Turbulent swirling flow inside a short pipe interacting with a conical bluff body was simulated using the commercial CFD code Fluent.The geometry used is a simplified version of a novel liquid/gas separator used in mu...Turbulent swirling flow inside a short pipe interacting with a conical bluff body was simulated using the commercial CFD code Fluent.The geometry used is a simplified version of a novel liquid/gas separator used in multiphase flow metering.Three turbulence models,belonging to the Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes(RANS)equations framework,are used.These are,RNG k-ε,SST k-ωand the full Reynolds stress model(RSM)in their steady and unsteady versions.Steady and unsteady RSM simulations show similar behavior.Compared to other turbulence models,they yield the best predictions of the mean velocity profiles though they exhibit some discrepancies in the core region.The influence of the Reynolds number on velocity profiles,swirl decay,and wall pressure on the bluff body are also presented.For Reynolds numbers generating a Rankine-like velocity profile,the width and magnitude of flow reversal zone decreases along the pipe axis disappearing downstream for lower Reynolds numbers.The tangential velocity peaks increase with increasing Reynolds number.The swirl decay rate follows an exponential form in accordance with the existing literature.These flow features would affect the performance of the real separator and,thus,the multiphase flow meter,noticeably.展开更多
The nature of turbulent swirling and rotating flow in a straight pipe is investigated using a family of near-wall two-equation models. Specifically, the viability of three different near-wall two-equation models is as...The nature of turbulent swirling and rotating flow in a straight pipe is investigated using a family of near-wall two-equation models. Specifically, the viability of three different near-wall two-equation models is assessed. These models are asymptotically consistent near the wall. The first two models, one with isotropic and another with anisotropic eddy viscosity invoked, solved a dissipation rate equation with no explicit correction made to account for swirl and flow rotation. The third model assumes an isotropic eddy viscosity but solves an improved dissipation rate equation that has explicit corrections made to account for swirl and flow rotation. Calculations of turbulent flows in the swirl number range 0.25 - 1.3 with and without a central recirculation region reveal that, with the exception of the third model, neither one of the other two models can replicate the mean field at the swirl numbers tested. Furthermore, taking stress anisotropy into account also fails to model swirl effect correctly. Significant improvements can be realized from the third model, which is based on an improved dissipation rate equation and the assumption of isotropic eddy viscosity. The predicted mean flow and turbulence statistics correlate well with measurements at low swirl. At high swirl, the two-equation model with an improved dissipation rate equation can still be used to model swirling and rotating pipe flows with a central recirculation region. However, its simulation of flows without a central recirculation region is not as satisfactory.展开更多
A derivation of an analytical expression for the inviscid velocity fieldinduced by a single right-handed helical vortex filament is presented. The vortex filament movesuniformly and rigidly without change of form in a...A derivation of an analytical expression for the inviscid velocity fieldinduced by a single right-handed helical vortex filament is presented. The vortex filament movesuniformly and rigidly without change of form in a cylindrical tube, where the vortex filamentrotates around its axis with a constant angular velocity and translates along its axis with aconstant translational velocity. The key to solve the problem is to set up a moving cylindricalcoordinate system fixed on the vortex filament. The result shows that the velocity field is atime-periodic function, and may degenerate into Okulovs' s formula when the helical vortex filamentslips along the filament itself or stays immobile.展开更多
基金ADNOC Onshore Company(ADCO)for the financial support of this research project.
文摘Turbulent swirling flow inside a short pipe interacting with a conical bluff body was simulated using the commercial CFD code Fluent.The geometry used is a simplified version of a novel liquid/gas separator used in multiphase flow metering.Three turbulence models,belonging to the Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes(RANS)equations framework,are used.These are,RNG k-ε,SST k-ωand the full Reynolds stress model(RSM)in their steady and unsteady versions.Steady and unsteady RSM simulations show similar behavior.Compared to other turbulence models,they yield the best predictions of the mean velocity profiles though they exhibit some discrepancies in the core region.The influence of the Reynolds number on velocity profiles,swirl decay,and wall pressure on the bluff body are also presented.For Reynolds numbers generating a Rankine-like velocity profile,the width and magnitude of flow reversal zone decreases along the pipe axis disappearing downstream for lower Reynolds numbers.The tangential velocity peaks increase with increasing Reynolds number.The swirl decay rate follows an exponential form in accordance with the existing literature.These flow features would affect the performance of the real separator and,thus,the multiphase flow meter,noticeably.
文摘The nature of turbulent swirling and rotating flow in a straight pipe is investigated using a family of near-wall two-equation models. Specifically, the viability of three different near-wall two-equation models is assessed. These models are asymptotically consistent near the wall. The first two models, one with isotropic and another with anisotropic eddy viscosity invoked, solved a dissipation rate equation with no explicit correction made to account for swirl and flow rotation. The third model assumes an isotropic eddy viscosity but solves an improved dissipation rate equation that has explicit corrections made to account for swirl and flow rotation. Calculations of turbulent flows in the swirl number range 0.25 - 1.3 with and without a central recirculation region reveal that, with the exception of the third model, neither one of the other two models can replicate the mean field at the swirl numbers tested. Furthermore, taking stress anisotropy into account also fails to model swirl effect correctly. Significant improvements can be realized from the third model, which is based on an improved dissipation rate equation and the assumption of isotropic eddy viscosity. The predicted mean flow and turbulence statistics correlate well with measurements at low swirl. At high swirl, the two-equation model with an improved dissipation rate equation can still be used to model swirling and rotating pipe flows with a central recirculation region. However, its simulation of flows without a central recirculation region is not as satisfactory.
文摘A derivation of an analytical expression for the inviscid velocity fieldinduced by a single right-handed helical vortex filament is presented. The vortex filament movesuniformly and rigidly without change of form in a cylindrical tube, where the vortex filamentrotates around its axis with a constant angular velocity and translates along its axis with aconstant translational velocity. The key to solve the problem is to set up a moving cylindricalcoordinate system fixed on the vortex filament. The result shows that the velocity field is atime-periodic function, and may degenerate into Okulovs' s formula when the helical vortex filamentslips along the filament itself or stays immobile.