Treating inflammatory bowel disease by adsorptive leucocytapheresis:A desire to treat without drugs

Ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease are the major phenotypes of the idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which afflicts millions of individuals throughout the world with debilitating symptoms, impairing function and quality of life. Current medications are aimed at reducing the symptoms or suppressing exacerbations. However, patients require life-long medications, and this can lead to drug dependency, loss of response together with adverse side effects. Indeed, drug side effects become additional morbidity factor in many patients on long-term medications. Nonetheless, the efficacy of anti-tumour necrosis factors (TNF)-α biologics has validated the role of inflammatory cytokines notably TNF-α in the exacerbation of IBD. However, inflammatory cytokines are released by patients’ own cellular elements including myeloid lineage leucocytes, which in patients with IBD are elevated with activation behaviour and prolonged survival. Accordingly, these leucocytes appear logical targets of therapy and can be depleted by adsorptive granulocyte/monocyte apheresis (GMA) with an Adacolumn. Based on this background, recently GMA has been applied to treat patients with IBD in Japan and in the European Union countries. Efficacy rates have been impressive as well as disappointing. In fact the clinical response to GMA seems to define the patients’ disease course, response to medications, duration of active disease, and severity at entry. The best responders have been first episode cases (up to 100%) followed by steroid naïve and patients with a short duration of active disease prior to GMA. Patients with deep ulcers together with extensive loss of the mucosal tissue and cases with a long duration of IBD refractory to existing medications are not likely to benefit from GMA. It is clinically interesting that patients who respond to GMA have a good long-term disease course by avoiding drugs including corticosteroids in the early stage of their IBD. Additionally, GMA is very much favoured by patients for its good safety profile. GMA in 21st century reminds us of phlebotomy as a major medical practice at the time of Hippocrates. However, in patients with IBD, there is a scope for removing from the body the sources of pro-inflammatory cytokines and achieve disease remission. The bottom line is that by introducing GMA at an early stage following the onset of IBD or before patients develop extensive mucosal damage and become refractory to medications, many patients should respond to GMA and avoid pharmacologics. This should fulfill the desire to treat without drugs.

Solid lipid nanoparticles delivering anti-inflammatory drugs to treat inflammatory bowel disease: Effects in an in vivo model

To improve anti-inflammatory activity while reducing drug doses, we developed a nanoformulation carrying dexamethasone and butyrate.METHODSDexamethasone cholesteryl butyrate-solid lipid nanoparticles (DxCb-SLN) were obtained with the warm microemulsion method. The anti-inflammatory activity of this novel nanoformulation has been investigated in vitro (cell adhesion to human vascular endothelial cells and pro-inflammatory cytokine release by lipopolysaccharide-induced polymorphonuclear cells) and in vivo (disease activity index and cytokine plasma concentrations in a dextran sulfate sodium-induced mouse colitis) models. Each drug was also administered separately to compare its effects with those induced by their co-administration in SLN at the same concentrations.RESULTSDxCb-SLN at the lowest concentration tested (Dx 2.5 nmol/L and Cb 0.1 μmol/L) were able to exert a more than additive effect compared to the sum of the individual effects of each drug, inducing a significant in vitro inhibition of cell adhesion and a significant decrease of pro-inflammatory cytokine (IL-1β and TNF-α) in both in vitro and in vivo models. Notably, only the DxCb nanoformulation administration was able to achieve a significant cytokine decrease compared to the cytokine plasma concentration of the untreated mice with dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis. Specifically, DxCb-SLN induced a IL-1β plasma concentration of 61.77% ± 3.19%, whereas Dx or Cb used separately induced a concentration of 90.0% ± 2.8% and 91.40% ± 7.5%, respectively; DxCb-SLN induced a TNF-α plasma concentration of 30.8% ± 8.9%, whereas Dx or Cb used separately induced ones of 99.5% ± 4.9% and 71.1% ± 10.9%, respectively.CONCLUSIONOur results indicate that the co-administration of dexamethasone and butyrate by nanoparticles may be beneficial for inflammatory bowel disease treatment.

