Clinical value of the Toronto inflammatory bowel disease global endoscopic reporting score in ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND Endoscopic evaluation in diagnosing and managing ulcerative colitis(UC)is becoming increasingly important.Several endoscopic scoring systems have been established,including the Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity(UCEIS)score and Mayo Endoscopic Subscore(MES).Furthermore,the Toronto Inflammatory Bowel Disease Global Endoscopic Reporting(TIGER)score for UC has recently been proposed;however,its clinical value remains unclear.AIM To investigate the clinical value of the TIGER score in UC by comparing it with the UCEIS score and MES.METHODS This retrospective study included 166 patients with UC who underwent total colonoscopy between January 2017 and March 2023 at the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University(Qingdao,China).We retrospectively analysed endoscopic scores,laboratory and clinical data,treatment,and readmissions within 1 year.Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient,receiver operating characteristic curve,and univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows,version 26.0(IBM Corp.,Armonk,NY,United States)and GraphPad Prism version 9.0.0 for Windows(GraphPad Software,Boston,Massachusetts,United States).RESULTS The TIGER score significantly correlated with the UCEIS score and MES(r=0.721,0.626,both P<0.001),showed good differentiating values for clinical severity among mild,moderate,and severe UC[8(4-112.75)vs 210(109–219)vs 328(219–426),all P<0.001],and exhibited predictive value in diagnosing patients with severe UC[area under the curve(AUC)=0.897,P<0.001].Additionally,the TIGER(r=0.639,0,551,0.488,0.376,all P<0.001)and UCEIS scores(r=0.622,0,540,0.494,and 0.375,all P<0.001)showed stronger correlations with laboratory and clinical parameters,including C-reactive protein,erythrocyte sedimentation rate,length of hospitalisation,and hospitalisation costs,than MES(r=0.509,0,351,0.339,and 0.270,all P<0.001).The TIGER score showed the best predictability for patients'recent advanced treatment,including systemic corticosteroids,biologics,or immunomodulators(AUC=0.848,P<0.001)and 1-year readmission(AUC=0.700,P<0.001)compared with the UCEIS score(AUC=0.762,P<0.001;0.627,P<0.05)and MES(AUC=0.684,P<0.001;0.578,P=0.132).Furthermore,a TIGER score of≥317 was identified as an independent risk factor for advanced UC treatment(P=0.011).CONCLUSION The TIGER score may be superior to the UCIES score and MES in improving the accuracy of clinical disease severity assessment,guiding therapeutic decision-making,and predicting short-term prognosis.

Arabic Version of the Modified Constant Murley Score

Objectives: “Patient-reported outcome measures” has been used extensively, and it has shown the diseases’ impact on patient quality of life and has enabled the clinician to evaluate the clinical care efficacy. In the literature, there are more than 34 shoulder function assessment scoring instruments;the Modified Constant Murley Score (M-CMS) is one of the most popular scores. Although, the M-CMS had been translated and culturally adapted to Danish, Brazilian and Turkish versions, there is no Arabic version found in the literature. We aim to translate and culturally adapt M-CMS into the Arabic language. Method: The M-CMS was translated using previously published guidelines. The translation and cultural adaptation were done in five stages, initial translation by two bilingual translators then a synthesis of the translations after that, back translation by two native English speakers. Then an expert committee meeting approved the pre-final Arabic version. Finally, a pilot test was conducted on 41 patients to ensure its validity. Results: The M-CMS was successfully translated from the original English version to the Arabic version;no difficulties in the translation process were faced. Conclusion: A validated Arabic version of the M-CMS was produced and ready to be used for functional assessment of different shoulder pathologies in Arabic-speaking countries. Future study is needed for translation and cultural adaptation of the English standardized test protocol to assure the reproducibility of the Arabic version of the M-CMS.

Preliminary Report on Phenom^®Femoral Component in Total Hip Replacement: The Correlation between Outcome Scores in a Cross-Seccional Study

Background: The main purpose of the present study was to assess the short term performance of a cementless femoral stem in total hip replacement. Methods: Cross-sectional observational study of a 48-patient cohort with Phenom? femoral stems implanted between June 1, 2014 and September 1, 2018, to determine clinical performance, stability, and radiographic osseointegration. Patients were followed-up from 13 to 76 months (mean: 44.5 months) and assessed using the Harris Hip Score-HHS, the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-HOOS and radiographs. Results: All stems were radiologically stable. Mean Harris Hip Score was 89.8 and the HOOS was 80.4. No statistical differences were observed among patients with different diagnoses. Conclusions: The short-term results revealed satisfactory clinical outcomes and radiological signs of implant stability in all cases. Using two functional scores was useful in detecting biases and a low to moderate agreement was found between the scores.

