BACKGROUND Minimally invasive pancreatic surgery via the multi-port approach has become a primary surgical method for distal pancreatectomy(DP)due to its advantages of lower wound pain and superior cosmetic results.So...BACKGROUND Minimally invasive pancreatic surgery via the multi-port approach has become a primary surgical method for distal pancreatectomy(DP)due to its advantages of lower wound pain and superior cosmetic results.Some studies have applied reduced-port techniques for DP in an attempt to enhance cosmetic outcomes due to the minimally invasive effects.Numerous recent review studies have compared multi-port laparoscopic DP(LDP)and multi-port robotic DP(RDP);most of these studies concluded multi-port RDP is more beneficial than multi-port LDP for spleen preservation.However,there have been no comprehensive reviews of the value of reduced-port LDP and reduced-port RDP.AIM To search for and review the studies on spleen preservation and the clinical outcomes of minimally invasive DP that compared reduced-port DP surgery with multi-port DP surgery.METHODS The PubMed medical database was searched for articles published between 2013 and 2022.The search terms were implemented using the following Boolean search algorithm:(“distal pancreatectomy”OR“left pancreatectomy”OR“peripheral pancreatic resection”)AND(“reduced-port”OR“single-site”OR“single-port”OR“dual-incision”OR“single-incision”)AND(“spleen-preserving”OR“spleen preservation”OR“splenic preservation”).A literature review was conducted to identify studies that compared the perioperative outcomes of reduced-port LDP and reduced-port RDP.RESULTS Fifteen articles published in the period from 2013 to 2022 were retrieved using three groups of search terms.Two studies were added after manually searching the related papers.Finally,10 papers were selected after removing case reports(n=3),non-English language papers(n=1),technique papers(n=1),reviews(n=1),and animal studies(n=1).The common items were defined as items reported in more than five papers,and data on these common items were extracted from all papers.The ten studies included a total of 337 patients(females/males:231/106)who underwent DP.In total,166 patients(females/males,106/60)received multi-port LDP,126(females/males,90/36)received reduced-port LDP,and 45(females/males,35/10)received reduced-port RDP.CONCLUSION Reduced-port RDP leads to a lower intraoperative blood loss,a lower postoperative pancreatic fistula rate,and shorter hospital stay and follow-up duration,but has a lower spleen preservation rate.展开更多
Due to the complexity of the splenic hilar vessels, their anatomical variation and the narrow and deep space, as well as the bleeding-prone splenic parenchyma and the difficulty to manage splenic or vascular bleeding ...Due to the complexity of the splenic hilar vessels, their anatomical variation and the narrow and deep space, as well as the bleeding-prone splenic parenchyma and the difficulty to manage splenic or vascular bleeding at the splenic hilum,the procedure remains challenging and technically demanding procedure for the performance of laparoscopic pancreas- and spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymph nodes dissection. Based on our experiences, we gradually explored a set of procednral operation steps called ＂Huang＇s three-step maneuver＂. In this paper, we not only provide the concrete operation steps for the surgeon, but we also provide our recommended technique of pulling and exposure for assistants. This new maneuver simplifies the complicated procedure and improves the efficiency of laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy, making it easier to master and allowing for its widespread adoption.展开更多
PreservaUon of the spleen at distal pancreatectomy has recently attracted considerable attention. Since our first successful trial, spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with conservation of the splenic artery and v...PreservaUon of the spleen at distal pancreatectomy has recently attracted considerable attention. Since our first successful trial, spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with conservation of the splenic artery and vein for tumors of the pancreas and chronic pancreatitis has been performed more frequently. The technique for spleenpreserving distal pancreatectomy with conservation of the splenic artery and vein are outlined. The splenic vein is identified behind the pancreas and within the thin connective tissue membrane. The connective tissue membrane is cut longitudinally above the splenic vein. An important issue is to remove the splenic vein from the body of the pancreas toward the spleen, since a different approach may be very difficult. The pancreas is preferably removed from the splenic artery toward the head of the pancreas itself. This procedure is much easier than removing the pancreas from the vein side. One patient had undergone distal gastrectomy for duodenal ulcer, with reconstruction by Billroth Ⅱ tehcnique. If distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy had been performed for the lesion of the distal pancreas at the time, the residual stomach would also have to be resected. The potential damage done to the patient by reconstruction of the gastrointestinal tract in combination with distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy would have been much greater than with distal pancreatectomy only with preservation of the spleen and residual stomach. Benign lesions as well as low-grade malignancy of the body and tail of the pancreas may be a possible indication for this procedure.展开更多
AIM: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (LSPDP) with autologous islet transplantation (AIT) for benign tumors of the pancreatic body-neck.
