We sought to compare the safety and accuracy of a new free-hand pedicle screw placement technique to that of the conventional technique. One hundred fifty-three consecutive adult patients with simple fracture in the t...We sought to compare the safety and accuracy of a new free-hand pedicle screw placement technique to that of the conventional technique. One hundred fifty-three consecutive adult patients with simple fracture in the tho- racic or/and lumbar spine were alternately assigned to either the new free-hand or the conventional group. In the new free-hand technique group, preoperative computerized tomography （CT） images were used to calculate the targeted medial-lateral angle of each pedicle trajectory and the pedicle screw was inserted perpendicular to the corresponding supraspinal ligament. In the conventional technique group, the medial-lateral and cranial-caudal angle of each pedicle trajectory was determined by intraoperatively under fluoroscopic guidance. The accuracy rate of pedicle screw placement, the time of intraoperative fluoroscopy, the operating time and the amount of blood loss during operation were respectively compared. All screws were analyzed by using intraoperative ra- diographs, intraoperative triggered electromyography （EMG） monitoring data, postoperative CT data and clinical outcomes. The accuracy rate of pedicle screw placement in the new free-hand technique group and the conven- tional technique group was 96.3% and 94.2% （P 〈 0.05）, respectively. The intraoperative fluoroscopy time of the new technique group was less than that of the conventional technique group （5.37 seconds vs. 8.79 seconds, P 〈 0.05）. However, there was no statistical difference in the operating time and the amount of blood loss during op- eration （P 〉 0.05）. Pedicle screw placement with the free-hand technique which keeps the screw perpendicular to the supraspinal ligament is an accurate, reliable and safe technique to treat simple fracture in the thoracic or lum- bar spine.展开更多
This study was aimed to introduce a novel entry point for pedicle screw fixation in the thoracic spine and compare it with the traditional entry point. A novel entry point was found with the aim of improving accuracy,...This study was aimed to introduce a novel entry point for pedicle screw fixation in the thoracic spine and compare it with the traditional entry point. A novel entry point was found with the aim of improving accuracy, safety and stability of pedicle screw technique based on anatomical structures of the spine. A total of 76 pieces of normal thoracic CT images at the transverse plane and the thoracic pedicle anatomy of 6 cadaveric specimens were recruited.Transverse pedicle angle（TPA）, screw length, screw placement accuracy rate and axial pullout strength of the two different entry point groups were compared. There were significant differences in the TPA, screw length, and the screw placement accuracy rate between the two groups（P〈0.05）. The maximum axial pullout strength of the novel entry point group was slightly larger than that of the traditional group. However, the difference was not significant（P 〉 0.05）. The novel entry point significantly improved the accuracy, stability and safety of pedicle screw placement.With reference to the advantages above, the new entry point can be used for spinal internal fixations in the thoracic spine.展开更多
Objective To explore the differences between anatomic and CT measurements for anterior transoral axial pedicle screw placement. Methods C2 vertebrae of 60 adult spines were measured anatomically,while 20 adult spine v...Objective To explore the differences between anatomic and CT measurements for anterior transoral axial pedicle screw placement. Methods C2 vertebrae of 60 adult spines were measured anatomically,while 20 adult spine vertebrae were展开更多
Objective To investigate the accuracy and feasibility of transpedicular screw placement assisted by the navigation templates in cadaveric thoracic spines.Methods Twenty thoracic cadavers specimens were randomly divide...Objective To investigate the accuracy and feasibility of transpedicular screw placement assisted by the navigation templates in cadaveric thoracic spines.Methods Twenty thoracic cadavers specimens were randomly divided into two展开更多
