The concern of the ethics and the meaning of life in young adults became universal and are present in all contexts of human life. Such universality is due to the development of modern rationality, to establish a relat...The concern of the ethics and the meaning of life in young adults became universal and are present in all contexts of human life. Such universality is due to the development of modern rationality, to establish a relationship between the intrinsic theoretical dimensions (scientific) and practical dimensions (ethical), originated that are present in the own array of knowledge. This descriptive cross-sectional study, aims to identify the values of the ethical dimension and meaning of life defended by the college students of the Universities of Madeira, Portugal and Fortaleza, Brazil. The sample consists of 605 University students (Madeira = 225 and Fortaleza = 380), with an average age of 21 years and a standard deviation of 2. We used the questionnaire on values (adapted from the European Values Survey). Most of the young people referred to have a religion (60% wood and 78.4% stronghold), being the most Catholic, however, present in your frequency disinterest and, yet, in Brazil there is a greater diversity of religions. Supporting the intervention of religious institutions in situations of everyday life is accepted mostly by Brazilians, with the exception of politics (35.5%). On the other hand, the university students of the University of Madeira understand that Religious Institutions should only give their opinion on racial discrimination (76.6%). Believe in God (90.8% and 55.1% Stronghold) and Soul (80.3% and 66.4% Stronghold) are beliefs more referred to by college students. These results are intended to contribute in the field of research on ethical values and meaning of life in young people. This study contributes to future comparative research among university students and to developing strategic programs in education and health, increasing the success and excellence in the formation of a full citizenship, preventing the fanaticisms and the social discrimination that today devastate the collective globally.展开更多
目的:引入Steger等编制的生命意义感量表(the Meaning in Life Questionnaire,MLQ),检验其在中国大学生群体中应用的信度和效度。方法:方便选取北京大学学生307名,随机分为两部分,一部分(n=150)进行探索性因素分析,另一部分(n=157)进行...目的:引入Steger等编制的生命意义感量表(the Meaning in Life Questionnaire,MLQ),检验其在中国大学生群体中应用的信度和效度。方法:方便选取北京大学学生307名,随机分为两部分,一部分(n=150)进行探索性因素分析,另一部分(n=157)进行验证性因素分析。用社会期望量表(Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale,MCSD)、未来取向应对量表(Future-oriented Coping Inventory,FCI)、正性负性情绪量表(Positive and Negative Affect Scale,PANAS)、自评抑郁量表(Self-Rating Depression Scale,SDS)、自尊量表(Self-Esteem Scale,SES)、总体幸福感量表(General Well-Being Schedule,GWB)检验MLQ中文版的效标效度。结果:(1)探索性因子分析提取了2个因子,分别是生命意义感(MLQ-P)和寻求意义感(MLQ-S),累计贡献率为57.22%,项目负荷在0.579～0.829之间。验证性因素分析检验了结构的有效性(χ2=43.81,GFI=0.94,AGFI=0.90,NFI=0.93,CFI=0.97,IFI=0.97,RMSEA=0.066)。(2)总量表的Cronbachα系数为0.71,2个分量表的α系数分别为0.81和0.72。(3)MLQ-P与SES、GWB、正性情绪、预先应对、预防应对、MCSD呈正相关(r=0.19～0.59,均P<0.01),而与SDS、负性情绪呈负相关(r=-0.50,-0.18,均P<0.01);MLQ-S与预先应对、预防应对和正性情绪正相关(r=0.20,0.31,0.15,均P<0.01)。结论:生命意义感量表中文版在大学生中的信、效度较好,但仍需扩大样本进一步深入检验。展开更多
目的探讨入伍新兵父亲教养方式、生命意义感、生活满意度与自杀态度间的关系,分析生活满意度在父亲积极教养方式与生命意义感中的中介效应,并探究自杀态度在父亲积极教养方式和生活满意度间的调节作用。方法以整群抽样的方法,选取某部...目的探讨入伍新兵父亲教养方式、生命意义感、生活满意度与自杀态度间的关系,分析生活满意度在父亲积极教养方式与生命意义感中的中介效应,并探究自杀态度在父亲积极教养方式和生活满意度间的调节作用。方法以整群抽样的方法,选取某部队入伍新兵1246人,结合父母教养方式评定量表(Egna Minnen av Barndoms Uppfostran,EMBU)、生活目的测验(purpose in life test,PIL)量表、生活满意度指数A(life satisfaction index A,LSIA)量表以及自杀态度问卷(suicide attitude questionnaire,QSA)进行调查。结果(1)入伍新兵的父亲积极教养方式、生命意义感、生活满意度和对自杀行为性质的认识两两之间均呈正相关(r=0.339,0.504,0.324,0.401,0.277,0.308,P均<0.001);(2)Bootstrap检验结果表明,生活满意度在父亲积极教养方式与生命意义之间起部分中介作用(95%CI:3.3992~7.0298),中介效应值为1.8508,中介效应大小为46.97%;(3)自杀态度在父亲积极教养方式对生活满意度的影响起调节作用(P<0.001)。结论入伍新兵对父亲的教养方式总体评价比较正向,其生命意义感处于中高等水平,可以通过增加军人对自杀行为性质的认识来提升生活满意度,进而提高个体的生命意义感。展开更多
