Intraocular pressure measurement over soft contact lens by rebound tonometer: a comparative study

AIM: To evaluate the intraocular pressure(IOP)measurements by Icare rebound tonometer over a contact lens in comparison with Goldmann applanation tonometry(GAT). METHODS: Fifty patients using contact lens were included in this study. One of the eyes of the patients was selected randomly and their IOP were measured by rebound tonometer with and without contact lens(RTCL,RT respectively) and by GAT, as well as their central corneal thickness(CCT) by optical pachymeter. The results of both methods were compared by correlation analysis, general linear method repeated measure and Bland-Altman analysis.RESULTS: Mean IOP values measured by RTCL, RT and GAT were 15.68 ±3.7, 14.50 ±3.4 and 14.16 ±2.8(P 【0.001), respectively. Mean IOP by RTCL was significantly higher than the measurements implemented by RT and GAT(P 【0.001), while there was no difference between the measurements by GAT and RT(P =0.629). There was a good level of positive correlation between GAT and RTCL as well as RT(r =0.786 P 【0.001, r =0.833 P 【0.001, respectively). We have observed that CCT increase did not show any correlation with the differences of the measurements between RTCL and RT(P =0.329), RTCL and GAT(P =0.07) as well as RT and GAT(P =0.189) in linear regression model.CONCLUSION: The average of the measurements over contact lens by rebound tonometer was found to be higher than what was measured by GAT. Although this difference is statistically significant, it may be clinically negligible in the normal population.

Evaluation of rebound tonometer iCare IC200 as compared with IcarePRO and Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma

Background:This study investigated the agreement between a new rebound tonometer,IC200,and IcarePRO and Goldmann applanation tonometry(GAT).Methods:This was a prospective cross-sectional study.We measured the intraocular pressure(IOP)in 145 eyes of 145 glaucoma patients in the sitting position using GAT,IcarePRO,and IC200.IcarePRO and IC200 measurements were also obtained in the supine position.IC200 measurement was performed using two modes:single six(IC200-single)and automatic(IC200-continuous)six-measurements mode.Results:All tonometers provided high reproducibility in both positions(all intraclass correlation coefficients>0.90),although it was highest with GAT,followed by IC200-continuous and IC200-single and then IcarePRO.In the sitting position,the mean(±SD)IOPs of GAT,IcarePRO,IC200-single,and IC200-continuous were 14.5±2.9 mmHg,13.3±3.2 mmHg,11.6±3.2 mmHg,and 11.5±3.2 mmHg,respectively.IOPs measured with IcarePRO or IC200 were significantly lower than those with GAT,particularly in patients with low IOP.IOPs measured with all tonometers were significantly elevated in the supine position as compared with the sitting position,but this difference was significantly greater with IC200-single and IC200-continuous compared with IcarePRO.IOP elevation was significant in eyes without bleb versus those with bleb,but this finding was not observed when IOP was measured with IcarePRO.The IOPs of the single and continuous modes of IC200 were interchangeable in both positions.Conclusions:GAT,IcarePRO,and IC200 had sufficiently high reproducibility,but measurements with IcarePRO may not be accurate in the supine position.Elevation of IOP in the supine position,especially in eyes with bleb,was more sensitively captured with IC200 than with IcarePRO.

Short-term fluctuation of intraocular pressure and influencing factors following intravitreal injection in patients with retinal vascular diseases

AIM:To investigate the patterns of short-term intraocular pressure(IOP)fluctuations and identify the contributing factors following intravitreal injection in patients with retinal vascular diseases.METHODS:Totally 81 patients were enrolled in this case control study.Eyes were categorized into 7 groups,including age-related macular degeneration(AMD),polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy(PCV),idiopathic choroidal neovascularization(CNV),proliferative diabetic retinopathy(PDR),diabetic macular edema(DME),macular edema secondary to branch(BVOME)and central(CVOME)retinal vein occlusion.IOP was measured in all patients using rebound tonometer at 7 preset time points perioperatively.Additionally,based on the administered medication,the eyes were classified into three treatment groups,including dexamethasone intravitreal implant(IVO),intravitreal conbercept(IVC),and intravitreal ranibizumab(IVR).To compare IOP values at various time points across groups,we employed one-way ANOVA,independent sample t-test or χ^(2) test and multivariate logistic regression analysis.RESULTS:Peak IOP values across all groups were observed at 40s,and 5min after intravitreal injection.Statistical differences in IOP were detected at the 5min among the 7 indication groups(F=2.50,P=0.029).When examing the impact of medications,the IVO group exhibited lower average IOP values at both 40s and 5min compared to the IVC and IVR groups(P<0.001;P=0.007).The IOP values at 40s and 5min were significantly higher in BVOME and CVOME group compared to non-retinal vein occlusionsecondary macular edema(RVOME)group(P<0.001).Multivariate logistic regression analysis further confirmed that IOP measurement at 40s was significantly higher in CVOME group than in non-RVOME group(OR=1.64,95%CI:1.09-2.47;P=0.018).CONCLUSION:Needle size plays a crucial role in the transient changes of IOP following intravitreal injection.Before administering intravitreal injection to patients with central retinal vein occlusion,it is essential to exclude any underlysing causes of increased IOP.

Impact of corneal parameters on intraocular pressure measurements in different tonometry methods

AIM: To evaluate the impact of central corneal thickness(CCT) and corneal curvature on intraocular pressure(IOP) measurements performed by three different tonometers. METHODS: IOP in 132 healthy eyes of 66 participants was measured using three different tonometry techniques: Goldmann applanation tonometer(GAT), Pascal dynamic contour tonometer(DCT), and ICare rebound tonometer(RT). CCT and corneal curvature were assessed. RESULTS: In healthy eyes, DCT presents significantly higher values of IOP than GAT(17.34±3.69 and 15.27±4.06 mm Hg, P<0.0001). RT measurements are significantly lower than GAT(13.56±4.33 mm Hg, P<0.0001). Compared with GAT, DCT presented on average 2.51 mm Hg higher values in eyes with CCT<600 μm and 0.99 mm Hg higher results in eyes with CCT≥600 μm. The RT results were lower on average by 1.61 and 1.95 mm Hg than those obtained by GAT, respectively. Positive correlations between CCT in eyes with CCT<600 μm were detected for all IOP measurement techniques, whereas a similar relationship was not observed in eyes with thicker corneas. A correlation between IOP values and keratometry in the group with CCT<600 μm was not detected with any of the tonometry methods. In thicker corneas, a positive correlation was found for GAT and mean keratometry values(R=0.369, P=0.005). CONCLUSION: The same method should always be chosen for routine IOP control, and measurements obtained by different methods cannot be compared. All analysed tonometry methods are dependent on CCT;thus, CCT should be taken into consideration for both diagnostics and monitoring.