AIM To determine factors correlated with postoperative radial shortening in patients with distal radius fractures treated with volar locking distal radius plates.METHODS A total of 250 patients with a distal radius fr...AIM To determine factors correlated with postoperative radial shortening in patients with distal radius fractures treated with volar locking distal radius plates.METHODS A total of 250 patients with a distal radius fracture stabilised with volar locking plates between January 2010 and December 2014 were included in a multicentre retrospective cohort study. We measured the distance of the distal locking screws to the joint line immediately postoperatively and then measured radial shortening after six to eight weeks using the change in ulnar variance.RESULTS Multivariate linear regression analysis showed that there was a significant linear association between the distance of the screws from the joint line and radial shortening. No other patient, injury, or treatment-related characteristic significantly influenced radial shortening in multivariate analysis.CONCLUSION Distal locking screws should be placed as close as possible to the subchondral joint line to prevent postoperative loss of reduction.展开更多
Objective:Robot-assisted pedicle screw insertion has recently emerged as an alternative to the traditional free-hand technique.However,discrepancies in the accuracy of screw placement between the 2 methods have been h...Objective:Robot-assisted pedicle screw insertion has recently emerged as an alternative to the traditional free-hand technique.However,discrepancies in the accuracy of screw placement between the 2 methods have been highlighted by some comparative studies.This meta-analysis was conducted to synthesize evidence comparing these techniques.Methods:Searches were conducted in 5 electronic databases adhering to specific eligibility criteria for randomized and observational studies.The data were analyzed using RevMan software and the results are presented as odds ratios(ORs),mean differences,or standard mean differences(SMDs)with 95%confidence intervals(CIs).Our analysis included 12 studies(7 randomized trials and 5 observational studies,involving 883 patients and 4903 screws).Results:The results demonstrated a higher rate of Grade A Gertzbein and Robbins pedicle placement score(OR:1.77;95%CI:1.10e2.87),a lower rate of revision surgeries(OR:0.21;95%CI:0.09e0.52),and a shorter radiation exposure duration(SMD?1.38,95%CI:2.32 to0.44)in the robot-assisted group compared with the free-hand group.Nonetheless,the length of hospital stay,volume of intraoperative blood loss,postoperative visual analogue scale scores for back pain,and rate of wound infection were similar between the 2 groups.Significant heterogeneity was observed in some outcomes.Conclusion:Compared with the free-hand method,the robot-assisted technique provides greater accuracy and reduced radiation exposure.The efficacy of the robot-assisted technique is expected to improve further as experience with its use in surgery grows.展开更多
Background： Sacroiliac （SI） screw fixation is a demanding technique, with a high rate of screw malposition due to the complex pelvic anatomy. TiRobot- is an orthopedic surgery robot which can be used for SI screw f...Background： Sacroiliac （SI） screw fixation is a demanding technique, with a high rate of screw malposition due to the complex pelvic anatomy. TiRobot- is an orthopedic surgery robot which can be used for SI screw fixation. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of robot-assisted placement of SI screws compared with a freehand technique. Methods：Thirty patients requiring posterior pelvic ring stabilization were randomized to receive freehand or robot-assisted SI screw fixation, between January 2016 and June 2016 at Beijing Jishuitan Hospital. Forty-five screws were placed at levels S1 and S2. In both methods, the primary end point screw position was assessed and classified using postoperative computed tomography. Fisher＇s exact probability test was used to analyze the screws＇positions. Secondary end points, such as duration of trajectory planning, surgical time after reduction of the pelvis, insertion time for guide wire, number of guide wire attempts, and radiation exposure without pelvic reduction, were also assessed. Results： Twenty-three screws were placed in the robot-assisted group and 22 screws in the freehand group; no postoperative complications or revisions were reported. The excellent and good rate of screw placement was 100% in the robot-assisted group and 95% in the freehand group. The P value （0.009） showed the same superiority in screw