文摘The concern of the ethics and the meaning of life in young adults became universal and are present in all contexts of human life. Such universality is due to the development of modern rationality, to establish a relationship between the intrinsic theoretical dimensions (scientific) and practical dimensions (ethical), originated that are present in the own array of knowledge. This descriptive cross-sectional study, aims to identify the values of the ethical dimension and meaning of life defended by the college students of the Universities of Madeira, Portugal and Fortaleza, Brazil. The sample consists of 605 University students (Madeira = 225 and Fortaleza = 380), with an average age of 21 years and a standard deviation of 2. We used the questionnaire on values (adapted from the European Values Survey). Most of the young people referred to have a religion (60% wood and 78.4% stronghold), being the most Catholic, however, present in your frequency disinterest and, yet, in Brazil there is a greater diversity of religions. Supporting the intervention of religious institutions in situations of everyday life is accepted mostly by Brazilians, with the exception of politics (35.5%). On the other hand, the university students of the University of Madeira understand that Religious Institutions should only give their opinion on racial discrimination (76.6%). Believe in God (90.8% and 55.1% Stronghold) and Soul (80.3% and 66.4% Stronghold) are beliefs more referred to by college students. These results are intended to contribute in the field of research on ethical values and meaning of life in young people. This study contributes to future comparative research among university students and to developing strategic programs in education and health, increasing the success and excellence in the formation of a full citizenship, preventing the fanaticisms and the social discrimination that today devastate the collective globally.
文摘目的:引入Steger等编制的生命意义感量表(the Meaning in Life Questionnaire,MLQ),检验其在中国大学生群体中应用的信度和效度。方法:方便选取北京大学学生307名,随机分为两部分,一部分(n=150)进行探索性因素分析,另一部分(n=157)进行验证性因素分析。用社会期望量表(Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale,MCSD)、未来取向应对量表(Future-oriented Coping Inventory,FCI)、正性负性情绪量表(Positive and Negative Affect Scale,PANAS)、自评抑郁量表(Self-Rating Depression Scale,SDS)、自尊量表(Self-Esteem Scale,SES)、总体幸福感量表(General Well-Being Schedule,GWB)检验MLQ中文版的效标效度。结果:(1)探索性因子分析提取了2个因子,分别是生命意义感(MLQ-P)和寻求意义感(MLQ-S),累计贡献率为57.22%,项目负荷在0.579～0.829之间。验证性因素分析检验了结构的有效性(χ2=43.81,GFI=0.94,AGFI=0.90,NFI=0.93,CFI=0.97,IFI=0.97,RMSEA=0.066)。(2)总量表的Cronbachα系数为0.71,2个分量表的α系数分别为0.81和0.72。(3)MLQ-P与SES、GWB、正性情绪、预先应对、预防应对、MCSD呈正相关(r=0.19～0.59,均P<0.01),而与SDS、负性情绪呈负相关(r=-0.50,-0.18,均P<0.01);MLQ-S与预先应对、预防应对和正性情绪正相关(r=0.20,0.31,0.15,均P<0.01)。结论:生命意义感量表中文版在大学生中的信、效度较好,但仍需扩大样本进一步深入检验。
文摘目的探讨入伍新兵父亲教养方式、生命意义感、生活满意度与自杀态度间的关系,分析生活满意度在父亲积极教养方式与生命意义感中的中介效应,并探究自杀态度在父亲积极教养方式和生活满意度间的调节作用。方法以整群抽样的方法,选取某部队入伍新兵1246人,结合父母教养方式评定量表(Egna Minnen av Barndoms Uppfostran,EMBU)、生活目的测验(purpose in life test,PIL)量表、生活满意度指数A(life satisfaction index A,LSIA)量表以及自杀态度问卷(suicide attitude questionnaire,QSA)进行调查。结果(1)入伍新兵的父亲积极教养方式、生命意义感、生活满意度和对自杀行为性质的认识两两之间均呈正相关(r=0.339,0.504,0.324,0.401,0.277,0.308,P均<0.001);(2)Bootstrap检验结果表明,生活满意度在父亲积极教养方式与生命意义之间起部分中介作用(95%CI:3.3992~7.0298),中介效应值为1.8508,中介效应大小为46.97%;(3)自杀态度在父亲积极教养方式对生活满意度的影响起调节作用(P<0.001)。结论入伍新兵对父亲的教养方式总体评价比较正向,其生命意义感处于中高等水平,可以通过增加军人对自杀行为性质的认识来提升生活满意度,进而提高个体的生命意义感。
