On April 9, 2008, a strategic cooperation signing ceremony between the China Association for Stan- dardization(CAS)and Schneider Electric took place at the Diao Yutai Guest Hotel in Beijing. Attending the signing cere...On April 9, 2008, a strategic cooperation signing ceremony between the China Association for Stan- dardization(CAS)and Schneider Electric took place at the Diao Yutai Guest Hotel in Beijing. Attending the signing ceremony were Mr Sun Xiaokang,Duty Director of SAC, Mr. Ma Lingcong, Secretary General of CAS, Mr. Noel Girard, Schneider Electric Marketing Director, Mr.Guy Dufrdi sse,Chairman of Schneider Electric(China)and more than twenty high-ranking managers from both companies.展开更多
It has been 4 years since the sensational lawsuit between Chint Group Corporation (hereinafter: Chint ) and Schneider Electric Low Voltage (Tianjin) Co.,Ltd (hereinafter: Schneider) settled. However, issues emerged in...It has been 4 years since the sensational lawsuit between Chint Group Corporation (hereinafter: Chint ) and Schneider Electric Low Voltage (Tianjin) Co.,Ltd (hereinafter: Schneider) settled. However, issues emerged in the case that relate to major issues in current patent law enforcement in China. This makes a re-examination of the case, with special consideration for the revisions to Chinese Patent law, worthwhile.展开更多
文摘On April 9, 2008, a strategic cooperation signing ceremony between the China Association for Stan- dardization(CAS)and Schneider Electric took place at the Diao Yutai Guest Hotel in Beijing. Attending the signing ceremony were Mr Sun Xiaokang,Duty Director of SAC, Mr. Ma Lingcong, Secretary General of CAS, Mr. Noel Girard, Schneider Electric Marketing Director, Mr.Guy Dufrdi sse,Chairman of Schneider Electric(China)and more than twenty high-ranking managers from both companies.
文摘It has been 4 years since the sensational lawsuit between Chint Group Corporation (hereinafter: Chint ) and Schneider Electric Low Voltage (Tianjin) Co.,Ltd (hereinafter: Schneider) settled. However, issues emerged in the case that relate to major issues in current patent law enforcement in China. This makes a re-examination of the case, with special consideration for the revisions to Chinese Patent law, worthwhile.