China enjoys historic rights over the South China Sea. It has become a controversial sea area due to the loopholes in the modern law of the sea. It is competed by neighboring countries for its interests, which exacerb...China enjoys historic rights over the South China Sea. It has become a controversial sea area due to the loopholes in the modern law of the sea. It is competed by neighboring countries for its interests, which exacerbate the tense situation in China＇s enforcement of maritime rights protection and poses the serious threat to our country＇s sovereignty over the South China Sea. The article takes the South China Sea controversial maritime rights enforcement model as the starting point. It contrasts the status quo of maritime rights enforcement system both at home and abroad, and analyzes the existing laws and regulations of maritime rights protection system in our country, such as the imperfect laws and regulations, the unreasonable establishment of law enforcement agencies and the imperfect law enforcement system. It also puts forward the strategy and idea of perfecting the law enforcement system of maritime rights protection in our country, which is of far-reaching significance to the strategy of safeguarding the maritime rights and interests of China and building a maritime power.展开更多
According to a series of important historical maps,i.e.,the Location Map of the South China Sea Islands,the Nansha Islands,Zhongsha Islands,Xisha Islands,Yongxing Island and Shidao Island,and Taiping Island（archived ...According to a series of important historical maps,i.e.,the Location Map of the South China Sea Islands,the Nansha Islands,Zhongsha Islands,Xisha Islands,Yongxing Island and Shidao Island,and Taiping Island（archived by the Territorial Administration Division of the Ministry of Interior of Republic of China in 1946）,and the Administration District Map of the Republic of China published in 1948,the dashed line surrounding the South China Sea Islands represents China＇s sea boundary in the South China Sea at that time.It was both connected with,and an extension of,the land boundary of China.At that time the dashed line was used to represent the waters boundaries while the solid line was used to represent the land boundary—a universal method used in maps that was then recognized internationally.The above observation provides historical and scientific evidence of China＇s sea boundary in the South China Sea that is useful for the international maritime delimitation over the South China Sea area.展开更多
US President Donald Trump initiated a trade war against China with the intention of altering China's development model,but trade friction can be resolved through negotiations.Although the short-term outlook on the...US President Donald Trump initiated a trade war against China with the intention of altering China's development model,but trade friction can be resolved through negotiations.Although the short-term outlook on the Sino-US relationship is not optimistic,the two countries'national interests are best served by avoiding long-term conflict.Trade friction or a trade war can only lead to mutual harm rather than benefits gained by either side.展开更多
基金supported by the Ministry of Education for the 2017 annual national and regional research center project"Ocean Law and Policy Northeast Asia Research Center"(GQ17091)2017 Liaoning Economic and Social Development Project(2018lslktyb-015)+1 种基金2016 Liaoning Provincial Department of Education Scientific Research Project(w201607)2016 Key Project of Teaching Reform of School-level Education(Dalian Ocean University,School of Public Administration(2017-14-7)
文摘China enjoys historic rights over the South China Sea. It has become a controversial sea area due to the loopholes in the modern law of the sea. It is competed by neighboring countries for its interests, which exacerbate the tense situation in China＇s enforcement of maritime rights protection and poses the serious threat to our country＇s sovereignty over the South China Sea. The article takes the South China Sea controversial maritime rights enforcement model as the starting point. It contrasts the status quo of maritime rights enforcement system both at home and abroad, and analyzes the existing laws and regulations of maritime rights protection system in our country, such as the imperfect laws and regulations, the unreasonable establishment of law enforcement agencies and the imperfect law enforcement system. It also puts forward the strategy and idea of perfecting the law enforcement system of maritime rights protection in our country, which is of far-reaching significance to the strategy of safeguarding the maritime rights and interests of China and building a maritime power.
文摘According to a series of important historical maps,i.e.,the Location Map of the South China Sea Islands,the Nansha Islands,Zhongsha Islands,Xisha Islands,Yongxing Island and Shidao Island,and Taiping Island（archived by the Territorial Administration Division of the Ministry of Interior of Republic of China in 1946）,and the Administration District Map of the Republic of China published in 1948,the dashed line surrounding the South China Sea Islands represents China＇s sea boundary in the South China Sea at that time.It was both connected with,and an extension of,the land boundary of China.At that time the dashed line was used to represent the waters boundaries while the solid line was used to represent the land boundary—a universal method used in maps that was then recognized internationally.The above observation provides historical and scientific evidence of China＇s sea boundary in the South China Sea that is useful for the international maritime delimitation over the South China Sea area.
文摘US President Donald Trump initiated a trade war against China with the intention of altering China's development model,but trade friction can be resolved through negotiations.Although the short-term outlook on the Sino-US relationship is not optimistic,the two countries'national interests are best served by avoiding long-term conflict.Trade friction or a trade war can only lead to mutual harm rather than benefits gained by either side.
