This cohort study included 36 eyes of 21 patients with high myopia treated with angle supported phakic intraocular lens（p IOL）.Endothelial cell density（ECD） at baseline,6 mo and 3 y were 3017±296,2775±26...This cohort study included 36 eyes of 21 patients with high myopia treated with angle supported phakic intraocular lens（p IOL）.Endothelial cell density（ECD） at baseline,6 mo and 3 y were 3017±296,2775±265 and 2558±299 cells/mm^2 respectively.ECD loss at 6 mo was 7.2% and annual ECD loss was 3% over 36 mo.Corrected distance visual acuity at 36 mo was 0.4 log MAR or better in 32（88.9%） eyes.Intraocular pressure did not change（P=0.9）.No eyes developed cataract,retinal detachment or pupillary distortion.Angle supported p IOL gives good visual outcome.Endothelial cell loss should be monitored.展开更多
Background:To evaluate the long-term safety,efficacy,predictability,and stability of implantable collamer lens with a central hole(EVO ICL)implantation for correcting high myopia(HM)and super high myopia(SHM).Methods:...Background:To evaluate the long-term safety,efficacy,predictability,and stability of implantable collamer lens with a central hole(EVO ICL)implantation for correcting high myopia(HM)and super high myopia(SHM).Methods:This prospective study evaluated 83 eyes of 46 patients who were divided into groups based on their spherical equivalent refractive error(SE):HM group(−12 D≤SE<−6 D)and SHM group(SE<−12 D).They were followed up for 5 years after ICL implantation;assessments of uncorrected distance visual acuity(UDVA),corrected distance visual acuity(CDVA),manifest refractive error,axial length,intraocular pressure,corneal endothelial cell density,and vault were conducted,and a questionnaire was administered.ResuIts:At 5 years postoperatively,the safety indices of the HM and SHM groups were 1.03±0.10 and 1.32±0.39,and the efficacy indices were 0.83±0.25 and 0.86±0.32,respectively.In the HM group,60.47%and 79.07%of the eyes were within±0.50 D and±1.00 D of the attempted correction,while it was achieved for 22.50%and 47.50%of the eyes in the SHM group,respectively.The SE of the HM group decreased from−9.72±1.41 D preoperatively to 0.04±0.39 D 1 month postoperatively and−0.67±0.57 D 5 years postoperatively,while in the SHM group,it decreased from−15.78±3.06 D preoperatively to−0.69±0.97 D 1 month postoperatively and−1.74±1.19 D 5 years postoperatively.Conclusion:EVO ICL implantation is safe,effective,and predictable for correcting HM and SHM.CDVA improved more after surgery for SHM,but the growth of axial length still needs attention.展开更多
Background:The accuracy of using total keratometry(TK)value in recent IOL power calculation formulas in highly myopic eyes remained unknown.Methods:Highly myopic patients who underwent uneventful cataract surgery were...Background:The accuracy of using total keratometry(TK)value in recent IOL power calculation formulas in highly myopic eyes remained unknown.Methods:Highly myopic patients who underwent uneventful cataract surgery were prospectively enrolled in this prospective comparative study.At one month postoperatively,standard deviation(SD)of the prediction errors(PEs),mean and median absolute error(MedAE)of 103 highly myopic eyes were back-calculated and compared among ten formulas,including XGboost,RBF 3.0,Kane,Barrett Universal II,Emmetropia Verifying Optical 2.0,Cooke K6,Haigis,SRK/T,and Wang-Koch modifications of Haigis and SRK/T formulas,using either TK or standard keratometry(K)value.Results:In highly myopic eyes,despite good agreement between TK and K(P>0.05),larger differences between the two were associated with smaller central corneal thickness(P<0.05).As to the refractive errors,TK method showed no differences compared to K method.The XGBoost,RBF 3.0 and Kane ranked top three when considering SDs of PEs.Using TK value,the XGboost calculator was comparable with the RBF 3.0 formula(P>0.05),which both presented smaller MedAEs than others(all P<0.05).As for the percentage of eyes within±0.50 D or±0.75 D of PE,the XGBoost TK showed comparable percentages with the RBF 3.0 TK formula(74.76%vs.66.99%,or 90.29%vs.87.38%,P>0.05),and statistically larger percentages than the other eight formulas(P<0.05).Conclusions:Highly myopic eyes with thinner corneas tend to have larger differences between TK and K.The XGboost enhancement calculator and RBF 3.0 formula using TK showed the most promising outcomes in highly myopic eyes.展开更多
文摘This cohort study included 36 eyes of 21 patients with high myopia treated with angle supported phakic intraocular lens（p IOL）.Endothelial cell density（ECD） at baseline,6 mo and 3 y were 3017±296,2775±265 and 2558±299 cells/mm^2 respectively.ECD loss at 6 mo was 7.2% and annual ECD loss was 3% over 36 mo.Corrected distance visual acuity at 36 mo was 0.4 log MAR or better in 32（88.9%） eyes.Intraocular pressure did not change（P=0.9）.No eyes developed cataract,retinal detachment or pupillary distortion.Angle supported p IOL gives good visual outcome.Endothelial cell loss should be monitored.
