Study on the Deepening Effect of Educational Capital and the Governance Mechanism

In recent years,social capital has played a crucial role in the field of educational trend and rapid expansion.Education capital,however,is a double-edged sword.On one hand,it plays a good role in the construction of learning society and national quality education.On the other hand,it causes serious obstacles and interference to our regional education resources and educational environment because of its own profit-seeking.In order to optimize the integration between education industry and social capital,to make good use of social capital and to promote the brilliant development of education industry,this article has investigated the deepening effect of education capital and the content of governance mechanism,hoping to provide some reference for the optimization and reform in the educational field.

Research on Risk Identification and Industrial Governance of Digital Education Products Based on Data Annotation Technology

The social transformation brought aboutby digital technology is deeply impacting various industries.Digital education products, with core technologiessuch as 5G, AI, IoT (Internet of Things),etc., are continuously penetrating areas such as teaching,management, and evaluation. Apps, miniprograms,and emerging large-scale models are providingexcellent knowledge performance and flexiblecross-media output. However, they also exposerisks such as content discrimination and algorithmcommercialization. This paper conducts anevidence-based analysis of digital education productrisks from four dimensions: “digital resourcesinformationdissemination-algorithm design-cognitiveassessment”. It breaks through corresponding identificationtechnologies and, relying on the diverse characteristicsof governance systems, explores governancestrategies for digital education products from the threedomains of “regulators-developers-users”.

Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) Education from Social Disciplinary Theoretical Perspectives

Disaster is a social phenomenon. The occurrence and impacts of disasters including the education sector can be studied through a social problem lens. This paper draws meaning and understanding of DRR education using the sociological disciplinary framework in a detailed qualitative case study of three schools as they responded to the devastating Gorakha earthquake in 2015 and other disasters in Nepal. This paper considers the three sub-disciplines of sociology: the sociology of disaster, the sociology of education and the sociology of education governance in a development context. These sub-disciplines are nested together to analyse social, political and historical factors and their relationships which are helpful to identify risks and vulnerabilities in the education sector in Nepal. These are the major areas to explore the disaster context and needs of context-specific education acts (hereafter DRR education) to minimise the potential risks of disasters. The article concludes that the social disciplinary framework is significantly useful to analyse DRR education provisions and implications of education governance to mobilise school in disaster preparedness, response and recovery.

有为政府与有效市场下的我国职业教育治理:理论逻辑与实践路径

政府与市场的关系是职业教育内外部治理关系的核心,先后经历了政府主导论、市场基础论、有为政府与有效市场论的演变。在有为政府与有效市场的关系形塑下,职业教育治理改革应实现三大转变,即政府治理方式应从事后响应转变为事前布局,职业院校治理角色应从代理主体转变为改革先锋,市场主体参与治理的动机应从短期利益转变为战略投资。政府、职业院校和市场的关系应由单向的“影响回应”关系转变为双向的“并行互动”关系。当前,我国政府参与职业教育治理的权责边界不清,职业院校办学自主权无法满足发展需求,市场主体参与职业教育缺乏战略自觉。为此,我国应加强各级政府的政策协作,提升政府政策的精准度和前瞻性;优化职业院校组织定位和内部治理模式,提升学校治理的灵活性和有效性;深度分析企业发展的外部条件和内部需求,提升企业发展的积极性和适应性。

创建“诚信教育”,迎接WTO挑战

迎接WTO的挑战 ,首要的是创建法制教育和诚信教育。诚信教育是建立在信誉和信用基础之上的教育 ,它是法制教育的基础。创建诚信教育是一场思想观念的革命 ;创建诚信教育 。

基于TOE理论框架的教育政务数据开放共享影响因素分析

教育政务数据开放共享是驱动教育治理现代化的重要引擎,也是重构教育生态的重要途径。然而,当前我国教育政务数据开放共享进程仍然面临数据开放总量偏少、数据开放质量较低、平台功能较弱、运行机制不够健全等诸多难题。因此,厘清教育政务数据高质量开放与共享的影响因素,是一项亟待开展的基础性工作。文章依据TOE(技术-组织-环境)理论框架,初步构建影响因素框架,运用德尔菲法经过三轮的专家意见征询,最终确定教育政务数据开放共享影响因素框架(3个一级指标,8个二级指标,17个三级指标),并对影响因素进行了解读与分析。最后,提出促进教育政务数据开放共享的三条发展建议:融合新一代信息技术强化政务数据开放平台的功能与使用体验;提升教育行政机构信息化建设与人才队伍数据素养水平;完善教育政务数据开放共享政策体系与安全保障机制。

