Background: Clinical reasoning is an essential skill for nursing students since it is required to solve difficulties that arise in complex clinical settings. However, teaching and learning clinical reasoning skills is...Background: Clinical reasoning is an essential skill for nursing students since it is required to solve difficulties that arise in complex clinical settings. However, teaching and learning clinical reasoning skills is difficult because of its complexity. This study, therefore aimed at exploring the challenges experienced by nurse educators in promoting acquisition of clinical reasoning skills by undergraduate nursing students. Methods: A qualitative exploratory research design was used in this study. The participants were purposively sampled and recruited into the study. Data were collected using semi-structured interview guides. Thematic analysis method was used to analyze the collected data The principles of beneficence, respect of human dignity and justice were observed. Results: The findings have shown that clinical learning environment, lacked material and human resources. The students had no interest to learn the skill. There was also knowledge gap between nurse educators and clinical nurses. Lack of role model was also an issue and limited time exposure. Conclusion: The study revealed that nurse educators encounter various challenges in promoting the acquisition of clinical reasoning skills among undergraduate nursing students. Training institutions and hospitals should periodically revise the curriculum and provide sufficient resources to facilitate effective teaching and learning of clinical reasoning. Nurse educators must also update their knowledge and skills through continuous professional development if they are to transfer the skill effectively.展开更多
Background: Clinical reasoning is a critical cognitive skill that enables undergraduate nursing students to make clinically sound decisions. A lapse in clinical reasoning can result in unintended harm to patients. The...Background: Clinical reasoning is a critical cognitive skill that enables undergraduate nursing students to make clinically sound decisions. A lapse in clinical reasoning can result in unintended harm to patients. The aim of the study was to assess and compare the levels of clinical reasoning skills between third year and fourth year undergraduate nursing students. Methods: The study utilized a descriptive comparative research design, based on the positivism paradigm. 410 undergraduate nursing students were systematically sampled and recruited into the study. The researchers used the Self-Assessment of Clinical Reflection and Reasoning questionnaire to collect data on clinical reasoning skills from third- and fourth-year nursing students while adhering to ethical principles of human dignity. Descriptive statistics were done to analyse the level of clinical reasoning and an independent sample t-test was performed to compare the clinical reasoning skills of the student. A p value of 0.05 was accepted. Results: The results of the study revealed that the mean clinical reasoning scores of the undergraduate nursing students were knowledge/theory application (M = 3.84;SD = 1.04);decision-making based on experience and evidence (M = 4.09;SD = 1.01);dealing with uncertainty (M = 3.93;SD = 0.87);reflection and reasoning (M = 3.77;SD = 3.88). The mean difference in clinical reasoning skills between third- and fourth-year undergraduate nursing students was not significantly different from an independent sample t-test scores (t = −1.08;p = 0.28);(t = −0.29;p = 0.73);(t = 1.19;p = 0.24);(t = −0.57;p = 0.57). Since the p-value is >0.05, the null hypothesis (H0) “there is no significantno significant difference in clinical reasoning between third year and fourth year undergraduate nursing students”, was accepted. Conclusion: This study has shown that the level of clinical reasoning skills of the undergraduate nursing students was moderate to low. This meant that the teaching methods have not been effective to improve the students clinical reasoning skills. Therefore, the training institutions should revise their curriculum by incorporating new teaching methods like simulation to enhance students’ clinical reasoning skills. In conclusion, evaluating clinical reasoning skills is crucial for addressing healthcare issues, validating teaching methods, and fostering continuous improvement in nursing education.展开更多
In this paper,we combine the teaching and learning situation of deaf and hard-of-hearing students in the Linear Algebra course of the Computer Science and Technology major at the Nanjing Normal University of Special E...In this paper,we combine the teaching and learning situation of deaf and hard-of-hearing students in the Linear Algebra course of the Computer Science and Technology major at the Nanjing Normal University of Special Education.Based on the cognitive style of deaf and hard-of-hearing students,we apply example induction,exhaustive induction,and mathematical induction to the teaching of Linear Algebra by utilizing specific course content.The aim is to design comprehensive teaching that caters to the cognitive style characteristics of deaf and hard-of-hearing students,strengthen their mathematical thinking styles such as quantitative thinking,algorithmic thinking,symbolic thinking,visual thinking,logical thinking,and creative thinking,and enhance the effectiveness of classroom teaching and learning outcomes in Linear Algebra for deaf and hard-of-hearing students.展开更多