基金supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant No.81770955)Joint Research Project of New Frontier Technology in municipal hospitals(Grant No.SHDC12018103)+3 种基金Project of Shanghai Science and Technology(Grant No.20410710100)Major Clinical Research Project of Shanghai Shenkang Hospital Development Center(Grant No.SHDC-2020CR1043B)Project of Shanghai Xuhui District Science and Technology(Grant No.2020-015)Shanghai Science and Technology Commission(Grant No.19140900700).
文摘Background:To evaluate the long-term safety,efficacy,predictability,and stability of implantable collamer lens with a central hole(EVO ICL)implantation for correcting high myopia(HM)and super high myopia(SHM).Methods:This prospective study evaluated 83 eyes of 46 patients who were divided into groups based on their spherical equivalent refractive error(SE):HM group(−12 D≤SE<−6 D)and SHM group(SE<−12 D).They were followed up for 5 years after ICL implantation;assessments of uncorrected distance visual acuity(UDVA),corrected distance visual acuity(CDVA),manifest refractive error,axial length,intraocular pressure,corneal endothelial cell density,and vault were conducted,and a questionnaire was administered.ResuIts:At 5 years postoperatively,the safety indices of the HM and SHM groups were 1.03±0.10 and 1.32±0.39,and the efficacy indices were 0.83±0.25 and 0.86±0.32,respectively.In the HM group,60.47%and 79.07%of the eyes were within±0.50 D and±1.00 D of the attempted correction,while it was achieved for 22.50%and 47.50%of the eyes in the SHM group,respectively.The SE of the HM group decreased from−9.72±1.41 D preoperatively to 0.04±0.39 D 1 month postoperatively and−0.67±0.57 D 5 years postoperatively,while in the SHM group,it decreased from−15.78±3.06 D preoperatively to−0.69±0.97 D 1 month postoperatively and−1.74±1.19 D 5 years postoperatively.Conclusion:EVO ICL implantation is safe,effective,and predictable for correcting HM and SHM.CDVA improved more after surgery for SHM,but the growth of axial length still needs attention.
基金supported by research grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant Nos.82122017,81870642,81970780 and 81670835)Science and Technology Innovation Action Plan of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission(Grant Nos.19441900700 and 21S31904900)+1 种基金Clinical Research Plan of Shanghai Shenkang Hospital Development Center(Grant Nos.SHDC2020CR4078 and SHDC12019X08)the Fudan University“Outstanding 2025”Program.
文摘Background:The accuracy of using total keratometry(TK)value in recent IOL power calculation formulas in highly myopic eyes remained unknown.Methods:Highly myopic patients who underwent uneventful cataract surgery were prospectively enrolled in this prospective comparative study.At one month postoperatively,standard deviation(SD)of the prediction errors(PEs),mean and median absolute error(MedAE)of 103 highly myopic eyes were back-calculated and compared among ten formulas,including XGboost,RBF 3.0,Kane,Barrett Universal II,Emmetropia Verifying Optical 2.0,Cooke K6,Haigis,SRK/T,and Wang-Koch modifications of Haigis and SRK/T formulas,using either TK or standard keratometry(K)value.Results:In highly myopic eyes,despite good agreement between TK and K(P>0.05),larger differences between the two were associated with smaller central corneal thickness(P<0.05).As to the refractive errors,TK method showed no differences compared to K method.The XGBoost,RBF 3.0 and Kane ranked top three when considering SDs of PEs.Using TK value,the XGboost calculator was comparable with the RBF 3.0 formula(P>0.05),which both presented smaller MedAEs than others(all P<0.05).As for the percentage of eyes within±0.50 D or±0.75 D of PE,the XGBoost TK showed comparable percentages with the RBF 3.0 TK formula(74.76%vs.66.99%,or 90.29%vs.87.38%,P>0.05),and statistically larger percentages than the other eight formulas(P<0.05).Conclusions:Highly myopic eyes with thinner corneas tend to have larger differences between TK and K.The XGboost enhancement calculator and RBF 3.0 formula using TK showed the most promising outcomes in highly myopic eyes.
