Comparative Analysis of the Efficacy of Transabdominal Pre-Peritoneal Vs Open Tension-Free Hernia Repair in Treating Inguinal Hernia

Objective:To investigate and analyze the clinical outcomes of inguinal hernia patients treated with transabdominal pre-peritoneal repair(TAPP)versus open tension-free hernia repair.Methods:The study was carried out from January 2021 to August 2023,and a total of 50 inguinal hernia patients were selected for this study.The patients were randomly divided into a study group(n=25)and a control group(n=25)by the numerical table method.The patients in the control group were treated with open tension-free hernia repair,whereas the patients in the study group were treated with TAPP.The surgical and postoperative recovery indexes,complication rates,and recurrence rates of the two groups were compared.Results:There was no significant difference in the operative time and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups(P>0.05),and the postoperative feeding time,time out of bed,and hospitalization time of the study group were shorter than those of the control group(P<0.05);the incidence rate of postoperative complications in the study group was lower than that in the control group(P<0.05);and there was no significant difference in the recurrence rate of the two groups after operation(P>0.05).Conclusion:Compared to open tension-free hernia repair,TAPP offers a shorter postoperative recovery duration and hospitalization time,and reduces the incidence of complications.Therefore,this surgical method should be popularized in the treatment of inguinal hernia.

The Effect of Tension-Free Herniorrhaphy in the Preperitoneal Space on the Treatment of Hernia

Objective:To explore the clinical effect of tension-free herniorrhaphy in the preperitoneal space in patients with hernia.Methods:The study period was from January 2020 to December 2022.198 samples of hernia patients admitted to our hospital were selected and divided into a research group(n=99)and a control group(n=99).Patients in the control group underwent tension-free herniorrhaphy with plain films,and patients in the study group underwent tension-free herniorrhaphy in the preperitoneal space.The surgical and postoperative recovery-related indicators,incidence of complications,and recurrence rate were compared between the two groups.Results:The intraoperative and postoperative recovery indexes of the study group were better than those of the control group(P<0.05);the incidence of complications in the study group was lower than that of the control group(P<0.05),and there was no significant difference in the recurrence rate between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion:Tension-free herniorrhaphy in the preperitoneal space shortens the operation and postoperative recovery time of hernia patients and reduces the incidence of postoperative complications,so it should be popularized.

Analysis of Ultrasound-guided Ilioinguinal and Iliohypogastric Nerve Block in Tension-Free Inguinal Hernia Repair in Elderly Patients

Objective:To explore the value of ultrasound-guided ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerve block(IINB)in tension-free inguinal hernia repair in elderly patients.Methods:A total of 70 elderly patients with tension-free inguinal hernia repair who treated in the hospital from April 2018 to November 2019 were selected and divided into two groups according to the random number table method,with 35 cases each.The control group underwent infiltration of local anesthesia(LA),and the study group added with IINB.The visual analogue scale(VAS)scores of the two groups of patients were compared.Results:The VAS score of the study group when pulling the hernia sac was lower than that of the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:IINB has good analgesic effect in tensionfree inguinal hernia repair in elderly patients,and it is worth promoting.

Analysis of the Effect and Efficiency of Tension- Free Hernia Repair and Traditional Surgery in The Treatment of Hernia

Objective: To analyze the efficiency of tension-free hernia repair and traditional surgery in the treatment of hernia. Methods: A total of 80 patients with hernias were selected and randomly into a control group (traditional hernia repair) and an observation group (tension-free hernia repair), of 40 cases each. The perioperative indicators, pain, physiological stress indicators, complications, and recurrence rates between the two groups were compared. Results: The perioperative indexes of the observation group were better than those of the control group (P < 0.05). The postoperative pain score, postoperative physiological stress index level, incidence of complications, and recurrence rate of the observation group were lower than those of the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: In the surgical treatment of hernia, tension-free hernia repair was less traumatic and had a better effect than traditional hernia repair.

