Background The role of renal artery sympathetic nerve ablation,widely known as renal sympathetic denervation(RDN)in the treatment of resistant hypertension(RH)has been clarified,and there is more and more evidence to ...Background The role of renal artery sympathetic nerve ablation,widely known as renal sympathetic denervation(RDN)in the treatment of resistant hypertension(RH)has been clarified,and there is more and more evidence to support its effect in the treatment of heart failure,ventricular hypertrophy and arteriosclerosis.Some studies also reported its role in treatment related to respiratory system(pulmonary hypertension,sleep apnea syndrome),endocrine system(metabolic syndrome,blood lipid metabolism,polycystic ovary syndrome),kidney disease(acute renal injury,renal failure)and other inflammation,remodeling,pain and so on.Though most of them were subgroup analysis and small-sample studies,even case reports,they had shed some light on possible use of RDN in the treatment of multi-system diseases.[S Chin J Cardiol 2024;25(1):57-66].展开更多
Objective:To study the safety and effi cacy of denervation of renal artery branches in the treatment of resistant hy-pertension.Methods:Sixty patients with resistant hypertension were enrolled.The patients were random...Objective:To study the safety and effi cacy of denervation of renal artery branches in the treatment of resistant hy-pertension.Methods:Sixty patients with resistant hypertension were enrolled.The patients were randomly assigned to the main renal artery plus branch ablation group or the main renal artery ablation group.The clinical data and operation-related parameters,including number of ablation points,temperature,and average energy,were recorded.Ambulatory blood pressure was taken for all patients at the baseline and at 6 months after treatment.Offi ce blood pressure was recorded before treatment and after treatment every 3 months for 2 years.Results:Sixty patients with resistant hypertension were enrolled in this study.There were 30 patients in each group.Angiography was performed after ablation.No renal artery complications,such as stenosis and dissection,occurred in the two groups.There was no signifi cant difference in age,sex,BMI,comorbid disease,and medication between the two groups(P>0.05).The number of ablation points for the main renal artery plus branch ablation group was greater than that for the main renal artery ablation group.The offi ce blood pressure and 24-hour blood pressure were signifi cantly lower 6 months after treatment than before treatment in both groups(P<0.05).Offi ce blood pressure in the main renal artery plus branch ablation group was lower than that in the main renal artery ablation group during the 3-12-month follow-up period,with a statistical difference.However,as the follow-up time increased,the difference disappeared.Conclusion:The results of this study show that main renal artery plus branch ablation is a safe interventional method,but there was no obvious advantage on long-term follow-up compared with only main renal artery ablation.展开更多
基金supported by the Shanghai Science and Technology Commission Science and Technology Innovation Action Plan(No.21Y11909600)。
文摘Background The role of renal artery sympathetic nerve ablation,widely known as renal sympathetic denervation(RDN)in the treatment of resistant hypertension(RH)has been clarified,and there is more and more evidence to support its effect in the treatment of heart failure,ventricular hypertrophy and arteriosclerosis.Some studies also reported its role in treatment related to respiratory system(pulmonary hypertension,sleep apnea syndrome),endocrine system(metabolic syndrome,blood lipid metabolism,polycystic ovary syndrome),kidney disease(acute renal injury,renal failure)and other inflammation,remodeling,pain and so on.Though most of them were subgroup analysis and small-sample studies,even case reports,they had shed some light on possible use of RDN in the treatment of multi-system diseases.[S Chin J Cardiol 2024;25(1):57-66].
基金Support for this study was provided by The Overseas Program of Shanghai University of Chinese Medicine,the Shanghai Key Medical Specialties Construction Project(ZK2019A11)the Shanghai Health and Family Planning Commission Medical Clinical Special Project(201840247)+3 种基金the Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program of CAST(QNRC2-B03)the Clinical Advantage Discipline of Health System of Putuo District in Shanghai(2019ysxk01)the Shanghai Traditional Chinese Medicine Inheritance and Technological Innovation Project(ZYCC2019026)the“Scientifi c and Technological Innovation Action Plan”medical innovation research project(20Y11910100).
文摘Objective:To study the safety and effi cacy of denervation of renal artery branches in the treatment of resistant hy-pertension.Methods:Sixty patients with resistant hypertension were enrolled.The patients were randomly assigned to the main renal artery plus branch ablation group or the main renal artery ablation group.The clinical data and operation-related parameters,including number of ablation points,temperature,and average energy,were recorded.Ambulatory blood pressure was taken for all patients at the baseline and at 6 months after treatment.Offi ce blood pressure was recorded before treatment and after treatment every 3 months for 2 years.Results:Sixty patients with resistant hypertension were enrolled in this study.There were 30 patients in each group.Angiography was performed after ablation.No renal artery complications,such as stenosis and dissection,occurred in the two groups.There was no signifi cant difference in age,sex,BMI,comorbid disease,and medication between the two groups(P>0.05).The number of ablation points for the main renal artery plus branch ablation group was greater than that for the main renal artery ablation group.The offi ce blood pressure and 24-hour blood pressure were signifi cantly lower 6 months after treatment than before treatment in both groups(P<0.05).Offi ce blood pressure in the main renal artery plus branch ablation group was lower than that in the main renal artery ablation group during the 3-12-month follow-up period,with a statistical difference.However,as the follow-up time increased,the difference disappeared.Conclusion:The results of this study show that main renal artery plus branch ablation is a safe interventional method,but there was no obvious advantage on long-term follow-up compared with only main renal artery ablation.