distribution. The fluoroscopy time after pelvic reduction in the robot-assisted group was significantly shorter than that in the freehand group （median [Q1, Q3]： 6.0 [6.0, 9.0] s vs. median [Q1, Q3]： 36.0 [21.5, 48.0] s; χ2 = 13.590, respectively, P 〈 0.001）; no difference in operation time after reduction of the pelvis was noted （χ2 = 1.990, P = 0.158）. Time for guide wire insertion was significantly shorter for the robot-assisted group than that for the freehand group （median [Q1, Q3]： 2.0 [2.0, 2.7] min vs. median [Q1, Q3]： 19.0 [15.5, 45.0] min; χ2 = 20.952, respectively, P 〈 0.001）. The number of guide wire attempts in the robot-assisted group was significantly less than that in the freehand group （median [Q1, Q3]： 1.0 [1.0,1.0] time vs. median [Q1, Q3]： 7.0 [1.0, 9.0] times; χ2 = 15.771, respectively, P 〈 0.001）. The instrumented SI levels did not differ between both groups （from S1 to S2, χ2 = 4.760, P = 0.093）. Conclusions： Accuracy of the robot-assisted technique was superior to that of the freehand technique. Robot-assisted navigation is safe for unstable posterior pelvic ring stabilization, especially in S1, but also in S2. SI screw insertion with robot-assisted navigation is clinically feasible.展开更多
Background：Although pedicle screw placement （PSP） is a well-established technique for spine surgery,the treatment of patients with primary invasive spinal tumor （PIST） has high surgical risks secondary to destroy...Background：Although pedicle screw placement （PSP） is a well-established technique for spine surgery,the treatment of patients with primary invasive spinal tumor （PIST） has high surgical risks secondary to destroyed pedicles.Intraoperative three-dimensional fluoroscopy-based navigation （ITFN） system permits safe and accurate instrumentation of the spine with the advantage of obtaining intraoperative real-time three-dimensional images and automatic registration.The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of PSP using ITFN system for patients afflicted with PIST in the thoracic spine.Methods：Fifty-one patients diagnosed with PISTs were retrospectively analyzed,and 157 pedicles screws were implanted in 23 patients using the free-hand technique （free-hand group） and 197 pedicle screws were implanted in 28 patients using the ITFN system （ITFN group）.Modified classification of Gertzbein and Robbins was used to evaluate the accuracy of PSP,and McCormick classification was applied for assessment of neurological function.Demographic data and factors affecting accuracy of screw insertion were compared using independent t-test while comparison of accuracy of screw insertion between the two groups was analyzed with Chi-square test.Results：Of 51 patients,39 demonstrated improved neurological status and the other 12 patients reported that symptoms remained the same.In the free-hand group,145 screws （92.4%） were Grade Ⅰ,9 screws （5.7%） were Grade Ⅱ,and 3 screws （1.9%） were Grade Ⅲ.In the ITFN group,192 screws （97.4%） were Grade Ⅰ,5 screws （2.6%） were Grade Ⅱ,and no Grade Ⅲ screw was detected.Statistical analysis showed that the accuracies of pedicle screws in the two groups are significantly different （χ^2 =4.981,P =0.026）.Conclusions：The treatments of PISTs include total tumor resection and reconstruction of spine stability.The ITFN system provides a high accuracy of pedicle screw placement.展开更多
目的:分析比较机器人辅助手术与传统导航辅助手术在经皮微创椎弓根螺钉置入治疗胸腰椎骨折的临床效果差异,为临床治疗决策提供参考。方法:检索中国知网(CNKI)、维普、万方数据库及英文数据库的PubMed和Web of science,分别以中文“椎弓...目的:分析比较机器人辅助手术与传统导航辅助手术在经皮微创椎弓根螺钉置入治疗胸腰椎骨折的临床效果差异,为临床治疗决策提供参考。方法:检索中国知网(CNKI)、维普、万方数据库及英文数据库的PubMed和Web of science,分别以中文“椎弓根螺钉”“椎弓根钉”“机器人”为关键词进行主题检索,以英文“robot”“pedicle screws”进行系统检索,检索时间均自数据库建库至2022年12月,收集机器人辅助手术和传统导航辅助手术经皮微创椎弓根螺钉置入治疗胸腰锥骨折的相关临床研究,采用Cochrane量表和纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)对文献进行质量评价并进行Meta分析,比较机器人辅助手术与传统导航辅助手术的临床效果差异。结果:将符合入选标准的15篇文献纳入研究。与传统导航辅助手术的经皮微创椎弓根螺钉置入相比,机器人辅助手术的手术时间更短[加权均数差(WMD)=-11.45,95%CI(-18.94~-3.95),P<0.05],术中出血量更少[WMD=-19.11,95%CI(-27.51~-10.70),P<0.001],置钉精度更高[A级钉数量:相对危险度(RR)=1.20,95%CI(1.16~1.25),P<0.001;A+B级钉数量:RR=1.09,95%CI(1.07~1.11),P<0.001],并发症更少[RR=0.35,95%CI(0.13~0.93),P<0.05],而住院时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:在经皮微创椎弓根螺钉置入治疗胸腰椎骨折中,机器人辅助手术与传统导航辅助手术相比,在手术时间、术中出血量、置钉精度以及并发症方面均具有优势。展开更多
