In order to promote the research on the evaluation index system of low-carbon city,this paper reviewed and summarized the current evaluation index systems in recent years and the concepts of lowcarbon city in China.Th...In order to promote the research on the evaluation index system of low-carbon city,this paper reviewed and summarized the current evaluation index systems in recent years and the concepts of lowcarbon city in China.The current evaluation index systems of low-carbon city in China could be divided into two types:two class index system and three class index system.The establishment of different index systems basically adheres to the scientific,systematic,operable and dynamic principles,and the target value and weight of evaluation index could be confirmed in multiple ways.This paper analyzed the existing problems in the evaluation index systems of low-carbon city,and came up with some suggestions and advice to promote relevant research.展开更多
目的对现有脑卒中患者衰弱评估工具进行范围综述,为脑卒中患者衰弱评估工具的选择提供参考。方法系统化检索PubMed、Web of Science、EMbase、SinoMed、万方、维普、知网数据库,检索时间为建库至2023年5月,筛选符合研究目的和研究问题...目的对现有脑卒中患者衰弱评估工具进行范围综述,为脑卒中患者衰弱评估工具的选择提供参考。方法系统化检索PubMed、Web of Science、EMbase、SinoMed、万方、维普、知网数据库,检索时间为建库至2023年5月,筛选符合研究目的和研究问题的文献,并提取每篇文献的基本信息,包括第一作者、发表年份、发表国家、研究设计类型、评估工具名称、量表维度、条目数、评估时间等。结果本研究共检索出1729篇文献,经多重筛选后最终纳入22篇文献(共包含8种衰弱评估工具)。分析结果显示,8种衰弱评估工具的评估指标、评估时间和评估方法等各不相同,且各有优缺点,其中衰弱指数是最常用的脑卒中患者衰弱评估工具。选择有效的衰弱评估工具对脑卒中患者进行衰弱筛查,对加强卒中前风险分层和改善卒中后结局至关重要。结论不同衰弱评估工具之间差异较大,且现有评估工具在衡量脑卒中患者衰弱方面均存在局限性,需结合临床医生的经验和判断进行综合评估。未来的研究需进一步深入探寻和开发新的衰弱评估工具,以更好地指导脑卒中患者的康复治疗和管理。展开更多
OBJECTIVE: To give a general introduction of journals on traditional medicine, which have been collected by the Science Citation Index(SCI). METHODS: A keyword search was conducted on the SCIE journals on the Thomson ...OBJECTIVE: To give a general introduction of journals on traditional medicine, which have been collected by the Science Citation Index(SCI). METHODS: A keyword search was conducted on the SCIE journals on the Thomson Reuters website(http://www.thomsonscientific.com.cn) with the search formula "Alternative OR Complementary OR Integrative OR Chinese Medicine OR Medicinal OR Ethnopharmacology OR Manipulative OR Natural Medicine OR Natural Product OR Phytotherapy OR Phytomedicine OR Homeopathy OR Acupuncture OR Planta OR Traditional OR Ayurvedic OR Herb OR Herbal". RESULTS: A total of 32 kinds of traditional medicine journals were collected by SCI, of which 30 are in English and the rest are in German.The subject of traditional medical journals covered by SCI covers traditional medicine, supplementary and alternative therapies, botanicals, and natural medicines. Chinese medicine professionals in China can take these factors into consideration when using literature or choosing the direction of paper submission. CONCLUSION: The IF of traditional medicine related journals are relative low, while those of biology and natural drugs are relative high. IF should not be considered as the only factor to evaluate the impact and academic level of journals.展开更多
This review aims to clarify the clinical significance of systematic reviews and meta-analyses by illustrating several classical examples.Firstly,systematic reviews can provide the highest level of evidence for clinica...This review aims to clarify the clinical significance of systematic reviews and meta-analyses by illustrating several classical examples.Firstly,systematic reviews can provide the highest level of evidence for clinical decisions.Secondly,systematic reviews can propose unresolved issues and future directions.Thirdly,systematic reviews can avoid harm to the human body.Fourthly,systematic reviews can prevent a waste of resources.Generally speaking,clinical researchers should be encouraged to perform systematic reviews and metaanalyses.展开更多
基金Sponsored by Ecology Leading Academic Discipline Project in Jiangsu ProvinceEnvironmental Science Leading Academic Discipline Project in NanjingScientific Research Project in Nanjing Xiaozhuang University(2012NXY24)
文摘In order to promote the research on the evaluation index system of low-carbon city,this paper reviewed and summarized the current evaluation index systems in recent years and the concepts of lowcarbon city in China.The current evaluation index systems of low-carbon city in China could be divided into two types:two class index system and three class index system.The establishment of different index systems basically adheres to the scientific,systematic,operable and dynamic principles,and the target value and weight of evaluation index could be confirmed in multiple ways.This paper analyzed the existing problems in the evaluation index systems of low-carbon city,and came up with some suggestions and advice to promote relevant research.