Current status of novel biologics and small molecule drugs in the individualized treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

Treatment strategies for inflammatory bowel disease(IBD)are rapidly evolving with the development of biologics and small molecule drugs(SMDs).However,these drugs are not guaranteed to be effective in all patients,and a“ceiling effect”of biologic monotherapy may occur.This issue highlights an unmet need for optimizing the use of biologics and predicting therapeutic responses.Thus,the development of new drugs with novel mechanisms of action is urgently needed for patients with primary nonresponse and secondary loss of response to conventional biologics and SMDs.In addition,combining different biologics or SMDs has been proposed as a novel strategy to enhance treatment efficacy in IBD,which theoretically has multidimensional anti-inflammatory potential.Based on the current evidence available for IBD,dual targeted therapy may be a promising strategy for refractory IBD patients who have failed in multiple biologic treatments or who have extraintestinal manifestation.Additionally,identifying the subgroup of IBD patients who are responding to biological combination therapies is also equally important in stable disease remission.In this review,we summarize the newly developed biologics and SMDs and the current status of biologics/SMDs to highlight the development of individualized treatment in IBD.

Is tumor necrosis factor-α monoclonal therapy with proactive therapeutic drug monitoring optimized for inflammatory bowel disease? Network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND The efficacy and safety of anti-tumor necrosis factor-α(TNF-α)monoclonal antibody therapy[adalimumab(ADA)and infliximab(IFX)]with therapeutic drug monitoring(TDM),which has been proposed for inflammatory bowel disease(IBD)patients,are still controversial.AIM To determine the efficacy and safety of anti-TNF-αmonoclonal antibody therapy with proactive TDM in patients with IBD and to determine which subtype of IBD patients is most suitable for proactive TDM interventions.METHODS As of July 2023,we searched for randomized controlled trials(RCTs)and observa-tional studies in PubMed,Embase,and the Cochrane Library to compare anti-TNF-αmonoclonal antibody therapy with proactive TDM with therapy with reactive TDM or empiric therapy.Pairwise and network meta-analyses were used to determine the IBD patient subtype that achieved clinical remission and to determine the need for surgery.RESULTS This systematic review and meta-analysis yielded 13 studies after exclusion,and the baseline indicators were balanced.We found a significant increase in the number of patients who achieved clinical remission in the ADA[odds ratio(OR)=1.416,95%confidence interval(CI):1.196-1.676]and RCT(OR=1.393,95%CI:1.182-1.641)subgroups and a significant decrease in the number of patients who needed surgery in the proactive vs reactive(OR=0.237,95%CI:0.101-0.558)and IFX+ADA(OR=0.137,95%CI:0.032-0.588)subgroups,and the overall risk of adverse events was reduced(OR=0.579,95%CI:0.391-0.858)according to the pairwise meta-analysis.Moreover,the network meta-analysis results suggested that patients with IBD treated with ADA(OR=1.39,95%CI:1.19-1.63)were more likely to undergo TDM,especially in comparison with patients with reactive TDM(OR=1.38,95%CI:1.07-1.77).CONCLUSION Proactive TDM is more suitable for IBD patients treated with ADA and has obvious advantages over reactive TDM.We recommend proactive TDM in IBD patients who are treated with ADA.

Exacerbation of inflammatory bowel disease by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors:Fact or fiction?

The existence of a possible link between inflammatory bowel disease （IBD） and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs （NSAIDs） has been repeatedly suggested. Recently, a few studies have addressed the issue of a possible, similar effect by selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors （COXIBs）. The present article reviews the available scientific evidence for this controversial subject.

Hepatobiliary manifestations in inflammatory bowel disease: The gut,the drugs and the liver