文摘We sought to compare the safety and accuracy of a new free-hand pedicle screw placement technique to that of the conventional technique. One hundred fifty-three consecutive adult patients with simple fracture in the tho- racic or/and lumbar spine were alternately assigned to either the new free-hand or the conventional group. In the new free-hand technique group, preoperative computerized tomography （CT） images were used to calculate the targeted medial-lateral angle of each pedicle trajectory and the pedicle screw was inserted perpendicular to the corresponding supraspinal ligament. In the conventional technique group, the medial-lateral and cranial-caudal angle of each pedicle trajectory was determined by intraoperatively under fluoroscopic guidance. The accuracy rate of pedicle screw placement, the time of intraoperative fluoroscopy, the operating time and the amount of blood loss during operation were respectively compared. All screws were analyzed by using intraoperative ra- diographs, intraoperative triggered electromyography （EMG） monitoring data, postoperative CT data and clinical outcomes. The accuracy rate of pedicle screw placement in the new free-hand technique group and the conven- tional technique group was 96.3% and 94.2% （P 〈 0.05）, respectively. The intraoperative fluoroscopy time of the new technique group was less than that of the conventional technique group （5.37 seconds vs. 8.79 seconds, P 〈 0.05）. However, there was no statistical difference in the operating time and the amount of blood loss during op- eration （P 〉 0.05）. Pedicle screw placement with the free-hand technique which keeps the screw perpendicular to the supraspinal ligament is an accurate, reliable and safe technique to treat simple fracture in the thoracic or lum- bar spine.
基金supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant #81371968, #81371969,#81401791)the Program for Development of Innovative Research Team in the First Affiliated Hospital of NJMU (No. IRT-015)a project funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
文摘This study was aimed to introduce a novel entry point for pedicle screw fixation in the thoracic spine and compare it with the traditional entry point. A novel entry point was found with the aim of improving accuracy, safety and stability of pedicle screw technique based on anatomical structures of the spine. A total of 76 pieces of normal thoracic CT images at the transverse plane and the thoracic pedicle anatomy of 6 cadaveric specimens were recruited.Transverse pedicle angle（TPA）, screw length, screw placement accuracy rate and axial pullout strength of the two different entry point groups were compared. There were significant differences in the TPA, screw length, and the screw placement accuracy rate between the two groups（P〈0.05）. The maximum axial pullout strength of the novel entry point group was slightly larger than that of the traditional group. However, the difference was not significant（P 〉 0.05）. The novel entry point significantly improved the accuracy, stability and safety of pedicle screw placement.With reference to the advantages above, the new entry point can be used for spinal internal fixations in the thoracic spine.
文摘Objective To explore the differences between anatomic and CT measurements for anterior transoral axial pedicle screw placement. Methods C2 vertebrae of 60 adult spines were measured anatomically,while 20 adult spine vertebrae were
文摘Objective To investigate the accuracy and feasibility of transpedicular screw placement assisted by the navigation templates in cadaveric thoracic spines.Methods Twenty thoracic cadavers specimens were randomly divided into two
文摘AIM To determine factors correlated with postoperative radial shortening in patients with distal radius fractures treated with volar locking distal radius plates.METHODS A total of 250 patients with a distal radius fracture stabilised with volar locking plates between January 2010 and December 2014 were included in a multicentre retrospective cohort study. We measured the distance of the distal locking screws to the joint line immediately postoperatively and then measured radial shortening after six to eight weeks using the change in ulnar variance.RESULTS Multivariate linear regression analysis showed that there was a significant linear association between the distance of the screws from the joint line and radial shortening. No other patient, injury, or treatment-related characteristic significantly influenced radial shortening in multivariate analysis.CONCLUSION Distal locking screws should be placed as close as possible to the subchondral joint line to prevent postoperative loss of reduction.
