Social vulnerability in this study represents the differences between the capacity to cope with natural hazards and disaster losses suffered within and between places.The assessment of social vulnerability has been re...Social vulnerability in this study represents the differences between the capacity to cope with natural hazards and disaster losses suffered within and between places.The assessment of social vulnerability has been recognized as a critical step in understanding natural hazard risks and enhancing effective response capabilities.This article presents an initial study of the social vulnerability of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei(B-T-H) Region in China.The goal is to replicate and test the applicability of the United States Social Vulnerability Index(So VI) method in a Chinese cultural context.Thirty-nine variables adapted from the So VI were collected in relation to two aspects:socioeconomic vulnerability and built environment vulnerability.Using factor analysis,seven factors were extracted from the variable set:the structure of social development,the level of economic and government financial strength,social justice and poverty,family structure,the intensity of space development,the status of residential housing and transportation,and building structure.Factor scores were summed to get the final So VI scores and the most and least vulnerable units were identified and mapped.The highest social vulnerability is concentrated in the northwest of the study area.The least socially vulnerable areas are mainly distributed in the Beijing,Tianjin and Shijiazhuang core urban peripheral and central city areas of the prefecture-level cities.The results show that this method is a useful tool for revealing places that have a high level of vulnerability,in other words,areas which are more likely to face significant challenges in coping with a large-scale event.These findings could provide a scientific basis for policy making and the implementation of disaster prevention and mitigation in China.展开更多
Reforms in social governance are promoted by changes in social environments.Social governance models cannot be constant,and the rise of every innovative governance model is inseparable from an ever-changing society.Th...Reforms in social governance are promoted by changes in social environments.Social governance models cannot be constant,and the rise of every innovative governance model is inseparable from an ever-changing society.The theoretical connotation of the collaborative innovation model in regional social governance is mainly reflected in its agents,actions,and processes.The fundamental requirements of the collaborative innovation model in regional social governance are de-administration and market-based.The key elements of the collaborative regional social governance model include:delegating power from central authorities,transferring selected social governance affairs,enhancing the development of governance capabilities in social governance agents,diversifying these agents by giving full play to the agency to strengthen the concept of collaborative governance for social governance agents,strengthening the establishment of the governance system,and ensuring the normal progress of the governance processes.The collaborative innovation model in regional social governance should be built in three aspects:a system of institutional norms,an evaluation indicator system,and law-based collaborative governance.展开更多
China＇s State Council held an executive meeting on Oct. 15, 2008, discussing how to support development in the Tibetan regions of Qinghai, Sichuan, Yunnan and Gansu provinces. Tibetan regions in these areas are auto...China＇s State Council held an executive meeting on Oct. 15, 2008, discussing how to support development in the Tibetan regions of Qinghai, Sichuan, Yunnan and Gansu provinces. Tibetan regions in these areas are autonomous where Tibetans and people of other nationalities live together. The regions are the important plateau ecological bar- rier that cover the head-stream area of major rivers, such as the Yellow, Yangtze and Lancang.展开更多
为准确评价区域海事事故治理效果,通过构建动态综合评价模型,为水上交通安全规划提供决策依据。首先,从事故的绝对指标与相对指标角度出发,建立包含8个指标的区域海事事故治理效果评价指标体系。其次,使用博弈赋权法对熵权法所得权重和...为准确评价区域海事事故治理效果,通过构建动态综合评价模型,为水上交通安全规划提供决策依据。首先,从事故的绝对指标与相对指标角度出发,建立包含8个指标的区域海事事故治理效果评价指标体系。其次,使用博弈赋权法对熵权法所得权重和指标相关性权重确定法(Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation, CRITIC)所得权重进行组合,以确定各时段评价指标组合权重,并采用逼近理想解排序法(Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution, TOPSIS)对各地区海事事故治理效果进行各时段静态综合评价。再次,通过混合时序算子集结各时段静态综合评价值,求得各地区海事事故治理效果的动态综合评价值,进而判断各地区海事事故的治理效果。最后,运用所建评价模型对2017—2021年上海、浙江、广东和山东4个地区海事事故治理效果进行动态综合评价。研究结果显示:与单一赋权TOPSIS法相比,博弈赋权-TOPSIS法所得静态综合评价结果更为合理可靠;与单一时序算子相比,混合时序算子所得动态综合评价结果更为合理可靠;随着海事事故治理策略和治理强度不同,上海和广东地区海事事故治理效果呈上升趋势,而浙江和山东地区海事事故治理效果呈下降趋势;广东地区海事事故治理效果稳定性最强,而浙江地区海事事故治理效果稳定性最弱;上海地区海事事故治理效果最好,而浙江地区海事事故治理效果最差。展开更多
