Reflection of the supplemem and correction of the defective evidences

Since the implementation of the rules of the supplement and correction of the defective evidences, there are many problems in the practice. The actual investigations and researches also feedback that the judges also have a lot of problems in the face of the definition of the meaning of the defective evidences, the correction application, and the degree restrictions. Behind this reflects the contradiction between the stress of the prosecution organs in the criminal detection and the deepening of the resisting mechanism in the court. And the litigation structure of the ＂division of responsibilities among three authorities＂ and the trial mode of ＂the centralism of the book records of the cases＂ exacerbated this opposition. On the basis of clarifying the origin and the meanings of the defective evidences, the author of this paper analyzes the essence and its harm of the rule. Through the reflections of the problems existing in the practice, the author further defines the two types of the ＂defects＂ that shall not be allowed to correct.

A comprehensive revisit of the ρ meson with improved Monte-Carlo based QCD sum rules

We improve the Monte-Carlo based QCD sum rules by introducing the rigorous Hoolder-inequalitydetermined sum rule window and a Breit-Wigner type parametrization for the phenomenological spectral function.In this improved sum rule analysis methodology, the sum rule analysis window can be determined without any assumptions on OPE convergence or the QCD continuum. Therefore, an unbiased prediction can be obtained for the phenomenological parameters（the hadronic mass and width etc.）. We test the new approach in the ρ meson channel with re-examination and inclusion of αs corrections to dimension-4 condensates in the OPE. We obtain results highly consistent with experimental values. We also discuss the possible extension of this method to some other channels.