基金the Human Research Ethics Committee,Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital,Mahidol University,IRB No.(COA.MURA2020/1934).
文摘Objective:Robot-assisted pedicle screw insertion has recently emerged as an alternative to the traditional free-hand technique.However,discrepancies in the accuracy of screw placement between the 2 methods have been highlighted by some comparative studies.This meta-analysis was conducted to synthesize evidence comparing these techniques.Methods:Searches were conducted in 5 electronic databases adhering to specific eligibility criteria for randomized and observational studies.The data were analyzed using RevMan software and the results are presented as odds ratios(ORs),mean differences,or standard mean differences(SMDs)with 95%confidence intervals(CIs).Our analysis included 12 studies(7 randomized trials and 5 observational studies,involving 883 patients and 4903 screws).Results:The results demonstrated a higher rate of Grade A Gertzbein and Robbins pedicle placement score(OR:1.77;95%CI:1.10e2.87),a lower rate of revision surgeries(OR:0.21;95%CI:0.09e0.52),and a shorter radiation exposure duration(SMD?1.38,95%CI:2.32 to0.44)in the robot-assisted group compared with the free-hand group.Nonetheless,the length of hospital stay,volume of intraoperative blood loss,postoperative visual analogue scale scores for back pain,and rate of wound infection were similar between the 2 groups.Significant heterogeneity was observed in some outcomes.Conclusion:Compared with the free-hand method,the robot-assisted technique provides greater accuracy and reduced radiation exposure.The efficacy of the robot-assisted technique is expected to improve further as experience with its use in surgery grows.
文摘Background： Sacroiliac （SI） screw fixation is a demanding technique, with a high rate of screw malposition due to the complex pelvic anatomy. TiRobot- is an orthopedic surgery robot which can be used for SI screw fixation. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of robot-assisted placement of SI screws compared with a freehand technique. Methods：Thirty patients requiring posterior pelvic ring stabilization were randomized to receive freehand or robot-assisted SI screw fixation, between January 2016 and June 2016 at Beijing Jishuitan Hospital. Forty-five screws were placed at levels S1 and S2. In both methods, the primary end point screw position was assessed and classified using postoperative computed tomography. Fisher＇s exact probability test was used to analyze the screws＇positions. Secondary end points, such as duration of trajectory planning, surgical time after reduction of the pelvis, insertion time for guide wire, number of guide wire attempts, and radiation exposure without pelvic reduction, were also assessed. Results： Twenty-three screws were placed in the robot-assisted group and 22 screws in the freehand group; no postoperative complications or revisions were reported. The excellent and good rate of screw placement was 100% in the robot-assisted group and 95% in the freehand group. The P value （0.009） showed the same superiority in screw distribution. The fluoroscopy time after pelvic reduction in the robot-assisted group was significantly shorter than that in the freehand group （median [Q1, Q3]： 6.0 [6.0, 9.0] s vs. median [Q1, Q3]： 36.0 [21.5, 48.0] s; χ2 = 13.590, respectively, P 〈 0.001）; no difference in operation time after reduction of the pelvis was noted （χ2 = 1.990, P = 0.158）. Time for guide wire insertion was significantly shorter for the robot-assisted group than that for the freehand group （median [Q1, Q3]： 2.0 [2.0, 2.7] min vs. median [Q1, Q3]： 19.0 [15.5, 45.0] min; χ2 = 20.952, respectively, P 〈 0.001）. The number of guide wire attempts in the robot-assisted group was significantly less than that in the freehand group （median [Q1, Q3]： 1.0 [1.0,1.0] time vs. median [Q1, Q3]： 7.0 [1.0, 9.0] times; χ2 = 15.771, respectively, P 〈 0.001）. The instrumented SI levels did not differ between both groups （from S1 to S2, χ2 = 4.760, P = 0.093）. Conclusions： Accuracy of the robot-assisted technique was superior to that of the freehand technique. Robot-assisted navigation is safe for unstable posterior pelvic ring stabilization, especially in S1, but also in S2. SI screw insertion with robot-assisted navigation is clinically feasible.
