期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
Role Reversal
1
作者 Maya Reid 《ChinAfrica》 2011年第12期50-50,共1页
HIERARCHY is a guiding structure in human society.People both climb and topple down social ladders as they struggle to gain a foothold in school,at work or in the public eye. What if this instinct could be altered? Sc... HIERARCHY is a guiding structure in human society.People both climb and topple down social ladders as they struggle to gain a foothold in school,at work or in the public eye. What if this instinct could be altered? Scientists in Shanghai have figured out how to do just that. Experimenting on mice,a research team with the Institute of 展开更多
关键词 role Reversal
下载PDF
Why are sexually selected weapons almost absent in females? 被引量:2
2
作者 Anders BERGLUND 《Current Zoology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2013年第4期564-568,共5页
In sex role reversed species, predominantly females evolve sexually selected traits, such as ornaments and/or weapons. Female ornaments are common and their function well documented in many species, whether sex role r... In sex role reversed species, predominantly females evolve sexually selected traits, such as ornaments and/or weapons. Female ornaments are common and their function well documented in many species, whether sex role reversed or not. However, sexually selected female weapons seem totally absent except for small wing spurs in three jacana species, present in both males and females. This poor female weaponry is in sharp contrast to the situation in species with conventional sex roles: males com- monly have evolved sexually selected weapons as well as ornaments. At the same time, females in many taxa have naturally se- lected weapons, used in competition over resources or in predator defence. Why are sexually selected weapons then so rare, al- most absent, in females? Here I briefly review weaponry in females and the function of these weapons, conclude that the near ab- sence of sexually selected weapons begs an explanation, and suggest that costs of sexually selected weapons may exceed costs of ornaments. Females are more constrained when evolving sexually selected traits compared to males, at least compared to those males that do not provide direct benefits, as trait costs reduce a female's fecundity. I suggest that this constraining trade-off between trait and fecundity restricts females to evolve ornaments but rarely weapons. The same may apply to paternally investing males. Whether sexually selected weapons actually are more costly than sexually selected ornaments remains to be investigated 展开更多
关键词 Sexual selection Female weapons Female ornaments Sex role reversal
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部