Intestinal erosion caused by meshoma displacement:A case report

BACKGROUND A meshoma formation and erosion to the small intestine is rare.Herein,we report one case of a meshoma that was not treated early;causing it to displace and erode the small intestine,with infection,complete control of symptoms was achieved after removal of the infected patch mass,no recurrence of hernia after 2 years of follow-up.CASE SUMMARY A 62-year-old male patient presented with recurrent abdominal pain repeatedly for 1 wk,which has worsened 2 d before admition,accompanied by fever.Five years before presentation he underwent right inguinal hernia Plug and patch repair approach.Two years ago,a computed tomography scan revealed a right lower abdominal mass with soft tissue density,measuring approximately 30 mm×17 mm,which was diagnosed as meshoma that was not treated.The patient had poorly controlled diabetes in the past year.CONCLUSION The formation of meshoma is rare,and that if not treated in time it might erode and require resection of the involved organ.

局麻无张力疝修补术与腹腔镜全腹膜外疝修补术的临床对比分析

目的比较局麻无张力疝修补Lichtenstein手术和腹腔镜全腹膜外疝修补术(total extrapentioneal repair,TEP)的优缺点。方法回顾252例成人腹股沟疝分别进行TEP56例和局麻Lichtenstein196例的临床资料。术后1周和半年进行临床评估。结果术后3d内应用止痛药频率、恢复正常活动时间、术后半年内手术区域慢性疼痛等方面,TEP组均优于Lichtenstein组,两组有显著性差异(P<0.05);并发症、复发率,TEP组与Lichtenstein组两者无显著性差异(P>0.05);手术时间、初次下床活动时间、术后住院时间、住院费用等方面Lichtenstein组优于TEP组,两者差异有显著性(P<0.05)。结论TEP具有伤口小、疼痛轻、恢复快的优点,但费用高。局麻Lichtenstein手术操作简单、费用低、适应证广,适合老年病人。

改良经腹腹膜前腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术

目的经腹腹膜前（TAPP）腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术因需广泛游离腹膜，分离斜疝疝囊，钉合或缝合腹膜，不仅增加了手术的难度及时间，也增加了费用。针对上述难点，我们对术式作了改良，探讨改良后的方法在成人疝修补中的应用价值。方法2006年5月-2008年4月，对腹股沟疝403例、股疝22例行改良TAPP术。剪开脐外侧韧带，斜疝患者以缝合小儿疝的方法关闭内环口，直疝疝囊、股环疝囊予以剥离，置补片，游离的脐外侧韧带腹膜全部覆盖网片，钉合及以可吸收线针织的方法固定。结果手术无中转，每侧手术时间20～30分钟，出血量约4～5ml。2例出现阴囊及阴茎淤肿，3例出现腹股沟及阴囊血清肿。随访时间2--22月，无复发。无腹部牵拉不适，也无腹痛、腹胀、恶心等肠梗阻及尿频、尿痛等膀胱刺激症状。结论改良TAPP腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术方法简单、效果确切，值得临床推广应用。

无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟复发疝临床效果评价

[目的]评价无张力疝修补手术治疗腹股沟复发疝的疗效。[方法]回顾性分析67例腹股沟复发疝行无张力疝修补手术临床资料。应用无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟复发疝67例,其中6例行疝环充填式无张力疝修补术,10例行Lichtenstein手术,51例行腹膜前间隙修补术。[结果]复发疝手术时间分别为最短42min,最长94min,平均73min。术后并发症包括1例阴囊血肿,2例腹股沟区疼痛,5例尿潴留。患者均于术后3～9d痊愈出院。89.6%(60/67)病例获得随访,随访时间5～36个月,无复发。[结论]采用无张力疝修补手术治疗腹股沟复发疝具有安全性高,并发症少,复发率低的优点。

不同年龄段腹股沟斜疝行无张力疝修补的临床对照研究

目的探讨疝环充填式无张力疝修补术对不同年龄腹股沟斜疝的治疗效果。方法将190例腹股沟斜疝患者根据年龄分成两组:60岁以上和60岁以下组,比较每组手术效果及并发症。结果在60岁以上组,疝环充填式无张力斜疝修补术在手术时间、平均下床活动时间、疼痛、牵拉不适以及复发等并发症方面优于传统腹股沟斜疝修补术;而在60岁对以下组,并不优于传统腹股沟斜疝修补术。结论疝的治疗应根据个体化原则进行。