Establishing minimum clinically important difference values for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function, hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score for joint reconstruction, and knee injury and osteoarthritis out

AIM To establish minimum clinically important difference(MCID) for measurements in an orthopaedic patient population with joint disorders.METHODS Adult patients aged 18 years and older seeking care for joint conditions at an orthopaedic clinic took the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function(PROMIS~? PF) computerized adaptive test(CAT), hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score for joint reconstruction(HOOS JR), and the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score for joint reconstruction(KOOS JR) from February 2014 to April 2017. MCIDs were calculated using anchorbased and distribution-based methods. Patient reports of meaningful change in function since their first clinic encounter were used as an anchor.RESULTS There were 2226 patients who participated with a mean age of 61.16(SD = 12.84) years, 41.6% male, and 89.7% Caucasian. Mean change ranged from 7.29 to 8.41 for the PROMIS~? PF CAT, from 14.81 to 19.68 for the HOOS JR, and from 14.51 to 18.85 for the KOOS JR. ROC cut-offs ranged from 1.97-8.18 for the PF CAT, 6.33-43.36 for the HOOS JR, and 2.21-8.16 for the KOOS JR. Distribution-based methods estimated MCID values ranging from 2.45 to 21.55 for the PROMIS~? PF CAT; from 3.90 to 43.61 for the HOOS JR, and from 3.98 to 40.67 for the KOOS JR. The median MCID value in the range was similar to the mean change score for each measure and was 7.9 for the PF CAT, 18.0 for the HOOS JR, and 15.1 for the KOOS JR.CONCLUSION This is the first comprehensive study providing a wide range of MCIDs for the PROMIS? PF, HOOS JR, and KOOS JR in orthopaedic patients with joint ailments.

考试分数报告研发的国际经验及启示

分数报告是考试结果的呈现形式,作为考试开发人员与考试使用者的沟通媒介,它在很大程度上影响着考试能否达成预期目的。十多年来,在教育与心理测量领域,分数报告的研究与实践取得丰硕成果。本文聚焦于国际前沿的分数报告开发流程和评价方法,对国内外大型外语考试分数报告案例进行分析,提出我国教育考试分数报告的改革和创新可以从整体规划、理论构建和加强信息技术运用等三个方面展开,为我国分数报告的理论和实践创新提供参考。

多模态超声校正BI-RADS 4类乳腺肿块的价值

目的 探讨乳腺自动容积成像(ABVS)、超声弹性评分(UES)及两者联合在校正乳腺影像报告和数据系统分级(BI-RADS) 4类乳腺肿块BI-RADS分级中的应用价值。方法 收集我院经常规超声诊断为BI-RADS 4类的乳腺肿块患者109例,共113个肿块。经ABVS及UES校正BI-RADS分级后,与病理结果对比,绘制ROC曲线,比较常规超声、ABVS、UES、ABVS联合UES诊断BI-RADS 4类乳腺肿块的差异。结果 109例患者113个肿块中包含良性78个,恶性35个,ABVS联合UES校正后的敏感度、特异性、准确性、ROC曲线下面积分别为94.29%、93.59%、93.80%、0.975。结论 ABVS联合UES有助于提高BI-RADS 4类肿块的总体诊断效能。两者联合诊断可以取长补短,提高诊断率。