A total of 19 cases were performed the resection of the body and tail of the pancreas with preservation of spleen in our department since it was first successfully carried out in the l...A total of 19 cases were performed the resection of the body and tail of the pancreas with preservation of spleen in our department since it was first successfully carried out in the late 1980′s The indications of operation were pancreatic cystadenoma(n=8),pseudocyst(n=2),insulioma(n=3),pancreatic injury(n=6) All but one went well intraoperatively and postoperatively with the normal appearance and function of the spleen The main observation items of postoperation were leukocyte phagocytosis test, splenic CT scan,ultrasonography and Technetium 99m spleen scan The exceptional one showed transient insufficiency of splenic blood supply after the operation Considering the regional conditions in the operations, the procedure could be classified into the resection of the body and tail of pancreas with and without conservation of the splenic artery and vein展开更多
Objective： To evaluate the effect of laparoscopic spleen-preserving operation for traumatic spleen rupture. Methods ： From 1997 to 2003. 15 cases of traumatic spleen rupture were treated with laparoscopic spleen-pr...Objective： To evaluate the effect of laparoscopic spleen-preserving operation for traumatic spleen rupture. Methods ： From 1997 to 2003. 15 cases of traumatic spleen rupture were treated with laparoscopic spleen-preserving operation in our hospital. Nine cases had operation history in the middle and lower abdomen. ZT binding, electrocoagulation, fibrin and gelfoam tamping and suture repairing were used in patients with spleen rupture of grade I and grade Ⅱ. Combined hemostasis was used for spleen rupture of grade Ⅲ. Results： All patients did not need laparotomy during operation and no postoperative bleeding occurred. They were all cured and followed up for 3-12 months.Determination of immunoglobulinis after operation showed normal, and spleen ultrasonic examination, CT and body state evaluations were all satisfactory. Conclusions： Laparoscopy in the management of spleen trauma can be used in confirmed diagnosis and in determining the degree of spleen injury. For patients with stable vital signs laparoscopic spleen-preserving operation can be used. The laparoscopic spleen-preserving operation is safe in the treatment of traumatic spleen rupture.展开更多
AIM: To analyze the results of ultrasound guided percu- taneous needle aspiration (PNA) and percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) in the treatment of splenic abscess. METHODS: Thirty-six patients (14 females and 22 mal...AIM: To analyze the results of ultrasound guided percu- taneous needle aspiration (PNA) and percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) in the treatment of splenic abscess. METHODS: Thirty-six patients (14 females and 22 males, with an average age of 54.1 ± 14.1 years) with splenic abscess were treated with ultrasound guided PNA and/or PCD. Patients with splenic abscess < 50 mm in diameter were initially treated by PNA and those with abscess ≥ 50 mm and bilocular abscesses were initially treated by an 8-French catheter drainage. The clinical characteristics, underlying diseases, organism spectra, therapeutic methods, and mortality rates were analyzed. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients had unilocular and 9 bilocular abscess. PNA was performed in 19 patients (52.8%), and 8 of them (42.1%) required PCD because of recurrence of abscess. In 17 patients (47.2%), PCD was performed initially. PCD was performed twice in six patients and three times in two. PNA was defi nitive treatment for 10 and PCD for 21 patients. One patient with PCD was referred for splenectomy, with successful outcome. In all 4 deceased patients, malignancy was the underlying condition. Twenty-one patients (58.3%) underwent 33 surgical interventions on abdomen before treatment. Cultures were positive in 30 patients (83.3%). Gram-negative bacillus predominated (46.7%). There were no complications related to the procedure. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous treatmnet of splenic abscess is an effective alternative to surgery, allowing preservation of the spleen. This treatment is especially indicative for the patients in critical condition postoperatively. We recommend PNA as primary treatment for splenic abscesses < 50 mm, and PCD for those ≥ 50 mm in diameter and for bilocular abscesses.展开更多