Kugel手术在疝环充填式无张力疝修补术后复发中的应用

目的探讨Kugel手术(腹膜前间隙内衬置片无张力疝修补术)在疝环充填式无张力疝修补术后复发中的临床效果与手术方式。方法回顾性分析2002年7月～2007年8月期间3,5例疝环充填式无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝术后复发再次行Kugel手术(腹膜前间隙内衬置片无张力疝修补术)病例(男性28例,女性7例)。前次手术属II型4例,Ⅲ型25例I,V型6例。35例腹股沟疝复发时间为3～32个月不等。结果手术时间平均(40±15)min,患者术后6～24 h下床活动,无切口皮下积血、切口感染及腹股沟区异物感等,随访无复发情况。结论 Kugel手术安全有效,术后恢复快,对于疝环充填式无张力疝修补术后复发疗效满意,具有推广应用价值。

疝环充填式无张力疝修补术并发症防治

目的:探讨疝环充填式无张力疝修补术后并发症的原因及处理方法,以提高手术的安全性、降低并发症的发生率。方法:总结国内51种杂志72篇文献报道的5 625例及我院253例无张力补片疝修补术患者的临床资料。结果:全组发生并发症512例,包括尿潴留(280例,4.8%)、阴囊积液及血肿(110例,1.8%)、切口液化(45例,0.8%)、术后长期疼痛(25例,0.4%)、切口感染(8例,0.1%)、缺血性睾丸炎(7例,0.1%)、术后复发(37例,0.6%)。结论:疝环充填式无张力疝修补术具有手术方法简单、术后恢复快、并发症少、复发率低等优点。只要充分认识到并发症的发生原因,多数并发症是可以避免的。

腹膜前无张力疝修补术在股疝治疗中的应用

目的 探讨腹膜前无张力疝修补术在股疝手术治疗中的应用.方法 回顾性分析应用Modified Kugel补片进行腹膜前无张力疝修补术的16例股疝患者临床资料,评估术后恢复与术后并发症情况.结果 全组病例术后疼痛轻微,无切口感染,术后12～24 h可下地活动,平均住院时间4 d.术后随访3～27个月,无复发,无异物感及慢性疼痛.结论 腹膜前无张力疝修补术治疗股疝符合解剖与生理,是一种合理而理想的手术方式,临床效果确切,术后并发症少.

巨大腹壁切口疝的无张力修补治疗

目的总结临床治疗巨大腹壁切口疝的经验和方法。方法回顾性分析21例巨大腹壁切口疝病人的年龄、手术方法、引流放置、抗生素应用及预后。结果发生巨大腹壁切口疝平均年龄64岁;均采用人工合成材料进行修补;术后放置引流,并使用预防性抗生素。治愈20例,复发1例。结论常见于老年病人腹部手术后的巨大腹壁切口疝,可使用人工合成材料进行修补,并获得良好疗效。

平片式无张力修补术治疗小儿巨大腹股沟斜疝

目的探讨平片式无张力修补术在小儿巨大及复发性腹股沟斜疝治疗中的安全性及手术效果。方法回顾性分析2011年1月至2015年3月小儿巨大疝及复发性腹股沟斜疝患儿资料共16例(19侧),均为男性,年龄1~14岁,平均年龄4.7岁。家长知情同意情况下,应用单层生物补片进行平片式无张力修补术,总结其年龄、病史、体检和超声检查、手术过程、术后治疗及康复情况。结果患儿共16例19侧疝,手术时间30~75 min,手术均顺利完成。手术后休息1周,随访3个月~2年,未见斜疝复发、感染及补片排异反应,均未诉异物感。结论对于小儿巨大及复发性腹股沟斜疝患儿,应用单层生物补片进行平片式无张力修补术安全、有效、可行,值得推广。

