenetic alterations(i.e., epimutations, transmitted through multiple replication cycles). Some of these mutations and epimutations may cause progression to cancer. Thus, deficient or absent DNA repair is likely an important underlying cause of cancer. Whole genome sequencing of GI cancers show that between thousands to hundreds of thousands of mutations occur in these cancers. Epimutations that reduce DNA repair gene expression and occur early in progression to GI cancers are a likely source of this high genomic instability. Cancer cells deficient in DNA repair are more vulnerable than normal cells to inactivation by DNA damaging agents. Thus, some of the most clinically effective chemotherapeutic agents in cancer treatment are DNA damaging agents, and their effectiveness often depends on deficient DNA repair in cancer cells. Recently, at least 18 DNA repair proteins, each active in one of six DNA repair pathways, were found to be subject to epigenetic reduction of expression in GI cancers. Different DNA repair pathways repair different types of DNA damage. Evaluation of which DNA repair pathway(s) are deficient in particular types of GI cancer and/or particular patients may prove useful in guiding choice of therapeutic agents in cancer therapy.展开更多
免疫检查点抑制剂的出现,增加了许多实体肿瘤的治疗选择。尽管在黑素瘤和肺癌的治疗中效果良好,但大多数转移性结直肠癌患者无法从免疫治疗中获益。免疫检查点抑制剂在错配修复功能缺失转移性结直肠癌患者中明确有显著和持久的临床反应...免疫检查点抑制剂的出现,增加了许多实体肿瘤的治疗选择。尽管在黑素瘤和肺癌的治疗中效果良好,但大多数转移性结直肠癌患者无法从免疫治疗中获益。免疫检查点抑制剂在错配修复功能缺失转移性结直肠癌患者中明确有显著和持久的临床反应,即使在既往多线治疗失败的群体中也是如此。然而,这种临床获益仅限于小部分肿瘤患者,约占转移性结直肠癌的4%。事实上抗程序性死亡受体1(programmed cell death protein 1,PD-1)单抗对错配修复功能缺失转移性结直肠癌患者是无效的。迫切需要新颖的治疗策略使这些肿瘤具有免疫应答。破坏肿瘤的疗法(化学疗法,放射疗法和靶向疗法),从而释放肿瘤抗原,是免疫检查点抑制和其他疗法相结合的最直接的策略。这些标准疗法远没有像曾经担心的那样削弱免疫反应,反而还可以增强免疫应答。展开更多
Growing evidence suggests that somatic hypermutational status and programmed cell death-1 overexpression are potential predictive biomarkers indicating treatment benefits from immunotherapy using immune checkpoint inh...Growing evidence suggests that somatic hypermutational status and programmed cell death-1 overexpression are potential predictive biomarkers indicating treatment benefits from immunotherapy using immune checkpoint inhibitors.However,biomarker-matched trials are still limited,and many of the genomic alterations remain difficult to target.To isolate the potential somatic hypermutational tumor from microsatellite instability low/microsatellite stability(MSI-L/MSS)cases,we employed two commercial kits to determine MSI and forensic short tandem repeat(STR)alternations in 250 gastrointestinal(GI)tumors.Three types of forensic STR alternations,namely,allelic loss,Aadd,and Anew,were identified.62.4%(156/250)of the patients with GI exhibited STR alternation,including 100%(15/15)and 60%(141/235)of the microsatellite high instability and MSI-L/MSS cases,respectively.30%(75/250)of the patients exhibited STR instability with more than 26.32%(26.32%–84.21%)STR alternation.The cutoff with 26.32%of the STR alternations covered all 15 MSI cases and suggested that it might be a potential threshold.Given the similar mechanism of the mutations of MSI and forensic STR,the widely used forensic identifier STR kit might provide potential usage for identifying hypermutational status in GI cancers.展开更多
文摘Anterior shoulder instability with bone loss can be a difficult problem to treat. It usually involves a component of either glenoid deficiency or a Hill-Sachs lesion. Recent data shows that soft tissue procedures alone are typically not adequate to provide stability to the shoulder. As such, numerous surgical procedures have been described to directly address these bony deficits. For glenoid defects, coracoid transfer and iliac crest bone block procedures are popular and effective. For humeral head defects, both remplissage and osteochondral allografts have decreased the rates ofrecurrent instability. Our review provides an overview of current literature addressing these treatment options and others for addressing bone loss complicating anterior glenohumeral instability.
基金Supported by National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding,No.2023-NHLHCRF-YYPPLC-TJ-03.