PI-RADS评分3分诊断临床有意义前列腺癌的危险因素分析

目的探索前列腺影像报告与数据系统(PI-RADS)评分3分患者发生临床有意义前列腺癌(csPCa)的独立危险因素。方法选取2018年1月至2022年6月在陕西省人民医院泌尿外科接受前列腺系统穿刺PI-RADS评分3分的118例患者作为研究对象。采用Logistic回归分析明确csPCa的独立危险因素并通过受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)及曲线下面积(AUC)评估穿刺前游离前列腺特异性抗原/总前列腺特异性抗原(fPSA/tPSA)、前列腺特异性抗原密度(PSAD)、直肠指检单独及联合应用诊断csPCa的准确性。结果118例患者中,29例(24.58%)患者诊断为csPCa,89例(75.42%)患者诊断为非csPCa。多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示,fPSA/tPSA≤0.16、PSAD≥0.20 ng/mL^(2)及直肠指检异常是csPCa的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。fPSA/tPSA、PSAD及直肠指检诊断csPCa的AUC值分别为0.71、0.80、0.74,联合应用后的AUC值为0.91。结论穿刺前fPSA/tPSA≤0.16、PSAD≥0.20 ng/mL^(2)及直肠指检异常是csPCa的独立危险因素,联合应用可以显著提高csPCa的诊断准确性,值得临床推广和应用。

C-TIRADS及弹性评分法联合Bethesda报告系统对甲状腺结节的诊断价值

目的探讨中国超声甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(C-TIRADS)及弹性评分法联合Bethesda报告系统(TBSRTC)对甲状腺结节的诊断价值。方法纳入2020年12月至2022年12月嘉兴市第一医院手术治疗的甲状腺结节患者122例,均行术后病理检查。术前根据常规超声检查发现甲状腺结节134个,再行弹性评分检查以及C-TIRADS分类,并在甲状腺细针穿刺活检(FNAB)后进行TBSRTC分级。以病理检查结果为金标准,分析不同诊断方法对甲状腺结节性质的诊断价值。结果TBSRTC单独诊断恶性甲状腺结节的灵敏度、准确度、阴性预测值分别为0.903、0.881、0.714,高于弹性评分(0.709、0.754、0.483)与C-TIRADS(0.718、0.716、0.431)(均P<0.05)。弹性评分、C-TIRADS联合TBSRTC诊断恶性结节的灵敏度为0.971,高于弹性评分联合C-TIRADS(0.757)、弹性评分联合TBSRTC(0.903)、C-TIRADS联合TBSRTC(0.903)(P<0.05)。弹性评分联合TBSRTC诊断恶性C-TIRADS 4B类以上结节的灵敏度为0.973,高于弹性评分(0.811)、TBSRTC(0.878)(均P<0.05)。结论TBSRTC单独诊断甲状腺结节性质的效果优于弹性评分、C-TIRADS,3者联合可提升诊断效能,且弹性评分联合TBSRTC对C-TIRADS 4B类以上结节性质的评估具有良好诊断价值。

某院医疗器械ADE-ASAS的构建及其对不良事件上报情况的影响

目的探讨某院医疗器械不良事件主动监测与智能评估警示系统(Adverse Drug Event-Active Safety Assessment System,ADE-ASAS)的构建及其对不良事件发生的影响。方法构建医疗器械ADE-ASAS,并选取某院2019—2022年全院上报的不良事件统计情况,数据来自早期手工填报以及医疗器械ADE-ASAS,统计分析系统实施效果及对不良事件发生的影响。结果2019—2022年4年间不良事件上报数逐年增长,医院在2021年上线医疗器械ADE-ASAS,2022年通过医疗器械ADE-ASAS不良事件上报数量较2021年显著增加,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001);2021年医患纠纷、医院投诉数量较2020年下降了14.00%,2022年较2021年下降了15.12%;不良事件报告整体质量评分逐年增高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。结论医疗器械ADE-ASAS的构建提升了医院不良事件的上报数,并使报告整体质量得以提升,有助于相关部门采取有效措施进行干预,以减少医患纠纷和医院投诉,具有一定的临床应用和推广价值。

超声剪切波弹性成像联合PI-RADS评分在前列腺病变良恶性诊断中的应用研究

目的探讨超声剪切波弹性成像(SWE)联合前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)评分在前列腺病变良恶性诊断中的应用价值。方法回顾性选取2018年1月至2023年1月杭州市第九人民医院收治的96例前列腺疾病患者作为研究对象,根据术后病理检查结果分为前列腺增生组(n=51)和前列腺癌组(n=45)。两组均进行SWE和磁共振成像(MRI)扫描,比较两组超声和MRI影像学特征、SWE值和PI-RADS评分,并评估二者对前列腺病变良恶性的诊断效能。结果前列腺增生组SWE最大值、平均值均低于前列腺癌组(P<0.05);前列腺增生组PI-RADS评分低于前列腺癌组(P<0.05);受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析显示,SWE最大值、SWE平均值和PI-RADS评分联合诊断良恶性前列腺病变的AUC高于单一指标(P<0.05)。结论SWE联合PI-RADS评分可提高前列腺病变良恶性的诊断效能,有助于前列腺癌的早期无创诊断。

