When implementing open access, policy pioneers and flagship institutions alike have faced considerable challenges in meeting their own aims and achieving a recognized success. Legitimate authority, sufficient resource...When implementing open access, policy pioneers and flagship institutions alike have faced considerable challenges in meeting their own aims and achieving a recognized success. Legitimate authority, sufficient resources and the right timing are crucial, but the professionals charged with implementing policy still need several years to accomplish significant progress. This study defines a methodological standard for evaluating the first generation of open access policies. Evaluating implementation establishes evidence, enables reflection, and may foster the emergence of a second generation of open access policies.While the study is based on a small number of cases, these case studies cover most of the pioneer institutions, present the most significant issues and offer an international overview.Each case is reconstructed individually on the basis of public documents and background information, and supported by interviews with professionals responsible for open access implementation. This article presents the highlights from each case study. The results are utilized to indicate how a second generation of policies might define open access as a key component of digital research infrastructures that provide inputs and outputs for research,teaching and learning in real time.展开更多
文章以Web of Science中的数据库为情报源,分析SSCI收录的3种期刊学、编辑学和出版学专业期刊《Learned Publishing》（LP）、《Journal of Scholarly Publishing》（JSP）、《Serials Review》（SR）在2007—2016年发表的高被引论文（...文章以Web of Science中的数据库为情报源,分析SSCI收录的3种期刊学、编辑学和出版学专业期刊《Learned Publishing》（LP）、《Journal of Scholarly Publishing》（JSP）、《Serials Review》（SR）在2007—2016年发表的高被引论文（共计133篇）,探讨高被引论文的年度分布、研究主题、文献类型及作者国别等,希望能在科学量化指标的基础上,揭示国外编辑出版类期刊高被引论文的特点,为国内编辑出版类期刊的栏目策划、选题组稿等提供借鉴,也为编辑出版学研究提供参考。展开更多
文摘When implementing open access, policy pioneers and flagship institutions alike have faced considerable challenges in meeting their own aims and achieving a recognized success. Legitimate authority, sufficient resources and the right timing are crucial, but the professionals charged with implementing policy still need several years to accomplish significant progress. This study defines a methodological standard for evaluating the first generation of open access policies. Evaluating implementation establishes evidence, enables reflection, and may foster the emergence of a second generation of open access policies.While the study is based on a small number of cases, these case studies cover most of the pioneer institutions, present the most significant issues and offer an international overview.Each case is reconstructed individually on the basis of public documents and background information, and supported by interviews with professionals responsible for open access implementation. This article presents the highlights from each case study. The results are utilized to indicate how a second generation of policies might define open access as a key component of digital research infrastructures that provide inputs and outputs for research,teaching and learning in real time.
文摘文章以Web of Science中的数据库为情报源,分析SSCI收录的3种期刊学、编辑学和出版学专业期刊《Learned Publishing》（LP）、《Journal of Scholarly Publishing》（JSP）、《Serials Review》（SR）在2007—2016年发表的高被引论文（共计133篇）,探讨高被引论文的年度分布、研究主题、文献类型及作者国别等,希望能在科学量化指标的基础上,揭示国外编辑出版类期刊高被引论文的特点,为国内编辑出版类期刊的栏目策划、选题组稿等提供借鉴,也为编辑出版学研究提供参考。