With the promoting of world integration,the role of English listening and speaking is becoming more and more important.English listening is attached more importance to in higher education.Although many universities an...With the promoting of world integration,the role of English listening and speaking is becoming more and more important.English listening is attached more importance to in higher education.Although many universities and college students take different measures to improve the students’English listening abilities,it is found that it is difficult to improve the students’English listening abilities effectively.This article will analyze the reasons of students’difficulty in improving their listening in the aim at discussing the measures to improve the students’listening effectively with other educators.展开更多
With the rapid development of China and its frequent exchanges with the outside world,the importance of oral English has become more and more prominent.However,most high school students keep silent in English classes....With the rapid development of China and its frequent exchanges with the outside world,the importance of oral English has become more and more prominent.However,most high school students keep silent in English classes.It will not only lead to the emotional frustration of the teachers,but also impede the development of students’comprehensive abilities in English.So it is necessary to analyze the major reasons and find out some effective solutions.展开更多
Speaking is a productive skill which is completely living in the en-couragement of communicative efficiency.Comparatively Chinesestudents are quiet and shy.One of the reasons is that they don’t haveadvantage in speak...Speaking is a productive skill which is completely living in the en-couragement of communicative efficiency.Comparatively Chinesestudents are quiet and shy.One of the reasons is that they don’t haveadvantage in speaking.They are afraid of making mistakes.展开更多
Background:Many low-income and crises-affected countries like Sierra Leone struggle with the recruitment and retention of their health professionals,particularly nurses and doctors.There are multiple factors that infl...Background:Many low-income and crises-affected countries like Sierra Leone struggle with the recruitment and retention of their health professionals,particularly nurses and doctors.There are multiple factors that influence the‘recruitment to retention’pipeline.The first stage of an exploration into the issues influencing the availability of qualified health care workers may focus on the aspects which influence their entry into relevant educational programmes.This paper explores the reasons given by junior doctors in Sierra Leone for wanting to become a doctor.It also describes entry procedures into undergraduate medical education.Methods:In-depth interviews were conducted with purposively sampled junior doctors(n=15)from the only medical school in Sierra Leone in October 2013.Digital diaries and two follow-up interviews were used to explore their evolving career experiences and aspirations until November 2016.In addition,semi-structured interviews with key informants(n=20),including senior teaching staff at the medical school(n=7),were conducted.Thematic analysis was used to explore linkages and themes across cases.Results:Six themes were identified.The most commonly mentioned reasons for wanting to become a doctor were a desire to help(theme 4)and the influence of family and friends,via role modelling(theme 2)and verbal encouragement(theme 3).Other motives were an interest from a young age(theme 1),being attracted by the job prospects(theme 5),and having an intellectual and science capacity(theme 6).Junior doctors gave at least two and up to six reasons for applying to enter the medical profession.Doctors were allowed entry to the medical school largely based on their previous academic performance.Conclusions:This study showed that multiple reasons underlie the decision to apply for entrance to medical school and the decision to enter medicine is complex.These findings may inform the review of future admission procedures by the medical school in Sierra Leone and similar settings,which is a crucial step in addressing the human resource needs for healthcare that currently exist.展开更多
文摘Background: Clinical reasoning is an essential skill for nursing students since it is required to solve difficulties that arise in complex clinical settings. However, teaching and learning clinical reasoning skills is difficult because of its complexity. This study, therefore aimed at exploring the challenges experienced by nurse educators in promoting acquisition of clinical reasoning skills by undergraduate nursing students. Methods: A qualitative exploratory research design was used in this study. The participants were purposively sampled and recruited into the study. Data were collected using semi-structured interview guides. Thematic analysis method was used to analyze the collected data The principles of beneficence, respect of human dignity and justice were observed. Results: The findings have shown that clinical learning environment, lacked material and human resources. The students had no interest to learn the skill. There was also knowledge gap between nurse educators and clinical nurses. Lack of role model was also an issue and limited time exposure. Conclusion: The study revealed that nurse educators encounter various challenges in promoting the acquisition of clinical reasoning skills among undergraduate nursing students. Training institutions and hospitals should periodically revise the curriculum and provide sufficient resources to facilitate effective teaching and learning of clinical reasoning. Nurse educators must also update their knowledge and skills through continuous professional development if they are to transfer the skill effectively.