文摘Background：Although pedicle screw placement （PSP） is a well-established technique for spine surgery,the treatment of patients with primary invasive spinal tumor （PIST） has high surgical risks secondary to destroyed pedicles.Intraoperative three-dimensional fluoroscopy-based navigation （ITFN） system permits safe and accurate instrumentation of the spine with the advantage of obtaining intraoperative real-time three-dimensional images and automatic registration.The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of PSP using ITFN system for patients afflicted with PIST in the thoracic spine.Methods：Fifty-one patients diagnosed with PISTs were retrospectively analyzed,and 157 pedicles screws were implanted in 23 patients using the free-hand technique （free-hand group） and 197 pedicle screws were implanted in 28 patients using the ITFN system （ITFN group）.Modified classification of Gertzbein and Robbins was used to evaluate the accuracy of PSP,and McCormick classification was applied for assessment of neurological function.Demographic data and factors affecting accuracy of screw insertion were compared using independent t-test while comparison of accuracy of screw insertion between the two groups was analyzed with Chi-square test.Results：Of 51 patients,39 demonstrated improved neurological status and the other 12 patients reported that symptoms remained the same.In the free-hand group,145 screws （92.4%） were Grade Ⅰ,9 screws （5.7%） were Grade Ⅱ,and 3 screws （1.9%） were Grade Ⅲ.In the ITFN group,192 screws （97.4%） were Grade Ⅰ,5 screws （2.6%） were Grade Ⅱ,and no Grade Ⅲ screw was detected.Statistical analysis showed that the accuracies of pedicle screws in the two groups are significantly different （χ^2 =4.981,P =0.026）.Conclusions：The treatments of PISTs include total tumor resection and reconstruction of spine stability.The ITFN system provides a high accuracy of pedicle screw placement.
文摘目的:分析比较机器人辅助手术与传统导航辅助手术在经皮微创椎弓根螺钉置入治疗胸腰椎骨折的临床效果差异,为临床治疗决策提供参考。方法:检索中国知网(CNKI)、维普、万方数据库及英文数据库的PubMed和Web of science,分别以中文“椎弓根螺钉”“椎弓根钉”“机器人”为关键词进行主题检索,以英文“robot”“pedicle screws”进行系统检索,检索时间均自数据库建库至2022年12月,收集机器人辅助手术和传统导航辅助手术经皮微创椎弓根螺钉置入治疗胸腰锥骨折的相关临床研究,采用Cochrane量表和纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)对文献进行质量评价并进行Meta分析,比较机器人辅助手术与传统导航辅助手术的临床效果差异。结果:将符合入选标准的15篇文献纳入研究。与传统导航辅助手术的经皮微创椎弓根螺钉置入相比,机器人辅助手术的手术时间更短[加权均数差(WMD)=-11.45,95%CI(-18.94~-3.95),P<0.05],术中出血量更少[WMD=-19.11,95%CI(-27.51~-10.70),P<0.001],置钉精度更高[A级钉数量:相对危险度(RR)=1.20,95%CI(1.16~1.25),P<0.001;A+B级钉数量:RR=1.09,95%CI(1.07~1.11),P<0.001],并发症更少[RR=0.35,95%CI(0.13~0.93),P<0.05],而住院时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:在经皮微创椎弓根螺钉置入治疗胸腰椎骨折中,机器人辅助手术与传统导航辅助手术相比,在手术时间、术中出血量、置钉精度以及并发症方面均具有优势。