Abnormal liver biochemical tests are present in up to30%of patients with inflammatory bowel disease(IBD),and therefore become a diagnostic challenge.Liver and biliary tract diseases are common extraintestinal manifestations for both Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis(UC),and typically do not correlate with intestinal activity.Primary sclerosing cholangitis(PSC)is the most common hepatobiliary manifestation of IBD,and is more prevalent in UC.Approximately 5%of patients with UC develop PSC,with the prevalence reaching up to 90%.Cholangiocarcinoma and colon cancer risks are increased in these patients.Less common disorders include autoimmune hepatitis/PSC overlap syndrome,IgG4-associated cholangiopathy,primary biliary cirrhosis,hepatic amyloidosis,granulomatous hepatitis,cholelithiasis,portal vein thrombosis,liver abscess,and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.Hepatitis B reactivation during immunosuppressive therapy is a major concern,with screening and vaccination being recommended in serologically negative cases for patients with IBD.Reactivation prophylaxis with entecavir or tenofovir for 6to 12 mo after the end of immunosuppressive therapy is mandatory in patients showing as hepatitis B surface antigen(HBsAg)positive,independently from viral load.HBsAg negative and anti-HBc positive patients,with or without anti-HBs,should be closely monitored,measuring alanine aminotransferase and hepatitis B virus DNA within 12 mo after the end of therapy,and should be treated if the viral load increases.On the other hand,immunosuppressive therapy does not seem to promote reactivation of hepatitis C,and hepatitis C antiviral treatment does not influence IBD natural history either.Most of the drugs used for IBD treatment may induce hepatotoxicity,although the incidence of serious adverse events is low.Abnormalities in liver biochemical tests associated with aminosalicylates are uncommon and are usually not clinically relevant.Methotrexaterelated hepatotoxicity has been described in 14%of patients with IBD,in a dose-dependent manner.Liver biopsy is not routinely recommended.Biologics-related hepatotoxicity is rare,but has been shown most frequently in patients treated with infliximab.Thiopurines have been associated with veno-occlusive disease,regenerative nodular hyperplasia,and liver peliosis.Routine liver biochemical tests are recommended,especially during the first month of treatment.All these conditions should be considered in IBD patients with clinical or biochemical features suggestive of hepatobiliary involvement.Diagnosis and management of these disorders usually involve hepatologists and gastroenterologists due to its complexity.

Biologics in the management of pediatric inflammatory bowel disease:When and what to choose

Pediatric inflammatory bowel disease(PIBD)is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the gastrointestinal tract,with rising global incidence and prevalence.Over the past two decades,biologics have added to the therapeutic armamentarium and revolutionized the approach to treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.The available biologics include monoclonal antibodies which target inflammatory cytokines(anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha,anti-interleukin 12/23)or recruitment of leucocytes to the gastrointestinal tract(anti-alpha4beta7 integrin)and small molecules(Janus kinase inhibitors,sphingosine 1-phosphate-inhibitors)which modify the proinflammatory signaling.Considering their potential disease-modifying ability,recent pediatric guidelines from the West have advocated upfront use of biologics in appropriate clinical scenarios as a top-down approach rather than the conventional step-up approach.Although real-world studies are available regarding the clinical efficacy of biologics in PIBD,there is paucity of long-term outcome and safety data in children.Also,little information is available about the best approach in the newly industrialized-developing countries where PIBD is rising but at the same time,infections are prevalent and resources are limited.In this review,we summarize the efficacy and safety profile of biologics and small molecule drugs and discuss the challenges in the management of PIBD,especially in the developing world,and future directions.

Constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome: A review of current and emerging drug therapies

Irritable bowel syndrome(IBS) is a highly prevalent medical condition that adversely affects patient quality of life and constitutes a significant economic burden on healthcare resources. A large proportion of patients suffer from the constipation subtype of IBS(IBS-C), most commonly afflicting older individuals and those with a lower socioeconomic status. Conventional pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatment options have limited efficacies and/or significant adverse events, which lead to increased long-term health care expenditures. Failure to effectively treat IBS-C patients over the past decades has largely been due to a poor understanding of disease pathophysiology, lack of a global view of the patient, and an inappropriate selection of patients and treatment endpoints in clinical trials. In recent years, however, more effective and safer drugs have been developed for the treatment of IBS-C. The advancement in the area of pharmacologic treatment is based on new knowledge of the pathophysiologic basis of IBS-C and the development of drugs with increased selectivity within pharmacologic classes with recognized efficacies. This narrative review covers the spectrum of available drugs and their mechanisms of action, as well as the efficacy and safety profiles of each as determined in relevant clinical trials that have investigated treatment options for IBS-C and chronic constipation. A brief summary of laxative-based treatment options is presented, followed by up-to-date assessments for three classes of drugs: prokinetics, prosecretory agents, and bile acid modulators.