文摘Background: Clinical reasoning is a critical cognitive skill that enables undergraduate nursing students to make clinically sound decisions. A lapse in clinical reasoning can result in unintended harm to patients. The aim of the study was to assess and compare the levels of clinical reasoning skills between third year and fourth year undergraduate nursing students. Methods: The study utilized a descriptive comparative research design, based on the positivism paradigm. 410 undergraduate nursing students were systematically sampled and recruited into the study. The researchers used the Self-Assessment of Clinical Reflection and Reasoning questionnaire to collect data on clinical reasoning skills from third- and fourth-year nursing students while adhering to ethical principles of human dignity. Descriptive statistics were done to analyse the level of clinical reasoning and an independent sample t-test was performed to compare the clinical reasoning skills of the student. A p value of 0.05 was accepted. Results: The results of the study revealed that the mean clinical reasoning scores of the undergraduate nursing students were knowledge/theory application (M = 3.84;SD = 1.04);decision-making based on experience and evidence (M = 4.09;SD = 1.01);dealing with uncertainty (M = 3.93;SD = 0.87);reflection and reasoning (M = 3.77;SD = 3.88). The mean difference in clinical reasoning skills between third- and fourth-year undergraduate nursing students was not significantly different from an independent sample t-test scores (t = −1.08;p = 0.28);(t = −0.29;p = 0.73);(t = 1.19;p = 0.24);(t = −0.57;p = 0.57). Since the p-value is >0.05, the null hypothesis (H0) “there is no significantno significant difference in clinical reasoning between third year and fourth year undergraduate nursing students”, was accepted. Conclusion: This study has shown that the level of clinical reasoning skills of the undergraduate nursing students was moderate to low. This meant that the teaching methods have not been effective to improve the students clinical reasoning skills. Therefore, the training institutions should revise their curriculum by incorporating new teaching methods like simulation to enhance students’ clinical reasoning skills. In conclusion, evaluating clinical reasoning skills is crucial for addressing healthcare issues, validating teaching methods, and fostering continuous improvement in nursing education.
文摘In this paper,we combine the teaching and learning situation of deaf and hard-of-hearing students in the Linear Algebra course of the Computer Science and Technology major at the Nanjing Normal University of Special Education.Based on the cognitive style of deaf and hard-of-hearing students,we apply example induction,exhaustive induction,and mathematical induction to the teaching of Linear Algebra by utilizing specific course content.The aim is to design comprehensive teaching that caters to the cognitive style characteristics of deaf and hard-of-hearing students,strengthen their mathematical thinking styles such as quantitative thinking,algorithmic thinking,symbolic thinking,visual thinking,logical thinking,and creative thinking,and enhance the effectiveness of classroom teaching and learning outcomes in Linear Algebra for deaf and hard-of-hearing students.
文摘With the promoting of world integration,the role of English listening and speaking is becoming more and more important.English listening is attached more importance to in higher education.Although many universities and college students take different measures to improve the students’English listening abilities,it is found that it is difficult to improve the students’English listening abilities effectively.This article will analyze the reasons of students’difficulty in improving their listening in the aim at discussing the measures to improve the students’listening effectively with other educators.
文摘With the rapid development of China and its frequent exchanges with the outside world,the importance of oral English has become more and more prominent.However,most high school students keep silent in English classes.It will not only lead to the emotional frustration of the teachers,but also impede the development of students’comprehensive abilities in English.So it is necessary to analyze the major reasons and find out some effective solutions.
文摘Speaking is a productive skill which is completely living in the en-couragement of communicative efficiency.Comparatively Chinesestudents are quiet and shy.One of the reasons is that they don’t haveadvantage in speaking.They are afraid of making mistakes.
基金funded by the King’s Centre for Global Health and Health Partnerships,King’s College London.
文摘Background:Many low-income and crises-affected countries like Sierra Leone struggle with the recruitment and retention of their health professionals,particularly nurses and doctors.There are multiple factors that influence the‘recruitment to retention’pipeline.The first stage of an exploration into the issues influencing the availability of qualified health care workers may focus on the aspects which influence their entry into relevant educational programmes.This paper explores the reasons given by junior doctors in Sierra Leone for wanting to become a doctor.It also describes entry procedures into undergraduate medical education.Methods:In-depth interviews were conducted with purposively sampled junior doctors(n=15)from the only medical school in Sierra Leone in October 2013.Digital diaries and two follow-up interviews were used to explore their evolving career experiences and aspirations until November 2016.In addition,semi-structured interviews with key informants(n=20),including senior teaching staff at the medical school(n=7),were conducted.Thematic analysis was used to explore linkages and themes across cases.Results:Six themes were identified.The most commonly mentioned reasons for wanting to become a doctor were a desire to help(theme 4)and the influence of family and friends,via role modelling(theme 2)and verbal encouragement(theme 3).Other motives were an interest from a young age(theme 1),being attracted by the job prospects(theme 5),and having an intellectual and science capacity(theme 6).Junior doctors gave at least two and up to six reasons for applying to enter the medical profession.Doctors were allowed entry to the medical school largely based on their previous academic performance.Conclusions:This study showed that multiple reasons underlie the decision to apply for entrance to medical school and the decision to enter medicine is complex.These findings may inform the review of future admission procedures by the medical school in Sierra Leone and similar settings,which is a crucial step in addressing the human resource needs for healthcare that currently exist.