文摘BACKGROUND RAS,BRAF,and mismatch repair(MMR)/microsatellite instability(MSI)are crucial biomarkers recommended by clinical practice guidelines for colorectal cancer(CRC).However,their characteristics and influencing factors in Chinese patients have not been thoroughly described.AIM To analyze the clinicopathological features of KRAS,NRAS,BRAF,and PIK3CA mutations and the DNA MMR status in CRC.METHODS We enrolled 2271 Chinese CRC patients at the China-Japan Friendship Hospital.MMR proteins were tested using immunohistochemical analysis,and the KRAS/NRAS/BRAF/PIK3CA mutations were determined using quantitative polymerase chain reaction.Microsatellite status was determined using an MSI detection kit.Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS software and logistic regression.RESULTS The KRAS,NRAS,BRAF,and PIK3CA mutations were detected in 44.6%,3.4%,3.7%,and 3.9% of CRC patients,respectively.KRAS mutations were more likely to occur in patients with moderate-to-high differentiation.BRAF mutations were more likely to occur in patients with right-sided CRC,poorly differentiated,or no perineural invasion.Deficient MMR(dMMR)was detected in 7.9% of all patients and 16.8% of those with mucinous adenocarcinomas.KRAS,NRAS,BRAF,and PIK3CA mutations were detected in 29.6%,1.1%,8.1%,and 22.3% of patients with dMMR,respectively.The dMMR was more likely to occur in patients with a family history of CRC,aged<50 years,right-sided CRC,poorly differentiated histology,no perineural invasion,and with carcinoma in situ,stage I,or stage II tumors.CONCLUSION This study analyzed the molecular profiles of KRAS,NRAS,BRAF,PIK3CA,and MMR/MSI in CRC,identifying key influencing factors,with implications for clinical management of CRC.
文摘Deficiencies in DNA repair due to inherited germ-line mutations in DNA repair genes cause increased risk of gastrointestinal(GI) cancer. In sporadic GI cancers, mutations in DNA repair genes are relatively rare. However, epigenetic alterations that reduce expression of DNA repair genes are frequent in sporadic GI cancers. These epigenetic reductions are also found in field defects that give rise to cancers. Reduced DNA repair likely allows excessive DNA damages to accumulate in somatic cells. Then either inaccurate translesion synthesis past the un-repaired DNA damages or error-prone DNA repair can cause mutations. Erroneous DNA repair can also cause epigenetic alterations(i.e., epimutations, transmitted through multiple replication cycles). Some of these mutations and epimutations may cause progression to cancer. Thus, deficient or absent DNA repair is likely an important underlying cause of cancer. Whole genome sequencing of GI cancers show that between thousands to hundreds of thousands of mutations occur in these cancers. Epimutations that reduce DNA repair gene expression and occur early in progression to GI cancers are a likely source of this high genomic instability. Cancer cells deficient in DNA repair are more vulnerable than normal cells to inactivation by DNA damaging agents. Thus, some of the most clinically effective chemotherapeutic agents in cancer treatment are DNA damaging agents, and their effectiveness often depends on deficient DNA repair in cancer cells. Recently, at least 18 DNA repair proteins, each active in one of six DNA repair pathways, were found to be subject to epigenetic reduction of expression in GI cancers. Different DNA repair pathways repair different types of DNA damage. Evaluation of which DNA repair pathway(s) are deficient in particular types of GI cancer and/or particular patients may prove useful in guiding choice of therapeutic agents in cancer therapy.
文摘免疫检查点抑制剂的出现,增加了许多实体肿瘤的治疗选择。尽管在黑素瘤和肺癌的治疗中效果良好,但大多数转移性结直肠癌患者无法从免疫治疗中获益。免疫检查点抑制剂在错配修复功能缺失转移性结直肠癌患者中明确有显著和持久的临床反应,即使在既往多线治疗失败的群体中也是如此。然而,这种临床获益仅限于小部分肿瘤患者,约占转移性结直肠癌的4%。事实上抗程序性死亡受体1(programmed cell death protein 1,PD-1)单抗对错配修复功能缺失转移性结直肠癌患者是无效的。迫切需要新颖的治疗策略使这些肿瘤具有免疫应答。破坏肿瘤的疗法(化学疗法,放射疗法和靶向疗法),从而释放肿瘤抗原,是免疫检查点抑制和其他疗法相结合的最直接的策略。这些标准疗法远没有像曾经担心的那样削弱免疫反应,反而还可以增强免疫应答。
基金supported by the grants from National Key Research and Development Program of China(Nos.2016YFA0500600 and 2016YFC0800703)the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars(No.81625013)+1 种基金General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.81772028)The funders had no role in study design,data analysis,publishing decisions,or manuscript preparation.
文摘Growing evidence suggests that somatic hypermutational status and programmed cell death-1 overexpression are potential predictive biomarkers indicating treatment benefits from immunotherapy using immune checkpoint inhibitors.However,biomarker-matched trials are still limited,and many of the genomic alterations remain difficult to target.To isolate the potential somatic hypermutational tumor from microsatellite instability low/microsatellite stability(MSI-L/MSS)cases,we employed two commercial kits to determine MSI and forensic short tandem repeat(STR)alternations in 250 gastrointestinal(GI)tumors.Three types of forensic STR alternations,namely,allelic loss,Aadd,and Anew,were identified.62.4%(156/250)of the patients with GI exhibited STR alternation,including 100%(15/15)and 60%(141/235)of the microsatellite high instability and MSI-L/MSS cases,respectively.30%(75/250)of the patients exhibited STR instability with more than 26.32%(26.32%–84.21%)STR alternation.The cutoff with 26.32%of the STR alternations covered all 15 MSI cases and suggested that it might be a potential threshold.Given the similar mechanism of the mutations of MSI and forensic STR,the widely used forensic identifier STR kit might provide potential usage for identifying hypermutational status in GI cancers.
