The dynamic nature of modern warfare,including threats and injuries faced by soldiers,necessitates the development of countermeasures that address a wide variety of injuries.Tissue engineering has emerged as a field w...The dynamic nature of modern warfare,including threats and injuries faced by soldiers,necessitates the development of countermeasures that address a wide variety of injuries.Tissue engineering has emerged as a field with the potential to provide contemporary solutions.In this review,discussions focus on the applications of stem cells in tissue engineering to address health risks frequently faced by combatants at war.Human development depends intimately on stem cells,the mysterious precursor to every kind of cell in the body that,with proper instruction,can grow and differentiate into any new tissue or organ.Recent reports have suggested the greater therapeutic effects of the anti-inflammatory,trophic,paracrine and immune-modulatory functions associated with these cells,which induce them to restore normal healing and tissue regeneration by modulating immune reactions,regulating inflammation,and suppressing fibrosis.Therefore,the use of stem cells holds significant promise for the treatment of many battlefield injuries and their complications.These applications include the treatment of injuries to the skin,sensory organs,nervous system tissues,the musculoskeletal system,circulatory/pulmonary tissues and genitals/testicles and of acute radiation syndrome and the development of novel biosensors.The new research developments in these areas suggest that solutions are being developed to reduce critical consequences of wounds and exposures suffered in warfare.Current military applications of stem cell-based therapies are already saving the lives of soldiers who would have died in previous conflicts.Injuries that would have resulted in deaths previously now result in wounds today;similarly,today’s permanent wounds may be reduced to tomorrow’s bad memories with further advances in stem cell-based therapies.展开更多
In August 1963, Israel＇s Prime Minister Levi Eshkol initiated the procedure for terminating the martial law in effect since the end of the War of Independence （1948） with regard to Israeli Arabs. Martial law discri...In August 1963, Israel＇s Prime Minister Levi Eshkol initiated the procedure for terminating the martial law in effect since the end of the War of Independence （1948） with regard to Israeli Arabs. Martial law discriminated against Israel＇s Arab minority, as opposed to the majority of Israel＇s society, as part of different issues bound up with this population＇s daily functioning. The aim of the paper is to present the reasons why Eshkol＇s doing away with the martial law stemmed was its ineffectiveness, while the other, and this makes up the core of our concern here, was his changing attitude toward the Arab minority in Israel, by contrast with that of his predecessor, David Ben Gurion The main conclusion of the paper is that even though Eshkol＇s ideas about the Arab minority were not very different from Ben Gurion＇s ideas one insisted on maintaining the military government in Israel, while the other saw this as unnecessary, and so brought it to an end. In August 1963, a few months after assuming office, Israel＇s Prime Minister Levi Eshkol initiated the first steps leading to the annulment of military rulet which had applied to Arabs in the State of Israel ever since the end of the War of Independence （1948）. This process was concluded some three years later. Military rule was lifted in effect on December 1, 1966. In the presentation, the author would like to look into the considerations which prompted Eshkol to take such a step, in light of the fact that his predecessor, Ben Gurion, was a staunch opponent of annulling the military regime, convinced as he was, even after the conclusion of his term in office, that the current state of affairs should remain in effect.展开更多
基金the Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia(MOHE),National Defence University of Malaysia for the approved FRGS/2/2013/SKK01/UPNM/02/1 and PRGS/2/2015/SKK07/UPNM/02/1 funds.
文摘The dynamic nature of modern warfare,including threats and injuries faced by soldiers,necessitates the development of countermeasures that address a wide variety of injuries.Tissue engineering has emerged as a field with the potential to provide contemporary solutions.In this review,discussions focus on the applications of stem cells in tissue engineering to address health risks frequently faced by combatants at war.Human development depends intimately on stem cells,the mysterious precursor to every kind of cell in the body that,with proper instruction,can grow and differentiate into any new tissue or organ.Recent reports have suggested the greater therapeutic effects of the anti-inflammatory,trophic,paracrine and immune-modulatory functions associated with these cells,which induce them to restore normal healing and tissue regeneration by modulating immune reactions,regulating inflammation,and suppressing fibrosis.Therefore,the use of stem cells holds significant promise for the treatment of many battlefield injuries and their complications.These applications include the treatment of injuries to the skin,sensory organs,nervous system tissues,the musculoskeletal system,circulatory/pulmonary tissues and genitals/testicles and of acute radiation syndrome and the development of novel biosensors.The new research developments in these areas suggest that solutions are being developed to reduce critical consequences of wounds and exposures suffered in warfare.Current military applications of stem cell-based therapies are already saving the lives of soldiers who would have died in previous conflicts.Injuries that would have resulted in deaths previously now result in wounds today;similarly,today’s permanent wounds may be reduced to tomorrow’s bad memories with further advances in stem cell-based therapies.
文摘In August 1963, Israel＇s Prime Minister Levi Eshkol initiated the procedure for terminating the martial law in effect since the end of the War of Independence （1948） with regard to Israeli Arabs. Martial law discriminated against Israel＇s Arab minority, as opposed to the majority of Israel＇s society, as part of different issues bound up with this population＇s daily functioning. The aim of the paper is to present the reasons why Eshkol＇s doing away with the martial law stemmed was its ineffectiveness, while the other, and this makes up the core of our concern here, was his changing attitude toward the Arab minority in Israel, by contrast with that of his predecessor, David Ben Gurion The main conclusion of the paper is that even though Eshkol＇s ideas about the Arab minority were not very different from Ben Gurion＇s ideas one insisted on maintaining the military government in Israel, while the other saw this as unnecessary, and so brought it to an end. In August 1963, a few months after assuming office, Israel＇s Prime Minister Levi Eshkol initiated the first steps leading to the annulment of military rulet which had applied to Arabs in the State of Israel ever since the end of the War of Independence （1948）. This process was concluded some three years later. Military rule was lifted in effect on December 1, 1966. In the presentation, the author would like to look into the considerations which prompted Eshkol to take such a step, in light of the fact that his predecessor, Ben Gurion, was a staunch opponent of annulling the military regime, convinced as he was, even after the conclusion of his term in office, that the current state of affairs should remain in effect.