Background The feasibility of spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy(SPDP)to treat well-differentiated non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors(NF-pNETs)located at the body and/or tail of the pancreas remains...Background The feasibility of spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy(SPDP)to treat well-differentiated non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors(NF-pNETs)located at the body and/or tail of the pancreas remains controversial.Distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy(DPS)has been widely applied in the treatment of NF-pNETs;however,it may increase the post-operative morbidities.This study aimed to evaluate whether SPDP is inferior to DPS in post-operative outcomes and survivals when being used to treat patients with NF-pNETs in our institute.Methods Clinicopathological features of patients with NF-pNETs who underwent curative SPDP or DPS at the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University(Guangzhou,China)between January 2010 and January 2022 were collected.Short-term outcomes and 5-year survivals were compared between patients undergoing SPDP and those undergoing DPS.Results Sixty-three patients(SPDP,27;DPS,36)with well-differentiated NF-pNETs were enrolled.All patients had grade 1/2 tumors.After identifying patients with T1–T2 NF-pNETs(SPDP,27;DPS,15),there was no disparity between the SPDP and DPS groups except for tumor size(median,1.4 vs 2.6 cm,P=0.001).There were no differences in operation time(median,250 vs 295 min,P=0.478),intraoperative blood loss(median,50 vs 100 mL,P=0.145),post-operative major complications(3.7%vs 13.3%,P=0.287),clinically relevant post-operative pancreatic fistula(22.2%vs 6.7%,P=0.390),or post-operative hospital stays(median,9 vs 9 days,P=0.750)between the SPDP and DPS groups.Kaplan–Meier curve showed no significant differences in the 5-year overall survival rate(100%vs 100%,log-rank P>0.999)or recurrence-free survival(100%vs 100%,log-rank P>0.999)between patients with T1–T2 NF-pNETs undergoing SPDP and those undergoing DPS.Conclusions In patients with T1–T2 well-differentiated NF-pNETs,SPDP could achieve comparable post-operative outcomes and prognosis compared with DPS.展开更多
基金Chung Shan Medical University,No.15I42440Feng Chia University/Chung Shan Medical University,No.FCU/CSMU104-001and Taiwan National Science and Technology Council,No.111-2314-B-035-001-MY3 and No.110-2221-E-035-016.
文摘BACKGROUND Minimally invasive pancreatic surgery via the multi-port approach has become a primary surgical method for distal pancreatectomy(DP)due to its advantages of lower wound pain and superior cosmetic results.Some studies have applied reduced-port techniques for DP in an attempt to enhance cosmetic outcomes due to the minimally invasive effects.Numerous recent review studies have compared multi-port laparoscopic DP(LDP)and multi-port robotic DP(RDP);most of these studies concluded multi-port RDP is more beneficial than multi-port LDP for spleen preservation.However,there have been no comprehensive reviews of the value of reduced-port LDP and reduced-port RDP.AIM To search for and review the studies on spleen preservation and the clinical outcomes of minimally invasive DP that compared reduced-port DP surgery with multi-port DP surgery.METHODS The PubMed medical database was searched for articles published between 2013 and 2022.The search terms were implemented using the following Boolean search algorithm:(“distal pancreatectomy”OR“left pancreatectomy”OR“peripheral pancreatic resection”)AND(“reduced-port”OR“single-site”OR“single-port”OR“dual-incision”OR“single-incision”)AND(“spleen-preserving”OR“spleen preservation”OR“splenic preservation”).A literature review was conducted to identify studies that compared the perioperative outcomes of reduced-port LDP and reduced-port RDP.RESULTS Fifteen articles published in the period from 2013 to 2022 were retrieved using three groups of search terms.Two studies were added after manually searching the related papers.Finally,10 papers were selected after removing case reports(n=3),non-English language papers(n=1),technique papers(n=1),reviews(n=1),and animal studies(n=1).The common items were defined as items reported in more than five papers,and data on these common items were extracted from all papers.The ten studies included a total of 337 patients(females/males:231/106)who underwent DP.In total,166 patients(females/males,106/60)received multi-port LDP,126(females/males,90/36)received reduced-port LDP,and 45(females/males,35/10)received reduced-port RDP.CONCLUSION Reduced-port RDP leads to a lower intraoperative blood loss,a lower postoperative pancreatic fistula rate,and shorter hospital stay and follow-up duration,but has a lower spleen preservation rate.