基金Under the auspices of National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.41401176,41201550,41201114)New Starting Point of Beijing Union University(No.ZK10201406,ZK10201302)+1 种基金Humanities and Social Science Key Research Base of Zhejiang Province(Applied Economics at Zhejiang Gongshang University)(No.JYTyyjj20130105)Incubation Programme of Great Wall Scholars of Beijing Municipal University&College(No.IDHT20130322)
文摘Social vulnerability in this study represents the differences between the capacity to cope with natural hazards and disaster losses suffered within and between places.The assessment of social vulnerability has been recognized as a critical step in understanding natural hazard risks and enhancing effective response capabilities.This article presents an initial study of the social vulnerability of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei(B-T-H) Region in China.The goal is to replicate and test the applicability of the United States Social Vulnerability Index(So VI) method in a Chinese cultural context.Thirty-nine variables adapted from the So VI were collected in relation to two aspects:socioeconomic vulnerability and built environment vulnerability.Using factor analysis,seven factors were extracted from the variable set:the structure of social development,the level of economic and government financial strength,social justice and poverty,family structure,the intensity of space development,the status of residential housing and transportation,and building structure.Factor scores were summed to get the final So VI scores and the most and least vulnerable units were identified and mapped.The highest social vulnerability is concentrated in the northwest of the study area.The least socially vulnerable areas are mainly distributed in the Beijing,Tianjin and Shijiazhuang core urban peripheral and central city areas of the prefecture-level cities.The results show that this method is a useful tool for revealing places that have a high level of vulnerability,in other words,areas which are more likely to face significant challenges in coping with a large-scale event.These findings could provide a scientific basis for policy making and the implementation of disaster prevention and mitigation in China.
文摘Reforms in social governance are promoted by changes in social environments.Social governance models cannot be constant,and the rise of every innovative governance model is inseparable from an ever-changing society.The theoretical connotation of the collaborative innovation model in regional social governance is mainly reflected in its agents,actions,and processes.The fundamental requirements of the collaborative innovation model in regional social governance are de-administration and market-based.The key elements of the collaborative regional social governance model include:delegating power from central authorities,transferring selected social governance affairs,enhancing the development of governance capabilities in social governance agents,diversifying these agents by giving full play to the agency to strengthen the concept of collaborative governance for social governance agents,strengthening the establishment of the governance system,and ensuring the normal progress of the governance processes.The collaborative innovation model in regional social governance should be built in three aspects:a system of institutional norms,an evaluation indicator system,and law-based collaborative governance.
文摘China＇s State Council held an executive meeting on Oct. 15, 2008, discussing how to support development in the Tibetan regions of Qinghai, Sichuan, Yunnan and Gansu provinces. Tibetan regions in these areas are autonomous where Tibetans and people of other nationalities live together. The regions are the important plateau ecological bar- rier that cover the head-stream area of major rivers, such as the Yellow, Yangtze and Lancang.
文摘为准确评价区域海事事故治理效果,通过构建动态综合评价模型,为水上交通安全规划提供决策依据。首先,从事故的绝对指标与相对指标角度出发,建立包含8个指标的区域海事事故治理效果评价指标体系。其次,使用博弈赋权法对熵权法所得权重和指标相关性权重确定法(Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation, CRITIC)所得权重进行组合,以确定各时段评价指标组合权重,并采用逼近理想解排序法(Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution, TOPSIS)对各地区海事事故治理效果进行各时段静态综合评价。再次,通过混合时序算子集结各时段静态综合评价值,求得各地区海事事故治理效果的动态综合评价值,进而判断各地区海事事故的治理效果。最后,运用所建评价模型对2017—2021年上海、浙江、广东和山东4个地区海事事故治理效果进行动态综合评价。研究结果显示:与单一赋权TOPSIS法相比,博弈赋权-TOPSIS法所得静态综合评价结果更为合理可靠;与单一时序算子相比,混合时序算子所得动态综合评价结果更为合理可靠;随着海事事故治理策略和治理强度不同,上海和广东地区海事事故治理效果呈上升趋势,而浙江和山东地区海事事故治理效果呈下降趋势;广东地区海事事故治理效果稳定性最强,而浙江地区海事事故治理效果稳定性最弱;上海地区海事事故治理效果最好,而浙江地区海事事故治理效果最差。