文摘目的对现有脑卒中患者衰弱评估工具进行范围综述,为脑卒中患者衰弱评估工具的选择提供参考。方法系统化检索PubMed、Web of Science、EMbase、SinoMed、万方、维普、知网数据库,检索时间为建库至2023年5月,筛选符合研究目的和研究问题的文献,并提取每篇文献的基本信息,包括第一作者、发表年份、发表国家、研究设计类型、评估工具名称、量表维度、条目数、评估时间等。结果本研究共检索出1729篇文献,经多重筛选后最终纳入22篇文献(共包含8种衰弱评估工具)。分析结果显示,8种衰弱评估工具的评估指标、评估时间和评估方法等各不相同,且各有优缺点,其中衰弱指数是最常用的脑卒中患者衰弱评估工具。选择有效的衰弱评估工具对脑卒中患者进行衰弱筛查,对加强卒中前风险分层和改善卒中后结局至关重要。结论不同衰弱评估工具之间差异较大,且现有评估工具在衡量脑卒中患者衰弱方面均存在局限性,需结合临床医生的经验和判断进行综合评估。未来的研究需进一步深入探寻和开发新的衰弱评估工具,以更好地指导脑卒中患者的康复治疗和管理。
文摘OBJECTIVE: To give a general introduction of journals on traditional medicine, which have been collected by the Science Citation Index(SCI). METHODS: A keyword search was conducted on the SCIE journals on the Thomson Reuters website(http://www.thomsonscientific.com.cn) with the search formula "Alternative OR Complementary OR Integrative OR Chinese Medicine OR Medicinal OR Ethnopharmacology OR Manipulative OR Natural Medicine OR Natural Product OR Phytotherapy OR Phytomedicine OR Homeopathy OR Acupuncture OR Planta OR Traditional OR Ayurvedic OR Herb OR Herbal". RESULTS: A total of 32 kinds of traditional medicine journals were collected by SCI, of which 30 are in English and the rest are in German.The subject of traditional medical journals covered by SCI covers traditional medicine, supplementary and alternative therapies, botanicals, and natural medicines. Chinese medicine professionals in China can take these factors into consideration when using literature or choosing the direction of paper submission. CONCLUSION: The IF of traditional medicine related journals are relative low, while those of biology and natural drugs are relative high. IF should not be considered as the only factor to evaluate the impact and academic level of journals.
文摘This review aims to clarify the clinical significance of systematic reviews and meta-analyses by illustrating several classical examples.Firstly,systematic reviews can provide the highest level of evidence for clinical decisions.Secondly,systematic reviews can propose unresolved issues and future directions.Thirdly,systematic reviews can avoid harm to the human body.Fourthly,systematic reviews can prevent a waste of resources.Generally speaking,clinical researchers should be encouraged to perform systematic reviews and metaanalyses.