基金National Key Clinical Specialty Discipline Construction program of China (No. [2012] 649)
文摘Due to the complexity of the splenic hilar vessels, their anatomical variation and the narrow and deep space, as well as the bleeding-prone splenic parenchyma and the difficulty to manage splenic or vascular bleeding at the splenic hilum,the procedure remains challenging and technically demanding procedure for the performance of laparoscopic pancreas- and spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymph nodes dissection. Based on our experiences, we gradually explored a set of procednral operation steps called ＂Huang＇s three-step maneuver＂. In this paper, we not only provide the concrete operation steps for the surgeon, but we also provide our recommended technique of pulling and exposure for assistants. This new maneuver simplifies the complicated procedure and improves the efficiency of laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy, making it easier to master and allowing for its widespread adoption.
文摘PreservaUon of the spleen at distal pancreatectomy has recently attracted considerable attention. Since our first successful trial, spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with conservation of the splenic artery and vein for tumors of the pancreas and chronic pancreatitis has been performed more frequently. The technique for spleenpreserving distal pancreatectomy with conservation of the splenic artery and vein are outlined. The splenic vein is identified behind the pancreas and within the thin connective tissue membrane. The connective tissue membrane is cut longitudinally above the splenic vein. An important issue is to remove the splenic vein from the body of the pancreas toward the spleen, since a different approach may be very difficult. The pancreas is preferably removed from the splenic artery toward the head of the pancreas itself. This procedure is much easier than removing the pancreas from the vein side. One patient had undergone distal gastrectomy for duodenal ulcer, with reconstruction by Billroth Ⅱ tehcnique. If distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy had been performed for the lesion of the distal pancreas at the time, the residual stomach would also have to be resected. The potential damage done to the patient by reconstruction of the gastrointestinal tract in combination with distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy would have been much greater than with distal pancreatectomy only with preservation of the spleen and residual stomach. Benign lesions as well as low-grade malignancy of the body and tail of the pancreas may be a possible indication for this procedure.
文摘AIM: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (LSPDP) with autologous islet transplantation (AIT) for benign tumors of the pancreatic body-neck.
文摘A total of 19 cases were performed the resection of the body and tail of the pancreas with preservation of spleen in our department since it was first successfully carried out in the late 1980′s The indications of operation were pancreatic cystadenoma(n=8),pseudocyst(n=2),insulioma(n=3),pancreatic injury(n=6) All but one went well intraoperatively and postoperatively with the normal appearance and function of the spleen The main observation items of postoperation were leukocyte phagocytosis test, splenic CT scan,ultrasonography and Technetium 99m spleen scan The exceptional one showed transient insufficiency of splenic blood supply after the operation Considering the regional conditions in the operations, the procedure could be classified into the resection of the body and tail of pancreas with and without conservation of the splenic artery and vein
文摘Objective： To evaluate the effect of laparoscopic spleen-preserving operation for traumatic spleen rupture. Methods ： From 1997 to 2003. 15 cases of traumatic spleen rupture were treated with laparoscopic spleen-preserving operation in our hospital. Nine cases had operation history in the middle and lower abdomen. ZT binding, electrocoagulation, fibrin and gelfoam tamping and suture repairing were used in patients with spleen rupture of grade I and grade Ⅱ. Combined hemostasis was used for spleen rupture of grade Ⅲ. Results： All patients did not need laparotomy during operation and no postoperative bleeding occurred. They were all cured and followed up for 3-12 months.Determination of immunoglobulinis after operation showed normal, and spleen ultrasonic examination, CT and body state evaluations were all satisfactory. Conclusions： Laparoscopy in the management of spleen trauma can be used in confirmed diagnosis and in determining the degree of spleen injury. For patients with stable vital signs laparoscopic spleen-preserving operation can be used. The laparoscopic spleen-preserving operation is safe in the treatment of traumatic spleen rupture.
