Through the retrieval of judicial documents involving sexual harassment in the workplace,it is found that the overall number of civil cases caused by sexual harassment in the workplace in China is very small.In relate...Through the retrieval of judicial documents involving sexual harassment in the workplace,it is found that the overall number of civil cases caused by sexual harassment in the workplace in China is very small.In related cases,the proportion of courts identifying sexual harassment in the workplace is low,the proportion of victims suing to protect their rights and interests is low,and the winning rate is also low.The main reason why it is difficult to take legal remedy is that the standards of sexual harassment identification are vague,the collection of evidence is difficult,the standards of proof are different,and it is difficult to take the liability of the employer.Article 1010 of the Civil Code stipulates the definition of sexual harassment and the whole-process prevention and treatment of the employer's obligation,which is significant progress in regulating sexual harassment in the workplace,but cannot completely solve the above problems.Before the legislation is further perfected,it is necessary to clarify the specific identification elements and judgment standards of sexual harassment,clarify the certifying power and proof standards of relevant evidence,and actively explore the path of liability of the employer.展开更多
基金the research findings of“Research on the Protection of Personal Information of Workers in the Digital Era”(project approval No.20BFX190),a general project of the National Social Science Fund of China。
文摘Through the retrieval of judicial documents involving sexual harassment in the workplace,it is found that the overall number of civil cases caused by sexual harassment in the workplace in China is very small.In related cases,the proportion of courts identifying sexual harassment in the workplace is low,the proportion of victims suing to protect their rights and interests is low,and the winning rate is also low.The main reason why it is difficult to take legal remedy is that the standards of sexual harassment identification are vague,the collection of evidence is difficult,the standards of proof are different,and it is difficult to take the liability of the employer.Article 1010 of the Civil Code stipulates the definition of sexual harassment and the whole-process prevention and treatment of the employer's obligation,which is significant progress in regulating sexual harassment in the workplace,but cannot completely solve the above problems.Before the legislation is further perfected,it is necessary to clarify the specific identification elements and judgment standards of sexual harassment,clarify the certifying power and proof standards of relevant evidence,and actively explore the path of liability of the employer.
