Objective:Rising cesarean section rates have led to an increase in cesarean scar defects.However,there is no consensus regarding the gold standard for treating cesarean scar defects.This study aims to compare the effi...Objective:Rising cesarean section rates have led to an increase in cesarean scar defects.However,there is no consensus regarding the gold standard for treating cesarean scar defects.This study aims to compare the efficacy of laparoscopy combined with hysteroscopy and hysteroscopy in treating cesarean scar defects.Methods:An electronic search of the MEDLINE,EMBASE,and Clinical Trials.gov databases was conducted in May 2020,utilizing combinations of relevant medical subject headings for“cesarean scar defect”,“laparoscope”,and“hysteroscope”.Reference lists of relevant articles and reviews were hand-searched for additional reports.Observed outcomes included menstruation after surgery,blood loss,operative time,and further fertility.Results:Eight studies with 467 patients were included.The menstruation duration after surgery for the laparoscopy combined with hysteroscopy group and hysteroscopy group was comparable.While the laparoscopy combined with hysteroscopy group trended to have less blood loss(mean difference 49.60,95%CI:42.12e57.09,p<0.05)and shorter operative time(mean difference 60.40,95%CI:53.33e67.48,p<0.05)compared to hysteroscopy group.And 26 out of 51 patients were able to achieve pregnancy for those choosing the laparoscopy combined with hysteroscopy.Conclusions:Patients with cesarean scar defect should choose the appropriate technique considering their age,residual myometrial thickness,desire for further fertility,and gynecological inflammation.The current study lacked evidence to prove that laparoscopy combined with hysteroscopy is superior to hysteroscopy.展开更多
目的基于CiteSpace软件对剖宫产切口瘢痕憩室(PCSD)的研究现状进行可视化分析,为今后相关研究提供参考。方法通过检索中国知网和Web of Science核心合集数据库中2000年1月至2021年12月PCSD相关研究文献,采用CiteSpace 5.8 R3软件对该领...目的基于CiteSpace软件对剖宫产切口瘢痕憩室(PCSD)的研究现状进行可视化分析,为今后相关研究提供参考。方法通过检索中国知网和Web of Science核心合集数据库中2000年1月至2021年12月PCSD相关研究文献,采用CiteSpace 5.8 R3软件对该领域研究的发文量、发文国家、发文机构、作者和关键词等进行可视化分析。结果共纳入1037篇,其中中国知网987篇,Web of Science核心合集数据库111篇。中国是发文量最多的国家。国内PCSD的发文量经历了3个不同的发展阶段,2018年发文量最高。相较于国外形成的密集合作网络结构,国内各机构之间合作关系分布疏松。国内外发文量最多的是汪希鹏教授带领的团队。国内中心性最强且出现最多的是“剖宫产”;国外中心性最强的是“risk factor”。国内突现度最强的是“子宫切口”,国外突现度最强的是“management”。结论中国是PCSD研究的核心国家,国内研究可能存在区域不平衡性,国内外研究热点略有差异,未来PCSD发生率有进一步升高的可能。展开更多
文摘Objective:Rising cesarean section rates have led to an increase in cesarean scar defects.However,there is no consensus regarding the gold standard for treating cesarean scar defects.This study aims to compare the efficacy of laparoscopy combined with hysteroscopy and hysteroscopy in treating cesarean scar defects.Methods:An electronic search of the MEDLINE,EMBASE,and Clinical Trials.gov databases was conducted in May 2020,utilizing combinations of relevant medical subject headings for“cesarean scar defect”,“laparoscope”,and“hysteroscope”.Reference lists of relevant articles and reviews were hand-searched for additional reports.Observed outcomes included menstruation after surgery,blood loss,operative time,and further fertility.Results:Eight studies with 467 patients were included.The menstruation duration after surgery for the laparoscopy combined with hysteroscopy group and hysteroscopy group was comparable.While the laparoscopy combined with hysteroscopy group trended to have less blood loss(mean difference 49.60,95%CI:42.12e57.09,p<0.05)and shorter operative time(mean difference 60.40,95%CI:53.33e67.48,p<0.05)compared to hysteroscopy group.And 26 out of 51 patients were able to achieve pregnancy for those choosing the laparoscopy combined with hysteroscopy.Conclusions:Patients with cesarean scar defect should choose the appropriate technique considering their age,residual myometrial thickness,desire for further fertility,and gynecological inflammation.The current study lacked evidence to prove that laparoscopy combined with hysteroscopy is superior to hysteroscopy.
文摘目的基于CiteSpace软件对剖宫产切口瘢痕憩室(PCSD)的研究现状进行可视化分析,为今后相关研究提供参考。方法通过检索中国知网和Web of Science核心合集数据库中2000年1月至2021年12月PCSD相关研究文献,采用CiteSpace 5.8 R3软件对该领域研究的发文量、发文国家、发文机构、作者和关键词等进行可视化分析。结果共纳入1037篇,其中中国知网987篇,Web of Science核心合集数据库111篇。中国是发文量最多的国家。国内PCSD的发文量经历了3个不同的发展阶段,2018年发文量最高。相较于国外形成的密集合作网络结构,国内各机构之间合作关系分布疏松。国内外发文量最多的是汪希鹏教授带领的团队。国内中心性最强且出现最多的是“剖宫产”;国外中心性最强的是“risk factor”。国内突现度最强的是“子宫切口”,国外突现度最强的是“management”。结论中国是PCSD研究的核心国家,国内研究可能存在区域不平衡性,国内外研究热点略有差异,未来PCSD发生率有进一步升高的可能。