Coronary artery calcium data and reporting system: Strengths and limitations

Coronary artery calcium data and reporting system(CAC-DRS)is a recently introduced standardized reporting system for calcium scoring on computed tomography.CAC-DRS provides four risk categories(0,1,2 and 3)along with treatment recommendations for each category.As with any other new reporting platform,CAC-DRS has both advantages and disadvantages.Improved communication,better clarity of details,organized management recommendations and utility in future research and education are the major strengths of CAC-DRS.It has many limitations such as questionable need for a new system,few missing components,use of a less accurate visual method and treatment suggestions based on expert opinion instead of clinical trials.In this contemporary review,we discuss the new reporting system CAC-DRS,its application,strengths and limitations and conclude with some remarks for the future.

基于多参数MRI的Kaiser评分系统对乳腺病变诊断效能的研究

目的探讨Kaiser评分在乳腺病变良恶性鉴别中的应用及其提高乳腺癌诊断效能的价值。方法收集我院2018年1月至2021年5月进行术前乳腺1.5TMRI检查的患者资料,以病理结果为金标准,分别计算并比较Kaiser评分及BI-RADS分类对乳腺病变良恶性的诊断效能。结果共纳入199个病灶,良性病变95个(47.7%),恶性病变104个(52.3%)。Kaiser评分诊断的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和准确性分别为94.2%、84.2%、86.7%、93.0%、89.4%;BI-RADS分类诊断的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和准确性分别为93.3%、65.3%、74.6%、89.9%、79.9%。Kaiser评分和BI-RADS分类对乳腺病变良恶性诊断的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.937和0.885。Kaiser评分对肿块和非肿块的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.952和0.883。结论Kaiser评分对于乳腺良恶性病变的诊断效能优于BI-RADS分类,并且可以为乳腺病变的诊断提供流程化、结构化的思路,对于肿块样病变诊断的准确性更高。

基于警戒分级法建立化妆品不良反应报告质量评分方法以评估某省化妆品不良反应报告为例

通过对比化妆品不良反应报告内容与VigiGrade维度,建立化妆品不良反应报告质量评分方法,并运用该方法回顾性统计分析某省2018-2020年度化妆品不良反应报告的质量。建立的化妆品不良反应报告质量评分方法共纳入了9项维度,包括和VigiGrade完整性评分方法相对应的潜伏期、结果、性别、年龄、国家(地区)、主要报告人、评论7项维度,删除了VigiGrade方法中报告来源、剂量、适应症3项维度,增加了过敏史、附加项2项维度;40851份化妆品不良反应报告中有32513份(79%)报告c大于0.8,可被归类为有据可查报告,平均完整性分数为0.89;按地区分类,来自L市、P市、R市、H市的化妆品不良反应报告数量最多;医疗卫生机构上报不良反应报告的份数及良好报告的比例最高;信息缺失或不完整主要集中在评论和年龄等维度;附加项得分的化妆品不良反应报告仅占总体报告的0.9%;该方法能反映报告整体质量以及报告质量的差异,对提高化妆品不良反应报告的质量具有参考价值。

