Continuous regional arterial infusion for the treatment of severe acute pancreatitis: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND： Continuous regional arterial infusion（CRAI） is a drug delivery system, which dramatically increases the drug concentration in the pancreas. Previous clinical and basic studies have demonstrated the possible therapeutic efficacy of CRAI for severe acute pancreatitis（SAP）. This meta-analysis of all published randomized controlled trials（RCTs） was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of CRAI for the treatment of SAP. DATA SOURCES： Up to August 10, 2014, RCTs comparing CRAI with intravenous infusion for SAP in PubM ed, Embase, EBSCO, MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded, Cochrane Library, China Academic Journals Full-Text Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, and Chinese Scientific Journals Database were selected by two independent reviewers. The relative risk（RR） and their 95% confidence intervals（CI） for duration of elevated serum amylase and urine amylase, duration of abdominal pain, infection rate, incidence of complication, overall mortality, curative rate, hospital stay and details of subgroup analysis were extracted. Meta-analyses were made using the software Review Manager（RevM an version 5.10）.RESULTS： Six RCTs with 390 patients meeting the inclusion criteria were included in the final analysis. Compared with intravenous infusion route, CRAI significantly shortened the duration of elevated urine amylase（MD=-2.40, 95% CI=-3.20,-1.60; P〈0.00001） and the duration of abdominal pain（MD=-1.46, 95% CI=-1.94,-0.98; P〈0.00001）, decreased the incidence of complication（RR=0.35, 95% CI=0.15, 0.81; P=0.01） and overall mortality（RR=0.25, 95% CI=0.08, 0.78;P=0.02）, shortened the duration of hospital stay（MD=-10.36, 95% CI=-17.05,-3.68; P=0.002）, and increased the curative rate（RR=1.66, 95% CI=1.13, 2.46; P=0.01）. No mortality and catheter-related infections due to CRAI administration was reported in these studies. Subgroup analysis showed that the combination of drug administration via CRAI did not significantly improve the outcomes.CONCLUSION： CRAI is effective for the treatment of SAP, and the combination of drug administration via CRAI did not have a significant effect on the improvement of the outcomes.

PERIPANCREATIC ARTERIAL LIGATION COMBINED WITH ARTERIAL INFUSION REGIONAL CHEMOTHERAPY FOR TREATING PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED PANCREATIC CARCINOMA

Objective To find out a new treatment method for advanced pancreatic carcinoma. Methods Twenty nine patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma and liver metastases were randomly divided into 2 groups.Group A ( n =11) underwent bilio enterostomy and/or gastro enterostomy combined with systemic chemotherapy after operation;Group B( n =18) underwent bilio enterostomy and/or gastro enterostomy combined with peripancreatic arterial ligation and arterial infusion regional chemotherapy.The alleviation of clinical symptom,the change of carcinoma volume by BUS and CT scan,survival period and serum CEA were observed in two groups. Results The symptoms were alleviated apparently in most cases in Group B;BUS and CT scan showed that the tumor volume decreased apparently in Group B;The response rate was 67.7% in Group B,and 18.2% in Group A,respectively( P <0.01);the mean survival period was (4.8±0.6) months in Group A,and (12.5±1.2) months in Group B,respectively( P <0.01),there was significant difference between the two groups.The decrease of serum CEA was 54% in Group A and 60% in Group B,but the difference was not significant( P >0.05). Conclusion Peripancreatic arterial ligation combined with arterial infusion regional chmotherapy is believed to be effective against both pancreatic carcinoma and liver metastases,and it can alleviate the clinical symptoms,postpone the growth speed of tumor,and prolong the survival period.

Consensus of primary care in acute pancreatitis in Japan

The incidence of acute pancreatitis in Japan is increasing and ranges from 187 to 347 cases per million populations. Case fatality was 0.2% for mild to moderate, and 9.0% for severe acute pancreatitis in Japan in 2003. Experts in pancreatitis in Japan made this document focusing on the practical aspects in the early management of patients with acute pancreatitis. The correct diagnosis of acute pancreatitis and severity stratification should be made in all patients using the criteria for the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis and the multifactor scoring system proposed by the Research Committee of Intractable Diseases of the Pancreas as early as possible. All patients diagnosed with acute pancreatitis should be managed in the hospital. Monitoring of blood pressure, pulse and respiratory rate, body temperature, hourly urinary volume, and blood oxygen saturation level is essential in the management of such patients. Early vigorous intravenous hydration is of foremost importance to stabilize circulatory dynamics. Adequate pain relief with opiates is also important. In severe acute pancreatitis, prophylactic intravenous administration of antibiotics at an early stage is recommended. Administration of protease inhibitors should be initiated as soon as thediagnosis of acute pancreatitis is confirmed. A combination of enteral feeding with parenteral nutrition from early stage is recommended if there are no clear signs and symptoms of ileus and gastrointestinal bleeding. Patients with severe acute pancreatitis should be transferred to ICU as early as possible to perform special measures such as continuous regional arterial infusion of protease inhibitors and antibiotics, and continuous hemodiafiltration. The Japanese Government covers medical care expense for severe acute pancreatitis as one of the projects of Research on Measures for Intractable Diseases.

Comparison of regional arterial chemotherapy and systemic intravenous chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer:a systematic review and meta-analysis

Chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer(stageⅢ/Ⅳ).However,conventional systemic intravenous chemotherapy(SIC)has been unsatisfactory for pancreatic cancer.In recent years,regional arterial infusion chemotherapy(RAIC)has been clinically used as a new chemotherapy regimen for the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer,but its efficacy is controversial.The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of RAIC.We searched literatures in databases such as PubMed,EMBASE,Cochrane Library,Web of Science,and CNKI.After screening,this meta-analysis finally included 9 randomized controlled trials(RCTs)with 444 patients(230 RAIC and 214 SIC).We used the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool to assess risk of bias for included RCTs.Outcomes were overall survival(OS),overall response rate(ORR),adverse events rate(AER),and pain remission rate.Outcome indicators used relative risk(RR)and its 95%confidence interval(CI)as effect analysis statistics.The results showed that RAIC had some advantages over SIC in terms of ORR,OS,incidence of leukopenia,and pain remission.In conclusion,compared with SIC,RAIC has better clinical efficacy and lower toxicity in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer.

Peripancreatic artery ligation and artery infusion chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic carcinoma

Objective To develop a new treatment for advanced pancreatic carcinoma. Methods Twenty-nine patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma (12 patients with liver metastasis at the same time) were randomly divided into two groups. In group A (n=11), patients underwent bilio-enterostomy and/or gastro-enterostomy combined with systemic chemotherapy after surgery. In group B (n=18), patients underwent bilio-enterostomy and/or gastro-enterostomy combined with peripancreatic arterial ligation and arterial infusion regional chemotherapy. Twenty-four patients were followed up for 3-18 months. The palliation of clinical symptoms, changes in carcinoma size by B ultrasound (BUS) and CT scan, survival period and serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) were observed and compared between the two groups. Results Symptoms were alleviated in most patients in group B, and BUS and CT scan showed that tumor volume decreased in group B. The response rate was 66.7% in group B and 18.2% in group A (P<0.01). The mean survival period was 4.8±0.6 months in group A and 12.5±1.2 months in group B (P<0.01); there were significant differences between the two groups. The decrease in serum CEA was 54% in group A and 60% in group B; the difference was not significant (P>0.05). Conclusion Peripancreatic arterial ligation combined with arterial infusion regional chemotherapy is effective against both pancreatic carcinoma and with liver metastases. It can alleviate clinical symptoms, postpone the growth rate of tumor and prolong the survival period.