目的:探究医护人员督导下的医院-家庭持续运动干预对糖尿病患者血糖水平、睡眠质量、心理及主观幸福感的影响。方法:选取2022年7月至2023年7月福建省莆田市涵江区妇幼保健院糖尿病患者80例作为研究对象,按照随机数字表法分为观察组和对...目的:探究医护人员督导下的医院-家庭持续运动干预对糖尿病患者血糖水平、睡眠质量、心理及主观幸福感的影响。方法:选取2022年7月至2023年7月福建省莆田市涵江区妇幼保健院糖尿病患者80例作为研究对象,按照随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组,每组40例。观察组施以医护人员督导下的医院-家庭持续运动干预,对照组施以常规护理。比较分析2组血糖水平、睡眠质量、心理评分及主观幸福感等。结果:观察组糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、空腹血糖(FPG)、餐后2 h血糖(2 h PG)水平均低于对照组(P<0.05);干预后观察组睡眠质量评分低于对照组(P<0.05);观察组焦虑、抑郁评分低于对照组(P<0.05);干预后观察组主观幸福感评分高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:采用医护人员督导下的医院-家庭持续运动干预糖尿病患者,可明显改善患者血糖水平和睡眠质量,提升主观幸福感,降低不良心理情绪,可在临床推广应用。展开更多
Objectives: To assess the patients and health personnel’s level of awareness on risks related to ionizing radiation during CT scan. Materials and methods: Three questionnaires were addressed to patients, prescribing ...Objectives: To assess the patients and health personnel’s level of awareness on risks related to ionizing radiation during CT scan. Materials and methods: Three questionnaires were addressed to patients, prescribing physicians, and the medical imaging staff for three hospitals respectively. This permitted us to assess their knowledge on the benefits and risks of the required medical exam, based on the dangers of being exposed to X-rays, especially induced-radiation cancer following the amount of X-rays received during a CT scan and the possibility of not receiving radiation as tools of diagnosis. Results: 150 patients, 84 referring doctors of CT scan tests and 60 medical imaging personnel were retained. For patients, only 7.1% received information on the benefits and risks of their exams, and 34.4% believed that x-rays were harmful to their health. For the prescribers, 46.7% took into account the benefits/risk ratio before prescribing a test and only 16.7% of the referring doctors have informed the patient of the risks related to X-ray. 90% of the medical imaging staff ensures that the required test is justified, and 50% informed the patient on the risks associated with their radiation exposure, and the increased risk of developing cancer. 65% of the imaging staff could not estimate the dose that the patient will receive during the medical test. 25% mentioned the dose received during the acquisition in the patient’s exam report. Conclusion: This study confirms that the referring doctors, the patients, and the radiologists have a low knowledge concerning the risks associated with radiation exposure during a CT scan assessment. We will therefore say that patients and prescribers are not aware of the doses of radiation on CT and their possible risks, even though there is a risk of developing cancer.展开更多
文摘目的:探究医护人员督导下的医院-家庭持续运动干预对糖尿病患者血糖水平、睡眠质量、心理及主观幸福感的影响。方法:选取2022年7月至2023年7月福建省莆田市涵江区妇幼保健院糖尿病患者80例作为研究对象,按照随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组,每组40例。观察组施以医护人员督导下的医院-家庭持续运动干预,对照组施以常规护理。比较分析2组血糖水平、睡眠质量、心理评分及主观幸福感等。结果:观察组糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、空腹血糖(FPG)、餐后2 h血糖(2 h PG)水平均低于对照组(P<0.05);干预后观察组睡眠质量评分低于对照组(P<0.05);观察组焦虑、抑郁评分低于对照组(P<0.05);干预后观察组主观幸福感评分高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:采用医护人员督导下的医院-家庭持续运动干预糖尿病患者,可明显改善患者血糖水平和睡眠质量,提升主观幸福感,降低不良心理情绪,可在临床推广应用。
文摘Objectives: To assess the patients and health personnel’s level of awareness on risks related to ionizing radiation during CT scan. Materials and methods: Three questionnaires were addressed to patients, prescribing physicians, and the medical imaging staff for three hospitals respectively. This permitted us to assess their knowledge on the benefits and risks of the required medical exam, based on the dangers of being exposed to X-rays, especially induced-radiation cancer following the amount of X-rays received during a CT scan and the possibility of not receiving radiation as tools of diagnosis. Results: 150 patients, 84 referring doctors of CT scan tests and 60 medical imaging personnel were retained. For patients, only 7.1% received information on the benefits and risks of their exams, and 34.4% believed that x-rays were harmful to their health. For the prescribers, 46.7% took into account the benefits/risk ratio before prescribing a test and only 16.7% of the referring doctors have informed the patient of the risks related to X-ray. 90% of the medical imaging staff ensures that the required test is justified, and 50% informed the patient on the risks associated with their radiation exposure, and the increased risk of developing cancer. 65% of the imaging staff could not estimate the dose that the patient will receive during the medical test. 25% mentioned the dose received during the acquisition in the patient’s exam report. Conclusion: This study confirms that the referring doctors, the patients, and the radiologists have a low knowledge concerning the risks associated with radiation exposure during a CT scan assessment. We will therefore say that patients and prescribers are not aware of the doses of radiation on CT and their possible risks, even though there is a risk of developing cancer.
