Background The aim of this research was to explore quality of life （QOL） and acceptance of disability and social support of colostomy patients as well as the relationship between these factors. Methods A descriptive...Background The aim of this research was to explore quality of life （QOL） and acceptance of disability and social support of colostomy patients as well as the relationship between these factors. Methods A descriptive, correlational study was conducted using four scales： the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire （EORTC QLQ-C30） and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Colorectal Cancer-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire （EORTC QLQ-CR38） scales, the Acceptance of Disability Scale （ADS）, and the Social Relational Quality Scale （SRQS）. A convenience sample of 111 colostomy patients from four hospitals in Guangzhou who underwent colostomy operation at least one month prior to the study and who visited the stoma clinic or association from August 2011 to February 2012 was evaluated for inclusion in the study. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 17.0 software （SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA）.展开更多
文摘Background The aim of this research was to explore quality of life （QOL） and acceptance of disability and social support of colostomy patients as well as the relationship between these factors. Methods A descriptive, correlational study was conducted using four scales： the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire （EORTC QLQ-C30） and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Colorectal Cancer-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire （EORTC QLQ-CR38） scales, the Acceptance of Disability Scale （ADS）, and the Social Relational Quality Scale （SRQS）. A convenience sample of 111 colostomy patients from four hospitals in Guangzhou who underwent colostomy operation at least one month prior to the study and who visited the stoma clinic or association from August 2011 to February 2012 was evaluated for inclusion in the study. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 17.0 software （SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA）.