美国民间教育组织生存之道探析:以AAUP为例

美国大学教授协会是美国众多历史悠久的民间教育组织中的一员,基础牢靠、领导得力、谨慎改革和与时俱进是它得以经历近百年的风雨而依然前进的生存品质,这些品质值得其他各民间教育组织借鉴。

基于熵权的Topsis教育资源评价

在教育综合评价指标体系的基础上,提出了一种基于熵权的Topsis评价方法,用于多指标的教育数据质量评价。首先收集能综合体现高校教育数据质量的真实数据,然后引进熵权确定各个指标的权值,最后利用Topsis评价模型对其进行综合评价,从而实现对高校教学质量的综合评价。与已有评价方式相比,文中方法评价结果更加简洁、客观。

A Review of the Policies on the Private Colleges of China

One of the most important factors impacting the development of today’s private higher education in China is that there are not enough policies to support it.Then,the history of private higher education in Nanjing Nationalist Government （19271949） is focused on.

Assuring Quality in Higher Education in a Confucian Collectivist Culture: The Vietnamese Experience

Quality assurance(QA)has been introduced and developed into Vietnam for almost 15 years.The importation of such a concept from other countries with different cultures may result in resistance in some ways.This study explores QA arrangements at three institutions of higher education(HE)in Vietnam,a Confucian heritage country,as perceived by academic leaders,QA practitioners,and academics to respond to QA policies from the government.The methodological approach taken in this research is a multiple case study.A qualitative approach was used to explore QA practices at three institutions.Data collected from documentation and in-depth interviews were analyzed for patterns and themes.It was found that centralism and large power distance of a Confucian collectivist country such as Vietnam significantly influenced the government’s attempts to reform HE for quality improvement.Culturally appropriate measures from the bottom level with long-term strategies should be considered to assure and improve quality,including the shift to decentralization in HE.

教育场景驱动的高校数据治理

教育数字化转型的重要任务之一是通过数据治理提高教育治理能力,当前数据治理呈现出场景化和智能化的趋势,但是以管理和标准为核心的静态治理理念难以适应应用场景的数字化转型和创新。该文首先从数据治理的视角探讨了教育场景的概念和特征,然后分析了当前高校教育场景数据治理中存在的数据不够“大”、数据不够“好”、数据未尽其“用”三个核心问题,提出高校教育场景驱动的数据治理方法和治理流程,教育场景中的原始数据经过数据资产化、数据标准化、数据要素化三个关键环节演化为具有计算属性、组织属性和教育属性的场景数据资产,作为关键要素进入到教育教学过程中,从而形成良性循环的数据资产生态,充分发挥数据资产的教育价值。

Is Shared Governance Feasible in Public Higher Education Institutions of China?

Economic development and rapid changes in technology have considerable impact on higher education in China.To prepare skilled highly-educated workforce and meet the demand for research development and productivity,higher education institutions in China are under a great pressure of adapting and implementing organizational change(Li et al.,2012).[20]This paper starts with an overview of the higher educational transformations in China in the past decades.Then the author assesses the shared governance practice in the U.S.and discusses the potential and limitations for China to adopt shared governance in the near future.

A Comparative Study of the Management Mode of Sino- American Institutions of Higher Learning from the Perspective of the Party-Administrative Power Separation and Operation Mechanism

In this paper, we research on the higher education management mode of China and America based on the perspective of operation mechanism, separation of school and the government. As the thought of higher education management theory or a form, we jump out of the labyrinth of modernism manages view and the introduction of totally different from the modernist paradigm, from the angle of the theory research of postmodernism manages view. The paper is organized as the follows. In the first section, we generally introduce the basic concepts of higher education management and the relationship of the schools and government. Then, by comparing the pattern of the Chinese and the American, we analyze the difference in detail. Finally, we set up the prospect and the conclusion. In conclusion, our method combines the advantages of the American higher education management model which will be meaningful.

Participation in Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) Education: Analysing the Practices, Issues and Challenges

This article draws from detailed qualitative case studies of three schools as they responded to the devastating Gorakha earthquake in 2015 and other disasters in Nepal. Using Arnstein’s [1] ladder of participation, it explores nature and importance of participation to address the local disaster context. Along with Robertson et al.’s [2] pluri-scalar education governance framework, it also discusses the current forms of participation from various stakeholders specifically within the education system. The article analyses the reasons for stakeholders’ participation in DRR initiatives. It also explains the purpose of the participation, challenges of participation in DRR education, and highlights some key messages around what the study’s data says about participation in DRR education. The article concludes with the idea that curriculum participation is a crucial element to mobilise schools for their disaster preparedness, response and recovery journeys.