文摘AIM: To analyze the results of ultrasound guided percu- taneous needle aspiration (PNA) and percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) in the treatment of splenic abscess. METHODS: Thirty-six patients (14 females and 22 males, with an average age of 54.1 ± 14.1 years) with splenic abscess were treated with ultrasound guided PNA and/or PCD. Patients with splenic abscess < 50 mm in diameter were initially treated by PNA and those with abscess ≥ 50 mm and bilocular abscesses were initially treated by an 8-French catheter drainage. The clinical characteristics, underlying diseases, organism spectra, therapeutic methods, and mortality rates were analyzed. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients had unilocular and 9 bilocular abscess. PNA was performed in 19 patients (52.8%), and 8 of them (42.1%) required PCD because of recurrence of abscess. In 17 patients (47.2%), PCD was performed initially. PCD was performed twice in six patients and three times in two. PNA was defi nitive treatment for 10 and PCD for 21 patients. One patient with PCD was referred for splenectomy, with successful outcome. In all 4 deceased patients, malignancy was the underlying condition. Twenty-one patients (58.3%) underwent 33 surgical interventions on abdomen before treatment. Cultures were positive in 30 patients (83.3%). Gram-negative bacillus predominated (46.7%). There were no complications related to the procedure. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous treatmnet of splenic abscess is an effective alternative to surgery, allowing preservation of the spleen. This treatment is especially indicative for the patients in critical condition postoperatively. We recommend PNA as primary treatment for splenic abscesses < 50 mm, and PCD for those ≥ 50 mm in diameter and for bilocular abscesses.
文摘Background The feasibility of spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy(SPDP)to treat well-differentiated non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors(NF-pNETs)located at the body and/or tail of the pancreas remains controversial.Distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy(DPS)has been widely applied in the treatment of NF-pNETs;however,it may increase the post-operative morbidities.This study aimed to evaluate whether SPDP is inferior to DPS in post-operative outcomes and survivals when being used to treat patients with NF-pNETs in our institute.Methods Clinicopathological features of patients with NF-pNETs who underwent curative SPDP or DPS at the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University(Guangzhou,China)between January 2010 and January 2022 were collected.Short-term outcomes and 5-year survivals were compared between patients undergoing SPDP and those undergoing DPS.Results Sixty-three patients(SPDP,27;DPS,36)with well-differentiated NF-pNETs were enrolled.All patients had grade 1/2 tumors.After identifying patients with T1–T2 NF-pNETs(SPDP,27;DPS,15),there was no disparity between the SPDP and DPS groups except for tumor size(median,1.4 vs 2.6 cm,P=0.001).There were no differences in operation time(median,250 vs 295 min,P=0.478),intraoperative blood loss(median,50 vs 100 mL,P=0.145),post-operative major complications(3.7%vs 13.3%,P=0.287),clinically relevant post-operative pancreatic fistula(22.2%vs 6.7%,P=0.390),or post-operative hospital stays(median,9 vs 9 days,P=0.750)between the SPDP and DPS groups.Kaplan–Meier curve showed no significant differences in the 5-year overall survival rate(100%vs 100%,log-rank P>0.999)or recurrence-free survival(100%vs 100%,log-rank P>0.999)between patients with T1–T2 NF-pNETs undergoing SPDP and those undergoing DPS.Conclusions In patients with T1–T2 well-differentiated NF-pNETs,SPDP could achieve comparable post-operative outcomes and prognosis compared with DPS.