基于前列腺影像报告数据系统及多参数MRI对移行带前列腺癌的诊断价值

目的探讨PI-RADS v2.1对移行带前列腺癌(prostate cancer,PCa)及临床显著前列腺癌(clinically significant prostate cancer,csPCa)的诊断价值。方法回顾性分析2019年8月至2022年6月宁夏回族自治区人民医院收治行前列腺活检穿刺术或根治性前列腺切除术,主病变位于移行带的86例(病理确诊:前列腺癌43例,前列腺增生合并前列腺炎43例)患者,患者术前临床资料及影像资料齐全。以病理Gleason评分为金标准,由年资不同的两位医师严格依据PI-RADS v2.1进行盲法评分,运用受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic,ROC)曲线分析并计算PI-RADS v2.1评分对移行带PCa和csPCa的诊断价值,采用Spearman相关分析分析PI-RADS v2.1评分结果与病理Gleason评分的相关性。结果PI-RADS v2.1评分检出移行带PCa和csPCa的AUC值分别为0.967(95%CI:0.933~1.000)和0.980(95%CI:0.958~1.000),差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。PI-RADS v2.1评分为3分和4分时,诊断移行带PCa的敏感度、特异度、准确度和约登指数分别为97.67%、74.42%、88.10%、0.73和88.37%、95.35%、94.05%、0.84;PI-RADS v2.1评分为3分和4分时,诊断移行带csPCa的敏感度、特异度、准确度、约登指数分别为100%、70.21%、85.71%、0.70和94.87%、93.62%、96.43%、0.88。PI-RADS v2.1评分与Gleason评分呈正相关(r=0.851,P<0.01)。结论PI-RADS v2.1对前列腺移行带PCa和csPCa具有较高的诊断价值,医师间诊断一致性较佳,可以避免前列腺患者不必要的穿刺。

基于Bp-MRI的PI-RADS v2.1评分构建列线图预测PSA(4-20 ng/mL)前列腺癌的诊断价值

目的 基于前列腺影像报告和数据系统2.1版(Prostate Imaging Report and Data System version 2.1, PI-RADS v2.1)的双参数磁共振成像(biparametric MRI, bp-MRI)和前列腺特异性抗原(prostate specific antigen, PSA)等临床指标,构建鉴别诊断PSA(4-20 ng/mL)前列腺癌(prostate cancer, PCa)的列线图模型。材料与方法 回顾性分析宁夏医科大学总医院2017年10月至2022年2月206例行bp-MRI检查并有病理学结果的患者资料。根据病理结果分为PCa组(n=66)和前列腺增生和(或)炎症组(n=140),经单、多因素logistic回归分析筛选PSA (4-20 ng/mL) PCa患者的独立危险因素,随后使用R软件构建列线图模型,并用决策曲线分析(decision curve analysis, DCA)其临床净效益。以受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic, ROC)曲线下面积(area under the curve, AUC)、敏感度和特异度评价诊断效能,并通过DeLong检验比较AUC值间的差异。结果 年龄、总前列腺特异性抗原(total prostate specific antigen, tPSA)、前列腺体积(prostate volume, PV)、PI-RADS v2.1是预测PSA (4-20 ng/mL) PCa的独立危险因素。基于上述4个独立指标构建的列线图模型诊断效能最好(AUC=0.945),明显高于PI-RADS v2.1(AUC=0.816)、PV(AUC=0.772)、tPSA(AUC=0.737)、年龄(AUC=0.680)。结论 基于bp-MRI的PI-RADS v2.1评分联合临床相关指标建立的列线图模型,预测PSA (4–20 ng/mL) PCa的诊断效能明显优于单一指标,可作为一种无创精准化预测工具,将更全面、准确地预测罹患PCa的风险概率,为临床提供有效的诊疗指导。

PI-RADS v2.1联合PSA、PSAD在前列腺癌诊断中的应用价值

目的:探究第2.1版前列腺影像报告与数据系统(prostate imaging reporting and data system,PI-RADS v2.1)联合前列腺特异抗原(prostate specific antigen,PSA)、前列腺特异抗原密度(prostate specific antigen density,PSAD)在前列腺癌(prostate cancer,PCa)诊断中的应用价值。方法:选择2016年5月—2021年6月于南通市第二人民医院进行治疗的90例疑似前列腺癌患者作为研究对象。90例患者分别进行多参数核磁共振(mp-MRI)检查,对患者的前列腺图像进行PIRADS v2.1评分及PI-RADS v2.1评分联合PSA、PSAD诊断。以患者前列腺穿刺取组织进行病理检查结果为金标准,分析患者的PSA、PSAD水平及PI-RADS v2.1评分联合PSA、PSAD对前列腺癌的敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。结果:90例疑似PCa患者,病理学诊断结果:恶性肿瘤42例,良性肿瘤48例。良性患者和恶性患者游离前列腺特异性抗原(f-PSA)对比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),良性患者PSAD、总前列腺特异性抗原(t-PSA)低于恶性肿瘤,f-PSA/t-PSA高于恶性肿瘤,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。PI-RADS v2.1评分联合PSA、PSAD诊断准确率高于PI-RADS v2.1评分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。PI-RADS v2.1评分联合PSA、PSAD检测的敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值均高于PI-RADS v2.1评分,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:对前列腺癌患者的诊断中,PI-RADS v2.1评分具有较高的准确性,但PI-RADS v2.1评分联合PSA、PSAD检测在敏感度、特异度和准确度更有参考价值。