Therapeutic drug monitoring in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

Thiopurine analogs and anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents have dramatically changed the therapeutics of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), improving short and long-term outcomes. Unfortunately some patients do not respond to therapy and others lose response over time. The pharmacokinetic properties of these drugs are complex, with high inter-patient variability. Thiopurine analogs are metabolized through a series of pathways, which vary according to the patients’ pharmacogenetic profile. This profile largely determines the ratios of metabolites, which are in turn associated with likelihoods of clinical efficacy and/or toxicity. Understanding these mechanisms allows for manipulation of drug dose, aiming to reduce the development of toxicity while improving the efficacy of treatment. The efficacy of anti-TNF drugs is influenced by many pharmacodynamic variables. Several factors may alter drug clearance, including the concomitant use of immunomodulators (thiopurine analogs and methotrexate), systemic inflammation, the presence of anti-drug antibodies, and body mass. The treatment of IBD has evolved with the understanding of the pharmacologic profiles of immunomodulating and TNF-inhibiting medications, with good evidence for improvement in patient outcomes observed when measuring metabolic pathway indices. The role of routine measurement of metabolite/drug levels and antibodies warrants further prospective studies as we enter the era of personalized IBD care.

Therapeutic drug monitoring in inflammatory bowel disease:The dawn of reactive monitoring

Inflammatory bowel disease(IBD)is a chronic condition that significantly affects the quality of life of its patients.Biologic drugs have been the mainstay treatment in the management of IBD patients but despite their significant contribution,there remains a proportion of patients that do not respond or lose response to treatment.Therapeutic drug monitoring(TDM)involves measuring levels of serum drug concentrations and anti-drug antibodies.TDM of biologic drugs initially emerged to understand treatment failure in other immune mediated inflammatory diseases.This was then introduced in IBD to rationalize primary non-response or secondary loss of response,given that low serum drug concentrations or the formation of anti-drug antibodies are variably associated with treatment failure.The aim of this narrative review is to provide an overview regarding the current use of TDM in clinical practice and to present the evidence available regarding its use in both proactive and reactive clinical settings in preventing and managing treatment failure.This review also presents the existing evidence regarding the association of various clinical outcomes with specific thresholds of drug concentrations,in everyday practice.A narrative review of published articles and conference abstracts regarding the use of TDM in IBD management,through an electronic search using PubMed and ScienceDirect.TDM has proven to be superior and more cost effective in guiding management of patients with treatment failure compared to empiric dose escalation or change in treatment.Despite a trend towards an association between clinical outcomes and drug concentrations,proactive TDM based strategies have not been shown to achieve clear benefit in long-term outcomes.In the clinical setting,TDM has proven to be useful in managing IBD patients,and its use in the reactive setting,as an additional tool to help manage patients with treatment failure,is being promoted as newer guidelines and consensus groups implement TDM as part of the management plan.

Modern drug discovery for inflammatory bowel disease: The role of computational methods

Inflammatory bowel diseases(IBDs)comprising ulcerative colitis,Crohn’s disease and microscopic colitis are characterized by chronic inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract.IBD has spread around the world and is becoming more prevalent at an alarming rate in developing countries whose societies have become more westernized.Cell therapy,intestinal microecology,apheresis therapy,exosome therapy and small molecules are emerging therapeutic options for IBD.Currently,it is thought that low-molecular-mass substances with good oral bio-availability and the ability to permeate the cell membrane to regulate the action of elements of the inflammatory signaling pathway are effective therapeutic options for the treatment of IBD.Several small molecule inhibitors are being developed as a promising alternative for IBD therapy.The use of highly efficient and time-saving techniques,such as computational methods,is still a viable option for the development of these small molecule drugs.The computeraided(in silico)discovery approach is one drug development technique that has mostly proven efficacy.Computational approaches when combined with traditional drug development methodology dramatically boost the likelihood of drug discovery in a sustainable and cost-effective manner.This review focuses on the modern drug discovery approaches for the design of novel IBD drugs with an emphasis on the role of computational methods.Some computational approaches to IBD genomic studies,target identification,and virtual screening for the discovery of new drugs and in the repurposing of existing drugs are discussed.