基础教育学校数字化治理的涵蕴、表征与路径

教育数字化的迅猛发展为学校治理数字化转型提供了理念引导和技术支持。数字化赋能基础教育高质量发展主要通过提升学校的治理能力,发挥学校在课程开发、教学设计、师生管理、综合评价等方面的主体作用,促进教育数字化与学校治理的有机结合。当前基础教育学校治理的数字化发展存在基建不完善、数据安全系数低和整体联通不畅等问题,需采取政府元治、多元共治、学校自治、厉行法治等多重路径实现学校数字化治理,为教育强国建设发挥基础教育的基点作用。

基础教育治理现代化的时代价值、核心议题与战略任务

建设教育强国,基础教育具有重要的基础性、战略性、先导性地位,基础教育治理现代化是教育治理现代化的重要基础。基础教育治理现代化事关教育强国建设,关乎教育公平,影响教育质量。在教育高质量发展的愿景下,推进基础教育治理现代化亟需关注三个核心议题,即推进基础教育公平、释放基础教育活力、提高基础教育质量。为加速基础教育治理现代化进程,助推基础教育高质量发展,需在树立正确教育政绩观、推进公共服务均等化、建立现代学校治理体系、推进育人方式转型、加快教育数字化变革、深化考试招生改革、全面依法治教、建设高水平教师队伍等方面进行重点考量。

Education Voucher Scheme in India: Would Lead to School Choice and Universal Education?

To remove obstacles in the path of‘Education for All’,the government of India launched several programs,Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan(SSA)being one of them.Despite several attempts,the government has failed to be successful in providing education to all students and the impact of such schemes has not been very good at the ground level.In India,children are not absent from school owing to a lack of demand;rather,low quality of government education delivery is a major cause for their absence.There is a need to redefine the Indian education system or policy to a new level as government schools are unable to fulfil the growing demand for high-quality education.Direct government funding to children or parents rather than schools can provide parents or children with the ability to select the school of their choice,whether it is a government or private school.This may be accomplished through the education voucher scheme.Governments do not need to spend any additional public funds on vouchers to implement this approach.The education voucher scheme deserves an effort among the several approaches that are being pursued to improve school education.

高校师范类专业认证行为偏差的现实表征、成因及治理

高校作为师范类专业认证的重要行动者,其认证行为的质量直接关涉认证目标的实现与认证价值的发挥。研究发现:高校在推进师范类专业认证工作的过程中存在诸多行为偏差,包括认证前的行为意向偏差、认证中的改革行为偏差以及认证后的持续改进行为偏差。究其原因在于,认证客体的认证素养储备不足、认证主客体组织架构固化、认证政策体系不完善及认证保障性措施欠缺。为矫正高校师范类专业认证行为偏差,需要从提升认证客体的认证素养,打破认证主客体固化的组织架构,完善认证政策体系及优化认证保障条件等方面作出努力。

现阶段高等教育评价改革的理念澄清和着力方向

高等教育评价是一种重要的教育治理手段,对学生学习、教师发展和学校改进都起着非常关键的作用。高等教育评价有着内在的价值和规律,体现在评价类型与评价应用的契合、评价价值与实践的契合以及评价体系与治理的契合等方面。在推进高等教育评价改革的过程中,由于没有充分尊重教育评价的内在价值与规律,出现了阻滞评价改革的问题,包括量化评价惯性思维、评价指标科学性和精准性有待提升和评价体系缺乏协同等。解决这些问题需要我们面向质量提升,将转变评价理念并改进评价实践、重拾学术信任文化以及提升评价参与者的评价素养作为改革推进的重要支撑。

科教融汇视域下高职教育校企协同创新治理的逻辑与路径研究

教育、科技、人才“三位一体”重要论述为科教融汇视域下高职教育校企协同创新治理提供了政策基础与现实依据。高职教育校企协同创新实践中呈现出校企主体功能效益差异、管理权力运行向度单一、利益平衡机制缺失等问题表征,实际上是由于协同创新价值认同缺失、权力分配失衡、利益共享不均衡等治理不足所致。外溢性的公共价值达成、异质性的多元主体协同及柔性的网络化秩序建立共同构成了高职教育校企协同创新治理的逻辑。结合实践案例分析,校企协同创新治理现代化应通过建立“产科教”融合的治理价值理念、保障协同创新治理主体话语权、建立协同创新治理机制、构建基于自组织的协同创新场域等路径推进。