多参数磁共振对前列腺癌的诊断价值及其与Gleason分级评分的相关性研究

目的:探索多参数磁共振成像(mp-MRI)应用前列腺成像报告和数据系统第2版(PI-RADS v2.1)对前列腺癌(PCa)的诊断价值及其与PCa Gleason分级评分的相关性。方法:选取在医院行mp-MRI且经穿刺病理证实的120例前列腺疾病患者,其中PCa患者68例,前列腺增生患者52例。以组织病理学检查结果为“金标准”,采用PI-RADS v2.1在双盲法下进行评分,使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析其PCa的诊断效能,采用Spearson相关性分析PI-RADS v2.1与PCa Gleason分级评分的相关性。结果:PI-RADS v2.1诊断PCa的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.957,最佳截断值≥3分,灵敏度95.1%,特异度79.3%,准确率88.3%,阳性预测值85.5%,阴性预测值93.2%。PI-RADS v2.1与PCa Gleason分级评分呈高度正相关(r=8.08,P<0.01)。结论:mp-MRI应用PI-RADS v2.1与PCa Gleason分级评分具有高度相关性,且对前列腺病变具有较高的的诊断效能。

Kaiser评分诊断MRI BI-RADS 4类亚厘米肿块的临床价值

目的:探讨Kaiser评分鉴别诊断乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)4类亚厘米肿块的临床应用价值。方法:回顾性搜集经病理证实的BI-RADS 4类亚厘米肿块患者173例,由3位乳腺诊断医师依据评分流程图进行盲法评估,通过ROC曲线分析诊断准确率。评估不同ADC阈值对评分的影响,不同ADC阈值的AUC比较行DeLong检验。结果:173例中,良性67例,恶性106例。Kaiser评分诊断亚厘米肿块的敏感度、特异度、准确率、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、阳性似然比、阴性似然比和AUC分别为90.6%~92.5%、62.7%~68.7%、80.9%~82.7%、79.7%~82.2%、81.5%~84.0%、2.48~2.92、0.12~0.14、0.801~0.830。以1.4×10-3 mm2/s作为ADC阈值,Kaiser评分的诊断准确率和AUC均最高,但不同ADC阈值的AUC之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:Kaiser评分诊断BI-RADS 4类亚厘米肿块性能良好,以1.4×10-3 mm2/s作为ADC阈值对Kaiser评分的辅助诊断价值更优。

3C护理服务用于消毒供应中心手术器械管理的效果评价

目的评价3C护理服务用于消毒供应中心手术器械管理的效果。方法选取2021年1—12月在湖南省第二人民医院消毒供应中心处理的手术器械300件作为传统组,进行传统护理服务。2022年1—12月在本院消毒供应中心处理的手术器械300件作为实践组,进行3C护理服务。两组手术器械均由消毒供应中心同一批工作人员(25名)处理。比较两组护理后的管理质量评分、消毒灭菌合格率、器械损坏率、安全隐患报告率。结果与传统组相比,实践组护理后的管理质量评分更高,消毒灭菌合格率更高,器械损坏率更低,安全隐患报告率更低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在消毒供应中心手术器械管理时,选用3C护理服务能够提升管理质量评分,提高消毒灭菌合格率,减少器械损坏情况,降低安全隐患报告率。

基于考试结果挖掘的教育评价:理论与实践

考试分数的使用是评价工作的关键一环,它直接影响着教育决策部门、学校和学生对分数及其背后信息的使用。近些年来,随着现代统计与测量理论研究的不断深化,国内外考试机构在考试分数的使用方面基于认知诊断和多元智能理论的应用取得了长足的进步,为政府部门的决策、学校的教学改进和考生自主学习提供了科学依据。笔者结合我国大规模教育考试的实际,在总结国内外理论研究和实践经验的基础上,在高考、教师资格考试、NCRE等项考试中尝试进行了利用考试分数开展评价的探索。