Novel drug delivery systems for inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel disease(IBD)is a chronic illness characterized by relapsing inflammation of the intestines.The disorder is stratified according to the severity and is marked by its two main phenotypical representations:Ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease.Pathogenesis of the disease is ambiguous and is expected to have interactivity between genetic disposition,environmental factors such as bacterial agents,and dysregulated immune response.Treatment for IBD aims to reduce symptom extent and severity and halt disease progression.The mainstay drugs have been 5-aminosalicylates(5-ASAs),corticosteroids,and immunosuppressive agents.Parenteral,oral and rectal routes are the conventional methods of drug delivery,and among all,oral administration is most widely adopted.However,problems of systematic drug reactions and low specificity in delivering drugs to the inflamed sites have emerged with these regular routes of delivery.Novel drug delivery systems have been introduced to overcome several therapeutic obstacles and for localized drug delivery to target tissues.Enteric-coated microneedle pills,various nano-drug delivery techniques,prodrug systems,lipid-based vesicular systems,hybrid drug delivery systems,and biologic drug delivery systems constitute some of these novel methods.Microneedles are painless,they dislodge their content at the affected site,and their release can be prolonged.Recombinant bacteria such as genetically engineered Lactococcus Lactis and eukaryotic cells,including GM immune cells and red blood cells as nanoparticle carriers,can be plausible delivery methods when evaluating biologic systems.Nano-particle drug delivery systems consisting of various techniques are also employed as nanoparticles can penetrate through inflamed regions and adhere to the thick mucus of the diseased site.Prodrug systems such as 5-ASAs formulations or their derivatives are effective in reducing colonic damage.Liposomes can be modified with both hydrophilic and lipophilic particles and act as lipid-based vesicular systems,while hybrid drug delivery systems containing an internal nanoparticle section for loading drugs are potential routes too.Leukosomes are also considered as possible carrier systems,and results from mouse models have revealed that they control anti-and pro-inflammatory molecules.

Therapeutic drug monitoring in inflammatory bowel disease:At the right time in the right place

Therapeutic drug monitoring(TDM)was one of most sought-after objective tools to determine therapeutic efficiency of different biologics and its role in the management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease(IBD)was regarded with great anticipation.But implementation of the TDM in clinical practice was challenged by several factors including uncertainty of the optimal cut-off values,assay variable sensitivity in detecting drug levels and antibodies and,most importantly,individual pharmacokinetics.While reactive TDM was embraced in clinical practice as a useful tool in assessing lack of response to therapy,the utility of proactive TDM in managing IBD therapy is still challenged by the lack of consistency between evidence.Described here,there are four groups of IBD patients for whom proactive TDM has the potential to greatly impact their therapeutic outcomes:Patients with perianal Crohn’s disease,patients with severe ulcerative colitis,pregnant women with IBD and children.As the future of IBD management moves towards personalizing treatment,TDM will be an important decision node in a machine learning based algorithm predicting the best strategy to maximize treatment results while minimizing the loss of response to therapy.

Liver-side of inflammatory bowel diseases:Hepatobiliary and druginduced disorders