两种无张力腹股沟疝修补术的比较分析

目的研究平片无张力疝修补术、疝环充填式疝修补术对成人腹股沟疝的手术效果。方法随机将1999年3月至2003年12月的358例腹股沟疝病人,分为平片式组和疝环充填式组,分析比较两组的临床资料。结果两者在术后复发,住院天数上差异无显著,但在术后切口异物感和治疗费用上差异有显著性。结论两种术式均有较好的治疗效果。但平片式无张力疝修补术在降低患者治疗费用,减轻切口异物感上更有优势。

腹股沟疝无张力修补术局部麻醉与硬膜外麻醉的比较

目的比较局部麻醉和硬膜外麻醉下行腹股沟疝无张力修补术的效果。方法60例腹股沟疝无张力修补患者随机分为局部麻醉组(n=28例)和硬膜外麻醉组(n=32例),对两组的手术时间、术后下床活动时间、术后伤口疼痛、术后尿潴留和住院费用等进行比较研究。结果局部麻醉组在手术时间、术后下床活动时间、术后尿潴留、住院费用等方面均优于硬膜外麻醉组(P<0.05)。结论局部麻醉下施行无张力疝修补术具有操作简单、患者痛苦小、恢复快、手术并发症少、住院时间短及住院费用低等优点,提高了手术安全性,拓宽了手术适应证,适合老年患者。

腹腔镜经腹腔腹膜前疝修补术与疝环充填式修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝的对比研究

目的与疝环充填式无张力修补术对比，回顾性分析腹腔镜经腹腔腹膜前疝修补术（TAPP）治疗腹股沟疝的效果。方法选取2014年1月至2016年12月本院开展的62例腹腔镜经腹腔腹膜前疝修补术患者为TAPP组，同期行疝环充填式无张力疝修补术88例患者为对照组。对比两组患者的住院时间、住院费用、疼痛评分、术后并发症（切口感染、血清肿、缺血性睾丸炎、复发）等。结果与对照组相比，TAPP组平均住院时间[（3．4±1．53）d比（6．5±2．71）d，P=0．003]、疼痛评分[（2．15±1．13）比（5．78±2．27），P=0．013]、总并发症发生率（3．22％比12．5％，P=0．047）均更少；住院费用增多[（13246．7±1238．5）元比（7852．5±533．8）元，P=0．0016]，差异有统计学意义。结论腹腔镜经腹腔腹膜前疝修补术是安全有效的，具有微创、疼痛轻、恢复快等优点。

腹股沟疝无张力修补术后复发原因分析

目的探讨腹股沟疝无张力修补术后复发因素。方法回顾性分析18例腹股沟疝无张力修补术复发患者的临床资料。结果自身复发因素9例,手术复发因素6例,混合复发因素3例,均经过再次手术治疗得到康复。结论复发因素主要与患者生理解剖缺陷、年龄和手术水平等有关。建议在首次手术时,尽量结合患者的具体情况,注意相关的手术事项,从而降低复发率。

记忆弹力环补片无张力疝修补术后复发的原因分析

目的总结记忆弹力环补片无张力疝修术后复发的原因及降低复发的措施。方法回顾性分析采用记忆弹力环补片进行无张力疝修补526例的临床资料。结果记忆弹力环补片无张力疝修补术后复发8例,复发率1.52%。结论记忆弹力环补片无张力疝修补术后复发与解剖层次不恰当和补片放置位置不恰当、移位、卷曲等多方面因素有关。

腹腔镜手术与疝环填充式修补术在老年腹股沟疝中的应用对比分析

目的：探讨观察腹腔镜手术与疝环填充式修补术在治疗老年腹股沟疝患者的治疗效果对比分析。方法选取本院2011年5月~2012年5月收治的老年腹股沟疝患者46例，依据治疗方法的不同将46例患者随机分为腹腔镜手术组和填充式修补术组两组，其中每组各23例。分析对比两组患者的手术时间、出院时间、预后情况和手术费用等情况。结果腹腔镜手术组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、出院时间和并发症发病率显著低于填充式手术组，但其相关手术费用显著高于填充式手术组。结论应用腹腔镜治疗老年腹股沟疝患者较填充式修补术取得更为明显的治疗效果，但腹腔镜手术治疗老年腹股沟疝患者的费用较高，一定程度上限制其临床发展。