Hepatobiliary disorders are among the most common extraintestinal manifestations in inflammatory bowel diseases(IBD),both in Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis(UC),and therefore represent a diagnostic challenge.Immunemediated conditions include primary sclerosing cholangitis(PSC)as the main form,variant forms of PSC(namely small-duct PSC,PSC-autoimmune hepatitis overlap syndrome and IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis)and granulomatous hepatitis.PSC is by far the most common,presenting in up to 8%of IBD patients,more frequently in UC.Several genetic foci have been identified,but environmental factors are preponderant on disease pathogenesis.The course of the two diseases is typically independent.PSC diagnosis is based mostly on typical radiological findings and exclusion of secondary cholangiopathies.Risk of cholangiocarcinoma is significantly increased in PSC,as well as the risk of colorectal cancer in patients with PSC and IBD-related colitis.No disease-modifying drugs are approved to date.Thus,PSC management is directed against symptoms and complications and includes medical therapies for pruritus,endoscopic treatment of biliary stenosis and liver transplant for end-stage liver disease.Other nonimmune-mediated hepatobiliary disorders are gallstone disease,whose incidence is higher in IBD and reported in up to one third of IBD patients,non-alcoholic fatty liver disease,pyogenic liver abscess and portal vein thrombosis.Druginduced liver injury(DILI)is an important issue in IBD,since most IBD therapies may cause liver toxicity;however,the incidence of serious adverse events is low.Thiopurines and methotrexate are the most associated with DILI,while the risk related to anti-tumor necrosis factor-αand anti-integrins is low.Data on hepatotoxicity of newer drugs approved for IBD,like anti-interleukin 12/23 and tofacitinib,are still scarce,but the evidence from other rheumatic diseases is reassuring.Hepatitis B reactivation during immunosuppressive therapy is a major concern in IBD,and adequate screening and vaccination is warranted.On the other hand,hepatitis C reactivation does not seem to be a real risk,and hepatitis C antiviral treatment does not influence IBD natural history.The approach to an IBD patient with abnormal liver function tests is complex due to the wide range of differential diagnosis,but it is of paramount importance to make a quick and accurate diagnosis,as it may influence the therapeutic management.

Effects of proton pump inhibitors on inflammatory bowel disease:An updated review

Inflammatory bowel disease(IBD)is believed to be caused by various factors,including abnormalities in disease susceptibility genes,environmental factors,immune factors,and intestinal bacteria.Proton pump inhibitors(PPIs)are the primary drugs used to treat acid-related diseases.They are also commonly prescribed to patients with IBD.Recent studies have suggested a potential association between the use of certain medications,such as PPIs,and the occurrence and progression of IBD.In this review,we summarize the potential impact of PPIs on IBD and analyze the underlying mechanisms.Our findings may provide insights for conducting further investigations into the effects of PPIs on IBD and serve as an important reminder for physicians to exercise caution when prescribing PPIs to patients with IBD.

Sex-dimorphic adverse drug reactions to immune suppressive agents in inflammatory bowel disease

AIM:To analyze sex differences in adverse drug reactions(ADR) to the immune suppressive medication in inflammatory bowel disease(IBD) patients.METHODS:All IBD patients attending the IBD outpatient clinic of a referral hospital were identified through the electronic diagnosis registration system.The electronic medical records of IBD patients were reviewed and the files of those patients who have used immune suppressive therapy for IBD,i.e.,thiopurines,methotrexate,cyclosporine,tacrolimus and anti-tumor necrosis factor agents(anti-TNF);infliximab(IFX),adalimumab(ADA) and/or certolizumab,were further analyzed.The reported ADR to immune suppressive drugs were noted.The general definition of ADR used in clinical practice comprised the occurrence of the ADR in the temporal relationship with its disappearance upon discontinuation of the medication.Patients for whom the required information on drug use and ADR was not available in the electronic medical record and patients with only one registered contact and no further followup at the outpatient clinic were excluded.The difference in the incidence and type of ADR between male and female IBD patients were analyzed statistically by χ 2 test.RESULTS:In total,1009 IBD patients were identified in the electronic diagnosis registration system.Out of these 1009 patients,843 patients were eligible for further analysis.There were 386 males(46%),mean age 42 years(range:16-87 years) with a mean duration of the disease of 14 years(range:0-54 years);578 patients with Crohn's disease,244 with ulcerative colitis and 21 with unclassified colitis.Seventy percent(586 pts) of patients used any kind of immune suppressive agents at a certain point of the disease course,the majority of the patients(546 pts,65%) used thiopurines,176 pts(21%) methotrexate,46 pts(5%) cyclosporine and one patient tacrolimus.One third(240 pts,28%) of patients were treated with anti-TNF,the majority of patients(227 pts,27%) used IFX,99(12%) used ADA and five patients certolizumab.There were no differences between male and female patients in the use of immune suppressive agents.With regards to ADR,no differences between males and females were observed in the incidence of ADR to thiopurines,methotrexate and cyclosporine.Among 77 pts who developed ADR to one or more anti-TNF agents,significantly more females(54 pts,39% of all anti-TNF treated women) than males(23 pts,23% of all antiTNF treated men) experienced ADR to an anti-TNF agent [P = 0.011;odds ratio(OR) 2.2,95%CI 1.2-3.8].The most frequent ADR to both anti-TNF agents,IFX and ADA,were allergic reactions(15% of all IFX users and 7% of all patients treated with ADA) and for both agents a significantly higher rate of allergic reactions in females compared with males was observed.As a result of ADR,36 patients(15% of all patients using anti-TNF) stopped the treatment,with significantly higher stopping rate among females(27 females,19% vs 9 males,9%,P = 0.024).CONCLUSION:Treatment with anti-TNF antibodies is accompanied by sexual dimorphic profile of ADR with female patients being more at risk for allergic reactions and subsequent discontinuation of the treatment.

Therapeutic drug monitoring in inflammatory bowel disease treatments

Recently,biological drugs have played a leading role in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease,and therapeutic drug monitoring(TDM)may be useful in maximizing their effectiveness.TDM involves the measurement of serum drug and anti-drug antibodies concentrations as the basis for dosage adjustments or drug conversions to achieve a higher response rate.We believe that concentration thresholds should be individualized based on patients’disease severity,extent and phenotype,and therapeutic purposes should also be considered,with higher cut-offs mainly needed for endoscopic and fistula healing than for symptomatic remission.Proactive and reactive TDM can help optimize treatment,especially in patients receiving anti-tumour necrosis factor,and guide dose adjustment or drug conversion with lower cost.TDM is a promising approach to achieve precision medicine and targeted medicine in the future.

Strategies for overcoming anti-tumor necrosis factor drug antibodies in inflammatory bowel disease:Case series and review of literature

Anti-tumor necrosis factor(TNF) biologics are currentlyamongst the most widely used and efficacious therapies for inflammatory bowel disease(IBD). The development of therapeutic drug monitoring for infliximab and ada-limumab has allowed for measurement of drug levels and antidrug antibodies. This information can allow for manipulation of drug therapy and prediction of response. It has been shown that therapeutic anti-TNF drug levels are associated with maintenance of remission, and development of antidrug antibodies is predictive of loss of response. Studies suggest that a low level of drug antibodies, however, can at times be overcome by dose escalation of anti-TNF therapy or addition of an immunomodulator. We describe a retrospective case series of twelve IBD patients treated at the University of California-Irvine, who were on infliximab or adalimumab therapy and were found to have detectable but low-level antidrug antibodies. These patients underwent dose escalation of the drug or addition of an immunomodulator, with subsequent follow-up drug levels obtained. Eight of the twelve patients(75%) demonstrated resolution of antidrug antibodies, and were noted to have improvement in disease activity. Though data regarding overcoming low-level anti-TNF drug antibodies remains somewhat limited, cases described in the literature as well as our own experience suggest that this may be a viable strategy for preserving the use of an anti-TNF drug. Low-level anti-TNF drug antibodies may be overcome by dose escalation and/or addition of an immunomodulator, and can allow for clinical improvement in disease status. Therapeutic drug monitoring is an important tool to guide this strategy.

Updates in therapeutic drug monitoring in inflammatory bowel disease

Biologics and immunomodulators(IMM)are generally considered the most effective therapies for the treatment of ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease.However,despite the efficacy of these therapies,many patients either have a primary lack of response or a secondary loss of response to these medications.Therapeutic drug monitoring(TDM)is a systematic approach to managing such patients.In this review,we summarize the latest data on TDM,including reactive and proactive TDM,in patients with inflammatory bowel disease on biologics and/or IMM.

The Role of Study Nurses in Clinical Trials of IBD Drugs

Objective: To explore the establishment and roles of study nurses in IBD drug clinical trials. Methods: The management experience of this department’s study nurses in IBD drug clinical trials was retrospectively analyzed. Results: The study nurses played very important roles at all links during the preliminary preparation of IBD drug clinical trials, the whole-process management after project initiation, and the later work of project conclusion. Conclusions: As direct participants in drug clinical trials, study nurses play a very important role in ensuring standardization of the trial process, safeguarding patient’s rights and safety, and assisting investigators in carrying out study works smoothly.